Ira wrote:

VDesai wrote:

93BUICK wrote:What about Amare on the 5 year max as is reported, and using Lee for S%T w the Cavs instead so Lebron gets the 6th yr and Cleveland a good player? Wouldn't the Cavs rather get something than nothing? Lee is a low risk investment with a great attitude for a small market team. Byron Scott would like him. Then Lee gets his 6th yr too.

If the Cavs lose Lebron they should blow it up because David Lee @ long term dollars does nothing for them. Also David Lee needs to agree and why would he want to go play with Jamison and the mommylover...

Lee might do it for the $$$$. He'll get more that way. For the Cavs, it gives them a good player - still young to start the rebuilding process.

He can get the same money on a better team. If you're losing Lebron you tear it up, you can't bandage much with David Lee and Antoine Jamsion as your best players.