martin wrote:s3231 wrote:I think a lot of people have this belief that LeBron and/or Bosh will just magically sign with the Knicks without us giving up any assets. I don't see that happening at all. If LeBron does come here, does everyone really think he is going to screw Cleveland over 100% and just come without a sign and trade? Say goodbye to at least Wilson Chandler, Bill Walker, etc. Which is why I was pretty concerned when Donnie put all of those assets in that Hill trade. Still, I'm hoping he must know something we don't to overpay to that degree.
I guess that would depend on your perspective.
All of the guys that are top tier are earning somewhere in the $13M+ per for at least 3 years. If all they want is the most amount of money in their contracts (near term winning championship, city, long term winning potential aside), they would stay with their current teams. Right? Cause they can offer the most. If it's the contract and the money they want, they could have signed long ago (if management indeed has offered). Kobe just signed, no reason LeBron couldn't have along with the rest. Perhaps Wade is the lone exception cause there is great uncertainly with that roster, but for the most part, each of the other guys - LeBron, Johnson, Amare, Dirk, Yao, Bosh - their teams (for all practical purposes) are pretty much locked in roster-wise.
So why haven't they signed extensions? Perhaps they are not 100% content with the championship potential (both short and long term) or just want change; the flip side is that they want to put pressure on management to upgrade roster (nearly impossible in most of the cases re my point above).
If there is a chance any of them want to move teams (and still want their new teams to be the best that they can), I don't know how or why they would want to entertain sign-and-trades that would drain their new team of young players (assets) or feel sorry for their old team VERSUS CONSIDERING just outright signing with their new team, especially with NY with their gobs of cap space. Like I said, if it's the long term money, just stay with your old team (but that hasn't happened). If it's for the potential of a better long term team, no reason to force your new team to give up players.
My premise and thinking is that most of these guys have already earned a butt-load of money and are more interested in the championship thing than outright maximizing money with next contract (which IMHO are a little bit contradictory except with Jordan, Kobe, Duncan situations).
Martin, I agree that if LeBron and Bosh decide to come to NY, nothing will stand in their way. But especially in LeBron's case, considering he grew up in Ohio, wouldn't you think that there would be more motivation to get a sign and trade done that would at least get Cleveland an asset or two while ensuring that he gets the most money possible? It's a win-win situation for both he and Cleveland. If LeBron comes here with Bosh, I don't think LeBron is going to feel that the Knicks giving up Chandler and Walker is depleting the roster. These guys are stars and like any stars, they have egos. If they both join forces and come to NY, they have to know that they can easily draw free agents to come to NY for the min that will probably be as effective as guys like Chandler.
That's just my opinion though, doesn't mean I believe I'm 100% right. If I was in their shoes though, I would probably try to get a sign and trade done if that was a viable option (which seems to be the case going by Colangelo's response).
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)