[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

What can we give for Carl Landry?
Author Thread
DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

12/1/2010  9:45 AM
crzymdups wrote:Briggs - I am watching Carl Landry right now and he looks like crap. 3 fouls in the first half, not playing well at all.

It's gotta be the shoes:
http://hoopshype.com/sneakers/peak/carl_landry_model.htm

Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
AUTOADVERT
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/1/2010  9:57 AM
smackeddog wrote:
crzymdups wrote:Briggs - I am watching Carl Landry right now and he looks like crap. 3 fouls in the first half, not playing well at all.

I think Carl Landry is going to have a poor year if he stays stuck with the Kings, but he was an absolute beast for the Rockets, and really helped them win games (more than Kevin Martin, thats for sure)- I think he's the kind of player that excels when he is on a winning team, or at least when he's in a position to help his team win. I'm not sure if they'll trade him though- I'm not sure whats going on in their GMs mind at all, that teams 2 main players have serious character issues.

Yeah, it looked like he was seriously forcing the issue last night, but he had some great hustle rebounds on both ends. I think he could fit here, but he's always seemed to play small to me. I thought he was 6'7"... he seems smaller than Wilson to me.

The Kings are a very weird team. Tyreke Evans looks like garbage this year - he has zero understanding of how to run the point. Dalembert is overrated and washed up (if i were the kings, he's the guy i would try to dump - and NO, i want no part of him on the Knicks). DeMarcus Cousins looked pretty good. He's very unorthodox though. It might be hard to build a winning team around him. He's a tough cover from the power forward spot though. Indiana could not handle him, but he kept getting in foul trouble.

I think the Kings might move Landry or Thompson... but Dalembert went down with an injury last night, so I doubt it's something they'd do now.

My preference is to develop AR - I think he's exact type of player we need. Game-changer on defense with his shotblocking and rebounding. Can run the break and can rebound at an elite level on the offensive end. We need to work with the kid. He should be exactly what we need. He had a good run in 4minutes last night. Let's hope he can work his way up to 10-15 minutes over the next month and then more from there.

¿ △ ?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/1/2010  10:07 AM
When i say Carl Landry or Jason Thompson--Im looking for realistic options. I think Id prefer Landry--hes a tad more battle tested and was great off a very good Houston rocket bench. Im not worried about if a guy is 6-9 or 7-0--Im looking for production off of our poor bench.
RIP Crushalot😞
fishmike
Posts: 53846
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/1/2010  10:10 AM
crzymdups wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
crzymdups wrote:Briggs - I am watching Carl Landry right now and he looks like crap. 3 fouls in the first half, not playing well at all.

I think Carl Landry is going to have a poor year if he stays stuck with the Kings, but he was an absolute beast for the Rockets, and really helped them win games (more than Kevin Martin, thats for sure)- I think he's the kind of player that excels when he is on a winning team, or at least when he's in a position to help his team win. I'm not sure if they'll trade him though- I'm not sure whats going on in their GMs mind at all, that teams 2 main players have serious character issues.

Yeah, it looked like he was seriously forcing the issue last night, but he had some great hustle rebounds on both ends. I think he could fit here, but he's always seemed to play small to me. I thought he was 6'7"... he seems smaller than Wilson to me.

The Kings are a very weird team. Tyreke Evans looks like garbage this year - he has zero understanding of how to run the point. Dalembert is overrated and washed up (if i were the kings, he's the guy i would try to dump - and NO, i want no part of him on the Knicks). DeMarcus Cousins looked pretty good. He's very unorthodox though. It might be hard to build a winning team around him. He's a tough cover from the power forward spot though. Indiana could not handle him, but he kept getting in foul trouble.

I think the Kings might move Landry or Thompson... but Dalembert went down with an injury last night, so I doubt it's something they'd do now.

My preference is to develop AR - I think he's exact type of player we need. Game-changer on defense with his shotblocking and rebounding. Can run the break and can rebound at an elite level on the offensive end. We need to work with the kid. He should be exactly what we need. He had a good run in 4minutes last night. Let's hope he can work his way up to 10-15 minutes over the next month and then more from there.

exactly... average age of our 10 guys that play is 24. AR is 21. Just because he's been around 2 years doesnt mean he's ready. He's not as mature as Gallo and doesnt have his feel for the game. Just keep getting him out there (like Mosgov). These guys can both be impact players and should be part of the rotation for years to come, but we need to develop them. That takes time, which we have.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
fishmike
Posts: 53846
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/1/2010  10:11 AM
BRIGGS wrote:When i say Carl Landry or Jason Thompson--Im looking for realistic options. I think Id prefer Landry--hes a tad more battle tested and was great off a very good Houston rocket bench. Im not worried about if a guy is 6-9 or 7-0--Im looking for production off of our poor bench.
Varejeo is a better fit, and might be attainable.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/1/2010  10:11 AM
BRIGGS wrote:When i say Carl Landry or Jason Thompson--Im looking for realistic options. I think Id prefer Landry--hes a tad more battle tested and was great off a very good Houston rocket bench. Im not worried about if a guy is 6-9 or 7-0--Im looking for production off of our poor bench.

bench is only poor when turiaf is out. when turiaf is back, it's improved. once turiaf and toney are healthier and if we can get kelenna and AR back to where they were, the bench is actually solid.

like i said, dalembert went down with a knee problem last night - i don't think now is the time the kings will be looking to trade thompson or landry - those guys are their only other bigs next to cousins.

i think the most realistic option is to develop AR and get him comfortable in this offense. the kid put up 11ppg 6rpg and 2 blocks last year in his second year in the league. he just needs to regain his confidence and find his place in this offense and he'll be fine.

d'antoni seriously needs to limit the plays where AR dribbles the ball up court after a rebound. that just shouldn't happen.

¿ △ ?
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/1/2010  10:12 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/1/2010  10:12 AM
fishmike wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:When i say Carl Landry or Jason Thompson--Im looking for realistic options. I think Id prefer Landry--hes a tad more battle tested and was great off a very good Houston rocket bench. Im not worried about if a guy is 6-9 or 7-0--Im looking for production off of our poor bench.
Varejeo is a better fit, and might be attainable.

Varejao is a different story all together. He'd be great here. I doubt he's available now... but if Cleveland is out of the playoffs picture by February... he might be then...

¿ △ ?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/1/2010  10:16 AM
fishmike wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:When i say Carl Landry or Jason Thompson--Im looking for realistic options. I think Id prefer Landry--hes a tad more battle tested and was great off a very good Houston rocket bench. Im not worried about if a guy is 6-9 or 7-0--Im looking for production off of our poor bench.
Varejeo is a better fit, and might be attainable.

not for nothing fishmike--but Carl Landry is out of the rotation and has an ending contact of 3mm--verajo is a starting C for Clev with a long term contract--they would want big time pieces for that. Im very willing to do a small deal for Landry that would appease the Kings. I dont need both Jerome Jordan and Mosgov---Id give them Mosgov a 2 and some cash to get landry.. and you know what if we did that--this club would actually be formidable against anyone..

RIP Crushalot😞
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/1/2010  10:26 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
fishmike wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:When i say Carl Landry or Jason Thompson--Im looking for realistic options. I think Id prefer Landry--hes a tad more battle tested and was great off a very good Houston rocket bench. Im not worried about if a guy is 6-9 or 7-0--Im looking for production off of our poor bench.
Varejeo is a better fit, and might be attainable.

not for nothing fishmike--but Carl Landry is out of the rotation and has an ending contact of 3mm--verajo is a starting C for Clev with a long term contract--they would want big time pieces for that. Im very willing to do a small deal for Landry that would appease the Kings. I dont need both Jerome Jordan and Mosgov---Id give them Mosgov a 2 and some cash to get landry.. and you know what if we did that--this club would actually be formidable against anyone..

Landry isn't out of the rotation though - I watched last night and he played most of the 4th quarter. Landry is still the big piece they got in the Kevin Martin deal. He's a very productive young NBA veteran with a very reasonable contract.

I don't think the Kings would be willing to give away one of their few veterans for a piece like Mozgov who is totally unproven. That team needs more stability, not less.

¿ △ ?
fishmike
Posts: 53846
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/1/2010  10:42 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
fishmike wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:When i say Carl Landry or Jason Thompson--Im looking for realistic options. I think Id prefer Landry--hes a tad more battle tested and was great off a very good Houston rocket bench. Im not worried about if a guy is 6-9 or 7-0--Im looking for production off of our poor bench.
Varejeo is a better fit, and might be attainable.

not for nothing fishmike--but Carl Landry is out of the rotation and has an ending contact of 3mm--verajo is a starting C for Clev with a long term contract--they would want big time pieces for that. Im very willing to do a small deal for Landry that would appease the Kings. I dont need both Jerome Jordan and Mosgov---Id give them Mosgov a 2 and some cash to get landry.. and you know what if we did that--this club would actually be formidable against anyone..

thats insane and may I respectfully say stupid. In 2-3 years Carl Landry is somone's 8th man off the bench and Mosgov is a legit 7'1 athletic center anchoring a defense. For 8 years I have listened to you talk about stockpiling youth and developing big players. Now our average age is 24 and you want to trade a nice chip at center who has shown good things for a garbage guy who has no future here and isnt getting us further in the playoffs.

This team doesnt need to be fixed. It just needs time. All the pieces are here, possibly for an elite team. If they arent we wont know until next year or the year after. On the flip side that same amount of time could produce a really bigtime young strong squad. Felton and Amare are not old. This is not a win now situation. We can take a year or even more to develop these players, and we will make the playoffs in the meantime

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
joec32033
Posts: 30612
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
12/1/2010  10:59 AM
SteveSmith wrote:
joec32033 wrote:Personally I don't have the faith in ADR some of you other guys do. I would trade AR, Walker, and $3 mil for Marc Gasol right now.

I would do this in a minute despite thinking AR will blossom this season, but Memphis would not

Maybe maybe not. They just signed Gay and Conley. Mayo and Gasol are due for extensions and they hit a high priced rookie waiting (Thabeet). They are bleeding money-look at what they did to this year's rookie Xavier Henry. Randolph is prolly gone...

A chance at a low cost high upside player, with some cash for a player they have a lower cost replacement for seem wise for a team like Memphis.

~You can't run from who you are.~
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/1/2010  11:24 AM
fishmike wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
fishmike wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:When i say Carl Landry or Jason Thompson--Im looking for realistic options. I think Id prefer Landry--hes a tad more battle tested and was great off a very good Houston rocket bench. Im not worried about if a guy is 6-9 or 7-0--Im looking for production off of our poor bench.
Varejeo is a better fit, and might be attainable.

not for nothing fishmike--but Carl Landry is out of the rotation and has an ending contact of 3mm--verajo is a starting C for Clev with a long term contract--they would want big time pieces for that. Im very willing to do a small deal for Landry that would appease the Kings. I dont need both Jerome Jordan and Mosgov---Id give them Mosgov a 2 and some cash to get landry.. and you know what if we did that--this club would actually be formidable against anyone..

thats insane and may I respectfully say stupid. In 2-3 years Carl Landry is somone's 8th man off the bench and Mosgov is a legit 7'1 athletic center anchoring a defense. For 8 years I have listened to you talk about stockpiling youth and developing big players. Now our average age is 24 and you want to trade a nice chip at center who has shown good things for a garbage guy who has no future here and isnt getting us further in the playoffs.

This team doesnt need to be fixed. It just needs time. All the pieces are here, possibly for an elite team. If they arent we wont know until next year or the year after. On the flip side that same amount of time could produce a really bigtime young strong squad. Felton and Amare are not old. This is not a win now situation. We can take a year or even more to develop these players, and we will make the playoffs in the meantime

The guy is 24 and cant even hold on to a basketball. The only thing Mosgov is going to anchor is his dingy back in Russia.

RIP Crushalot😞
Knixkik
Posts: 35457
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
12/1/2010  12:04 PM
Landry is good at what he does, but he is a PF who can't play any minutes at C and he doesn't rebound or defend particularly well. Not sure if he is a good fit given the talent on our team.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/1/2010  12:14 PM
Knixkik wrote:Landry is good at what he does, but he is a PF who can't play any minutes at C and he doesn't rebound or defend particularly well. Not sure if he is a good fit given the talent on our team.

If we were able to add Landry and azu--that could give us some explosive in-out scoring off the bench---that we dont have. Turriaf can fill a 15 minute role and TD can get back to playing more of a back up PG role. Landry is a good physical defender/player who plays with a ton of energy--almost a perfect bench player for this team. If we can keep Turriaf at 10-15 minutes--maybe we can keep him healthy. This miracle 7 foot player is not out there right now and I don't think it's even necessary if that talent is not there. Id rather haev a 6-9 245 pg guy who can give me what Landry has proven he can do.

RIP Crushalot😞
Knixkik
Posts: 35457
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
12/1/2010  12:24 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
Knixkik wrote:Landry is good at what he does, but he is a PF who can't play any minutes at C and he doesn't rebound or defend particularly well. Not sure if he is a good fit given the talent on our team.

If we were able to add Landry and azu--that could give us some explosive in-out scoring off the bench---that we dont have. Turriaf can fill a 15 minute role and TD can get back to playing more of a back up PG role. Landry is a good physical defender/player who plays with a ton of energy--almost a perfect bench player for this team. If we can keep Turriaf at 10-15 minutes--maybe we can keep him healthy. This miracle 7 foot player is not out there right now and I don't think it's even necessary if that talent is not there. Id rather haev a 6-9 245 pg guy who can give me what Landry has proven he can do.


Landry is better, but in terms of what this team needs, i think Thompson would offer more.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/1/2010  1:32 PM
The more Landry's on the team--the better we will be.
RIP Crushalot😞
fishmike
Posts: 53846
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/1/2010  1:55 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
fishmike wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
fishmike wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:When i say Carl Landry or Jason Thompson--Im looking for realistic options. I think Id prefer Landry--hes a tad more battle tested and was great off a very good Houston rocket bench. Im not worried about if a guy is 6-9 or 7-0--Im looking for production off of our poor bench.
Varejeo is a better fit, and might be attainable.

not for nothing fishmike--but Carl Landry is out of the rotation and has an ending contact of 3mm--verajo is a starting C for Clev with a long term contract--they would want big time pieces for that. Im very willing to do a small deal for Landry that would appease the Kings. I dont need both Jerome Jordan and Mosgov---Id give them Mosgov a 2 and some cash to get landry.. and you know what if we did that--this club would actually be formidable against anyone..

thats insane and may I respectfully say stupid. In 2-3 years Carl Landry is somone's 8th man off the bench and Mosgov is a legit 7'1 athletic center anchoring a defense. For 8 years I have listened to you talk about stockpiling youth and developing big players. Now our average age is 24 and you want to trade a nice chip at center who has shown good things for a garbage guy who has no future here and isnt getting us further in the playoffs.

This team doesnt need to be fixed. It just needs time. All the pieces are here, possibly for an elite team. If they arent we wont know until next year or the year after. On the flip side that same amount of time could produce a really bigtime young strong squad. Felton and Amare are not old. This is not a win now situation. We can take a year or even more to develop these players, and we will make the playoffs in the meantime

The guy is 24 and cant even hold on to a basketball. The only thing Mosgov is going to anchor is his dingy back in Russia.

funny, you didnt say that after watching him push around Tyson Chandler.

I have yet to see us run ONE play for Mosgov in the post and give him the high lob pass you should give any 7'1 player. Stop making a 7 footer catch low bounce passes at his knees.

Who's the better prospect right now? Mosgov or your boy Thabeet? Cause you once said 2 years ago Thabeet would add 20 wins to the Knicks.

Amigo you make some good observations, but my 7 year old son has 30x your patience.

Mosgov has shown more in his failures than in his success, because he's not ready yet keeps on busting it every night.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
12/1/2010  11:16 PM
BRIGGS wrote:When i say Carl Landry or Jason Thompson--Im looking for realistic options. I think Id prefer Landry--hes a tad more battle tested and was great off a very good Houston rocket bench. Im not worried about if a guy is 6-9 or 7-0--Im looking for production off of our poor bench.

Things seem to be crazy in Sacramento. Either of these guys would be great for the Knicks and the Kings don't seem that committed to either at this point.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
umynot
Posts: 21465
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/4/2008
Member: #2093
USA
12/1/2010  11:43 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
fishmike wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
fishmike wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:When i say Carl Landry or Jason Thompson--Im looking for realistic options. I think Id prefer Landry--hes a tad more battle tested and was great off a very good Houston rocket bench. Im not worried about if a guy is 6-9 or 7-0--Im looking for production off of our poor bench.
Varejeo is a better fit, and might be attainable.

not for nothing fishmike--but Carl Landry is out of the rotation and has an ending contact of 3mm--verajo is a starting C for Clev with a long term contract--they would want big time pieces for that. Im very willing to do a small deal for Landry that would appease the Kings. I dont need both Jerome Jordan and Mosgov---Id give them Mosgov a 2 and some cash to get landry.. and you know what if we did that--this club would actually be formidable against anyone..

thats insane and may I respectfully say stupid. In 2-3 years Carl Landry is somone's 8th man off the bench and Mosgov is a legit 7'1 athletic center anchoring a defense. For 8 years I have listened to you talk about stockpiling youth and developing big players. Now our average age is 24 and you want to trade a nice chip at center who has shown good things for a garbage guy who has no future here and isnt getting us further in the playoffs.

This team doesnt need to be fixed. It just needs time. All the pieces are here, possibly for an elite team. If they arent we wont know until next year or the year after. On the flip side that same amount of time could produce a really bigtime young strong squad. Felton and Amare are not old. This is not a win now situation. We can take a year or even more to develop these players, and we will make the playoffs in the meantime

The guy is 24 and cant even hold on to a basketball. The only thing Mosgov is going to anchor is his dingy back in Russia.

Briggs give the Kid some time man...... AR too

Your giving up on these guys too easy...... Its not talent its mental!!

It will come for both of them!!

Would Love Mayo though!!

KNICKS on the way UP!!!
FistOfOakley
Posts: 21079
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/18/2010
Member: #3075

12/2/2010  12:09 AM
landry is a nice option off the bench but it'll be hard to play him and amare together because a)they're both are best down on the block and b)he does not rebound well, though he's solid defensively.

marc gasol is someone to go after though his availability is questionable at this point.

What can we give for Carl Landry?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy