[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

wow... Lakers smoke Suns last night, shoot 58%
Author Thread
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
5/18/2010  3:10 PM
fishmike wrote:
djsunyc wrote:
fishmike wrote:
djsunyc wrote:alvin gentry has the team in the same round as d'antoni.

so either gentry is just as good, if not better than d'antoni or nash is truly an all time great regardless of coach.

Does this apply to JVG and Riley and the Knicks? Same logic

i do stipulate that if a coach can win in multiple spots, then it's different. riley is great as coaches didn't win as much with ewing and he also built the heat into a good team. van gundy you can debate but his work with an injured rockets team say yes.

he did everything Riley did with the Knicks and beat Riley in several head to head matchups in the playoffs.

Yet, he failed to get out of the first without Ewing and facing Riley in a series. There is something to it. The fact that his most successful run came using guys that he did not want (Spree came off the bench for the season and Camby barely played) says that he was more along for the ride in many cases. I think that a main reason why he's been without a NBA job for awhile.

I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
AUTOADVERT
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/18/2010  3:39 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
djsunyc wrote:alvin gentry has the team in the same round as d'antoni.

so either gentry is just as good, if not better than d'antoni or nash is truly an all time great regardless of coach.

Oh yeah nash has everythng to do with the success of both Gentry and MDA, just like KOBE and MJ keep making phil look like a genius...Isn't all about the talent...

Like I said if you're on a slow horse you have no chance. Put a great horse in the hands of a great jockey and he could win a triple crown. The coach is there to prod and guide the talent. If you don't have the talent it's much harder for a coach to do something good. Just ask LB or any of our other coaches. You've got to build with the best ingredients and they have to make sense together. That's what DW is about to do.

Djsunyc, the Idea that Bell and Marion were the reasons that MDA had a better defense than Gentry is obviously missing the fact that Gentry has more size than MDA had and supposedly a more focused Amare. Let's just face the facts the Suns aren't really built as a defensive juggernaut. Even with the additions Kerr and company have made the teams is still weak up the middle so long as Nash and Amare are in there. Lopex and Frye don't really scare anyone.

Here we want to put together a better core of naturally gifted 2 way players. Gallo, Chan & TD can defend and proved that this year. Not the greatest, but when you start to put together a group that can get stops you need your skill people to be able to hold their own. Now Add Lebron, Bosh and a shotblocker like Tyrus or Brendan Haywood and you could have something pretty strong.

martin
Posts: 76381
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
5/18/2010  3:40 PM
sebstar wrote:
Nalod wrote:
sebstar wrote:
fishmike wrote:No D from the Suns. Obviously DAntoni's fault.

Just sayin

Wait, wasn't your diva tryin to take credit for the Suns success? Didnt he, and his groupies, feel so "vindicated" and the like?

What happened? Abandon ship when the pressure gets a lil tight?

IM thinking the FishMike was being sarcastic.........

Sarcastic about what?

The Diva was the one that made the effort to attach himself to the recent success of the Suns and many around here enthusiastically co-signed him. Now they get mashed on and ya'll want to laugh off any perceived D'Antoni/Suns association or influence. Cant have it both ways.

Win or lose, he doesnt have jack shyt to do with the Suns.

you must be referring to this quote by MDA:

"It's Alvin's way, too, but what it does is gives me more confidence that you can win that way," D'Antoni said. "I'm not gloating or taking credit because Alvin's done a great job, but I'm happy for them and it makes me feel good about the system."

Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/knicks/antoni_already_busting_at_seams_JzyZepXylmpgx5CX0taojL

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Olbrannon
Posts: 21913
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/2/2009
Member: #2919
USA
5/18/2010  5:31 PM
Well...if the Suns get swept...it does not bode well for the future.
Bill Simmons on Tyreke Evans "The prototypical 0-guard: Someone who handles the ball all the time, looks for his own shot, gets to the rim at will and operates best if his teammates spread the floor to watch him."
eymyel827
Posts: 20238
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/9/2004
Member: #694
USA
5/18/2010  5:55 PM
I think the Lakers would cruise thru the Finals. The league wants Lakers and Celtics. No way The Suns beat the Lakers. The refs are briefed on this alrady
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
5/18/2010  6:08 PM
If the suns get swept it's surly not becuase the suns system, there over match in the front court by far..and the lakers have the best player on the planet, the 2nd best(gasol) big man in the league, and the most versitle (odom) player in the NBA..
ES
Olbrannon
Posts: 21913
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/2/2009
Member: #2919
USA
5/18/2010  6:31 PM
knicks1248 wrote:If the suns get swept it's surly not becuase the suns system, there over match in the front court by far..and the lakers have the best player on the planet, the 2nd best(gasol) big man in the league, and the most versitle (odom) player in the NBA..

You nissed the point by a mile. 'Smallball' or the '7 seconds or less' offense is predicated on speed which bigs don't usually possess. And is therefor supposed to neutralise the need for the traditional bigs. Your point about Kobe not withstanding.

I say again if since D'Antoni says the Suns validate his belief in his 'system' ...if the Lakers sweep the future does not bode well for the Knicks with him as coach. You cannot have it both ways.

If the margin is small you do have a valid argument perhaps. But 30+ point blowouts ....

Bill Simmons on Tyreke Evans "The prototypical 0-guard: Someone who handles the ball all the time, looks for his own shot, gets to the rim at will and operates best if his teammates spread the floor to watch him."
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
5/18/2010  6:37 PM
considering gasol and odom are not your typical slow footed big men, i think i make a good case.
ES
Olbrannon
Posts: 21913
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/2/2009
Member: #2919
USA
5/18/2010  6:40 PM
knicks1248 wrote:considering gasol and odom are not your typical slow footed big men, i think i make a good case.

Perhaps...still until speedball actually can get the ring...it is unproven theory. Not saying you cannot field a winning team...
but the evidence says not an NBA championship.

Bill Simmons on Tyreke Evans "The prototypical 0-guard: Someone who handles the ball all the time, looks for his own shot, gets to the rim at will and operates best if his teammates spread the floor to watch him."
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

5/18/2010  6:53 PM
djsunyc wrote:
fishmike wrote:
djsunyc wrote:alvin gentry has the team in the same round as d'antoni.

so either gentry is just as good, if not better than d'antoni or nash is truly an all time great regardless of coach.

Does this apply to JVG and Riley and the Knicks? Same logic

i do stipulate that if a coach can win in multiple spots, then it's different. riley is great as coaches didn't win as much with ewing and he also built the heat into a good team. van gundy you can debate but his work with an injured rockets team say yes.

Riley didn't build the heat (as a coach), SVG did. Riley stepped in to take credit for it.

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/18/2010  7:18 PM
The reason why MDA even looked at the system that he has is because MOST teams will fall short in comparison to a team like the Lakers. It's so hard to find even one good big, much less to have an abundance of them. This has been the case in the expanded league for years now. Thus you have to find a way to maximize a smaller teams effectiveness and in that regard no one has been more successful in finding a way to somewhat balance that than MDA!

When you think about it his system has been able to find success with smaller lineups on a more consistent basis. You still need good players but if you can find good players but can't find a top Big, which most teams don't have, then this is a style of play that has gotten to the Conference finals several times now. Of course if you had to chose, you'd want the more traditional team, but HOW in the world do you build a team with a franchise quality C when there are so few? This is a practical means of building a title contender without one. You put a top player like Lebron in this system and you may be able to succeed where they failed in the past. You just might make the finals and win with a great player like Lebron in this system.

wow... Lakers smoke Suns last night, shoot 58%

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy