[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

I want to know what fantasy trades that you think Denver is willing to accepot from the Knicks
Author Thread
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

12/19/2010  1:15 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:Which are examples of elite teams that have a weak starting 5 but win because of their strong bench?

Show me an example of a championship team with no bench. We already have a great deal of talent in the top 5. We cant give up two or 3 starters + picks for one with no bench. Its' smart business to wait it out

So if we got Fishlips, Ridnour and Camby we'd be in the Finals? Don't kid yourself on the talent of our starting 5. After Felton and Amare the line between starters and bench is quite blurred.

AUTOADVERT
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

12/19/2010  1:16 PM
As Lupica made the point: Lebron, Wade and Bosh scored 84 points to our entire teams 91. You gonna tell me their bench beat us?
cheers
Posts: 21060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/27/2010
Member: #3316

12/19/2010  1:18 PM
BlueSeats wrote:As Lupica made the point: Lebron, Wade and Bosh scored 84 points to our entire teams 91. You gonna tell me their bench beat us?

this means what

keep the current status quo of burning out our top five. meh. i'd rather fire the coach.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/19/2010  1:30 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/19/2010  1:34 PM
BlueSeats wrote:As Lupica made the point: Lebron, Wade and Bosh scored 84 points to our entire teams 91. You gonna tell me their bench beat us?

Who cares what Lupica says the guy hasn't had a decent column in 10+ years--hes a dinosaur and out of touch. Go back to my question--what team that has won the championship has done so with no bench? You are focusing on 1 /2 of basketball compared to complete NBA history.

Its bad business to give up what Denver wants when we can be patient and play from strength and take the time to also fill out the back end of the roster. I don't know what guys we can actually get for our bench--but we do need to upgrade it--to me that is step 1. If we traded for Melo and had to give up chandler fields and Gallo--we still would need a bench AND wed be down two starters--we still have no C. We need to add without subtraction continue the chemistry while focusing on getting their minutes down+adding quality bench players.

RIP Crushalot😞
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

12/19/2010  1:35 PM
cheers wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:As Lupica made the point: Lebron, Wade and Bosh scored 84 points to our entire teams 91. You gonna tell me their bench beat us?

this means what

keep the current status quo of burning out our top five. meh. i'd rather fire the coach.

We have a lot of holes, and not just on the bench.

One problem with our bench is that guys like Turiaf and TD are banged up. IF RT could be counted on for 20 MPG it would be great, but that seems unlikely. Another problem is that going to our bench pretty much guarantees a deficit.

But you can't just upgrade your bench for free. If people aren't willing to give guys up for a premier starter what are they willing to give up to solidify the bench?

Personally I'd round out my starting 5 before diddling with the bench.

To be great you need a good bench, and great starters.

BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

12/19/2010  1:41 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:As Lupica made the point: Lebron, Wade and Bosh scored 84 points to our entire teams 91. You gonna tell me their bench beat us?

Who cares what Lupica says the guy hasn't had a decent column in 10+ years--hes a dinosaur and out of touch.

Nice Briggs, I hope shooting the messenger made you feel better.

cheers
Posts: 21060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/27/2010
Member: #3316

12/19/2010  1:42 PM
BlueSeats wrote:
cheers wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:As Lupica made the point: Lebron, Wade and Bosh scored 84 points to our entire teams 91. You gonna tell me their bench beat us?

this means what

keep the current status quo of burning out our top five. meh. i'd rather fire the coach.

We have a lot of holes, and not just on the bench.

One problem with our bench is that guys like Turiaf and TD are banged up. IF RT could be counted on for 20 MPG it would be great, but that seems unlikely. Another problem is that going to our bench pretty much guarantees a deficit.

But you can't just upgrade your bench for free. If people aren't willing to give guys up for a premier starter what are they willing to give up to solidify the bench?

Personally I'd round out my starting 5 before diddling with the bench.

To be great you need a good bench, and great starters.

honestly i think the biggest hole is a stubborn coach.

guys like td (and i like td) should be given a bruce bowen role, but clearing mda wants td to shoot shoot shoot cause he keeps putting him in when he does just that. if turiaf leg is that bad, there are replacements for turiaf named ar and timo on the bench.

as for rounding out the starting five. i see it more as we have five top players, who we want in the game fresh to close games out. we have a bench who's job can be just that.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/19/2010  1:47 PM
BlueSeats wrote:
cheers wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:As Lupica made the point: Lebron, Wade and Bosh scored 84 points to our entire teams 91. You gonna tell me their bench beat us?

this means what

keep the current status quo of burning out our top five. meh. i'd rather fire the coach.

We have a lot of holes, and not just on the bench.

One problem with our bench is that guys like Turiaf and TD are banged up. IF RT could be counted on for 20 MPG it would be great, but that seems unlikely. Another problem is that going to our bench pretty much guarantees a deficit.

But you can't just upgrade your bench for free. If people aren't willing to give guys up for a premier starter what are they willing to give up to solidify the bench?

Personally I'd round out my starting 5 before diddling with the bench.

To be great you need a good bench, and great starters.

Its the same starting 5 who put up 109 of 116 points in a game we shouldve won against the best team int he NBA wed night. And yes we do have a way to add without giving up those guys--its called FA.
As far as the bench--the Knicks management has to make a strong decision on Douglas Randolph Mosgov turriaf picks cash ending contracts etc..... If we can formulate a plan to bring in 2 quality bench players at a price that is reasonable--accepting some extra cap space is reasonable in combination with what we also have--but Id rather have 7 guys in place for next years free agency and draft with a focus of a 9 man rotation next year. No team has traded for melo yet--this gives me the feeling that it might not happen and leaves the Knicks with the right to choose to go that way if they so desire. If Im melo--i want 6 years instead of 3 anyway. 6 years 120 is better than 3 65.

RIP Crushalot😞
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

12/19/2010  1:50 PM
cheers wrote:honestly i think the biggest hole is a stubborn coach.

I think there's an interesting D'Antoni phenomenon at work, that I think was there in Phoenix too, wherein the team over achieves because of the system, and then get's held accountable for not living up to the resultant over expectations.

A 16-12 record tells me the coach is doing okay. Fields, Timo, Turiaf, Gallo and Chandler in the starting lineup tells me the coach is okay playing bench guys if they perform.

The stated goal for this season is to make the playoffs. Getting significant minutes from AR is a luxury not a necessity for THIS season.

BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

12/19/2010  1:58 PM
Briggs, I think if you can get your head around the notion that a starting 5 of Felton, Fields, Gallo, Will, Amare will not take you to the promised land the rest will fall into place.
cheers
Posts: 21060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/27/2010
Member: #3316

12/19/2010  2:00 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/19/2010  3:23 PM
BlueSeats wrote:
cheers wrote:honestly i think the biggest hole is a stubborn coach.

I think there's an interesting D'Antoni phenomenon at work, that I think was there in Phoenix too, wherein the team over achieves because of the system, and then get's held accountable for not living up to the resultant over expectations.

A 16-12 record tells me the coach is doing okay. Fields, Timo, Turiaf, Gallo and Chandler in the starting lineup tells me the coach is okay playing bench guys if they perform.

The stated goal for this season is to make the playoffs. Getting significant minutes from AR is a luxury not a necessity for THIS season.

phoenix was a long time ago. mda system isnt taking anyone by surprise anymore, it was effectively countered by celtics and miami. who guess what.. used their bench to spell their top guys in order to keep em fresh to finish the knicks. mda never countered this, instead ran his top five to exhaustion and the cavs capitalized on [knicks] being a tired team.

cheers
Posts: 21060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/27/2010
Member: #3316

12/19/2010  2:03 PM
BlueSeats wrote:Briggs, I think if you can get your head around the notion that a starting 5 of Felton, Fields, Gallo, Will, Amare will not take you to the promised land the rest will fall into place.

that should not be the knicks starting five. those are our top five guys and one of em (wil) needs to anchor the bench. mda has given this role to td, lolololol. i like td but he has been put in a fail spot by coach.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/19/2010  2:06 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/19/2010  2:12 PM
BlueSeats wrote:Briggs, I think if you can get your head around the notion that a starting 5 of Felton, Fields, Gallo, Will, Amare will not take you to the promised land the rest will fall into place.

My god how about some patience. These are some really good ball players who also happen to be 22-22 23 26 28. We finally get some really good ballplayers and now what--remove them??? How about the theory of adding to them???

also look what Shawne Williams did yesterday. When our starters faltered--he basically put us into position to win the game. That's what a good bench does. A few seconds different with the Celtic and Cav games and were talking 18-10 and how much promise we have. Now its we sck we need melo give them anything they want--thats what Van Gundy said---I say shut up and let D walsh do it.

RIP Crushalot😞
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

12/19/2010  2:20 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:Briggs, I think if you can get your head around the notion that a starting 5 of Felton, Fields, Gallo, Will, Amare will not take you to the promised land the rest will fall into place.

My god how about some patience. These are some really good ball players who also happen to be 22-22 23 26 28. We finally get some really good ballplayers and now what--remove them??? How about the theory of adding to them???

also look what Shawne Williams did yesterday. When our starters faltered--he basically put us into position to win the game. That's what a good bench does. A few seconds different with the Celtic and Cav games and were talking 18-10 and how much promise we have. Now its we sck we need melo give them anything they want--thats what Van Gundy said---I say shut up and let D walsh do it.

It's not about patience, I have more of it than you. It's about prioritizing. This is the last time we'll be under the cap for a looong time. Solidify your core first, then diddle with the bench.

cheers
Posts: 21060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/27/2010
Member: #3316

12/19/2010  2:32 PM
BlueSeats wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:Briggs, I think if you can get your head around the notion that a starting 5 of Felton, Fields, Gallo, Will, Amare will not take you to the promised land the rest will fall into place.

My god how about some patience. These are some really good ball players who also happen to be 22-22 23 26 28. We finally get some really good ballplayers and now what--remove them??? How about the theory of adding to them???

also look what Shawne Williams did yesterday. When our starters faltered--he basically put us into position to win the game. That's what a good bench does. A few seconds different with the Celtic and Cav games and were talking 18-10 and how much promise we have. Now its we sck we need melo give them anything they want--thats what Van Gundy said---I say shut up and let D walsh do it.

It's not about patience, I have more of it than you. It's about prioritizing. This is the last time we'll be under the cap for a looong time. Solidify your core first, then diddle with the bench.

this is like an orphan annie sun will come out tomorrow reply. how about today? i agree with briggs let donnie figure out tomorrow as of today its all eyes on mda. is mda countering smart teams that use mda's run system against him?? no. the game plan for any opposing team is, gas mda top guys out cause he will never rest 'em.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/19/2010  2:44 PM
BlueSeats wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:Briggs, I think if you can get your head around the notion that a starting 5 of Felton, Fields, Gallo, Will, Amare will not take you to the promised land the rest will fall into place.

My god how about some patience. These are some really good ball players who also happen to be 22-22 23 26 28. We finally get some really good ballplayers and now what--remove them??? How about the theory of adding to them???

also look what Shawne Williams did yesterday. When our starters faltered--he basically put us into position to win the game. That's what a good bench does. A few seconds different with the Celtic and Cav games and were talking 18-10 and how much promise we have. Now its we sck we need melo give them anything they want--thats what Van Gundy said---I say shut up and let D walsh do it.

It's not about patience, I have more of it than you. It's about prioritizing. This is the last time we'll be under the cap for a looong time. Solidify your core first, then diddle with the bench.

Ok then be patient and let the team get to free agency right? But as we get there--lets see if we can improve the team now so that free agency will be the final stamp for 5 years. Ill take my chances this year with what we have + a bench enhancement and talk next year in the summer.

RIP Crushalot😞
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

12/19/2010  2:53 PM
cheers wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
cheers wrote:honestly i think the biggest hole is a stubborn coach.

I think there's an interesting D'Antoni phenomenon at work, that I think was there in Phoenix too, wherein the team over achieves because of the system, and then get's held accountable for not living up to the resultant over expectations.

A 16-12 record tells me the coach is doing okay. Fields, Timo, Turiaf, Gallo and Chandler in the starting lineup tells me the coach is okay playing bench guys if they perform.

The stated goal for this season is to make the playoffs. Getting significant minutes from AR is a luxury not a necessity for THIS season.

phoenix was a long time ago. mda system isnt taking anyone by surprise anymore, it was effectively countered by celtics and miami. who guess what.. used their bench to spell their top guys in order to keep em fresh to finish the knicks. mda never countered this, instead ran his top five to exhaustion and the cavs capitalized on being a tired team.


At least in the case of Boston, I'm not sure you can say it was "countered."

The Cavs game was a result of what took place against Miami- both mentally and physically.

Agree with the idea that our starters are going to wear out, but offensively, I have no problem with this team when guys are doing what they are supposed to be doing.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

12/19/2010  3:02 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/19/2010  3:03 PM
cheers wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:Briggs, I think if you can get your head around the notion that a starting 5 of Felton, Fields, Gallo, Will, Amare will not take you to the promised land the rest will fall into place.

My god how about some patience. These are some really good ball players who also happen to be 22-22 23 26 28. We finally get some really good ballplayers and now what--remove them??? How about the theory of adding to them???

also look what Shawne Williams did yesterday. When our starters faltered--he basically put us into position to win the game. That's what a good bench does. A few seconds different with the Celtic and Cav games and were talking 18-10 and how much promise we have. Now its we sck we need melo give them anything they want--thats what Van Gundy said---I say shut up and let D walsh do it.

It's not about patience, I have more of it than you. It's about prioritizing. This is the last time we'll be under the cap for a looong time. Solidify your core first, then diddle with the bench.

this is like an orphan annie sun will come out tomorrow reply. how about today? i agree with briggs let donnie figure out tomorrow as of today its all eyes on mda. is mda countering smart teams that use mda's run system against him?? no. the game plan for any opposing team is, gas mda top guys out cause he will never rest 'em.

I don't have a problem with scrubs getting garbage time. But I don't think throwing injured guys and wild cards into crunch time turns an average team into a winner.

Yes, the starters need to suck it up and play extended minutes until the bench heals and/or develops.

But, I am just a humble fan. I must never forget how much more armchair quarterbacks really know about the game than the coach.

So remind me, why is it so bad that Felton is currently fourth in minutes and Amare 16th?

BTW, you know who tops the league in MPG? Rudy Gay, on a bad knee.

cheers
Posts: 21060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/27/2010
Member: #3316

12/19/2010  3:11 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/19/2010  3:22 PM
Paladin55 wrote:
cheers wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:
cheers wrote:honestly i think the biggest hole is a stubborn coach.

I think there's an interesting D'Antoni phenomenon at work, that I think was there in Phoenix too, wherein the team over achieves because of the system, and then get's held accountable for not living up to the resultant over expectations.

A 16-12 record tells me the coach is doing okay. Fields, Timo, Turiaf, Gallo and Chandler in the starting lineup tells me the coach is okay playing bench guys if they perform.

The stated goal for this season is to make the playoffs. Getting significant minutes from AR is a luxury not a necessity for THIS season.

phoenix was a long time ago. mda system isnt taking anyone by surprise anymore, it was effectively countered by celtics and miami. who guess what.. used their bench to spell their top guys in order to keep em fresh to finish the knicks. mda never countered this, instead ran his top five to exhaustion and the cavs capitalized on [knicks] being a tired team.


At least in the case of Boston, I'm not sure you can say it was "countered."

The Cavs game was a result of what took place against Miami- both mentally and physically.

Agree with the idea that our starters are going to wear out, but offensively, I have no problem with this team when guys are doing what they are supposed to be doing.

celtics bench played: 72 minutes ~ knicks bench played: 31 minutes = celtics win.

BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

12/19/2010  3:19 PM
BlueSeats wrote:So remind me, why is it so bad that Felton is currently 4th in minutes and Amare 16th?

BTW, you know who tops the league in MPG? Rudy Gay, on a bad knee.

Allow me to correct myself about the bad knee, I was thinking of Brandon Roy. I have no idea of the state of Gays knee.

I want to know what fantasy trades that you think Denver is willing to accepot from the Knicks

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy