[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Chris Broussard just said
Author Thread
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

2/11/2011  9:48 PM
OasisBU wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:I would still make the deal. Would try to keep Fields. Think he oculd be special. Don't think that about the rest and believe they're all replaceable.

You do realize how much work it took just to get to this level o talent right? It's not like the Knicks can just fill the roster with these types of players - it has taken many years of trades to get here. Are they elite? No, but I don't think it will be easy to fill out a roster with limited cap room and no draft picks.

Was "You do realize how much work it took just to get to this level o talent right?" really necessary? Don't appreciate it. Disagree all you want but in the words of Mark Jackson, come on man, you're better than that

Either way they're a .500 team. I do think the future is brighter by filling the holes after the fact too.

Anyone remember the KG trade? KG for "Ryan Gomes, Gerald Green, Al Jefferson, Theo Ratliff, Sebastian Telfair, a 2009 first round draft pick (top three protected) and a return of Minnesota's conditional first round draft pick previously obtained in the Ricky Davis-Wally Szczerbiak trade." celtics.com

I'm sorry but Mozgov, Chandler, Gallo, Brewer and 2 first rd picks <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< what the Wolves got. And they stunk for a long time.

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/11/2011  9:56 PM
OasisBU wrote:
TMS wrote:
OasisBU wrote:I think you offer Curry, Chandler, AR, and some picks and you don't budge. Is that lowballing? Sure - Gasol got traded for less. Melo wants out, if he wants to be a Knick and play on a great team then he will find a way here that doesn't hurt the franchise.

IMO u gotta be willing to substitute Gallo or Fields for Wilson... bottomline is neither of those guys are worth losing Melo over... i would tell Denver u can choose any 2 of the following:

Gallo
Wilson
Fields
AR

& with those 2 u can also have cash, a future #1 & any other filler u want out of our expirings & Mozgov... that's it, take it or leave it... i think that's a completely reasonable offer & won't make either team look like chumps in the process.

Agreed - but that is as far as I would go and I am not sure I would allow Gallo AND Chandler to go.

I would do:
Either Wilson or Gallo and your choice of AR, Fields, etc

IMO it probably makes more sense for the Knicks to hold onto Fields than either Wilson or Gallo being as tho Melo plays the position they play... i know Wilson can also play the 2G but i think Fields is more effective as a dirty work style role player, which is probably more of what you will need if u add Melo to the mix... either way, if it takes Fields or Gallo to get Melo to NY, i'm down for it... just gotta draw some kind of reasonable line in the sand the Nuggets are seriously buggin' if they think they can milk a better package of talent out of the Knicks than they were gonna get from the Nets.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
gr33d
Posts: 20788
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/19/2006
Member: #1097
USA
2/11/2011  10:54 PM
TMS wrote:
OasisBU wrote:
TMS wrote:
OasisBU wrote:I think you offer Curry, Chandler, AR, and some picks and you don't budge. Is that lowballing? Sure - Gasol got traded for less. Melo wants out, if he wants to be a Knick and play on a great team then he will find a way here that doesn't hurt the franchise.

IMO u gotta be willing to substitute Gallo or Fields for Wilson... bottomline is neither of those guys are worth losing Melo over... i would tell Denver u can choose any 2 of the following:

Gallo
Wilson
Fields
AR

& with those 2 u can also have cash, a future #1 & any other filler u want out of our expirings & Mozgov... that's it, take it or leave it... i think that's a completely reasonable offer & won't make either team look like chumps in the process.

Agreed - but that is as far as I would go and I am not sure I would allow Gallo AND Chandler to go.

I would do:
Either Wilson or Gallo and your choice of AR, Fields, etc

IMO it probably makes more sense for the Knicks to hold onto Fields than either Wilson or Gallo being as tho Melo plays the position they play... i know Wilson can also play the 2G but i think Fields is more effective as a dirty work style role player, which is probably more of what you will need if u add Melo to the mix... either way, if it takes Fields or Gallo to get Melo to NY, i'm down for it... just gotta draw some kind of reasonable line in the sand the Nuggets are seriously buggin' if they think they can milk a better package of talent out of the Knicks than they were gonna get from the Nets.

If we could get Melo to cooperate and start demanding Knicks or else... Come on, the basketball gods owe us one for the years of Layden and Zeke trash we had to put up with.

"If you ain't first, you're last" - Ricky Bobby
Swishfm3
Posts: 23310
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2003
Member: #392
2/11/2011  10:59 PM
TMS wrote:
Swishfm3 wrote:So they Want Mozgov, Fields, Gallo and a First rounder from us?

Although I feel that Gallo would benefit playing with Melo, and having Gallo and Melo on the Knicks would make us a MUCH better team, I think this is a fair trade.

Get it done!!!!

they also want AR (he's going to Minny to get Brewer & their 1st rd pick)

u can't make that trade w/all that going to DEN, that's a better package of talent than they were getting from the Nets for cripes sakes... the Nuggets need to get real, they can demand the world doesn't mean they're gonna get it... IMO unless they're willing to send Afflalo & Nene back to us in that deal, there's no way DW is even considering making that deal.

I understand that and it sucks that we have to give up some of these guys...but I have to ask you the same question SAS asked Harry (what you posted on the other thread)

"TMS, I'm asking you a simple question. Do you think a team with Melo & Amare have a better chance of competing for a championship than a team of Amare, Wilson Chandler & Gallinari?"

Thats what it boils down. Gallo and Fields are role players that can be easily replaced...How many chances are the Knicks going to get to add another player, of Melo caliber, to play next Amare?

giantfan216
Posts: 20052
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/16/2009
Member: #3016

2/11/2011  10:59 PM
They are not getting all of these players for Melo plain and simple. They have no leverage and if Melo has a change of heart and signs an extension with them after the 24th then it wasn't meant to be anyway. Let's be patient and see how this plays out over the next few weeks.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/11/2011  11:07 PM
Swishfm3 wrote:
TMS wrote:
Swishfm3 wrote:So they Want Mozgov, Fields, Gallo and a First rounder from us?

Although I feel that Gallo would benefit playing with Melo, and having Gallo and Melo on the Knicks would make us a MUCH better team, I think this is a fair trade.

Get it done!!!!

they also want AR (he's going to Minny to get Brewer & their 1st rd pick)

u can't make that trade w/all that going to DEN, that's a better package of talent than they were getting from the Nets for cripes sakes... the Nuggets need to get real, they can demand the world doesn't mean they're gonna get it... IMO unless they're willing to send Afflalo & Nene back to us in that deal, there's no way DW is even considering making that deal.

I understand that and it sucks that we have to give up some of these guys...but I have to ask you the same question SAS asked Harry (what you posted on the other thread)

"TMS, I'm asking you a simple question. Do you think a team with Melo & Amare have a better chance of competing for a championship than a team of Amare, Wilson Chandler & Gallinari?"

Thats what it boils down. Gallo and Fields are role players that can be easily replaced...How many chances are the Knicks going to get to add another player, of Melo caliber, to play next Amare?

no question i'm not saying i'd say no if Denver wants Wilson & Gallo for Melo... what i'm saying is they're in no position to be demanding all those other pieces they're asking for on top... AR, Fields, another 1st rounder & Mozgov? sorry but that's not reasonable... that's a better package of talent than the one they were gonna get from the Nets originally... right now they have no other real options but to deal w/the Knicks, they need to be reasonable & take a fair package or be resigned to risk losing him for nothing... they can't ask for all of our young talent in exchange for Melo at this point.

again, i think a fair package is letting them have 2 of the 4 guys in question & whatever other lesser filler pieces it takes to make the deal work... if we have to throw in TD, Mozgov or Walker, i'm with it... i don't give a crap about guys like that, we can easily replace them... IMO we need to be able to hold onto 2 of those top 4 young talents in order for the deal to make sense from the Knicks' standpoint, especially already knowing that there's a good chance that Melo would sign w/us this summer if a trade can't get done... for the benefit of having Melo earlier than this summer i'm willing to sacrifice a couple of our best young players to get the deal done, but not all of them, that's just stupid.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
2/11/2011  11:24 PM
At this point I dont care who we give up to get Melo. This team is going nowhere fast.

The month of march is going to be brutal too.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/11/2011  11:28 PM
We should be able to meet in the middle on this. More than our original offer, but not as much as the Nuggets are asking. This deal gets done IMO. The risks for both teams are too high not to find a way to make a good compromise. We came in too low and now they've come back too high. Just get the deal done already. We've got 3 games before the deadline and i'd like to see this deal done before the 3rd game against the Bucks.
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
2/11/2011  11:30 PM
nixluva wrote:We should be able to meet in the middle on this. More than our original offer, but not as much as the Nuggets are asking. This deal gets done IMO. The risks for both teams are too high not to find a way to make a good compromise. We came in too low and now they've come back too high. Just get the deal done already. We've got 3 games before the deadline and i'd like to see this deal done before the 3rd game against the Bucks.

Yea like Daryl Morey told Walsh last year before the Jefferies trade. "Think it over some Morey, Walsh".

We NEED Melo. Gallo and Chandler are nice but they aren't winning us games.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

2/11/2011  11:36 PM
F Chris Broussard and his Knicks-hating steakhouse journalism.
Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
2/11/2011  11:38 PM
Walsh will be fair and not gut the team by caving in to Denver. However, there is the wild card named Dolan. If he gets involved, and it seems like he already is, then anything can happen.
The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
umynot
Posts: 21465
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/4/2008
Member: #2093
USA
2/12/2011  12:27 AM
OasisBU wrote:I can't believe there are people on this forum who would agree to thus trade - obviously the word championship means little to nothing to some people. You cannot gut this team an mortgage it's future in order to get 1 player. Especially not for a player who has an opt out clause and can come here for nothing. I'm sorry but I don't make that trade.

I want Melo as much as anyone, I saw him at Cuse and have been a fan ever since. However, I also want the Knicks to be contenders and the only way they do that is with a deep talented team. It's funny how so many in this forum are ready to dump Chandler, Gallo, Felton, Fields, an Moz plus picks to get one guy. We will have the same problems if that happens - even if they throw in Billups.

I think you offer Curry, Chandler, AR, and some picks and you don't budge. Is that lowballing? Sure - Gasol got traded for less. Melo wants out, if he wants to be a Knick and play on a great team then he will find a way here that doesn't hurt the franchise.

Nicely said duke.....

I add Williams and Felton if we get Billups back as well

I think we need Melo more now then ever but The Don wont sell farm
He knows he doesn't have to

KNICKS on the way UP!!!
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/12/2011  12:33 AM
I honestly don't see a deal happening this year. There is no way to appease Denver and we have no chance to win in the playoffs with or without Melo anyway.


Id like to see focus on trying to improve the team in other ways. We give up 60 points EVERY game in the first half--Id like to see if we can stop that.

Why not play Randolph a bit more for D

See if there are other teams who want to deal fairly. Maybe move Chandler to a true contender like we did with Nate--maybe get back a future 1.

RIP Crushalot&#128542;
umynot
Posts: 21465
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/4/2008
Member: #2093
USA
2/12/2011  12:34 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:
OasisBU wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:I would still make the deal. Would try to keep Fields. Think he oculd be special. Don't think that about the rest and believe they're all replaceable.

You do realize how much work it took just to get to this level o talent right? It's not like the Knicks can just fill the roster with these types of players - it has taken many years of trades to get here. Are they elite? No, but I don't think it will be easy to fill out a roster with limited cap room and no draft picks.

Was "You do realize how much work it took just to get to this level o talent right?" really necessary? Don't appreciate it. Disagree all you want but in the words of Mark Jackson, come on man, you're better than that

Either way they're a .500 team. I do think the future is brighter by filling the holes after the fact too.

Anyone remember the KG trade? KG for "Ryan Gomes, Gerald Green, Al Jefferson, Theo Ratliff, Sebastian Telfair, a 2009 first round draft pick (top three protected) and a return of Minnesota's conditional first round draft pick previously obtained in the Ricky Davis-Wally Szczerbiak trade." celtics.com

I'm sorry but Mozgov, Chandler, Gallo, Brewer and 2 first rd picks <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< what the Wolves got. And they stunk for a long time.

Garnett was signed long term and could of been traded anywhere!!

If Melo was signed he be a Net already

Not the same situation here ....... Melo has all the power here not Denver If Melo had 3 years
left on his deal Denver never even entertains trading him!!

We do not need to sell farm....... Hope we dont trade Gallo nor Moz

Would love to keep Fields as well but if we get Melo I'm sure Fields will play much less
so if we have to trade him to get Melo along with Chandler AR and Curry that's beyond fair
for everyone.

In the NBA owners do not want to just take your players thats why you saw all these 2 first
round picks going back to teams who lost FA this summer..

In my opinion we need to either SAY we will wait till Summer or make a move now!

Drama has lasted TOO LONG ALREADY!!

KNICKS on the way UP!!!
umynot
Posts: 21465
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/4/2008
Member: #2093
USA
2/12/2011  12:36 AM
BRIGGS wrote:I honestly don't see a deal happening this year. There is no way to appease Denver and we have no chance to win in the playoffs with or without Melo anyway.


Id like to see focus on trying to improve the team in other ways. We give up 60 points EVERY game in the first half--Id like to see if we can stop that.

Why not play Randolph a bit more for D

See if there are other teams who want to deal fairly. Maybe move Chandler to a true contender like we did with Nate--maybe get back a future 1.


You don't think we can compete with Melo this year for real?

KNICKS on the way UP!!!
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
2/12/2011  12:42 AM
CHAOS wrote:Denver wants Mozgov, Chandler, Gallo, Brewer and 2 first rd picks to start with

Why not add Felton Amar'e Fields Dan D'antoni Herb Williams and 4 first round picks

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
ramtour420
Posts: 26283
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 3/19/2007
Member: #1388
Russian Federation
2/12/2011  12:53 AM
Too funny. Dallas offered a 2nd rounder. Lakers offered Bynum, but then it turned out to be "inaccurate" and BS anyway. Why should we give them a package that is worthy of a superstar and ruin our core in the process? Whatever we decide to give up is better, by far, than anything else they can get.
Everything you have ever wanted is on the other side of fear- George Adair
Nalod
Posts: 71178
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
2/12/2011  1:54 AM
That reported deal has to be inaccurate.
Not even worth talking about.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/12/2011  2:37 AM
BRIGGS wrote:I honestly don't see a deal happening this year. There is no way to appease Denver and we have no chance to win in the playoffs with or without Melo anyway.


Id like to see focus on trying to improve the team in other ways. We give up 60 points EVERY game in the first half--Id like to see if we can stop that.

Why not play Randolph a bit more for D

See if there are other teams who want to deal fairly. Maybe move Chandler to a true contender like we did with Nate--maybe get back a future 1.

Playing Randolph isn't really gonna improve the Defense as much as you imagine. There are other fundamental issues with this teams defensive effort. We can and have played better defense this year than we are currently. Still this is just not a team that has a ton of great defensive players. We should be better than this, but this team was never going to be great on D, with the players we have. The only thing we can do at this point is to double down on the offense, which is pretty much what the Deal for Melo is for.

You add Melo, not cuz you expect the defense to improve, right? It's all about making this team even more potent offensively. We can look down the line at finding role players who are better defensively after you get Melo, but for right now adding him is only for the offensive end. I see only maybe adding a guy like Pryzbilla and looking for some perimeter defender to add to the mix. The thing is that's hard to find just like finding great offensive players.

Papabear
Posts: 24373
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 3/31/2007
Member: #1414

2/12/2011  9:35 AM
Papabear Says

Talk with Denver and wait till the last day and see what Carmelo does. Do he really want to come here with a team that will take 2 years to rebuild in order to contend for a championship or do he says screw it I'll wait till the end of the season and sign with the Knicks with a full team.

Papabear
Chris Broussard just said

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy