[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Fire the coach?


Author Poll
BasketballJones
Posts: 11973
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
Is it time for a ritual coach-firing to exorcise the demons of losing? I hope so, because there's nothing I love more than a good coach-firing. I don't think Donnie will be able to top the utter humiliation meted out to Don Chaney and, to a lesser, extent, Larry Brown, but there's always hope.

I say it doesn't matter what the myriad problems with this team might be. Just fire the coach already.

What do you think? Should Mike D'Antoni be fired?

Yes
No
View Results


Author Thread
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
3/13/2010  6:05 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/13/2010  6:06 PM
We should have never torn down the roster. I think Isiah put together a powerhouse.


Curry
Zach
Q
Craw
Marbs

And then we would have had Gallo, Chandler, Hill, Lee, Douglas.

Jeffries and Darko.

I agree. Just keep firing the coaches until we get one that could guide that star power to their rightful place at the top of the Eastern Conference.

---


But, no, we had to tear down that formidable team!

But that doesn't mean we wouldn't have been great this year you know.

If Mike had just started and played:

Darko
Hill
Gallo
Chandler
Douglas

From the start of the year? We'd be 42-22 and sitting pretty. Zero doubt in my mind. Not sure how much more of these losses in 09/10 I can take anymore! We were robbed of a playoff berth. Absolutely.

FIRE THE DAMN COACH NOW!!!!

Promote Herb.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
AUTOADVERT
Swishfm3
Posts: 23324
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2003
Member: #392
3/13/2010  6:05 PM
The Knicks have a "coach"?

one who instructs or trains; especially : one who instructs players in the fundamentals of a competitive sport and directs team strategy
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/coach

WOODMANnYk
Posts: 22417
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2002
Member: #529
USA
3/13/2010  6:30 PM
FIRE HIS ARSE at ONCE!
The Future. GO KNICKS!
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/13/2010  6:47 PM
Aside from being extremely flawed on many levels he is 54-93 as the coach of the Knicks and 89-169 when he doesn't have Steve Nash running the team he coaches. That is a significant body of work in the nba and a significant period of time when he has not won. He has proven that he is not able to win without Nash and two other allstars. He has proven that he can't coach guys that need any kind of mentoring and structure. He has proven that he doesn't coach or emphasize defense and I don't care how many times he yells play d on the sidelines he doesn't coach it or make adjustments for individual teams. He doesn't develop young players, and devalues assets. He creates lots of drama, struggles with communicating with his players and puts his gm in the position of having to bail him out of these situations. He has unreasonable character and maturity requirements for the guys who will be in his bizzare rotation. His training camps are useless and he is unable to motivate guys to play for him. I see no reason for him to be here another year. He is extremely rigid. He has shown who he is and he is lucky that he has a guy like Walsh that backs him and protects him even when he doesn't play the guys that Donnie wants to be on the team and a part of the rotation. He has lost the team even with the purging of the guys he struggled with.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241

3/13/2010  6:56 PM
Again, it just comes down to the players.

If we had Lebron on our team, the creation of negative threads would be non existent on this forum.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/13/2010  6:57 PM
JrZyHuStLa wrote:Again, it just comes down to the players.

If we had Lebron on our team, the creation of negative threads would be non existent on this forum.

LeBron would have to be willing to take on a Messier type role if he came to NY with D'Antoni.

I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241

3/13/2010  6:59 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:Again, it just comes down to the players.

If we had Lebron on our team, the creation of negative threads would be non existent on this forum.

LeBron would have to be willing to take on a Messier type role if he came to NY with D'Antoni.

Never got into hockey. Please elaborate.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/13/2010  7:09 PM
The best job of coaching that MDA did wasn't his league best 62 win season, but instead it was the 2005-06 season where he guided them to 54 wins, without Amare and with only Nash, Diaw, Bell & Marion as the core. He had KT for only 54 games that year too. That roster was OK but IMO had no business going as far as the WCF's before losing in 6 to the Mavs. IF he couldn't coach that surely would've been the season to show. Like I said how do you get to the WCF's with that roster if you aren't doing a good job? Don't tell me it's all Nash, cuz that's crazy.

My point in all this is that we hope to have a roster far better than Nash, Diaw, Bell, Marion & KT. If we do I expect that we can do very well. MDA can coach, but we have to have something on the roster to work with. We at least need someone on the court who can take the lead. That's the idea of adding a star player or two. The whole roster doesn't have to be great, but just balanced. He's already shown that he can get a lot out of just a couple of stars and some key role players. That 05-06 team had no size or shotblocking and still was the 2nd seed in the West. We hope to have a more balanced team than that.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/13/2010  7:10 PM
This is a good article about the impact he had early in his tenure in NY. In a nutshell, he was one of the greatest leaders in sports.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1003533/5/index.htm

I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
3/13/2010  7:44 PM
nixluva wrote:The best job of coaching that MDA did wasn't his league best 62 win season, but instead it was the 2005-06 season where he guided them to 54 wins, without Amare and with only Nash, Diaw, Bell & Marion as the core. He had KT for only 54 games that year too. That roster was OK but IMO had no business going as far as the WCF's before losing in 6 to the Mavs. IF he couldn't coach that surely would've been the season to show. Like I said how do you get to the WCF's with that roster if you aren't doing a good job? Don't tell me it's all Nash, cuz that's crazy.

My point in all this is that we hope to have a roster far better than Nash, Diaw, Bell, Marion & KT. If we do I expect that we can do very well. MDA can coach, but we have to have something on the roster to work with. We at least need someone on the court who can take the lead. That's the idea of adding a star player or two. The whole roster doesn't have to be great, but just balanced. He's already shown that he can get a lot out of just a couple of stars and some key role players. That 05-06 team had no size or shotblocking and still was the 2nd seed in the West. We hope to have a more balanced team than that.

What are you talking about? Amare was never considered the key to that Phoenix team. Games in which he would go nuts, Suns would lose if Nash had a bad game. It was common for Amare critics to say he put in the most quietest 30 points sometimes. When Nash won the MVP in the 04/05 season I thought that he didn't earn it over Shaq because of his quality of teammates and his opponents high scoring outputs against him at the point guard position and the fact that his numbers weren't MVP type. IMO, that 04/05 Suns team was so stacked. With the likes of Nash, a healthy Amare, Marion still in his prime, and a young Joe Johnson, and an ok Q-Rich. But in the 05/06 season he earned it outright because Amare was injured for most of the season, Joe was in Atlanta and Richardson was traded to the Knicks. Nash's shot attempts and scoring increased significantly on that team.

Check out D'Antoni's record with Nash on the team but when he was out of the lineup. He is 4 and 12. 33%. Now compare that percentage to his NBA coaching career without Nash on his team and it's very similar. To me that's a very telling sign. Without Steve Nash, D'Antoni has only been able to win 33% of his games. That's below mediocrity. We had threads about D'Antoni being overrated going back to the very season you are talking about and how much impact Nash has on that team. D'Antoni was always considered an afterthought. It was always about letting Nash do what he wanted to do. This ain't news.

I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/13/2010  8:48 PM
Cosmic wrote:We should have never torn down the roster. I think Isiah put together a powerhouse.


Curry
Zach
Q
Craw
Marbs

And then we would have had Gallo, Chandler, Hill, Lee, Douglas.

Jeffries and Darko.

I agree. Just keep firing the coaches until we get one that could guide that star power to their rightful place at the top of the Eastern Conference.

---


But, no, we had to tear down that formidable team!

But that doesn't mean we wouldn't have been great this year you know.

If Mike had just started and played:

Darko
Hill
Gallo
Chandler
Douglas

From the start of the year? We'd be 42-22 and sitting pretty. Zero doubt in my mind. Not sure how much more of these losses in 09/10 I can take anymore! We were robbed of a playoff berth. Absolutely.

FIRE THE DAMN COACH NOW!!!!

Promote Herb.

probably a better plan to build a champion is your favored route to trade away every draft pick we own for the next century & hope we can land the next Michael Jordan in free agency to come save our franchise.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
3/13/2010  10:50 PM
firing the coach has been a proven track to success. look around the league. teams like the lakers, jazz and spurs keep floundering with their long-tenured coaches, while the knicks have been riding the coaching carousel of success.
check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
3/13/2010  10:52 PM
Pharzeone wrote:Without Steve Nash, D'Antoni has only been able to win 33% of his games.

fact: phil jackson minus a top 50 player on his team would still win at a 70% clip.

check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
skeng
Posts: 22090
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 10/27/2009
Member: #2959
Denmark
3/13/2010  10:52 PM
eViL wrote:firing the coach has been a proven track to success. look around the league. teams like the lakers, jazz and spurs keep floundering with their long-tenured coaches, while the knicks have been riding the coaching carousel of success.

amen!

Legalize di NBA
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/13/2010  11:39 PM
eViL wrote:firing the coach has been a proven track to success. look around the league. teams like the lakers, jazz and spurs keep floundering with their long-tenured coaches, while the knicks have been riding the coaching carousel of success.
Its funny because Pop has a list of guys who worked with him who have gone on to have tremendous success (i.e. Mike Brown). I was thinking about Sloan today and wondering if he had ever gotten a coach of the year award because alot of 1 and done guys have gotten it and he is a hof coach. Implying that D'Antoni will be in the same league as those guys because keeping him would retain consistency is just not accurate. Those guys are big defense guys. They have guys on their teams that might not be a finished project and they are successful. They have adjusted their plays to fit different rosters. They haven't lost their team and there is no drama because everyone knows who is in charge. If you want an authoritarian coach long term then you don't want D'Antoni.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/13/2010  11:47 PM
Pharzeone wrote:What are you talking about? Amare was never considered the key to that Phoenix team. Games in which he would go nuts, Suns would lose if Nash had a bad game. It was common for Amare critics to say he put in the most quietest 30 points sometimes.
Who said that Amare was the key to the PHX team? The point is that he was a TOP player on that team and he wasn't there. Take any team and remove the 2nd best player on that team and it's tough to adjust to that loss. Was Amare an All Star or not? They didn't replace his production from any single player, but still they found a way to win. That's what a coach is there for. To come up with a game plan and a way to use the guys he had left. Changes had to be made cuz the guys brought in had different strengths and weaknesses, but overall none were on the level of Amare. Don't try to minimize the loss of a guy that was very productive on that team. Especially when you have Diaw and KT as the replacement.
Pharzeone wrote:Check out D'Antoni's record with Nash on the team but when he was out of the lineup. He is 4 and 12. 33%. Now compare that percentage to his NBA coaching career without Nash on his team and it's very similar. To me that's a very telling sign. Without Steve Nash, D'Antoni has only been able to win 33% of his games. That's below mediocrity. We had threads about D'Antoni being overrated going back to the very season you are talking about and how much impact Nash has on that team. D'Antoni was always considered an afterthought. It was always about letting Nash do what he wanted to do. This ain't news.
Great players make great teams, but in the case of the Suns you can't forget that Nash gives credit to MDA and lobbied for the team to return to the system that MDA taught him. It's not about what MDA's record is without Nash. You should be saying that his record without a good team period isn't that good. besides which it's well known that he will be far more successful with a PG that can effectively run his system. Heck whenever Duhon actually stepped up and played well you could see what a difference it made even on this weak team.

Look the players are always more important than the coach, but the coach sets the direction, philosophy and helps to get them back on track when they falter. You can't just wipe away a coaches involvement in a winning team.

I found this article of note:

The Suns’ offense hums again — if at a slightly less frantic pace than it once did. The coach and the players are all using the same playbook again. Their superstar point guard is happy again.

“It was what I hoped,” said Steve Nash, who signed a contract extension this summer in a leap of faith that the Suns could reclaim their lost glory after a humdrum 46-win season.

They have, more quickly and more convincingly than anyone could have forecast. But the Suns have long had a thing for speed.

Coach Alvin Gentry, who took over in February after the team fired Terry Porter, reinstated D’Antoni’s run-and-gun offense, albeit a slightly modified version of it. The results are evident. The Suns lead the league in scoring at 112 points a game and are once again putting up (and making) 3-pointers at a dizzying rate, going 178 for 400 from the arc. (Their .445 success rate on 3-pointers was better than the total field-goal percentage for 10 teams through Sunday).

“To be honest with you, we’re doing what Mike taught me,” Gentry said Monday. “We tweaked a little here and there. But this is how we’ve played the last four and a half, five years.”

It is, in essence, the formula that made the Suns the N.B.A.’s most entertaining team in the mid-2000s, when they averaged 58 victories for four seasons under D’Antoni. But by their own standards, these Suns are slow.

They still run when possible, but they are not as reliant on the fast break. Phoenix ranked fifth in pace — an estimation of possessions per 48 minutes — according to basketball-reference.com, behind Golden State, Indiana, Denver and the Knicks.

“We’re not a fast-break team,” Nash told The Arizona Republic last week in a statement that bordered on heresy. “We’re not a great running team.”

Indeed, the Suns are taking 82.6 shots a game, nearly five fewer than they averaged in 2005-6, the last time they made the Western Conference finals. But they are shooting a league-leading 50.7 percent from the field, which offsets any decline in scoring chances.

“We don’t get as many fast-break points, but we do keep the tempo high,” said Amar’e Stoudemire, an All-Star power forward who is averaging 19.8 points. That would be his lowest figure for a full season since his rookie campaign in 2002-3.

The Suns also say they are more attentive to defense, although they ranked 22nd, according to basketball-reference.com’s defensive rating formula. (They were 16th in 2005-6.)(Note that they are not as good on D as they were under MDA, despite having more size and supposedly more emphasis on D)

There is no scientific measure for the Suns’ greatly improved mood. Nash and others were angry at D’Antoni’s forced departure last year and nearly depressed when Boris Diaw and Raja Bell, two stalwarts of the D’Antoni era, were traded to Charlotte last December. And they struggled to adapt to Porter’s coaching.

“I don’t think we really had a clear understanding of what type of team we were,” Nash said Monday. “We came into the season saying we were going to be a running team, but we never really practiced being a running team. In actuality, we became a post-up team. But we never really declared, ‘O.K., we’re a post-up team now.’ We never really got on the same page or felt comfortable. I think when people are confused, it really can detract from effectiveness, but also chemistry.”

The ambiguities have been lifted. Gentry is a D’Antoni disciple and a true believer in the running game. The Suns also traded Shaquille O’Neal, whose mammoth personality and presence hung on the lineup like an anvil.

The driving lanes are now wide open for Nash and Grant Hill. Stoudemire is free to roam the low blocks. He is also free, for now, of the trade rumors that haunted him for the past year.

The Suns will probably not sustain this pace, but they have already surpassed most outside expectations.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/13/2010  11:50 PM
The Suns also say they are more attentive to defense, although they ranked 22nd, according to basketball-reference.com’s defensive rating formula. (They were 16th in 2005-6.)(Note that they are not as good on D as they were under MDA, despite having more size and supposedly more emphasis on D)

u don't think no longer having Marion, Raja Bell, Boris Diaw & now with Barbosa being out for a big chunk of the year had just a tad bit to do w/that? the Suns players saying they're stressing defense more under a different coach is pretty telling.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/14/2010  3:07 AM
TMS wrote:
The Suns also say they are more attentive to defense, although they ranked 22nd, according to basketball-reference.com’s defensive rating formula. (They were 16th in 2005-6.)(Note that they are not as good on D as they were under MDA, despite having more size and supposedly more emphasis on D)

u don't think no longer having Marion, Raja Bell, Boris Diaw & now with Barbosa being out for a big chunk of the year had just a tad bit to do w/that? the Suns players saying they're stressing defense more under a different coach is pretty telling.

Kerr is the one that is responsible for this roster! He's the one that made the deals to move the guys they had before under MDA. Kerr made a big deal about D back in MDA's last year and that's after they tried to improve the rosters D with KT then Shaq. Now they've got Lopez and you'd think they'd be able to at least hold up at the level they had back when MDA was there. They've shrunk back over the last 2 years and it's up to Kerr to being in players that could help to improve that area. If they don't have better defenders that's ON KERR! He shouldn't have talked so much about MDA's lack of D while not doing his job in bringing in players that can play D! Kerr is the one that brought in Terry Porter with this whole shift to a defensive team only to see that crash and burn and then have to hire MDA lite in his assistant Gentry. All this talk about more focus on D if fine, but the source of the problem wasn't MDA it was Kerr and his failure to bolster the roster in terms of defensive help.

Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
3/14/2010  5:14 AM
nixluva wrote:
TMS wrote:
The Suns also say they are more attentive to defense, although they ranked 22nd, according to basketball-reference.com’s defensive rating formula. (They were 16th in 2005-6.)(Note that they are not as good on D as they were under MDA, despite having more size and supposedly more emphasis on D)

u don't think no longer having Marion, Raja Bell, Boris Diaw & now with Barbosa being out for a big chunk of the year had just a tad bit to do w/that? the Suns players saying they're stressing defense more under a different coach is pretty telling.

Kerr is the one that is responsible for this roster! He's the one that made the deals to move the guys they had before under MDA. Kerr made a big deal about D back in MDA's last year and that's after they tried to improve the rosters D with KT then Shaq. Now they've got Lopez and you'd think they'd be able to at least hold up at the level they had back when MDA was there. They've shrunk back over the last 2 years and it's up to Kerr to being in players that could help to improve that area. If they don't have better defenders that's ON KERR! He shouldn't have talked so much about MDA's lack of D while not doing his job in bringing in players that can play D! Kerr is the one that brought in Terry Porter with this whole shift to a defensive team only to see that crash and burn and then have to hire MDA lite in his assistant Gentry. All this talk about more focus on D if fine, but the source of the problem wasn't MDA it was Kerr and his failure to bolster the roster in terms of defensive help.

It's not on Kerr totally. D'Antoni dealt Nate Robinson and Q-Rich for KT. Kerr was hosting TNT games during that time. Kerr brought in Shaq and drafted Lopez. They had to dump Marion because he was unhappy about his contract future. Let's be real here. MDA handed out contracts as Suns general manager that would have made Isiah blush. Diaw and Barbosa were D'Antoni's Jeffries and Jamal type of contracts. Marcus Banks is D'Antoni's Curry. Kerr was just as hamstring with bloated contracts as Walsh was when he arrived.

MDA was responsible for these contracts when he was VP of Operations/GM

Banks
Diaw
Barbosa
Kurt Thomas
Raja Bell

They were in cap hell but it wasn't as big of a deal because they were winning but as they begin to not advance further, cap space became an issue when they wanted to make moves. In addition to bringing in Kerr to improve the roster, Kerr was suppose to help move guys for cap space.

Nix, with this reasoning that it's on Kerr and not on MDA then you should be killing Walsh for the current state of the Knicks roster with the same line of thinking.

I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Swishfm3
Posts: 23324
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2003
Member: #392
3/14/2010  5:37 AM
eViL wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:Without Steve Nash, D'Antoni has only been able to win 33% of his games.

fact: phil jackson minus a top 50 player on his team would still win at a 70% clip.

Thats not a fact because Phil Jackson has never had a team without, at least one, top 50 player.

Fire the coach?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy