[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Brook Lopez... one rebound
Author Thread
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
3/26/2010  12:57 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:
kam77 wrote:Stiff Legs.

Gallo's entire body is stiff.....

TMI bro!

lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
AUTOADVERT
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/26/2010  5:12 PM
Lopez is very good. He also is very young, plays on a very young team that has had a ton of injuries. I think you could make a strong argument that he is the second or third best player out of that draft. He is averaging 19, 9 and almost 2 blocks a game. He is a legitimate center and he isn't even 23 years old yet.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

3/26/2010  5:52 PM
CrushAlot wrote:Lopez is very good. He also is very young, plays on a very young team that has had a ton of injuries. I think you could make a strong argument that he is the second or third best player out of that draft. He is averaging 19, 9 and almost 2 blocks a game. He is a legitimate center and he isn't even 23 years old yet.

Lopez has put up some nice numbers so far. I don't know what his ceiling is, but I look at him the same way I look at other 2nd year players- I forget the "every so often bad games," look at the good stuff he is doing, and watch how he is developing over an extended period of time. Young players are always going to have a few bad games for every good game.

I see this thread as a jab at the people around here have done the same kind of thing for guys like Gallo, TD, Hill, and even Chandler.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
Ira
Posts: 24691
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
3/26/2010  7:46 PM
Lopez is a nice player. I'd like to have him on the Knicks. But something about the guy makes me feel that he isn't going to improve a lot. I can't explain why.
rp
Posts: 20756
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2009
Member: #2965
USA
3/26/2010  10:23 PM
You can't take away what he does best just as a fan I hope they have better coaching with better philosophy to probably win lol
"Failure is only postponed success as long as courage coaches ambition. The habit of persistence is the habit of victory" -Herbert Kaufman
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/26/2010  10:26 PM
Lopez has 35 and 10 right now against the Pistons and he has been dominant. He also has passed well out of the post and double teams in the third and fourth quarter. I missed the first two quarters but he certainly looks like the real deal tonight and is just 22 years old.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
ramtour420
Posts: 26573
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 3/19/2007
Member: #1388
Russian Federation
3/26/2010  10:35 PM
I don't watch the Nets. Sry. From what I hear, Brook Lopez is a giant mechanical teddy bear. That gets good stats and has game. Will he develop some "nastytude" ? If he does that would be funny, and scary at the same time. . .
Everything you have ever wanted is on the other side of fear- George Adair
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/26/2010  10:37 PM
ramtour420 wrote:I don't watch the Nets. Sry. From what I hear, Brook Lopez is a giant mechanical teddy bear. That gets good stats and has game. Will he develop some "nastytude" ? If he does that would be funny, and scary at the same time. . .
You should watch them. I think you would have a different opinion.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
huskies01
Posts: 20027
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/21/2008
Member: #1841

3/26/2010  11:00 PM
37 and 10 for Lopez against the Pistons. How much semen would this message board will be filled with from some if Gallo even came close to a 30 point game?

Oh that's right. Brook Lopez has a "ceiling" which he has already reached at 21 years old and Gallo hasn't even though both are of the same age. That **** still kills me. Keep telling yourselves that Gallo is better. Maybe you might even believe it if you keep saying it over and over again.

Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
3/26/2010  11:09 PM
huskies01 wrote:37 and 10 for Lopez against the Pistons. How much semen would this message board will be filled with from some if Gallo even came close to a 30 point game?

Oh that's right. Brook Lopez has a "ceiling" which he has already reached at 21 years old and Gallo hasn't even though both are of the same age. That **** still kills me. Keep telling yourselves that Gallo is better. Maybe you might even believe it if you keep saying it over and over again.

Are you a Nets fan? Calm yourself fool. Gallo is a 21 year old European rookie. He barely played his first year due to injury. Lopez had an entire year to play at this level and work on his game. Gallo didn't. Lopez played the American game. Gallo didn't. End of story.

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/26/2010  11:17 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:
huskies01 wrote:37 and 10 for Lopez against the Pistons. How much semen would this message board will be filled with from some if Gallo even came close to a 30 point game?

Oh that's right. Brook Lopez has a "ceiling" which he has already reached at 21 years old and Gallo hasn't even though both are of the same age. That **** still kills me. Keep telling yourselves that Gallo is better. Maybe you might even believe it if you keep saying it over and over again.

Are you a Nets fan? Calm yourself fool. Gallo is a 21 year old European rookie. He barely played his first year due to injury. Lopez had an entire year to play at this level and work on his game. Gallo didn't. Lopez played the American game. Gallo didn't. End of story.

I watch the Nets whenever the Knicks aren't on and this was Lopez's 31st double double. You can't discount this guys talent, height or the position he plays.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
3/26/2010  11:21 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:
huskies01 wrote:37 and 10 for Lopez against the Pistons. How much semen would this message board will be filled with from some if Gallo even came close to a 30 point game?

Oh that's right. Brook Lopez has a "ceiling" which he has already reached at 21 years old and Gallo hasn't even though both are of the same age. That **** still kills me. Keep telling yourselves that Gallo is better. Maybe you might even believe it if you keep saying it over and over again.

Are you a Nets fan? Calm yourself fool. Gallo is a 21 year old European rookie. He barely played his first year due to injury. Lopez had an entire year to play at this level and work on his game. Gallo didn't. Lopez played the American game. Gallo didn't. End of story.

I watch the Nets whenever the Knicks aren't on and this was Lopez's 31st double double. You can't discount this guys talent, height or the position he plays.

I'm not discounting the guys' talent but I also don't appreciate some dude discounting Gallo's talent in the process.

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/27/2010  12:58 AM
To me Lopez is just a solid guy in a position that has almost NO COMPETITION!!! There are so few good C's anymore that if you're just OK, you'll get numbers. Gallo IMO is a budding star!!! This kid needs only to make some small adjustments in his approach to the game, grow into his body, which he's still growing and just got to the height he is now. Some guys like Lopez peak physically a lot earlier. Gallo is still on the rise physically. Lopez would be a great asset to have on any team, so it's not a put down to say that we like Gallo's potential better.

I think Gallo can win you games in the 4th qtr. When teams are packing it in, a slow footed guy like Lopez is gonna find it hard to get off and will have to pass it back out late in games. He strikes me as a perfect example of a middle of the game player. He'll get a lot of stats but won't impact the team in terms of wins. We saw how Gallo seemed to effect the way the Knicks played last year in a positive way. Not that he's a superstar, but he did have a positive effect. We'll see how they both develop over the next few years but I already see Gallo being a star. He's got that star mentality inside, bursting to come out. Gallo wanting to defend the best players, starting to ask for the ball late in games, talking trash and backin it up. You can see him starting to blossom as a top young player in this league one day. I hope he get's serious this summer and I believe he will. Last summer he couldn't really go hard, but this year I can see this kid going for it. How hot would it be if Lebron took him under his wing and worked out with him?

Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
3/27/2010  2:28 AM    LAST EDITED: 3/27/2010  2:34 AM
^^^Dude you are the most homerific poster ever. 1 pound of salt.............. But I wonder if the Nets were minus a 19/9/2 center and had a 14/5/1 small forward, if they would hav a single win.


I liked AR and still do, Gallo has been great late, but Lopez has been doing Gallos great for two seasons now. It's obvious he is the best of three to date.

"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/27/2010  4:55 AM
Anji wrote:^^^Dude you are the most homerific poster ever. 1 pound of salt.............. But I wonder if the Nets were minus a 19/9/2 center and had a 14/5/1 small forward, if they would hav a single win.


I liked AR and still do, Gallo has been great late, but Lopez has been doing Gallos great for two seasons now. It's obvious he is the best of three to date.

Wow considering Gallo was coming off freakin back surgery and most athletes take a year to fully recover from major injuries, I think he's exceeded what most thought he'd be at this point. Lopez is big and on a team that flat stinks. What is his real value if at full strength he can't get his team to double digit wins this late in the season? When was the last bigtime C that had such a poor effect on his team?
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/27/2010  8:56 AM
nixluva wrote:
Anji wrote:^^^Dude you are the most homerific poster ever. 1 pound of salt.............. But I wonder if the Nets were minus a 19/9/2 center and had a 14/5/1 small forward, if they would hav a single win.


I liked AR and still do, Gallo has been great late, but Lopez has been doing Gallos great for two seasons now. It's obvious he is the best of three to date.

Wow considering Gallo was coming off freakin back surgery and most athletes take a year to fully recover from major injuries, I think he's exceeded what most thought he'd be at this point. Lopez is big and on a team that flat stinks. What is his real value if at full strength he can't get his team to double digit wins this late in the season? When was the last bigtime C that had such a poor effect on his team?

The Knicks stink also. The big differences I see are that the Nets committed to playing their young players for the season and have had alot of injuries. They also have two first round picks including their own so stinking for a year really isn't a bad plan with their roster.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
CrashDMB237
Posts: 20276
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #759
3/27/2010  10:49 AM
Brook Lopez is good on a bad team with a decent point guard. Brook Lopez on this current Knicks team and hopefully next year's that has a go-to guy and established scorer is useless. Put Lopez on any playoff team and he'll be putting up Brendan Haywood numbers.
http://homeoftheknicks.com
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/27/2010  12:06 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Anji wrote:^^^Dude you are the most homerific poster ever. 1 pound of salt.............. But I wonder if the Nets were minus a 19/9/2 center and had a 14/5/1 small forward, if they would hav a single win.


I liked AR and still do, Gallo has been great late, but Lopez has been doing Gallos great for two seasons now. It's obvious he is the best of three to date.

Wow considering Gallo was coming off freakin back surgery and most athletes take a year to fully recover from major injuries, I think he's exceeded what most thought he'd be at this point. Lopez is big and on a team that flat stinks. What is his real value if at full strength he can't get his team to double digit wins this late in the season? When was the last bigtime C that had such a poor effect on his team?

The Knicks stink also. The big differences I see are that the Nets committed to playing their young players for the season and have had alot of injuries. They also have two first round picks including their own so stinking for a year really isn't a bad plan with their roster.

It's funny cuz some have made the case that if we had committed to playing our kids it would've led to more wins, not less. How can anyone make a positive case for Lopez when he isn't able to help make any kind of impact on his teams success? If Gallo is supposed to have little impact how do you explain Lopez impact?
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/27/2010  12:28 PM
nixluva wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Anji wrote:^^^Dude you are the most homerific poster ever. 1 pound of salt.............. But I wonder if the Nets were minus a 19/9/2 center and had a 14/5/1 small forward, if they would hav a single win.


I liked AR and still do, Gallo has been great late, but Lopez has been doing Gallos great for two seasons now. It's obvious he is the best of three to date.

Wow considering Gallo was coming off freakin back surgery and most athletes take a year to fully recover from major injuries, I think he's exceeded what most thought he'd be at this point. Lopez is big and on a team that flat stinks. What is his real value if at full strength he can't get his team to double digit wins this late in the season? When was the last bigtime C that had such a poor effect on his team?

The Knicks stink also. The big differences I see are that the Nets committed to playing their young players for the season and have had alot of injuries. They also have two first round picks including their own so stinking for a year really isn't a bad plan with their roster.

It's funny cuz some have made the case that if we had committed to playing our kids it would've led to more wins, not less. How can anyone make a positive case for Lopez when he isn't able to help make any kind of impact on his teams success? If Gallo is supposed to have little impact how do you explain Lopez impact?

Knicks were 24-58 in Ewings second year.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/27/2010  3:23 PM
nixluva wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Anji wrote:^^^Dude you are the most homerific poster ever. 1 pound of salt.............. But I wonder if the Nets were minus a 19/9/2 center and had a 14/5/1 small forward, if they would hav a single win.


I liked AR and still do, Gallo has been great late, but Lopez has been doing Gallos great for two seasons now. It's obvious he is the best of three to date.

Wow considering Gallo was coming off freakin back surgery and most athletes take a year to fully recover from major injuries, I think he's exceeded what most thought he'd be at this point. Lopez is big and on a team that flat stinks. What is his real value if at full strength he can't get his team to double digit wins this late in the season? When was the last bigtime C that had such a poor effect on his team?

The Knicks stink also. The big differences I see are that the Nets committed to playing their young players for the season and have had alot of injuries. They also have two first round picks including their own so stinking for a year really isn't a bad plan with their roster.

It's funny cuz some have made the case that if we had committed to playing our kids it would've led to more wins, not less. How can anyone make a positive case for Lopez when he isn't able to help make any kind of impact on his teams success? If Gallo is supposed to have little impact how do you explain Lopez impact?

i don't think anyone has ever made the point that we'd have won more games if we'd played our rookies from the start, they just wanted to see our rookies getting regular minutes in a season when it was obvious we would suck regardless... MDA committed to playing Gallo early & often in his rookie season whenever he was healthy enough to play... we wanted to see Jordan Hill & Toney Douglas get the same kind of a chance to show what they could do while we had the opportunity, because this season really should have been all about evaluation of players who had a chance to stick around for the long term... instead MDA chose to try & milk wins out of veterans with limited skills & talent... he tried to feature certain players who had very little talent to be showcased while neglecting certain others who were much more talented that he didn't get along with... just didn't make sense.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Brook Lopez... one rebound

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy