[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Should Knicks go after Jason Thompson


Author Poll
BRIGGS
Posts: 33275
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
I think they should and my bet is he is available and Im willing to pay a very fair price to get him.
Yes he would be a nice fit @ 6-11 250 to play as a third big
No Mosgov and or Randolph needs those minutes
View Results


Author Thread
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
11/22/2010  8:20 PM
Thompson is on his rookie contract so the salary isn't a concern. He might be tradeable straight up for Randolph or Gallo as they were all drafted in the lottery that year. I believe Thomas was picked 10th and Randolph 12th.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/22/2010  8:22 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/22/2010  8:22 PM
Ira wrote:Jason Thompson is a good overall player. He can score, play d and board. He's not great at any one thing, but does most things well. As a backup at center and pf, he'd be a good fit.

unless we're talking about a Mozgov/Azabuike trade to get him, i wouldn't do it... i don't give up AR for Jason Thompson, i think AR has a bigger upside & he's 3 years younger.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38414
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
11/22/2010  8:26 PM
Don't know much about the kid. Looked at his youtube highligts and was not impressed. I would rather have AR or use AR in a bigger trade.
ATrain
Posts: 21487
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2010
Member: #3192

11/22/2010  8:57 PM
I'd rather have Thompson than AR.
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
11/22/2010  8:58 PM
Who wants to bet BRIGGS will make a "Time to trade Jason Thompson" thread one month after acquiring him?
"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

11/22/2010  9:42 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:Who wants to bet BRIGGS will make a "Time to trade Jason Thompson" thread one month after acquiring him?

Cruel...very cruel.

You know Briggs is a stocks guy, and always looking to make a profit, build a portfolio, unload an underperforming company, or discover the next big thing- he's just translating this to basketball.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/22/2010  9:58 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:Who wants to bet BRIGGS will make a "Time to trade Jason Thompson" thread one month after acquiring him?

If MDA wont play Randolph and if the Knicks are unwilling or cannot send him to the D league to play--then what value does he have to the team? We need a third big who can play without question. Certainly there are other players out there but in terms of bigs who are proven and cheap--the list is smallish.

RIP Crushalot😞
GustavBahler
Posts: 42838
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

11/22/2010  10:03 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:Who wants to bet BRIGGS will make a "Time to trade Jason Thompson" thread one month after acquiring him?

If MDA wont play Randolph and if the Knicks are unwilling or cannot send him to the D league to play--then what value does he have to the team? We need a third big who can play without question. Certainly there are other players out there but in terms of bigs who are proven and cheap--the list is smallish.

I understand where you're coming from but its still too early to tell if AR can fit in with this squad. I'm hoping that with this new found commitment to playing uptempo that AR will start to get more burn.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/22/2010  10:17 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/22/2010  10:17 PM
Paladin55 wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:Who wants to bet BRIGGS will make a "Time to trade Jason Thompson" thread one month after acquiring him?

Cruel...very cruel.

You know Briggs is a stocks guy, and always looking to make a profit, build a portfolio, unload an underperforming company, or discover the next big thing- he's just translating this to basketball.

is buying high & selling low a good stock strategy?

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Elite
Posts: 26372
Alba Posts: 23
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510

11/22/2010  10:49 PM
last year I watched Jason Thompson for like 3-4 games cuz I had him on my fantasy team... I have to admit I LOVED his game.. hes so active.. he does great things out there on the floor... I would love to have him on this team.. but at what cost?
alexs
Posts: 20143
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2007
Member: #1262
Kenya
11/23/2010  6:29 AM
Not enough of an upgrade I think, just sitting it out for a while could be a much better strategy, especially AR should come along, too talented not to get it at a certain point in time.
Ira
Posts: 24688
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
11/23/2010  6:54 AM
TMS wrote:
Ira wrote:Jason Thompson is a good overall player. He can score, play d and board. He's not great at any one thing, but does most things well. As a backup at center and pf, he'd be a good fit.

unless we're talking about a Mozgov/Azabuike trade to get him, i wouldn't do it... i don't give up AR for Jason Thompson, i think AR has a bigger upside & he's 3 years younger.

