EwingsGlass wrote:

TMS wrote:

crzymdups wrote:

TMS wrote:i'd rather have Collison & OK4 than Al Jefferson

agreed.

i don't buy that they move Collison for that little though.

i don't buy it either... just saying.

i think we'd have to include Gallo in any deal to get Collison personally.

It has to be true. I mean, they gave up Ty Chandler (although not amazing in any sense, far superior to Curry in talent and ability to stay on the court (still not saying much)-- and Chandler had a similar contract to Curry. To think they would give up OK4 and Collison to get a player inferior to Ty Chandler does not make sense to me. You can say that was then, this is now-- but I still don't understand it.

Not sure they would do it either, but the real issue for them is getting rid of OK4's contract (4 more years), and the cost is Collison, who duplicates the abilities of your best player, Paul, who happens to be under contract for 3 more years, and is only 2 years older than Collison.

Curry as an expiring is important, as a player...not so important. You (NO) have some cap flexibility after next season- maybe you look at Anthony if he opts out of Denver, pick up a serviceable big man, resign Thornton, and have more ability to be creative if you intend to keep West.

The trade scenario is not as crazy as it seems.

wow. would minny be willing to give up the player they traded kg for for an expiring??