[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

dont need dont want carmelo
Topic LOCKED
Author Thread
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/29/2010  2:11 PM
BigSm00th wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:We're a .500 team without adding any other all star.

i'd say we're above 500 w/o adding another star. knicks are 9-9 right now and gallinari and chandler have both been inconsistent. i would anticipate both will improve as the year goes on. chemistry will improve as well. plus randolph is still on the bench not giving anything. this team will finish something like 43-39 without another trade, which would likely put them at top 6 in the east.

i agree with briggs, carmelo is not whats needed. gallinari is younger and cheaper and his skills complement amare way more.

LOL @ Anubis, Gallo hasn't impressed you so far? Did you watch the games @ GS, @ LAC, or against the pistons? Gallo had HUGE game-breaking 3s in each of those. those 3 games are losses without him stepping up and burying tough 3s. that's pretty impressive in my opinion. his consistency hasn't been there but he has proven he can score and score when it counts.

i think chandler is the movable piece here. he's a 3/4 and the knicks have a 3 (gallo) and a 4 (stat). we need a true C who can play next to amare and allow turiaf to come off the bench. who that guy is i'm not sure, but it sure as hell isn't melo.

right now if u gave me a choice whether to trade Gallo or Wilson, i'd rather keep Wilson... Wilson will be traded because of his contract situation i think that's fair to assume, but he's also a better player than Gallo is right now.

last night we saw Gallo hit a huge 3 in the 2nd OT that helped to win the game... we also saw him almost single handedly lose the game w/his crappy defense on Tayshaun Prince & his inability to hit open J's... MDA stuck w/him through 2 OT's of him playing like his head was not in the game & luckily it paid off in the end, but it could have easily cost us a W last night... he has been highly inconsistent all year & tho i've always been a huge supporter of his, in general i've been disappointed by his play this season... to say we don't need Carmelo on this team is pretty silly if u ask me... he would provide a huge upgrade at the SF position

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AUTOADVERT
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
11/29/2010  2:15 PM
i would assume that if we don’t make any moves that take up cap space for next year then that signals to carmelo that we're holding the spot for him. i'm still in the get-him-for-cap-space camp. i'm willing to gamble that he might agree to a sign-and-trade elsewhere.
iSergio
Posts: 21499
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2010
Member: #3043
USA
11/29/2010  2:17 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/29/2010  2:22 PM
He's been in love with BJ Mullens, Hassan Whiteside, Anthony Randolph and now Jason Thompson.

I see a pattern. LOL

Enough is enough man.

smackeddog
Posts: 38390
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
11/29/2010  2:18 PM
Aside from John Thompson, what other PF-C are there out there that might be a good fit and that are obtainable? Also can anyone think of any obtainable back up PG's?
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
11/29/2010  2:21 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/29/2010  2:22 PM
guys john thompson retired from the nba in 1966. are you perhaps referring to jason thompson?
iSergio
Posts: 21499
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2010
Member: #3043
USA
11/29/2010  2:22 PM
Marv wrote:guys john thompson retired from thte nba in 1966. are you perhaps referring to jason thompson?

Oops.

BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
11/29/2010  2:34 PM
TMS wrote:
BigSm00th wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:We're a .500 team without adding any other all star.

i'd say we're above 500 w/o adding another star. knicks are 9-9 right now and gallinari and chandler have both been inconsistent. i would anticipate both will improve as the year goes on. chemistry will improve as well. plus randolph is still on the bench not giving anything. this team will finish something like 43-39 without another trade, which would likely put them at top 6 in the east.

i agree with briggs, carmelo is not whats needed. gallinari is younger and cheaper and his skills complement amare way more.

LOL @ Anubis, Gallo hasn't impressed you so far? Did you watch the games @ GS, @ LAC, or against the pistons? Gallo had HUGE game-breaking 3s in each of those. those 3 games are losses without him stepping up and burying tough 3s. that's pretty impressive in my opinion. his consistency hasn't been there but he has proven he can score and score when it counts.

i think chandler is the movable piece here. he's a 3/4 and the knicks have a 3 (gallo) and a 4 (stat). we need a true C who can play next to amare and allow turiaf to come off the bench. who that guy is i'm not sure, but it sure as hell isn't melo.

right now if u gave me a choice whether to trade Gallo or Wilson, i'd rather keep Wilson... Wilson will be traded because of his contract situation i think that's fair to assume, but he's also a better player than Gallo is right now.

last night we saw Gallo hit a huge 3 in the 2nd OT that helped to win the game... we also saw him almost single handedly lose the game w/his crappy defense on Tayshaun Prince & his inability to hit open J's... MDA stuck w/him through 2 OT's of him playing like his head was not in the game & luckily it paid off in the end, but it could have easily cost us a W last night... he has been highly inconsistent all year & tho i've always been a huge supporter of his, in general i've been disappointed by his play this season... to say we don't need Carmelo on this team is pretty silly if u ask me... he would provide a huge upgrade at the SF position

LOL,,,i mean,,,,melo's D is nothing to write home to mom about. gallo is cheaper and younger, and arguably plays harder. melo is great but if it takes giving up 3 pieces to get him i don't understand how we're a better team. if he's a free agent and knicks have room to sign him, i think they should. but to give up a bunch to get him when this team is clearly a playoff team in the east and when the knicks have all the leverage is stupid.

#Knickstaps
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/29/2010  2:34 PM
smackeddog wrote:Aside from John Thompson, what other PF-C are there out there that might be a good fit and that are obtainable? Also can anyone think of any obtainable back up PG's?

Anderson Varejao would be a good fit except for his contract... i don't see us taking on any longterm deals until we see how this Melo situation plays out.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Nalod
Posts: 71190
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
11/29/2010  2:35 PM

Briggs has a point.

To me its not about where the team is now but where it is going. They are getting better and it takes more than 18 games to evaluate.

I don't advocate trading for Melo but instead let him apply the presure for Denver to settle on Wilson and Eddy instead of nothing.

Im with briggs thought on not making a full value trade for him at "any cost to get him". Our options are far greater if he comes via free agency.

Also, I want to see this team gel thru this season.

Would continue to advocate for Mozgov and develope him but we do need another banger because Turiaf is only a 20 minute player.

My thinking we are not contender and fan base would be content with .500 season. Im thinking of it longer term that you go into next year with greater options with felton as an expiring next year, Cap room with Eddy gone and Carmelo looming along with Rubio being able to leave europe.

Stay content short term and retool as opporunity presents itself.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/29/2010  2:37 PM
BigSm00th wrote:
TMS wrote:
BigSm00th wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:We're a .500 team without adding any other all star.

i'd say we're above 500 w/o adding another star. knicks are 9-9 right now and gallinari and chandler have both been inconsistent. i would anticipate both will improve as the year goes on. chemistry will improve as well. plus randolph is still on the bench not giving anything. this team will finish something like 43-39 without another trade, which would likely put them at top 6 in the east.

i agree with briggs, carmelo is not whats needed. gallinari is younger and cheaper and his skills complement amare way more.

LOL @ Anubis, Gallo hasn't impressed you so far? Did you watch the games @ GS, @ LAC, or against the pistons? Gallo had HUGE game-breaking 3s in each of those. those 3 games are losses without him stepping up and burying tough 3s. that's pretty impressive in my opinion. his consistency hasn't been there but he has proven he can score and score when it counts.

i think chandler is the movable piece here. he's a 3/4 and the knicks have a 3 (gallo) and a 4 (stat). we need a true C who can play next to amare and allow turiaf to come off the bench. who that guy is i'm not sure, but it sure as hell isn't melo.

right now if u gave me a choice whether to trade Gallo or Wilson, i'd rather keep Wilson... Wilson will be traded because of his contract situation i think that's fair to assume, but he's also a better player than Gallo is right now.

last night we saw Gallo hit a huge 3 in the 2nd OT that helped to win the game... we also saw him almost single handedly lose the game w/his crappy defense on Tayshaun Prince & his inability to hit open J's... MDA stuck w/him through 2 OT's of him playing like his head was not in the game & luckily it paid off in the end, but it could have easily cost us a W last night... he has been highly inconsistent all year & tho i've always been a huge supporter of his, in general i've been disappointed by his play this season... to say we don't need Carmelo on this team is pretty silly if u ask me... he would provide a huge upgrade at the SF position

LOL,,,i mean,,,,melo's D is nothing to write home to mom about. gallo is cheaper and younger, and arguably plays harder. melo is great but if it takes giving up 3 pieces to get him i don't understand how we're a better team. if he's a free agent and knicks have room to sign him, i think they should. but to give up a bunch to get him when this team is clearly a playoff team in the east and when the knicks have all the leverage is stupid.

no, Melo's D is definitely nothing to write home about, but his offensive skillset represents a huge upgrade at the SF position... & i'm not going to assume Melo's signing here in free agency & make the same mistake we did with Lebron & D Wade... you may think it's stupid to trade away a package of assets to get him but IMO it's stupid to pass up on a chance to get him because we're too afraid to trade pieces like Gallo, AR or Wilson Chandler.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/29/2010  2:37 PM
It's fair to bash Gallo, but who exactly on our roster was gonna stop Tayshaun? So to be fair, he could've done better, but really not that much better. That last bad call was one bad possession, cuz he let him get by too easily. He also had many good defensive efforts that Prince just hit tough shots. Most of the year Gallo has been good on D. Wallace didn't like going against him, I think he was effective on other good scorers too. He has an effect on how those guys score, cuz most of the time they have to score over him rather than just getting by him.

Melo is a stud, but he's also a bit of a nut. He still makes dumb forced shots. He's not a defender at all either. Still Melo is the kind of player we lack. If we add him it doesn't mean that we'd be in better shape this year. It may take more moves to make up for the role players we'd give up to get him.
Meanwhile a smaller move might bear more fruit. Just adding a player that can give us the scoring threat and punch we miss at times may be enough or adding a PG that is a better orchestrator. It's a big if right now, but IF AZ can eventually get some of his game back it could be a big boost. I want to keep working on AR to see if he can have the lightbulb cut on at some point. He's just got so much raw talent. For now I say stand pat for most of the roster.

The biggest issue for me is backup PG. TD would need to make a MAJOR leap for me to feel he's right for the backup PG spot. TD is a SG. I'm done with Mason and if we can let him go and bring in a better backup ball handler, that would help a ton.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/29/2010  2:43 PM
If it was about getting star players Miami would be 17-0 they arent and they wont be ever.


It sports its about team and chemistry. We have two ball dominant players Amare and Felton--that is fine becasue our other guys can get theirs in the flow without the need to dominate it.

This isnt baseball this is a team sport. There are roles there is only 1 basketball. We need another scoring big and enhancement from the bench. That way we could play with amare with Gallo at PF Thompson at PF Turriaf at C etc.. the rotation is nice--

just think about this think about the differential if we removed Mosgov and pout in Thompson and Azu--cut down minutes so guys could go harder and get good rest. thatw hat SA is doing and they are 13-1. Utah--3 bigs you need 3 bigs. we have the other pieces or most of them that are building chemsitry

RIP Crushalot😞
CHAOS
Posts: 20961
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/1/2009
Member: #3002

11/29/2010  2:47 PM
BJ MULLINS / WHITESIDE / AR / THOMPSON ??? What do they all have in common ???
tj23
Posts: 21851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/20/2010
Member: #3119

11/29/2010  2:48 PM
How much salary is Will going to command? I really like him but he's nowhere near a Carmelo. Let Curry and Mason expire. Let AR walk and save a couple mill. No reason to go after Paul right now, and he's probably happy there anyway since they're winning. We got Felton for 7-8 mill a year instead of 16-17 and he's up there statistically with the best. But I'd defiitely go after Carmelo. You still have the mid level to get a big who can add some rebounding and defense and we can get a backup pg really cheap. That's how we get our big 3 and we do it by saving 8 million which gives us more depth than Miami. These guys can play together. add Melo running around some screens and he would only help. This isn't a Miami team that has 2 stars that need to dominate the ball and a big that adds no help defense. These pieces fit together, and Melo would fit too. I really dont see a better alternative. If we go for a 2nd tier star like say Gasol he'll still probably want like 10 mill per year. That only leaves us with 6 million which doesn't get you a whole lot.
cheers
Posts: 21060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/27/2010
Member: #3316

11/29/2010  2:48 PM
good point nalod-- let melo's pressure and wilson's play make a trade happen.

if that doesnt work with denver, then it doesnt. ny is not harmed-- melo will be fa next year. for the first time in a long time, time is on the knicks side.

CHAOS
Posts: 20961
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/1/2009
Member: #3002

11/29/2010  2:50 PM
Agreeded cheers
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

11/29/2010  2:51 PM
AnubisADL wrote:We NEED Carmelo. This team is stuck in purgatory at the moment.

Not good enough to go deep in the playoffs and not bad enough to get a high lottery pick.

Amare needs help to for us to get to the next level.

People are looking at what is happening in Miami, I would think. Would Melo coming to the Knicks be a "subtraction by addition" situation, which may be what has happened in Miami? Would he fit in with Felton and Amare?

I'm not sure how he would fit in (things could turn out fine), but there is no guarantee that his addition to the team will be smooth.

Personally, I would rather have a 25 yr. old Ray Allen type player on this team- the kind of player who does not have to dominate the ball to be effective- than Melo, who may be a rhythm scorer who needs the ball a certain percentage of the time to be effective.

MDA coached him in the Olympics...wonder what his feelings are about him?

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
11/29/2010  2:56 PM
TMS wrote:
BigSm00th wrote:
TMS wrote:
BigSm00th wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:We're a .500 team without adding any other all star.

i'd say we're above 500 w/o adding another star. knicks are 9-9 right now and gallinari and chandler have both been inconsistent. i would anticipate both will improve as the year goes on. chemistry will improve as well. plus randolph is still on the bench not giving anything. this team will finish something like 43-39 without another trade, which would likely put them at top 6 in the east.

i agree with briggs, carmelo is not whats needed. gallinari is younger and cheaper and his skills complement amare way more.

LOL @ Anubis, Gallo hasn't impressed you so far? Did you watch the games @ GS, @ LAC, or against the pistons? Gallo had HUGE game-breaking 3s in each of those. those 3 games are losses without him stepping up and burying tough 3s. that's pretty impressive in my opinion. his consistency hasn't been there but he has proven he can score and score when it counts.

i think chandler is the movable piece here. he's a 3/4 and the knicks have a 3 (gallo) and a 4 (stat). we need a true C who can play next to amare and allow turiaf to come off the bench. who that guy is i'm not sure, but it sure as hell isn't melo.

right now if u gave me a choice whether to trade Gallo or Wilson, i'd rather keep Wilson... Wilson will be traded because of his contract situation i think that's fair to assume, but he's also a better player than Gallo is right now.

last night we saw Gallo hit a huge 3 in the 2nd OT that helped to win the game... we also saw him almost single handedly lose the game w/his crappy defense on Tayshaun Prince & his inability to hit open J's... MDA stuck w/him through 2 OT's of him playing like his head was not in the game & luckily it paid off in the end, but it could have easily cost us a W last night... he has been highly inconsistent all year & tho i've always been a huge supporter of his, in general i've been disappointed by his play this season... to say we don't need Carmelo on this team is pretty silly if u ask me... he would provide a huge upgrade at the SF position

LOL,,,i mean,,,,melo's D is nothing to write home to mom about. gallo is cheaper and younger, and arguably plays harder. melo is great but if it takes giving up 3 pieces to get him i don't understand how we're a better team. if he's a free agent and knicks have room to sign him, i think they should. but to give up a bunch to get him when this team is clearly a playoff team in the east and when the knicks have all the leverage is stupid.

no, Melo's D is definitely nothing to write home about, but his offensive skillset represents a huge upgrade at the SF position... & i'm not going to assume Melo's signing here in free agency & make the same mistake we did with Lebron & D Wade... you may think it's stupid to trade away a package of assets to get him but IMO it's stupid to pass up on a chance to get him because we're too afraid to trade pieces like Gallo, AR or Wilson Chandler.

TMS..the diff. between the Lebron/Wade sweepstakes and the Melo situation is that he seems like he really, really want to play here.

Also as it stands right now..it doesn't look like the Knicks have any shot at trading for him unless Denver proposes something. So far it looks like they're still trying to keep Melo. For now, regardless of whether anyone thinks it's better to trade for him or sign him as an FA, doesn't it look to you like the latter is the only option available to the Knicks right now?

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/29/2010  3:01 PM
Paladin55 wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:We NEED Carmelo. This team is stuck in purgatory at the moment.

Not good enough to go deep in the playoffs and not bad enough to get a high lottery pick.

Amare needs help to for us to get to the next level.

People are looking at what is happening in Miami, I would think. Would Melo coming to the Knicks be a "subtraction by addition" situation, which may be what has happened in Miami? Would he fit in with Felton and Amare?

I'm not sure how he would fit in (things could turn out fine), but there is no guarantee that his addition to the team will be smooth.

Personally, I would rather have a 25 yr. old Ray Allen type player on this team- the kind of player who does not have to dominate the ball to be effective- than Melo, who may be a rhythm scorer who needs the ball a certain percentage of the time to be effective.

MDA coached him in the Olympics...wonder what his feelings are about him?

Paladdin, i think you make fair points as usual, but what 25 yo Ray Allen type player can we realistically get our hands on? is OJ Mayo a guy that can fill that role, & is he even available? is there another guy out there that comes close to filling that type of role?

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
11/29/2010  3:04 PM
TMS wrote:
Paladin55 wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:We NEED Carmelo. This team is stuck in purgatory at the moment.

Not good enough to go deep in the playoffs and not bad enough to get a high lottery pick.

Amare needs help to for us to get to the next level.

People are looking at what is happening in Miami, I would think. Would Melo coming to the Knicks be a "subtraction by addition" situation, which may be what has happened in Miami? Would he fit in with Felton and Amare?

I'm not sure how he would fit in (things could turn out fine), but there is no guarantee that his addition to the team will be smooth.

Personally, I would rather have a 25 yr. old Ray Allen type player on this team- the kind of player who does not have to dominate the ball to be effective- than Melo, who may be a rhythm scorer who needs the ball a certain percentage of the time to be effective.

MDA coached him in the Olympics...wonder what his feelings are about him?

Paladdin, i think you make fair points as usual, but what 25 yo Ray Allen type player can we realistically get our hands on? is OJ Mayo a guy that can fill that role, & is he even available? is there another guy out there that comes close to filling that type of role?

Kevin Martin fits the bill but he's possibly injury prone, not that great on D, has a long term contract I think and doesn't appear to be available.

Kinda weird that not too many guys come out of HS/College with the ability to use screens off the ball to get free and score without pounding the ball looking for their shot that way.

Moving without the ball = a lost art in today's game?

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
Topic LOCKED
dont need dont want carmelo

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy