[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Cleveland has now lost 27 of 28.
Author Thread
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
1/25/2011  2:49 PM
Marv wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
Eastern Conference scout on the depths of Cleveland's collapse post-LeBron James:


"Without [Anderson] Varejao and Mo Williams? They're playing with a summer-league team and Antawn Jamison. Byron [Scott] was calling plays [in a recent game] and trying to explain to guys where to go. They didn't know the plays. Antawn was just shaking his head.

"I know it's easy to say this now, but I thought they'd be last or next-to-last in the East when the season started. It was apparent when LeBron was there and you looked at the rest of the talent. When Varejao went down and took the defense with him ... they're just not very much fun to watch.

"My biggest concern would be J.J. Hickson. He doesn't fit into Byron's scheme. If it's true that they could have traded him for Amare Stoudemire, that's one they may regret forever, because I don't think he's a starter on a good team. On a team as bad as that, [Hickson] should be 20 and 10 every night. He should be David West. But he doesn't seem to be a self-disciplined player. He's not in good shape. He's [a] once-every-five-games guy, to me."

http://espn.go.com/nba/dailydime/_/page/dime-110121-23/nba-scouts-saying

Let's hope we don't say this about Chandler/Gallo/Fields if we miss out on Melo.

way to hijack a thread. are any of those undisdciplined, out of shape once every 5 game players?

no but there are parallels. Hickson showed flashes of being a good player last season playing next to Lebron. All 3 of these guys are showing flashes of greatness playing next to Amare.

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
AUTOADVERT
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
1/25/2011  2:54 PM
Panos wrote:
nyk4ever wrote:yeah but they still have boobie

How long are you gonna milk that one, nyk?

yeah i think he should nip that one in the bud.

Uptown
Posts: 31323
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

1/25/2011  3:26 PM
jrodmc wrote:
Uptown wrote:
MS wrote:I think this very easily solves the debate

Lebron > Kobe

And it's not even close. The Cavs led the league in wins with him and are the worst team in the league without him.

Stupid owner who didn't understand this and take Beasley and break the team up and move Mo and Anderson right after the decision

I wont say easily, but I concur. Been arguing for years with buddies of mine how that Cleve squad lacked the talent that the other elite teams had. Lebron was the sole reason why that team won as huch as they did. Just goes to show how much one star player can make a difference.

So to completely solve the debate, you'd have to see Lakers - Kobe = total meltdown. Now, granted, the Cavs don't have anyone of Gasol's status, but are the Lakers going to the Finals for the last 3-4 years without Kobe? Is Lamar Odom that good? Are Derek Fisher and Artest going to lead your team anywhere? And Bynum bows to almost the same injury gods as Greg Oden, so he can't count.

Place the Cavs and Lakers rosters in a draft (Sans Kobe and Lebron) and 3 possibly 4 Lakers are your first 4 picks:

1. Gasol
2. Odom
3. Bynum
4. Artest?

K22
Posts: 25143
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/18/2006
Member: #1182
USA
1/27/2011  11:50 AM
Cavs got a beating in Boston to make it 28 of 29. Next three games - Denver at home, then Orlando and Miami on the road.

Bad times.

-- the preceding post was brought to you by the letter K and the number 22.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38412
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
1/27/2011  12:10 PM
K22 wrote:Cavs got a beating in Boston to make it 28 of 29. Next three games - Denver at home, then Orlando and Miami on the road.

Bad times.

This just means they again have another chance of picking number 1 in the draft this summer.

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39906
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

1/27/2011  12:33 PM
JJ Hickson has been putting up some monster rebounding games of late. He might be the back-up big we've been searching for.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
matt
Posts: 22259
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 11/5/2003
Member: #487
USA
1/27/2011  12:49 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:JJ Hickson has been putting up some monster rebounding games of late. He might be the back-up big we've been searching for.

I don't think a single player on the Cavs (except Varejao, maybe) is what we've been searching for

K22
Posts: 25143
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/18/2006
Member: #1182
USA
1/30/2011  10:40 PM
LINK

Streak is up to 20. 30 of 31.

-- the preceding post was brought to you by the letter K and the number 22.
toodarkmark
Posts: 21145
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/2/2004
Member: #515
USA
1/31/2011  12:22 AM
And you don't hear the Lebron leaving Cleveland garbage anymore. Everyone loved beating up on him, but Cleveland was a loser before him, and they are after him. Plain and simple, if you want to keep a superstar, build a winner around him. When Jordan retired from the Bulls they won 55 games. When James left Cleveland they won't even win 10.
I don't care what people think. People are stupid. - Charles Barkley
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
1/31/2011  9:38 AM
Uptown wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
Uptown wrote:
MS wrote:I think this very easily solves the debate

Lebron > Kobe

And it's not even close. The Cavs led the league in wins with him and are the worst team in the league without him.

Stupid owner who didn't understand this and take Beasley and break the team up and move Mo and Anderson right after the decision

I wont say easily, but I concur. Been arguing for years with buddies of mine how that Cleve squad lacked the talent that the other elite teams had. Lebron was the sole reason why that team won as huch as they did. Just goes to show how much one star player can make a difference.

So to completely solve the debate, you'd have to see Lakers - Kobe = total meltdown. Now, granted, the Cavs don't have anyone of Gasol's status, but are the Lakers going to the Finals for the last 3-4 years without Kobe? Is Lamar Odom that good? Are Derek Fisher and Artest going to lead your team anywhere? And Bynum bows to almost the same injury gods as Greg Oden, so he can't count.

Place the Cavs and Lakers rosters in a draft (Sans Kobe and Lebron) and 3 possibly 4 Lakers are your first 4 picks:

1. Gasol
2. Odom
3. Bynum
4. Artest?

And the difference between this new Cavs team you just drafted and the old Memphis Grizzlies would be...?

iSergio
Posts: 21499
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2010
Member: #3043
USA
1/31/2011  9:43 AM
This is actually a blessing. When you lose a player as good as LeCon, you tank and tank hard. No point in being a middle of the pack team. It used to frustrate me so damn much when we tried to win games with a terrible roster ending up with 33 wins every year and a mediocre prospect.
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39906
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

1/31/2011  8:36 PM
Things aren't getting any better for Cleveland. Dwayne Wade already has 26 points with time left to spare in the second quarter. He might end up with 60 tonight.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Cleveland has now lost 27 of 28.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy