cheers wrote:BlueSeats wrote:BRIGGS wrote:BlueSeats wrote:Briggs, I think if you can get your head around the notion that a starting 5 of Felton, Fields, Gallo, Will, Amare will not take you to the promised land the rest will fall into place.
My god how about some patience. These are some really good ball players who also happen to be 22-22 23 26 28. We finally get some really good ballplayers and now what--remove them??? How about the theory of adding to them???
also look what Shawne Williams did yesterday. When our starters faltered--he basically put us into position to win the game. That's what a good bench does. A few seconds different with the Celtic and Cav games and were talking 18-10 and how much promise we have. Now its we sck we need melo give them anything they want--thats what Van Gundy said---I say shut up and let D walsh do it.
It's not about patience, I have more of it than you. It's about prioritizing. This is the last time we'll be under the cap for a looong time. Solidify your core first, then diddle with the bench.
this is like an orphan annie sun will come out tomorrow reply. how about today? i agree with briggs let donnie figure out tomorrow as of today its all eyes on mda. is mda countering smart teams that use mda's run system against him?? no. the game plan for any opposing team is, gas mda top guys out cause he will never rest 'em.
I don't have a problem with scrubs getting garbage time. But I don't think throwing injured guys and wild cards into crunch time turns an average team into a winner.
Yes, the starters need to suck it up and play extended minutes until the bench heals and/or develops.
But, I am just a humble fan. I must never forget how much more armchair quarterbacks really know about the game than the coach.
So remind me, why is it so bad that Felton is currently fourth in minutes and Amare 16th?
BTW, you know who tops the league in MPG? Rudy Gay, on a bad knee.