Pharzeone wrote:Caption Pic

I wheeeeeeel break you if you do not stop screaming.

Pharzeone wrote:Caption Pic

*fartsss* mi scusi....

Juice wrote:Nahhhh you take Wesley Johnson

agree... personally i'd take Favors at 3 if i were the Nets but if they think Yi can do the job next year, then Wesley Johnson would be my pick.

EnySpree wrote:

Juice wrote:Nahhhh you take Wesley Johnson

Terence Williams emerged down the stretch of the season...he's their answer at SF. Briggs makes sense with the Monroe idea. Nets need a big man. It really depends on who they can sign....that person might very well be David Lee.

Holy shot....would the Nets trade that pick to get David Lee???

I wanted us to draft T-Will or Clark BTW

The same T-Will BRIGGS stated wouldn't amount to much in the NBA. T-Will is a facilitator, so much so the Nets may consider trading Harris as Thorn has already admitted

"We have been fielding calls on Devin, I'm not going to lie about it."

That being said You make T-Will become the point forward and slide Johnson over to the 3. Sign Free Agents to fill in other holes. I love how Kinck fans like to point out supposed redundancy on a team when look at the Lakers? Look at our very own Knicks.

WesJo is like Grant Hill and Shawn Marion rolled into one player. T-Will is like a poor man's Lebron/Vince Carter. Lebron and Grant Hill definitely could have played together.

You draft BPA if you are the Nets because for the most part they have positions filled.

I like Greg Monroe but like many have concerns over he's like a Paul Milsap type good player, nice skillset, adds depth to a team, but he isn't a player who looks to dominate or has enough of a mean streak to his game. I was high on him last year and still would take him but he didn't show enough growth from this year compared to last year.

Why would the Nets trade the pick when they can sign Lee outright if they want him?

TMS wrote:

Juice wrote:Nahhhh you take Wesley Johnson

agree... personally i'd take Favors at 3 if i were the Nets but if they think Yi can do the job next year, then Wesley Johnson would be my pick.

I agree. I think....LOL..I mean Brook Lopez, Yi and now Greg Monroe? I don't know man, sounds like an awful lot of finesse types with that mix. That was my first reaction yesterday..I think they'd be better off with a no-nonsense type of big like a Derrick Favors myself. Greg Monroe is very talented though -- didn't mean to shortchange him yesterday...And they still have Josh Boone around to bang and supply physicality & interior D....Tough call. When you get right down to it, they'd be improved with either guy. I wouldn't be surprised if they considered taking Whiteside at 3, even with Lopez...

Juice wrote:

EnySpree wrote:

Juice wrote:Nahhhh you take Wesley Johnson

Terence Williams emerged down the stretch of the season...he's their answer at SF. Briggs makes sense with the Monroe idea. Nets need a big man. It really depends on who they can sign....that person might very well be David Lee.

Holy shot....would the Nets trade that pick to get David Lee???

I wanted us to draft T-Will or Clark BTW

The same T-Will BRIGGS stated wouldn't amount to much in the NBA. T-Will is a facilitator, so much so the Nets may consider trading Harris as Thorn has already admitted

"We have been fielding calls on Devin, I'm not going to lie about it."

That being said You make T-Will become the point forward and slide Johnson over to the 3. Sign Free Agents to fill in other holes. I love how Kinck fans like to point out supposed redundancy on a team when look at the Lakers? Look at our very own Knicks.

WesJo is like Grant Hill and Shawn Marion rolled into one player. T-Will is like a poor man's Lebron/Vince Carter. Lebron and Grant Hill definitely could have played together.

You draft BPA if you are the Nets because for the most part they have positions filled.

I like Greg Monroe but like many have concerns over he's like a Paul Milsap type good player, nice skillset, adds depth to a team, but he isn't a player who looks to dominate or has enough of a mean streak to his game. I was high on him last year and still would take him but he didn't show enough growth from this year compared to last year.

Why would the Nets trade the pick when they can sign Lee outright if they want him?

T will had a great ending to what was a very porous start[on many teams he wouldve lost that opportunity]. I would tend to agree that he should be given the chance to stick and see if he can be consistent. I think however I was much closer to what I thought Steph Curry was than what you thought T will is.

sebstar wrote:Monroe, Favors, and Cousins have busts written all over them.

No way--I think when you find a 6-10 250 pound player like Monroe who is as skilled as he is--and who showed the toughness that he was lacking--he's no bust--he's got player written all over him. He's from G Town he's got a high character. I would always prefer 7-1 260:) but they already have that. Monroe at over 6-10 is perfect for the Nets.

AnubisADL wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

sebstar wrote:Monroe, Favors, and Cousins have busts written all over them.

No way--I think when you find a 6-10 250 pound player like Monroe who is as skilled as he is--and who showed the toughness that he was lacking--he's no bust--he's got player written all over him. He's from G Town he's got a high character. I would always prefer 7-1 260:) but they already have that. Monroe at over 6-10 is perfect for the Nets.

Monroe and Lopez would be the most nonathletic front court in the NBA.

I don't think so but every time I think of someone saying that with any team I think of Bird Mchale Parrish. Skill size and talent always rule