[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

the biggest issue I see with keeping MDA as the coach is
Author Thread
martin
Posts: 76381
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
5/15/2010  1:04 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
martin wrote:
TMS wrote:
Moonangie wrote:
TMS wrote:the biggest issue is that this team will never be a good defensive team as long as he's our head coach.

Hogwash. We had games THIS YEAR where we played outstanding defense. I agree that MDA isn't going to "teach" defense or coach it from the sidelines. But that hardly means he doesn't care about it. Defense is much more about heart than finesse/skill. You have to be motivated to win in order to play solid D, but it's not rocket science. It requires hustle, tenacity, exertion. These things are hard to muster up when your team of cast-offs sucks and the whole roster is subject to turnover. Get a solid core and a steady rotation with a couple of superstars and MDAs team will play terrific defense because they will be MOTIVATED to win.

It's time to stop scapegoating MDA for our current state of suckiness. This season and last was part of Donnie's plan to rebuild our team. MDA will shine as a head coach once given a roster that can contend. And they will certainly play solid D. They won't be at the Celtics/Lakers level in the first year, but they will bring the required intensity to stop the other team from scoring at will.

please name me one team MDA has coached that played consistent tough gritty defense.

one can say that MDA coached to his players' strengths. Name some players on his teams that were defensive minded.


Every player wants to score, to be Mike, to be Kobe, Dr.J etc scoring is a personal victory. Defense is a team mentality. It is the blue collar portion of basketball. It isn't glamorous but it is neccessary for a team to win. Getting a group of guys to buy into a team mentality where tough defense is played for team goals is part of a good coaches job. Scouting, preparing your team to play defense and take away teams strengths is not glamorous for a coach but it is what successful and championship coaches do. D'Antoni was blessed with one of the most talented distributors in basketball during the winning portion of his tenure in Phoenix. In my opinion he has parlayed his time with Nash into a second big paycheck that he will never live up to. D'Antoni doesn't scout and he doesn't coach defense. Opposing coaches have been quoted as saying that they changed their offense but it wouldn't matter because D'Antoni doesn't scout or prepare for opposing teams so his team would not be ready for their adjustments.

did you even try to answer my question?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
AUTOADVERT
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
5/15/2010  1:25 AM
I did. If I wasn't clear my point was that defense is a team mentality and the coach has to emphasize it. MDA didn't do that. He did have some guys credited as being good defensive players but that was self-motivation. When the Knicks were winning in the 90's they focused on defense and conditioning. In rebuilding they have hired a coach that doesn't want to teach, play rookies, or play defense. Marion and Bell were are both considered excellent defenders.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
martin
Posts: 76381
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
5/15/2010  11:59 AM
CrushAlot wrote:I did. If I wasn't clear my point was that defense is a team mentality and the coach has to emphasize it. MDA didn't do that. He did have some guys credited as being good defensive players but that was self-motivation. When the Knicks were winning in the 90's they focused on defense and conditioning. In rebuilding they have hired a coach that doesn't want to teach, play rookies, or play defense. Marion and Bell were are both considered excellent defenders.

2 of the 5 were decent defenders. Raja is still undersized at his position while Marion can be considered big. Meanwhile, Nash, Amare and caca at center are below average defenders.

Also, their main nemesis throughout this whole time has players that are exactly at the positions that are against their weakest link: The Spurs with Duncan and LA Lakers with Shaq and Kobe.

This is a question that I posed to Marv a while back: If Riley was such a genius on the offensive end when at the Lakers, why couldn't he produce a better offensive team with the Knicks during the 90s? That was their Achilles heal, the offense. Or was it such that they just ran into better teams all-around (mainly the Bulls)?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
5/15/2010  12:33 PM
martin wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:I did. If I wasn't clear my point was that defense is a team mentality and the coach has to emphasize it. MDA didn't do that. He did have some guys credited as being good defensive players but that was self-motivation. When the Knicks were winning in the 90's they focused on defense and conditioning. In rebuilding they have hired a coach that doesn't want to teach, play rookies, or play defense. Marion and Bell were are both considered excellent defenders.