I agree that AR, on the surface, has bigger upside. But two things bother me about him. One is that he's an injury waiting to happen, so I think it makes sense to trade him while he's healthy. The other is that he doesn't play smart. I like his size, quickness and athleticism, but when I see him on the court, I'm not impressed with his game.

fishmike
Posts: 53846
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/23/2010  7:39 AM
crzymdups wrote:anyone who thinks that Chris Paul is available right now is straight bananas.
yea.. like we should trade for Blake Griffin to play center next to Amare. It just silly.

To me there is a philisophical question here. Are we close enough to winning or being a certain level of team where it makes sense to trade for inferior talent to get a piece that might fit better? I dont think we are there yet.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
alexs
Posts: 20143
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2007
Member: #1262
Kenya
11/23/2010  7:42 AM
To me there is a philisophical question here. Are we close enough to winning or being a certain level of team where it makes sense to trade for inferior talent to get a piece that might fit better? I dont think we are there yet.

You're right fish, we're not there (at all)

Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

11/23/2010  9:23 AM
alexs wrote:
To me there is a philisophical question here. Are we close enough to winning or being a certain level of team where it makes sense to trade for inferior talent to get a piece that might fit better? I dont think we are there yet.

You're right fish, we're not there (at all)

If you can pick up a serviceable player who is seemingly out of favor with his team, and whose value is dropping day by day, you pick him up if the cost is minimal, especially if you took a look at him in a workout and liked him(did we?), the year he was drafted.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/23/2010  10:59 AM
alexs wrote:Not enough of an upgrade I think, just sitting it out for a while could be a much better strategy, especially AR should come along, too talented not to get it at a certain point in time.

We have an MVP type post player we have a 20+ point wing we have a top 10 PG we have a top3 6th man we haev a defensive big who brings a ton of energy and toughness we have a 6-7 do everything wing who has played very well on both sides of the ball--what we need is a third skilled big--we see how thin we are when Turiaf goes down. This team has many of the needed parts to bve a big time team now--just need to fill in the blanks. If Gallo keeps up the 20-24 pts--there are so many shots to go around. we could use a guy who could give us 12-8 and hopefully azu comes back--that would upgrade the team. If I could get Thompson for as cheap as possible I would but I think its going to take an AR type deal--whats better getting 0 value or helping this team win now without disrupting FA, and for the right big deal--I would easily disrupt FA. I just think Thompson is the cheap way to improve.

The goal is to win--no team is that great in the east if we are able to load up a bit more.

RIP Crushalot😞
fishmike
Posts: 53846
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/23/2010  12:09 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
alexs wrote:Not enough of an upgrade I think, just sitting it out for a while could be a much better strategy, especially AR should come along, too talented not to get it at a certain point in time.

We have an MVP type post player we have a 20+ point wing we have a top 10 PG we have a top3 6th man we haev a defensive big who brings a ton of energy and toughness we have a 6-7 do everything wing who has played very well on both sides of the ball--what we need is a third skilled big--we see how thin we are when Turiaf goes down. This team has many of the needed parts to bve a big time team now--just need to fill in the blanks. If Gallo keeps up the 20-24 pts--there are so many shots to go around. we could use a guy who could give us 12-8 and hopefully azu comes back--that would upgrade the team. If I could get Thompson for as cheap as possible I would but I think its going to take an AR type deal--whats better getting 0 value or helping this team win now without disrupting FA, and for the right big deal--I would easily disrupt FA. I just think Thompson is the cheap way to improve.

The goal is to win--no team is that great in the east if we are able to load up a bit more.

Briggs, as a fan I would love to agree. But collectively Gallo, Chandler, Felton, Fields and Turiaf (the pieces you mention) have done VERY LITTLE at the NBA level to prove that we are as close as you think we are. I want to see 40-50 games with that group. A 45 win team (.550 winning %) is your good, but non elite NBA team

If we are 28-22 (.55) after 50 games (right about the trade deadline) then I am on board. If we are winning the games winning teams are "supposed" to win. If we are winning some games against the good teams in the NBA then OK. This team shows promise. BUT... There still seem to be a lot of holes in this team and its not clear where they are. We just lost 6 in a row and a lot of those teams were awful. We are doing some things better, but mostly Gallo is beasting and Felton's role seems to have been adjusted and its working out great.

I need to see more before I trade my prospects for guys who will be NBA carreer role players. At one point AR was the guy you wanted to see start at center. Maybe he's the missing piece. Maybe its Mosgov. Time will tell... cant speed up time.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/23/2010  5:11 PM
fishmike wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
alexs wrote:Not enough of an upgrade I think, just sitting it out for a while could be a much better strategy, especially AR should come along, too talented not to get it at a certain point in time.

We have an MVP type post player we have a 20+ point wing we have a top 10 PG we have a top3 6th man we haev a defensive big who brings a ton of energy and toughness we have a 6-7 do everything wing who has played very well on both sides of the ball--what we need is a third skilled big--we see how thin we are when Turiaf goes down. This team has many of the needed parts to bve a big time team now--just need to fill in the blanks. If Gallo keeps up the 20-24 pts--there are so many shots to go around. we could use a guy who could give us 12-8 and hopefully azu comes back--that would upgrade the team. If I could get Thompson for as cheap as possible I would but I think its going to take an AR type deal--whats better getting 0 value or helping this team win now without disrupting FA, and for the right big deal--I would easily disrupt FA. I just think Thompson is the cheap way to improve.

The goal is to win--no team is that great in the east if we are able to load up a bit more.

Briggs, as a fan I would love to agree. But collectively Gallo, Chandler, Felton, Fields and Turiaf (the pieces you mention) have done VERY LITTLE at the NBA level to prove that we are as close as you think we are. I want to see 40-50 games with that group. A 45 win team (.550 winning %) is your good, but non elite NBA team

If we are 28-22 (.55) after 50 games (right about the trade deadline) then I am on board. If we are winning the games winning teams are "supposed" to win. If we are winning some games against the good teams in the NBA then OK. This team shows promise. BUT... There still seem to be a lot of holes in this team and its not clear where they are. We just lost 6 in a row and a lot of those teams were awful. We are doing some things better, but mostly Gallo is beasting and Felton's role seems to have been adjusted and its working out great.

I need to see more before I trade my prospects for guys who will be NBA carreer role players. At one point AR was the guy you wanted to see start at center. Maybe he's the missing piece. Maybe its Mosgov. Time will tell... cant speed up time.

Fishmike--go tell me the records of the last 25 teams with a guy who won the MVP. If Amare stays at his current level(game picked up--he will be in the running) When you have an NBA MVP caliber player a legit 20 pt wing scorer a legit top 10 PG a legit top 3 6th man a solid back up defender at C I mean we haev some serious pieces--when you have that--its win now my friend--win baby win--there is no defeatist attitude. I feel Gallo is here to stay now where he is at skill wise and that gives us a big 3 with more of a team concept. The time to win is today.

RIP Crushalot😞
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/24/2010  3:08 AM
Ira wrote:
TMS wrote:
Ira wrote:Jason Thompson is a good overall player. He can score, play d and board. He's not great at any one thing, but does most things well. As a backup at center and pf, he'd be a good fit.

unless we're talking about a Mozgov/Azabuike trade to get him, i wouldn't do it... i don't give up AR for Jason Thompson, i think AR has a bigger upside & he's 3 years younger.

I agree that AR, on the surface, has bigger upside. But two things bother me about him. One is that he's an injury waiting to happen, so I think it makes sense to trade him while he's healthy. The other is that he doesn't play smart. I like his size, quickness and athleticism, but when I see him on the court, I'm not impressed with his game.

i have no problem whatsoever in trading AR, but for a proven player that will make a real impact... Jason Thompson won't make that much of a difference IMO.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Should Knicks go after Jason Thompson

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy