[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Young Players
Author Thread
Moonangie
Posts: 24767
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 7/9/2009
Member: #2788

3/24/2010  11:24 AM
joec32033 wrote:Gallo and Toney are in my top 2. Walker may be 3 depending.

I am worried about Chandler constantly breaking down at the end of seasons though. Didn't the same thing happen last year? If I am trading anyone it is Wil.

I haven't seen Giddens enough.

Wil to the Wolves for Rubio rights.

AUTOADVERT
NYKBocker
Posts: 38456
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
3/24/2010  11:25 AM
Bill Walker and JR Giddens are from Gallo's draft class. We have a nice set of youngins for the future. Like everyone else has said, we need a couple of PF/C type players from this draft with the 2 second rounders. I am more than happy to roll with TD and Sergio as our PG tandem for next year.

Sorry TMS, I still like Sergio. I think once players understand that they need to run with him then we will see exactly what he can do. He would be a nice 1-2 punch with TD.

Watching the game last night against the Nuggets and it clearly shows that we need another body since TMac can't play into the 4th and The Mayor being out. I was wondering why we have not called up a player for a 10 contract at least. I would love to see Pat Jr back in the mix.

NYKBocker
Posts: 38456
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
3/24/2010  11:26 AM
Moonangie wrote:
joec32033 wrote:Gallo and Toney are in my top 2. Walker may be 3 depending.

I am worried about Chandler constantly breaking down at the end of seasons though. Didn't the same thing happen last year? If I am trading anyone it is Wil.

I haven't seen Giddens enough.

Wil to the Wolves for Rubio rights.

This is not a bad deal. The only thing is that Rubio cannot join the team for 2 more years since he signed that euro contract. I don't think he has a buyout.

Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
3/24/2010  11:31 AM
NYKBocker wrote:
Moonangie wrote:
joec32033 wrote:Gallo and Toney are in my top 2. Walker may be 3 depending.

I am worried about Chandler constantly breaking down at the end of seasons though. Didn't the same thing happen last year? If I am trading anyone it is Wil.

I haven't seen Giddens enough.

Wil to the Wolves for Rubio rights.

This is not a bad deal. The only thing is that Rubio cannot join the team for 2 more years since he signed that euro contract. I don't think he has a buyout.

rubio's so young it's probably better for him to get more seasoning and maturity before coming to the states. plus we’ll likely have a surplus of forwards after free agency this summer.

chandler for rubio in 2 years would be the kind of forward thinking that this franchise never demonstrates.

Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
3/24/2010  11:33 AM
Chandler for Rubio shaves another 2M off the cap too.
PURE KNICKS LOVE
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
3/24/2010  11:59 AM
(bootleg post of the day from my boy emann)

Toney Douglas.

Our Golden Child … He has a wisdom about him that accounts for his mature ways. Dude can ball … I mean Madison Square Garden type ball. He could pick up from where Clyde left off so far as being a multi-year all-star at the point.

Now these little stocking stuffers that Danny threw in are quite interesting to say the least. Both cats are high energy … That’s good! Bill Walker looks like cats we grew up with back home in the hood. He does a lot of things really well. He could be a nice second or third man up off the bench each night.

Quite a nice nucleus of youth in Gallo/Douglas/Chandler/Lee*/Walker/Giddens

*Can’t guarantee he will be here next season

Giddens is interesting too, but I haven’t seen as much of him as I have seen Walker.

Great American sounding names in Jack Johnson (Olympic Hockey) and Bill Walker.

Jack Johnson

Bill Walker

once a knick always a knick
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34071
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

3/24/2010  12:06 PM
hockey reference.... I LIKE IT

JAck Johnson is an outstanding throwback stand up defensemen... which is ironic, because Bill Walker plays with throwback edge too

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Nalod
Posts: 71761
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
3/24/2010  12:51 PM
6 years and only 2200 posts? Seemed like so much more!
umynot
Posts: 21465
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/4/2008
Member: #2093
USA
3/24/2010  1:26 PM
Bippity10 wrote:Gallo-You could see the Gallo thing coming. He's inconsistent because he's young. I think he also had a stage in there where the infection started to take over and he seemed to take a backseat to everyone. He appeared to accept the losing and I feared for him. I think since the Nate trade someone got into his head(maybe it was him) and he has really turned it up a notch. He's asked to take on defensive responsibility which is also adding more overall responsbility and is helping him develop. As if I had inside information I told you over time he will drive more and that the team would ask him to go in the post. You will see more and more post play next year as he continues to get stronger. Soon it will be impossible to guard him with PG's and SG's. I know there are fantastic talent evaluators on this site, but a lot of them seem to miss that one. I guess he wasn't a bust like the "experts" called

TD-I'm not sure TD will learn to run the PG position on a full-time basis. I think you will see him more in the Barbosa type role as we move through time. Still a very valuable role in this offense. Add his defense to the mix and he's a legit player. However he has to stop gambling on defense. He does get steals but he also gives up a ton of "where did my man go" threes when he gambled on teh double team. He's a hard working kid who learns(notice he started pulling up last night instead of blasting through the lane after he drew that first charge) so over time I think he will learn like Charlie Ward did......So much for "no J" and too little athletic ability to get his shot off.

Walker-Tough to evaluate at this point because this is his first real playing time. Tough to determine what is a trend and what is not. If I was the typical talent evaluator on this site I would just scream that he is a bust and that Walsh blew it on the Nate trade but instead I will give this time. Athletic ability is obvious. the jumper is surprising although I'm not sold yet. He obviously needs to work on his defense. But the more I watch him play the more I realize that he was "infected" in Boston. He makes smart and deliberate passes, he plays team D and most importantly gives no layups. I see him right now as a poor man's Wilson Chandler with a chance to develop. Chandler is better defensively, has a more consistent mid-range game and is more confident. Walker actually reminds me of Stanley Robinson at CT. Supreme athletic ability, drifts in out mentally and does not seem to realize yet how much is athletic ability will help his offensive game. He needs more playing time to develop this confidence and hopefully will work hard at the same time. He can turn himself into a legit player if he works hard enough.

Giddens-I like Giddens. Haven't seen enough to make a thorough eval(should I just call him a bust?) but I like his effort. He plays D and really gets after it on the boards. At this point seems like a great energy guy off the bench.


Agreed with everything you said about Gallo and TD....... You could see leaving TD along side Duhon and Sergio
in that Barbosa type role already....

I disagree about Walker though.....

I believe this Kid mentally believes he belongs in this league

I also believe he has a good midrange game and a more polished long range jumper
then Chandler already...... When he slows the NBA game down and starts playing smarter
he will be a really good player in this league....

Maybe even an All Star

KNICKS on the way UP!!!
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
3/24/2010  1:57 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/24/2010  1:58 PM
Bippity10 wrote:Walker-Tough to evaluate at this point because this is his first real playing time. Tough to determine what is a trend and what is not. If I was the typical talent evaluator on this site I would just scream that he is a bust and that Walsh blew it on the Nate trade but instead I will give this time.

Problem with this is that the reaction to the Nate trade has been overwelmingly positive around here as the progress of Walker and Giddens has been received well.

So could it be that the criticism of D'Antoni, which is no doubt fueling your passive antagonism, might have merit and not be a symptom of us being bitchy or whiny about everything?

My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
3/24/2010  3:07 PM
umynot wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:Gallo-You could see the Gallo thing coming. He's inconsistent because he's young. I think he also had a stage in there where the infection started to take over and he seemed to take a backseat to everyone. He appeared to accept the losing and I feared for him. I think since the Nate trade someone got into his head(maybe it was him) and he has really turned it up a notch. He's asked to take on defensive responsibility which is also adding more overall responsbility and is helping him develop. As if I had inside information I told you over time he will drive more and that the team would ask him to go in the post. You will see more and more post play next year as he continues to get stronger. Soon it will be impossible to guard him with PG's and SG's. I know there are fantastic talent evaluators on this site, but a lot of them seem to miss that one. I guess he wasn't a bust like the "experts" called

TD-I'm not sure TD will learn to run the PG position on a full-time basis. I think you will see him more in the Barbosa type role as we move through time. Still a very valuable role in this offense. Add his defense to the mix and he's a legit player. However he has to stop gambling on defense. He does get steals but he also gives up a ton of "where did my man go" threes when he gambled on teh double team. He's a hard working kid who learns(notice he started pulling up last night instead of blasting through the lane after he drew that first charge) so over time I think he will learn like Charlie Ward did......So much for "no J" and too little athletic ability to get his shot off.

Walker-Tough to evaluate at this point because this is his first real playing time. Tough to determine what is a trend and what is not. If I was the typical talent evaluator on this site I would just scream that he is a bust and that Walsh blew it on the Nate trade but instead I will give this time. Athletic ability is obvious. the jumper is surprising although I'm not sold yet. He obviously needs to work on his defense. But the more I watch him play the more I realize that he was "infected" in Boston. He makes smart and deliberate passes, he plays team D and most importantly gives no layups. I see him right now as a poor man's Wilson Chandler with a chance to develop. Chandler is better defensively, has a more consistent mid-range game and is more confident. Walker actually reminds me of Stanley Robinson at CT. Supreme athletic ability, drifts in out mentally and does not seem to realize yet how much is athletic ability will help his offensive game. He needs more playing time to develop this confidence and hopefully will work hard at the same time. He can turn himself into a legit player if he works hard enough.

Giddens-I like Giddens. Haven't seen enough to make a thorough eval(should I just call him a bust?) but I like his effort. He plays D and really gets after it on the boards. At this point seems like a great energy guy off the bench.


Agreed with everything you said about Gallo and TD....... You could see leaving TD along side Duhon and Sergio
in that Barbosa type role already....

I disagree about Walker though.....

I believe this Kid mentally believes he belongs in this league

I also believe he has a good midrange game and a more polished long range jumper
then Chandler already...... When he slows the NBA game down and starts playing smarter
he will be a really good player in this league....

Maybe even an All Star

I don't think Walker lacks confidence. I think he does feel that he belongs. But I do think that he lacks the supreme confidence to bring it every night. Gallo does too. TD to me at this point seems to be the one young guy that has it. The others drift in and out. But that's okay, they are young and it goes with the territory. But I agree Walker does have some serious talent. IF he works hard he could go places.

I just hope that people will like me
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
3/24/2010  3:13 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/24/2010  3:15 PM
sebstar wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:Walker-Tough to evaluate at this point because this is his first real playing time. Tough to determine what is a trend and what is not. If I was the typical talent evaluator on this site I would just scream that he is a bust and that Walsh blew it on the Nate trade but instead I will give this time.

Problem with this is that the reaction to the Nate trade has been overwelmingly positive around here as the progress of Walker and Giddens has been received well.

So could it be that the criticism of D'Antoni, which is no doubt fueling your passive antagonism, might have merit and not be a symptom of us being bitchy or whiny about everything?

I know I haven't been here for a while but the Bip does not believe in passive antagonism, he believes in direct antagonism. This post has nothing to do with anyone's criticism of D'Antoni and everything to do with the morons that called Gallo a bust last year and Hill and Douglas busts during this years summer league. Those "talent evaluators" are not talent evaluators they are strictly whiners.

As for criticism of D'Antoni, what criticism of D'Antoni would bother me? I personally feel most of what I've heard about D'Antoni has been valid. The only thing I do not agree with is the calls to fire him without giving him a roster to win with. Just because I offer a coaches perspective or an alternative view to the D'Antoni conspiracy theories does not mean I love everything the man does. Other than that, have at it on D'Antoni. Maybe this was an argument you were having with someone else and are just projecting upon me.

I just hope that people will like me
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/24/2010  4:21 PM
NYKBocker wrote:Bill Walker and JR Giddens are from Gallo's draft class. We have a nice set of youngins for the future. Like everyone else has said, we need a couple of PF/C type players from this draft with the 2 second rounders. I am more than happy to roll with TD and Sergio as our PG tandem for next year.

Sorry TMS, I still like Sergio. I think once players understand that they need to run with him then we will see exactly what he can do. He would be a nice 1-2 punch with TD.

Watching the game last night against the Nuggets and it clearly shows that we need another body since TMac can't play into the 4th and The Mayor being out. I was wondering why we have not called up a player for a 10 contract at least. I would love to see Pat Jr back in the mix.

i like everyone of our young kids & Walker & Giddens have both been better than i ever expected, but Sergio just hasn't shown me any reason to get excited over him... i can find any number of fools on the playgrounds who will run around & be active all day long but have no idea what to do with the ball... to me, Sergio still needs a ton of work before u can consider him a viable option at the PG position.

totally feel u on the Patrick Ewing Jr. thing, would love to see him get a 10 day contract to see what he's got... we have nothing to lose at this point.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
3/24/2010  4:58 PM
TMS wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:Bill Walker and JR Giddens are from Gallo's draft class. We have a nice set of youngins for the future. Like everyone else has said, we need a couple of PF/C type players from this draft with the 2 second rounders. I am more than happy to roll with TD and Sergio as our PG tandem for next year.

Sorry TMS, I still like Sergio. I think once players understand that they need to run with him then we will see exactly what he can do. He would be a nice 1-2 punch with TD.

Watching the game last night against the Nuggets and it clearly shows that we need another body since TMac can't play into the 4th and The Mayor being out. I was wondering why we have not called up a player for a 10 contract at least. I would love to see Pat Jr back in the mix.

i like everyone of our young kids & Walker & Giddens have both been better than i ever expected, but Sergio just hasn't shown me any reason to get excited over him... i can find any number of fools on the playgrounds who will run around & be active all day long but have no idea what to do with the ball... to me, Sergio still needs a ton of work before u can consider him a viable option at the PG position.

totally feel u on the Patrick Ewing Jr. thing, would love to see him get a 10 day contract to see what he's got... we have nothing to lose at this point.

I'm with you on Sergio. I like his energy but above that he doesn't provide a whole lot. HE makes some fancy passes, but overall I'm not that impressed with hsi passing. HE misses a lot of open guys and the dominates the ball on offense. Add to this, the crazy turnovers he makes and he loses a fan in Bip. I have heard good things about his ability to run the offense in Europe and if you can run an offense in one place you can run it anywhere. I'm just not sure he's put in the work to make the adjustment to ball over here. Too small of a sample to be sure, but so far that's what I've seen. And dude really needs to get his legs in his shot and get some arch underneath it. Who does he think he is? TMac?

I just hope that people will like me
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/24/2010  5:06 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/24/2010  5:06 PM
Bippity10 wrote:
TMS wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:Bill Walker and JR Giddens are from Gallo's draft class. We have a nice set of youngins for the future. Like everyone else has said, we need a couple of PF/C type players from this draft with the 2 second rounders. I am more than happy to roll with TD and Sergio as our PG tandem for next year.

Sorry TMS, I still like Sergio. I think once players understand that they need to run with him then we will see exactly what he can do. He would be a nice 1-2 punch with TD.

Watching the game last night against the Nuggets and it clearly shows that we need another body since TMac can't play into the 4th and The Mayor being out. I was wondering why we have not called up a player for a 10 contract at least. I would love to see Pat Jr back in the mix.

i like everyone of our young kids & Walker & Giddens have both been better than i ever expected, but Sergio just hasn't shown me any reason to get excited over him... i can find any number of fools on the playgrounds who will run around & be active all day long but have no idea what to do with the ball... to me, Sergio still needs a ton of work before u can consider him a viable option at the PG position.

totally feel u on the Patrick Ewing Jr. thing, would love to see him get a 10 day contract to see what he's got... we have nothing to lose at this point.

I'm with you on Sergio. I like his energy but above that he doesn't provide a whole lot. HE makes some fancy passes, but overall I'm not that impressed with hsi passing. HE misses a lot of open guys and the dominates the ball on offense. Add to this, the crazy turnovers he makes and he loses a fan in Bip. I have heard good things about his ability to run the offense in Europe and if you can run an offense in one place you can run it anywhere. I'm just not sure he's put in the work to make the adjustment to ball over here. Too small of a sample to be sure, but so far that's what I've seen. And dude really needs to get his legs in his shot and get some arch underneath it. Who does he think he is? TMac?

he shoots the ball off his right shoulder & gets no elevation, it's a weird shooting form... i have no idea how someone can get an accurate sense of where they're shooting the ball when their head is 6 inches to the left of where the release point is.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
3/24/2010  6:34 PM
Bippity10 wrote:
sebstar wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:Walker-Tough to evaluate at this point because this is his first real playing time. Tough to determine what is a trend and what is not. If I was the typical talent evaluator on this site I would just scream that he is a bust and that Walsh blew it on the Nate trade but instead I will give this time.

Problem with this is that the reaction to the Nate trade has been overwelmingly positive around here as the progress of Walker and Giddens has been received well.

So could it be that the criticism of D'Antoni, which is no doubt fueling your passive antagonism, might have merit and not be a symptom of us being bitchy or whiny about everything?

I know I haven't been here for a while but the Bip does not believe in passive antagonism, he believes in direct antagonism. This post has nothing to do with anyone's criticism of D'Antoni and everything to do with the morons that called Gallo a bust last year and Hill and Douglas busts during this years summer league. Those "talent evaluators" are not talent evaluators they are strictly whiners.

As for criticism of D'Antoni, what criticism of D'Antoni would bother me? I personally feel most of what I've heard about D'Antoni has been valid. The only thing I do not agree with is the calls to fire him without giving him a roster to win with. Just because I offer a coaches perspective or an alternative view to the D'Antoni conspiracy theories does not mean I love everything the man does. Other than that, have at it on D'Antoni. Maybe this was an argument you were having with someone else and are just projecting upon me.


Well, excuuuuuuse me then....lol

My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
3/24/2010  7:34 PM
TMS wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:
TMS wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:Bill Walker and JR Giddens are from Gallo's draft class. We have a nice set of youngins for the future. Like everyone else has said, we need a couple of PF/C type players from this draft with the 2 second rounders. I am more than happy to roll with TD and Sergio as our PG tandem for next year.

Sorry TMS, I still like Sergio. I think once players understand that they need to run with him then we will see exactly what he can do. He would be a nice 1-2 punch with TD.

Watching the game last night against the Nuggets and it clearly shows that we need another body since TMac can't play into the 4th and The Mayor being out. I was wondering why we have not called up a player for a 10 contract at least. I would love to see Pat Jr back in the mix.

i like everyone of our young kids & Walker & Giddens have both been better than i ever expected, but Sergio just hasn't shown me any reason to get excited over him... i can find any number of fools on the playgrounds who will run around & be active all day long but have no idea what to do with the ball... to me, Sergio still needs a ton of work before u can consider him a viable option at the PG position.

totally feel u on the Patrick Ewing Jr. thing, would love to see him get a 10 day contract to see what he's got... we have nothing to lose at this point.

I'm with you on Sergio. I like his energy but above that he doesn't provide a whole lot. HE makes some fancy passes, but overall I'm not that impressed with hsi passing. HE misses a lot of open guys and the dominates the ball on offense. Add to this, the crazy turnovers he makes and he loses a fan in Bip. I have heard good things about his ability to run the offense in Europe and if you can run an offense in one place you can run it anywhere. I'm just not sure he's put in the work to make the adjustment to ball over here. Too small of a sample to be sure, but so far that's what I've seen. And dude really needs to get his legs in his shot and get some arch underneath it. Who does he think he is? TMac?

he shoots the ball off his right shoulder & gets no elevation, it's a weird shooting form... i have no idea how someone can get an accurate sense of where they're shooting the ball when their head is 6 inches to the left of where the release point is.

LOL....I think I used to have similar form when I was in middle school before a coach set me straight.

I just hope that people will like me
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
3/24/2010  7:34 PM
sebstar wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:
sebstar wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:Walker-Tough to evaluate at this point because this is his first real playing time. Tough to determine what is a trend and what is not. If I was the typical talent evaluator on this site I would just scream that he is a bust and that Walsh blew it on the Nate trade but instead I will give this time.

Problem with this is that the reaction to the Nate trade has been overwelmingly positive around here as the progress of Walker and Giddens has been received well.

So could it be that the criticism of D'Antoni, which is no doubt fueling your passive antagonism, might have merit and not be a symptom of us being bitchy or whiny about everything?

I know I haven't been here for a while but the Bip does not believe in passive antagonism, he believes in direct antagonism. This post has nothing to do with anyone's criticism of D'Antoni and everything to do with the morons that called Gallo a bust last year and Hill and Douglas busts during this years summer league. Those "talent evaluators" are not talent evaluators they are strictly whiners.

As for criticism of D'Antoni, what criticism of D'Antoni would bother me? I personally feel most of what I've heard about D'Antoni has been valid. The only thing I do not agree with is the calls to fire him without giving him a roster to win with. Just because I offer a coaches perspective or an alternative view to the D'Antoni conspiracy theories does not mean I love everything the man does. Other than that, have at it on D'Antoni. Maybe this was an argument you were having with someone else and are just projecting upon me.


Well, excuuuuuuse me then....lol

You are excused

I just hope that people will like me
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
3/24/2010  8:18 PM
Bippity10 wrote:

I know I haven't been here for a while but the Bip does not believe in passive antagonism, he believes in direct antagonism. This post has nothing to do with anyone's criticism of D'Antoni and everything to do with the morons that called Gallo a bust last year and Hill and Douglas busts during this years summer league. Those "talent evaluators" are not talent evaluators they are strictly whiners.

I think Hill sucked from summer league, from pre-season, and from the regular season, and what he's doing in Houston still sucks. Maybe I'll end up wrong about it maybe I won't. Don't really care anymore he's a Rocket.

Douglas I saw fire from the beginning and have thought all along he'd be very good.

Gallo I thought had a lot of skills - but - his health issue had me frustrated and that health issue for quite some time looked like he was going to be a bust. A bust not because of skill, a bust because of HEALTH issues. I thought Gallo showed some serious game from the get-go. But that damn year+ of health issues sucked.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
3/25/2010  8:05 AM
Cosmic wrote:
Bippity10 wrote:

I know I haven't been here for a while but the Bip does not believe in passive antagonism, he believes in direct antagonism. This post has nothing to do with anyone's criticism of D'Antoni and everything to do with the morons that called Gallo a bust last year and Hill and Douglas busts during this years summer league. Those "talent evaluators" are not talent evaluators they are strictly whiners.

I think Hill sucked from summer league, from pre-season, and from the regular season, and what he's doing in Houston still sucks. Maybe I'll end up wrong about it maybe I won't. Don't really care anymore he's a Rocket.

Douglas I saw fire from the beginning and have thought all along he'd be very good.

Gallo I thought had a lot of skills - but - his health issue had me frustrated and that health issue for quite some time looked like he was going to be a bust. A bust not because of skill, a bust because of HEALTH issues. I thought Gallo showed some serious game from the get-go. But that damn year+ of health issues sucked.

Hill will not be a star in this league, but he will be a productive player. Too much athletic ability and activity to not be a player. He's already showing signs of it and was showing it as a Knick.

People were so busy complaining about Gallo that they forgot that he was waht 20 or 21 and had an injury. They didn't notice that the only reason he wasn't scoring in the post was because 150 lb PG's were able to push him around. They forgot that players get stronger as they develop. They didn't notice that despite being a jumpshooter, opponents were fouling him consistently, and that when a guy gets fouled a lot, opponents are telling you that he is hard to guard. We were so quick to feel bad for ourselves that we refused to analyze his game...........The back issues were scary and still are. Who knows if they flare up and ruin his career. But to label a guy a bust and to get down in the dumps over an injury and call a guy a bust before you even know the outcome is just feeling sorry for yourself, jumping the gun and not paying attention to the fact that everyone eventually gets hurt and most players recover.

Douglas showed a consistent offensive game in college. He has 6 bad games in summer league and the entire site had his carer predicted. They didn't pay attentiion to how easily he got into the paint(event though the shots weren't falling). They didn't notice how much difficulty defenders were having against him. They didn't notice the old school Knick grit, toughness and hustle. A guy that should have been an early fan favorite was instead labelled a bust based on 6 summer league games.

I still am not sure there is a superstar in the group. But there are five solid young guys with plenty of upside on this roster. It's okay to disagree with me and think otherwise. But give some valid reasons. The "because he's a bust" and "because he sucks" school of talent evaluation just ends up embarrassing the person that does it.

I just hope that people will like me
Young Players

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy