[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

OT: What do you do if you're the Blazers?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 3 ‹ Previous 1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
martin
Posts: 76270
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/14/2010  2:07 PM
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:I'd take the guy off their hands because he doesn't rely on his athleticism to score anyway.

Not a good look for Roy. Guy is still a baller. He just cant be depended on for 30+ MPG a game.

Why oh why would you be glad to take Brandon Roy off of their hands when you don't think you can depend on him for 30+ minutes a game? Please tell me you didn't really think this through before typing it out.

that's like 90% of his posts.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
AUTOADVERT
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
12/14/2010  2:19 PM
martin wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:I'd take the guy off their hands because he doesn't rely on his athleticism to score anyway.

Not a good look for Roy. Guy is still a baller. He just cant be depended on for 30+ MPG a game.

Why oh why would you be glad to take Brandon Roy off of their hands when you don't think you can depend on him for 30+ minutes a game? Please tell me you didn't really think this through before typing it out.

that's like 90% of his posts.

I don't like to try to pick on posters or anything but that was the icing on the cake for me.

Cap space. Defense. Things to think about before posting stuff like that. Ah well. To each his own I guess martin.

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127
12/14/2010  2:24 PM
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
martin wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:I'd take the guy off their hands because he doesn't rely on his athleticism to score anyway.

Not a good look for Roy. Guy is still a baller. He just cant be depended on for 30+ MPG a game.

Why oh why would you be glad to take Brandon Roy off of their hands when you don't think you can depend on him for 30+ minutes a game? Please tell me you didn't really think this through before typing it out.

that's like 90% of his posts.

I don't like to try to pick on posters or anything but that was the icing on the cake for me.

Cap space. Defense. Things to think about before posting stuff like that. Ah well. To each his own I guess martin.

he had over 18,000 posts on RealGM as GuyverADL--then they waived him, and then made this place his home

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
12/14/2010  2:30 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
martin wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:I'd take the guy off their hands because he doesn't rely on his athleticism to score anyway.

Not a good look for Roy. Guy is still a baller. He just cant be depended on for 30+ MPG a game.

Why oh why would you be glad to take Brandon Roy off of their hands when you don't think you can depend on him for 30+ minutes a game? Please tell me you didn't really think this through before typing it out.

that's like 90% of his posts.

I don't like to try to pick on posters or anything but that was the icing on the cake for me.

Cap space. Defense. Things to think about before posting stuff like that. Ah well. To each his own I guess martin.

he had over 18,000 posts on RealGM as GuyverADL--then they waived him, and then made this place his home

I don't mind a spirited debate with people on basketball and the Knicks..that's what I'm here for. It DOES get a bit..irking..when you take the time to do some research and try to post something that's been thought out for a while and to get something short of that in response. Ah well.

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127
12/14/2010  2:36 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/14/2010  2:39 PM
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
martin wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:I'd take the guy off their hands because he doesn't rely on his athleticism to score anyway.

Not a good look for Roy. Guy is still a baller. He just cant be depended on for 30+ MPG a game.

Why oh why would you be glad to take Brandon Roy off of their hands when you don't think you can depend on him for 30+ minutes a game? Please tell me you didn't really think this through before typing it out.

that's like 90% of his posts.

I don't like to try to pick on posters or anything but that was the icing on the cake for me.

Cap space. Defense. Things to think about before posting stuff like that. Ah well. To each his own I guess martin.

he had over 18,000 posts on RealGM as GuyverADL--then they waived him, and then made this place his home

I don't mind a spirited debate with people on basketball and the Knicks..that's what I'm here for. It DOES get a bit..irking..when you take the time to do some research and try to post something that's been thought out for a while and to get something short of that in response. Ah well.

Agreed. I'm not one who will usually rip how a poster posts either, but I'll make an exception here. It is annoying as hell to write something out and then have the response be the equivalent of "you're wrong. It's obviously 100 percent black. What I think is actually universal law" and then you respond and he writes back "I think this and it is this way because that's just the way it is and I am not going to comment on any of your points whatsoever. I hope I was insulting enough in the process to piss you off and make this place less fun for everyone else too"

I used to post at RealGM and then I hopped over here... still posted there from time to time, but he's one of a few posters that caused me to quit posting there for good. And now he's here. Ugh. He's one of the worst posters in RealGM history... take that for what it's worth

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
12/14/2010  2:46 PM
martin wrote:Remember when Portland wouldn't trade Rudy for Chandler and wanted a first rounder included?

walsh is still crouch over holding is stomach laughing at that

ES
martin
Posts: 76270
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/14/2010  2:47 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
martin wrote:Remember when Portland wouldn't trade Rudy for Chandler and wanted a first rounder included?

walsh is still crouch over holding is stomach laughing at that

nap time is over?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
12/14/2010  2:49 PM
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:I'd take the guy off their hands because he doesn't rely on his athleticism to score anyway.

Not a good look for Roy. Guy is still a baller. He just cant be depended on for 30+ MPG a game.

Why oh why would you be glad to take Brandon Roy off of their hands when you don't think you can depend on him for 30+ minutes a game? Please tell me you didn't really think this through before typing it out.

Im not getting him to be a focal point. He'd play 3rd string to Amare and Melo.

If Roy wasnt damaged goods we wouldnt get him at all.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
martin
Posts: 76270
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/14/2010  2:51 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:I'd take the guy off their hands because he doesn't rely on his athleticism to score anyway.

Not a good look for Roy. Guy is still a baller. He just cant be depended on for 30+ MPG a game.

Why oh why would you be glad to take Brandon Roy off of their hands when you don't think you can depend on him for 30+ minutes a game? Please tell me you didn't really think this through before typing it out.

Im not getting him to be a focal point. He'd play 3rd string to Amare and Melo.

If Roy wasnt damaged goods we wouldnt get him at all.

damaged goods, 3rd stringer at max $? This is a good idea?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
12/14/2010  2:55 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:I'd take the guy off their hands because he doesn't rely on his athleticism to score anyway.

Not a good look for Roy. Guy is still a baller. He just cant be depended on for 30+ MPG a game.

Why oh why would you be glad to take Brandon Roy off of their hands when you don't think you can depend on him for 30+ minutes a game? Please tell me you didn't really think this through before typing it out.

Im not getting him to be a focal point. He'd play 3rd string to Amare and Melo.

If Roy wasnt damaged goods we wouldnt get him at all.

Bro, I'll tell you how bad his contract is now that he has knees that are done and won't get better...

If you called the Clips and asked Sterling to trade you Baron Davis, he would laugh at you.

If you called the Prime Minister of Turkey and asked him to trade you Allen Iverson... he would say, "I'll take my chances with AI."

Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127
12/14/2010  2:59 PM
JohnWallace44 wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:I'd take the guy off their hands because he doesn't rely on his athleticism to score anyway.

Not a good look for Roy. Guy is still a baller. He just cant be depended on for 30+ MPG a game.

Why oh why would you be glad to take Brandon Roy off of their hands when you don't think you can depend on him for 30+ minutes a game? Please tell me you didn't really think this through before typing it out.

Im not getting him to be a focal point. He'd play 3rd string to Amare and Melo.

If Roy wasnt damaged goods we wouldnt get him at all.

Bro, I'll tell you how bad his contract is now that he has knees that are done and won't get better...

If you called the Clips and asked Sterling to trade you Baron Davis, he would laugh at you.

If you called the Prime Minister of Turkey and asked him to trade you Allen Iverson... he would say, "I'll take my chances with AI."

If he had the Prime Minister of Turkey's telephone number, Turkey would procure nuclear missiles and deployment technologies to nuke NYC, LA, and Chicago out of sheer principle. let's not joke about Anubis being a international point-of-contact

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
12/14/2010  2:59 PM
martin wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:I'd take the guy off their hands because he doesn't rely on his athleticism to score anyway.

Not a good look for Roy. Guy is still a baller. He just cant be depended on for 30+ MPG a game.

Why oh why would you be glad to take Brandon Roy off of their hands when you don't think you can depend on him for 30+ minutes a game? Please tell me you didn't really think this through before typing it out.

Im not getting him to be a focal point. He'd play 3rd string to Amare and Melo.

If Roy wasnt damaged goods we wouldnt get him at all.

damaged goods, 3rd stringer at max $? This is a good idea?

Why are you so concerned about the money. If we get Melo we are capped out any. I CLEARLY stated that I would get Roy to ADD to Melo and Amare.

Roy at 50% is still better than any SG we can REALISTICALLY acquire. SG's(who can shoot), PG's, and C's come at a premium in the NBA. This is why guys like Arenas and Roy get the max even though they have knee injuries.

Boston won a championship 1 yr removed from being a lottery team. Steal a few games in the playoffs and you can be in the finals.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
12/14/2010  3:06 PM
JohnWallace44 wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:I'd take the guy off their hands because he doesn't rely on his athleticism to score anyway.

Not a good look for Roy. Guy is still a baller. He just cant be depended on for 30+ MPG a game.

Why oh why would you be glad to take Brandon Roy off of their hands when you don't think you can depend on him for 30+ minutes a game? Please tell me you didn't really think this through before typing it out.

Im not getting him to be a focal point. He'd play 3rd string to Amare and Melo.

If Roy wasnt damaged goods we wouldnt get him at all.

Bro, I'll tell you how bad his contract is now that he has knees that are done and won't get better...

If you called the Clips and asked Sterling to trade you Baron Davis, he would laugh at you.

If you called the Prime Minister of Turkey and asked him to trade you Allen Iverson... he would say, "I'll take my chances with AI."

I understand what you said. Brandon Roy is still the best player on that Portland team. Plus they are losing so that just compounds the tension there.

Roy and Miller didnt like each other last year and they dont like each other now.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
martin
Posts: 76270
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/14/2010  3:12 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
martin wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:I'd take the guy off their hands because he doesn't rely on his athleticism to score anyway.

Not a good look for Roy. Guy is still a baller. He just cant be depended on for 30+ MPG a game.

Why oh why would you be glad to take Brandon Roy off of their hands when you don't think you can depend on him for 30+ minutes a game? Please tell me you didn't really think this through before typing it out.

Im not getting him to be a focal point. He'd play 3rd string to Amare and Melo.

If Roy wasnt damaged goods we wouldnt get him at all.

damaged goods, 3rd stringer at max $? This is a good idea?

Why are you so concerned about the money. If we get Melo we are capped out any. I CLEARLY stated that I would get Roy to ADD to Melo and Amare.

Roy at 50% is still better than any SG we can REALISTICALLY acquire. SG's(who can shoot), PG's, and C's come at a premium in the NBA. This is why guys like Arenas and Roy get the max even though they have knee injuries.

Boston won a championship 1 yr removed from being a lottery team. Steal a few games in the playoffs and you can be in the finals.

You'd make a good fantasy league GM. maybe.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
12/14/2010  3:19 PM
3-16, and 4-16 in the last two since he aggravated the knee

Anubis, he is done in the way we've seen Penny and TMac be done, but he doesn't have their size advantage at his position and his knees are worse than theirs were.

Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
12/14/2010  3:35 PM
JohnWallace44 wrote:3-16, and 4-16 in the last two since he aggravated the knee

Anubis, he is done in the way we've seen Penny and TMac be done, but he doesn't have their size advantage at his position and his knees are worse than theirs were.

Roy shouldn't be taking 16 shots a game. Penny and TMac were more reliant on athleticism than Roy ever was.

If we can get a Houston Rocket level T-Mac type talent on the cheap then Im sold.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
12/14/2010  3:40 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/14/2010  3:42 PM
AnubisADL wrote:
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:I'd take the guy off their hands because he doesn't rely on his athleticism to score anyway.

Not a good look for Roy. Guy is still a baller. He just cant be depended on for 30+ MPG a game.

Why oh why would you be glad to take Brandon Roy off of their hands when you don't think you can depend on him for 30+ minutes a game? Please tell me you didn't really think this through before typing it out.

Im not getting him to be a focal point. He'd play 3rd string to Amare and Melo.

If Roy wasnt damaged goods we wouldnt get him at all.

but again why commit all that time and $ to a player who isn't healthy? Have you looked into whether Amare, Melo and Roy would even fit under the cap?

Aren't there a thousand better ways to spend $15-$16 M per season to help build a team than on Brandon Roy? You can't be serious with this one...

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
12/14/2010  3:51 PM

Hopefully this will end the debate... in this clip from last night you basically see the high end that Roy is capable of, leaning on dudes in the lane and tossing up a fadeaway floater. You also see clearly that he has no elevation AT ALL on his shots and can't get around anyone so he's shooting with a hand in his face whenever he shoots.

He's not the Houston version of TMac.

He's the 2020 version of Marty Collins.

Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
cheers
Posts: 21060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/27/2010
Member: #3316
12/14/2010  4:07 PM
JohnWallace44 wrote:

Hopefully this will end the debate... in this clip from last night you basically see the high end that Roy is capable of, leaning on dudes in the lane and tossing up a fadeaway floater. You also see clearly that he has no elevation AT ALL on his shots and can't get around anyone so he's shooting with a hand in his face whenever he shoots.

He's not the Houston version of TMac.

He's the 2020 version of Marty Collins.

wow blazers are stuck. remeinds me of when the knicks had to go through it with houston, and presently curry. the one thing missing in the nba is the nfl-option of voiding contracts.
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
12/14/2010  5:22 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/14/2010  5:32 PM
JohnWallace44 wrote:

Hopefully this will end the debate... in this clip from last night you basically see the high end that Roy is capable of, leaning on dudes in the lane and tossing up a fadeaway floater. You also see clearly that he has no elevation AT ALL on his shots and can't get around anyone so he's shooting with a hand in his face whenever he shoots.

He's not the Houston version of TMac.

He's the 2020 version of Marty Collins.

Come on now man you act like Roy was jumping over people before the injury. What I see is he has no problem getting shots off. Those are just very difficult shots that he was able to make before. He will have easier attempts than that here.

I see a "gimpy" Roy STILL gets an IMMEDIATE double team.

Like I said, Im not getting him to play with Melo and Amare. He'd be our Chris Bosh.

MLE signing
Amare
Melo
Roy
Felton

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
Page 2 of 3 ‹ Previous 1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
OT: What do you do if you're the Blazers?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy