kam77 wrote:Paladin55 wrote:Solace wrote:I have to agree with you, Paladin. After what happened with Izzo, I think that's a good sign that no matter what happens, James is probably not going back to Cleveland. He didn't want to be involved with anything of the Izzo situation, because he didn't want to risk leading the Cavs on, so to speak.
For a guy who cares about his image, this is significant, because to be seen as "leading the Cavs on" instantly turns James, the local boy who made good, into a "bad guy" in the eyes of his home state.
On the contrary, landing Izzo for the CAVS could have been LeBron's last gift to Cleveland. Do you think they will find a better coach if LeBron leaves?
... a gift that was not going to happen, though, without a certain promise from James to Izzo. If Izzo was to be Lebron's "parting gift" to Cleveland, James surely did not anticipate that there were going to be some strings attached. Looking at it now, Izzo was obviously not going to become the Cavs' coach if Lebron did not give him some kind of sign that he was staying in Cleveland, and James, obviously, could not assure Izzo that he was staying, to the point where he would not even meet with him.
You might hypothesize that James deliberately chose to distance himself from Izzo, in an attempt to block him from becoming the Cav's coach, even though he had made some positive comments about him in the press, but I simply cannot believe that Cleveland would pursue Izzo if they did not think Lebron was on board with their choice of a new coach- in fact you would think that trying to sign Izzo was an attempt to get Lebron to think about staying.
For me the Izzo incident good news for us and not so good for the Cavs.
No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee