Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
fishmike
Posts: 53837 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
![]() JrZyHuStLa wrote:thats where your wrong... chemistry and roles are huge in basketball.. more than any other sport.Silverfuel wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:JrZyHuStLa wrote:orangeblobman wrote:JrZyHuStLa wrote:Dear Amar'e. This team won 32 games: Who was the star who came in and changed everything? Uncle Cliffy baby "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677 Alba Posts: 3 Joined: 1/5/2007 Member: #1241 |
![]() fishmike wrote:JrZyHuStLa wrote:thats where your wrong... chemistry and roles are huge in basketball.. more than any other sport.Silverfuel wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:JrZyHuStLa wrote:orangeblobman wrote:JrZyHuStLa wrote:Dear Amar'e. Didn't really go through the list of players or numbers, but if you're just pointing out a rare case or scenario then yea, good find. But in general, my post is accurate. We've had nothing but role players during our losing seasons. So if they're as valuable as some people think, how come we weren't successful in reaching at least the playoffs. Why couldn't D'antoni win with Crawfold, Marbury, Curry, etc. Is it really because of chemistry? Now that we have a top 10 player, possibly 5, we're winning all of a sudden. Coincidence? lol |