2 of the 5 were decent defenders. Raja is still undersized at his position while Marion can be considered big. Meanwhile, Nash, Amare and caca at center are below average defenders.

Also, their main nemesis throughout this whole time has players that are exactly at the positions that are against their weakest link: The Spurs with Duncan and LA Lakers with Shaq and Kobe.

This is a question that I posed to Marv a while back: If Riley was such a genius on the offensive end when at the Lakers, why couldn't he produce a better offensive team with the Knicks during the 90s? That was their Achilles heal, the offense. Or was it such that they just ran into better teams all-around (mainly the Bulls)?

I think Riley coached to his team and players strengths. I don't think D'Antoni is willing change.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
martin
Posts: 76381
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
5/15/2010  12:43 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
martin wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:I did. If I wasn't clear my point was that defense is a team mentality and the coach has to emphasize it. MDA didn't do that. He did have some guys credited as being good defensive players but that was self-motivation. When the Knicks were winning in the 90's they focused on defense and conditioning. In rebuilding they have hired a coach that doesn't want to teach, play rookies, or play defense. Marion and Bell were are both considered excellent defenders.

2 of the 5 were decent defenders. Raja is still undersized at his position while Marion can be considered big. Meanwhile, Nash, Amare and caca at center are below average defenders.

Also, their main nemesis throughout this whole time has players that are exactly at the positions that are against their weakest link: The Spurs with Duncan and LA Lakers with Shaq and Kobe.

This is a question that I posed to Marv a while back: If Riley was such a genius on the offensive end when at the Lakers, why couldn't he produce a better offensive team with the Knicks during the 90s? That was their Achilles heal, the offense. Or was it such that they just ran into better teams all-around (mainly the Bulls)?

I think Riley coached to his team and players strengths. I don't think D'Antoni is willing change.

well, what was my first response? "one can say that MDA coached to his players' strengths."

Generally speaking, as funs, we have seen MDA coach 1 team - this Knicks version is caca and no one can tell anything (and if you can, it is that after 10 games MDA slowed the game down and inserted defensive minded JJ into the lineup) - and he prob coached that team (PHO) to its strengths.

I am a bit surprised that no one has done any looking into what MDA did over in Europe. He was a starting and all-staring PG for championship teams and then a championship coach. I have no idea if it was a level playing field or what, but I kind of assume that defense was a big part of what he did over there and he knows it, otherwise he prob would not have won.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/16/2010  7:33 PM
martin wrote:
TMS wrote:
Moonangie wrote:
TMS wrote:the biggest issue is that this team will never be a good defensive team as long as he's our head coach.

Hogwash. We had games THIS YEAR where we played outstanding defense. I agree that MDA isn't going to "teach" defense or coach it from the sidelines. But that hardly means he doesn't care about it. Defense is much more about heart than finesse/skill. You have to be motivated to win in order to play solid D, but it's not rocket science. It requires hustle, tenacity, exertion. These things are hard to muster up when your team of cast-offs sucks and the whole roster is subject to turnover. Get a solid core and a steady rotation with a couple of superstars and MDAs team will play terrific defense because they will be MOTIVATED to win.

It's time to stop scapegoating MDA for our current state of suckiness. This season and last was part of Donnie's plan to rebuild our team. MDA will shine as a head coach once given a roster that can contend. And they will certainly play solid D. They won't be at the Celtics/Lakers level in the first year, but they will bring the required intensity to stop the other team from scoring at will.

please name me one team MDA has coached that played consistent tough gritty defense.

one can say that MDA coached to his players' strengths. Name some players on his teams that were defensive minded.

i don't agree... i think he coaches to HIS strengths, & that is the dedication & belief in his offensive minded system that it will net results... so far it has succeeded in regular season success but no championships to date... most NBA champions place much more emphasis on playing defense than MDA's teams traditionally do.

MDA has never shown a willingness & adaptability to completely change his system to suit the players on the roster the way a Pat Riley did for the Lakers, Knicks & Heat for example... yeah, he slowed down the pace a little this season because we had no able PG to run his SSOL system correctly, but there was still zero emphasis being placed on defense... it was essentially still a system where getting the ball & shooting the ball was the foundation to maximize possessions during the course of a game, it was not a defensive-centric philosophy, & historically none of his other teams ever had a defensive-mindset.

but to answer your question, Shawn Marion, Leandro Barbosa, Raja Bell, Boris Diaw, Jake Voskuhl, Steven Hunter, Bo Outlaw, Brian Grant, Kurt Thomas, Brian Skinner, Fishlips, Toney Douglas (who he refused to use until the season was essentially over), Larry Hughes (who he completely phased out of the system entirely even after the team had its best run of success this season with him a major part of the rotation) & Danilo Gallinari are a few of the defensive minded players he's coached over his tenure in Phoenix & NY... i won't even bother counting his stint in DEN but i'm sure you could probably add a few names to the list... even with personnel that are capable of playing defensive style basketball, he's consistently coached teams that were rated in the bottom 1/2 of the NBA while being offensively rated in the top few... he is an offensive minded coach... pure & simple.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
scoshin
Posts: 20584
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #568
5/16/2010  8:15 PM
I don't understand the notion that Mike's "system" can't win championships. I see no reason a 7SoL offensive system can't be successful in the playoffs. The problem is that you still have to play the other half of the game. Moreover, SSOL actually depends on good defense and turnovers to create offensive opportunities. You don't really get that when the other team scores a bucket and has time to find their man again. I don't think the problem is the system, it's more that D'Antoni's too much of a player's coach and doesn't make players accountable for defensive lapses. Did he yell at Lee once this year, for letting a player have an open lane to the hoop?

I'm pretty sure D'Antoni stresses defense. I can't think of any coach who wouldn't. This is the guy who started Raja Bell and Jared Jeffries on his teams.

I think the problem is that D'Antoni is of the mindset that a player is either a good defender or not. Thus he doesn't really preach defense, but rather puts players who are inately good defenders on the court, like Jeffries. As opposed to say a Larry Brown or Pat Riley or Jeff Van Gundy who believe every NBA athlete has the ability to play good defense, and gets players who used to be liabilities to put 110% effort and buy into a system.

fishmike
Posts: 53863
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
5/16/2010  8:46 PM
crzymdups wrote:fish, but last year you really thought eddy was going for 14ppg/6rpg/55%fg. book it, you said.
I meant this year. I swear
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/16/2010  9:19 PM
scoshin wrote:I don't understand the notion that Mike's "system" can't win championships. I see no reason a 7SoL offensive system can't be successful in the playoffs. The problem is that you still have to play the other half of the game. Moreover, SSOL actually depends on good defense and turnovers to create offensive opportunities. You don't really get that when the other team scores a bucket and has time to find their man again. I don't think the problem is the system, it's more that D'Antoni's too much of a player's coach and doesn't make players accountable for defensive lapses. Did he yell at Lee once this year, for letting a player have an open lane to the hoop?

I'm pretty sure D'Antoni stresses defense. I can't think of any coach who wouldn't. This is the guy who started Raja Bell and Jared Jeffries on his teams.

I think the problem is that D'Antoni is of the mindset that a player is either a good defender or not. Thus he doesn't really preach defense, but rather puts players who are inately good defenders on the court, like Jeffries. As opposed to say a Larry Brown or Pat Riley or Jeff Van Gundy who believe every NBA athlete has the ability to play good defense, and gets players who used to be liabilities to put 110% effort and buy into a system.

his system has never won a championship even with a stacked roster & league MVP... what reason do you have to think it can?

btw, i didn't say i don't think it can ever win a championship, just that i have no reason to think that it can, it's never been proven... most NBA teams that win championships play good team defense... this is not an opinion, it's fact.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
scoshin
Posts: 20584
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #568
5/16/2010  10:16 PM
My point was that his system concerns solely the offensive side of the ball. The triangle offense wasn't a proven winner until Phil Jackson made it a proven winner. Nothing in SSOL says you can't play good defense. In fact, great defense leads into better opportunities on the break. It's Mike D'Antoni, the coach, not the system, that doesn't have good defensive teams.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/16/2010  10:51 PM
yeah, that's why i said:

the biggest issue is that this team will never be a good defensive team as long as he's our head coach.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
the biggest issue I see with keeping MDA as the coach is

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy