NYKBocker wrote:AnubisADL wrote:rp wrote:AnubisADL wrote:Bippity10 wrote:People can't get out of the high school mindset that everytime a guy goes to the bench it is a demotion. D'Antoni said nothing of Gallo playing better or being a better player then Wilson. He said he was bringing Wilson off the bench because "he brings more firepower" and that it may shake Gallo's confidence whereas Wilson will not be affected.The sixth man role IS AS IMPORTANT as any of the starting roles. This is why the championship San Antonio Spurs had no problem moving Ginobli to sixth man role in 06-07 and 07-08. Now did they make this move because they wanted to balance their team and have a great player provide energy and lead the second unit? Or did they make this move because Popovich was a stupid, stupid coach that had a silly love affair with Bruce Bowen and Michael Finley?
SMH. So D'Antoni babies Gallo and lets Randolph rot on the bench.
This is exactly how coaches lose the respect of players.
Unconfirmed quote there Anubis :)
Harrington already alluded to D'Antoni's favoritism earlier this season.
Wow. I remember that quote from Al. I don't remember him mentioning MDA favoring Gallo but rather his teammates were jealous of Gallo because the Knicks org was pushing Gallo to the fans.
So he blamed that on D'Antoni???? Isn't that the marketing department pushing the obvious. Gallo was going to be here and Al and the rest of the team were not. It's a difficult situation but the whining is probably why Al is on 6th team and that 6th team is trying to move him as well.
As for D'Antoni's supposed favoritism of Gallo
FGA per game 2008
Al harrington 16.79
Danilo 4.46
FGA per game 2009
Al Harrington 14.31
GAllo 11.44
Al was the number one option. The teams marketing department was clearly pushing GAllo, but the coach was clearly giving Al the green light to score points and pad his stats. So much so, that now he is an albatross contract.