[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Walsh, Why Exactly Did You Trade Darko
Author Thread
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/23/2010  8:46 PM
sebstar wrote:Clearly.

We all know if D'ivatoni wanted Jennings here then he would be here. The Diva wears the pants in the relationship. Walsh wears the Depends.

if MDA wanted Jennings he would be wearing a Knicks' jersey right now, guaranteed... what MDA wants he gets

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AUTOADVERT
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
2/23/2010  8:47 PM
TMS wrote:
sebstar wrote:Clearly.

We all know if D'ivatoni wanted Jennings here then he would be here. The Diva wears the pants in the relationship. Walsh wears the Depends.

if MDA wanted Jennings he would be wearing a Knicks' jersey right now, guaranteed... what MDA wants he gets

I thought D'Antoni wanted Hill because of the Amare comparisons and they thought that Lee was going to get away.

I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/23/2010  8:59 PM
Pharzeone wrote:
TMS wrote:
sebstar wrote:Clearly.

We all know if D'ivatoni wanted Jennings here then he would be here. The Diva wears the pants in the relationship. Walsh wears the Depends.

if MDA wanted Jennings he would be wearing a Knicks' jersey right now, guaranteed... what MDA wants he gets

I thought D'Antoni wanted Hill because of the Amare comparisons and they thought that Lee was going to get away.

right, he wasn't interested in Jennings otherwise DW would have taken the kid... MDA saw Jordan Hill as a possible Amare clone in his system, so we took him.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Uptown
Posts: 31359
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

2/23/2010  9:58 PM
TMS wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:
TMS wrote:
sebstar wrote:Clearly.

We all know if D'ivatoni wanted Jennings here then he would be here. The Diva wears the pants in the relationship. Walsh wears the Depends.

if MDA wanted Jennings he would be wearing a Knicks' jersey right now, guaranteed... what MDA wants he gets

I thought D'Antoni wanted Hill because of the Amare comparisons and they thought that Lee was going to get away.

right, he wasn't interested in Jennings otherwise DW would have taken the kid... MDA saw Jordan Hill as a possible Amare clone in his system, so we took him.


MDA wantd Hill because he was an Amare clone, so did he change his mind and force Walsh to trade him. BTW, I mentioned this earlier in this thread but are we going to ignore Walsh's own words that he didn't have a 'feel for Jennings game'.

sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
2/23/2010  10:03 PM
Uptown wrote:
TMS wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:
TMS wrote:
sebstar wrote:Clearly.

We all know if D'ivatoni wanted Jennings here then he would be here. The Diva wears the pants in the relationship. Walsh wears the Depends.

if MDA wanted Jennings he would be wearing a Knicks' jersey right now, guaranteed... what MDA wants he gets

I thought D'Antoni wanted Hill because of the Amare comparisons and they thought that Lee was going to get away.

right, he wasn't interested in Jennings otherwise DW would have taken the kid... MDA saw Jordan Hill as a possible Amare clone in his system, so we took him.


MDA wantd Hill because he was an Amare clone, so did he change his mind and force Walsh to trade him. BTW, I mentioned this earlier in this thread but are we going to ignore Walsh's own words that he didn't have a 'feel for Jennings game'.

Amare was gettin' serious burn as a rookie, so yeah D'ivatoni changed his mind. Hill aint shyt.

They knew they had to cut bait with Hill. They would have fought tooth and nail to keep him if they thought he was a future star.

I mean, look at it this way. Why wouldnt Walsh, when asked about Jennings, say "hey, Jennings is a great talent but we're very excited about Jordan Hill"...Whenever Walsh talks about the Jennings blunder its like he's talking about his Grandma just dying.

Well, his Grandma prolly already dead, but you know what I mean.

My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
Uptown
Posts: 31359
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

2/23/2010  10:09 PM
sebstar wrote:
Uptown wrote:
TMS wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:
TMS wrote:
sebstar wrote:Clearly.

We all know if D'ivatoni wanted Jennings here then he would be here. The Diva wears the pants in the relationship. Walsh wears the Depends.

if MDA wanted Jennings he would be wearing a Knicks' jersey right now, guaranteed... what MDA wants he gets

I thought D'Antoni wanted Hill because of the Amare comparisons and they thought that Lee was going to get away.

right, he wasn't interested in Jennings otherwise DW would have taken the kid... MDA saw Jordan Hill as a possible Amare clone in his system, so we took him.


MDA wantd Hill because he was an Amare clone, so did he change his mind and force Walsh to trade him. BTW, I mentioned this earlier in this thread but are we going to ignore Walsh's own words that he didn't have a 'feel for Jennings game'.

Amare was gettin' serious burn as a rookie, so yeah D'ivatoni changed his mind. Hill aint shyt.

They knew they had to cut bait with Hill. They would have fought tooth and nail to keep him if they thought he was a future star.

I mean, look at it this way. Why wouldnt Walsh, when asked about Jennings, say "hey, Jennings is a great talent but we're very excited about Jordan Hill"...Whenever Walsh talks about the Jennings blunder its like he's talking about his Grandma just dying.

Well, his Grandma prolly already dead, but you know what I mean.


Hill wasn't who they wanted, they coveted Steph Curry. Once Curry was gone, they took the next best player on their board, which was Hill. They tossed a few nice lines at reporters about how much they liked Hill, but action speaks louder than words. MDA didn't play him much because he wasn't feeling his game; plain and simple.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/23/2010  10:12 PM
Uptown wrote:
TMS wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:
TMS wrote:
sebstar wrote:Clearly.

We all know if D'ivatoni wanted Jennings here then he would be here. The Diva wears the pants in the relationship. Walsh wears the Depends.

if MDA wanted Jennings he would be wearing a Knicks' jersey right now, guaranteed... what MDA wants he gets

I thought D'Antoni wanted Hill because of the Amare comparisons and they thought that Lee was going to get away.

right, he wasn't interested in Jennings otherwise DW would have taken the kid... MDA saw Jordan Hill as a possible Amare clone in his system, so we took him.


MDA wantd Hill because he was an Amare clone, so did he change his mind and force Walsh to trade him. BTW, I mentioned this earlier in this thread but are we going to ignore Walsh's own words that he didn't have a 'feel for Jennings game'.

bro, i don't take anything DW or MDA says at face value anymore... they've been BSing Knicks fans ever since they got here... all the stuff about developing our youth & not giving up future assets just to clear salary last year, & we go & trade for T-Mac & trade away 3 of our future assets to dump a contract at the deadline this year in a complete panic maneuver... when we made the Jamal & Zach trades, DW tried to sell the fans that those trades were not just a salary dump & that he thought we actually got better in the deal... the only thing DW has been consistent on since he's been here is that he didn't want to take on any longterm contracts because he wanted to preserve his cap space... to that point he's held true to his word all the way, but he has contradicted himself on plenty of other occasions that i no longer hold anything he has to say at much value.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
2/23/2010  10:12 PM
So because they didnt get the guy they wanted, they basically just said "the hell with it" and threw a dart against the board?
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/23/2010  10:17 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/23/2010  10:19 PM
i already posted the draft night clip from YouTube the other day... feel free to watch & listen to the comments made by Donnie that night on why he picked Jordan Hill... take it for whatever it's worth if u believe him or not.

FWD to 3:19


btw, love what JVG says at 4:45... tell those booin' fools what's up VG! they don't even know wtf they're booin' at.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Uptown
Posts: 31359
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

2/23/2010  10:21 PM
TMS wrote:
Uptown wrote:
TMS wrote:
Pharzeone wrote:
TMS wrote:
sebstar wrote:Clearly.

We all know if D'ivatoni wanted Jennings here then he would be here. The Diva wears the pants in the relationship. Walsh wears the Depends.

if MDA wanted Jennings he would be wearing a Knicks' jersey right now, guaranteed... what MDA wants he gets

I thought D'Antoni wanted Hill because of the Amare comparisons and they thought that Lee was going to get away.

right, he wasn't interested in Jennings otherwise DW would have taken the kid... MDA saw Jordan Hill as a possible Amare clone in his system, so we took him.


MDA wantd Hill because he was an Amare clone, so did he change his mind and force Walsh to trade him. BTW, I mentioned this earlier in this thread but are we going to ignore Walsh's own words that he didn't have a 'feel for Jennings game'.

bro, i don't take anything DW or MDA says at face value anymore... they've been BSing Knicks fans ever since they got here... all the stuff about developing our youth & not giving up future assets just to clear salary last year, & we go & trade for T-Mac & trade away 3 of our future assets to dump a contract at the deadline this year in a complete panic maneuver... when we made the Jamal & Zach trades, DW tried to sell the fans that those trades were not just a salary dump & that he thought we actually got better in the deal... the only thing DW has been consistent on since he's been here is that he didn't want to take on any longterm contracts because he wanted to preserve his cap space... to that point he's held true to his word all the way, but he has contradicted himself on plenty of other occasions that i no longer hold anything he has to say at much value.

Of courese theres been double talk. All GM's do it to appease the fan-base. But Walsh has been consistant about clearing cap space for the summer of 2010. He said that from day 1 that was his number 1 priority and his actions are speaking very loud.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/23/2010  10:24 PM
right, i don't doubt his integrity about the 2010 clearing cap plan... it's just some of his other inconsistencies that i doubt... we use a pick on a player who he seemingly is high on & a few months later we end up dumping him with other assets to clear cap... if we were trying to dump Fishlips contract last year don't u think a #8 lottery pick would have been more than enough to get it done w/o having to deal away future picks in the process? i do.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
2/23/2010  10:27 PM
TMS wrote:right, i don't doubt his integrity about the 2010 clearing cap plan... it's just some of his other inconsistencies that i doubt... we use a pick on a player who he seemingly is high on & a few months later we end up dumping him with other assets to clear cap... if we were trying to dump Fishlips contract last year don't u think a #8 lottery pick would have been more than enough to get it done w/o having to deal away future picks in the process? i do.

A number 8 pick has got value. Hill does not.

My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
Uptown
Posts: 31359
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

2/23/2010  10:27 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/23/2010  10:30 PM
TMS wrote:right, i don't doubt his integrity about the 2010 clearing cap plan... it's just some of his other inconsistencies that i doubt... we use a pick on a player who he seemingly is high on & a few months later we end up dumping him with other assets to clear cap... if we were trying to dump Fishlips contract last year don't u think a #8 lottery pick would have been more than enough to get it done w/o having to deal away future picks in the process? i do.

Walsh clearly missed the boat on the Sac-town deal last year. I think it was do or die at the deadline. The window was closing on his 2010 dreams and he was forced to give perhaps a little more than he wanted (2012 draft pick, and Hill) in order to keep the 2010 plan alive. I wasn't happy we included the pick, but Walsh felt compelled to do it.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/23/2010  10:34 PM
sebstar wrote:
TMS wrote:right, i don't doubt his integrity about the 2010 clearing cap plan... it's just some of his other inconsistencies that i doubt... we use a pick on a player who he seemingly is high on & a few months later we end up dumping him with other assets to clear cap... if we were trying to dump Fishlips contract last year don't u think a #8 lottery pick would have been more than enough to get it done w/o having to deal away future picks in the process? i do.

A number 8 pick has got value. Hill does not.

dude, can u get off the trashing Jordan Hill kick for just a second & consider the fact that if Donnie had been proactive last year about dumping Fishlips' contract that we likely could have gotten it done without having to give up such a heavy price?

whatever, call this all speculation on my part, but there were enough rumblings in trade rumors with Fishlips' name involved that there had to be some fire where there was smoke... not once did u ever hear about other teams demanding multiple draft picks to take on his salary... face it, Donnie paid through the nose at the deadline this year because he knew he missed the boat last year & this was his last chance to get something done... last year Donnie played it very conservative thinking we'd be a playoff contender this season with Fishlips & Nate on the roster & he got burned for it bigtime... all that's left to do is hope & pray that we get Lebron this summer.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
2/23/2010  10:35 PM
sebstar wrote:
A number 8 pick has got value. Hill does not.

That is why I wrote earlier, that Walsh should have just packaged Jeffries with the #8 pick and then he wouldn't have had to trade 1.5 more first rounders to get rid of him.

But Walsh blew that pick so bad that it was almost like the Rockets had to take on Hill in order to get the 1.5 picks.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/23/2010  10:37 PM
Uptown wrote:
TMS wrote:right, i don't doubt his integrity about the 2010 clearing cap plan... it's just some of his other inconsistencies that i doubt... we use a pick on a player who he seemingly is high on & a few months later we end up dumping him with other assets to clear cap... if we were trying to dump Fishlips contract last year don't u think a #8 lottery pick would have been more than enough to get it done w/o having to deal away future picks in the process? i do.

Walsh clearly missed the boat on the Sac-town deal last year. I think it was do or die at the deadline. The window was closing on his 2010 dreams and he was forced to give perhaps a little more than he wanted (2012 draft pick, and Hill) in order to keep the 2010 plan alive. I wasn't happy we included the pick, but Walsh felt compelled to do it.

i agree, he felt compelled to do it... i wish he had been more proactive last season to avoid some of the panic moves he made this year... maybe we could have ended up with some useful assets out of the Nate Robinson trade instead of rental players that are all likely to be renounced to save on the cap, or at the very least not have had to give up so much to dump Jeffries' contract.

i don't often kill trades before i know the outcome but this one i just can't push it under the rug & convince myself everything's going to work out just fine... hoping for the best tho.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
2/23/2010  10:42 PM
I cant imagine that Walsh passed up on a Nate/Jeffries for an expiring deal. Considering how much they hate Robinson, and how much of an albatross the Jeffries contract was, I would have to think they would have jumped at such an offer.

I'm thinking Sac asked for more and Walsh balked, figuring he might be able to bring up Jeffries value. Finally, he had to face facts this past deadline.

Just me thinking out loud.

My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/23/2010  10:48 PM
sebstar wrote:I cant imagine that Walsh passed up on a Nate/Jeffries for an expiring deal. Considering how much they hate Robinson, and how much of an albatross the Jeffries contract was, I would have to think they would have jumped at such an offer.

I'm thinking Sac asked for more and Walsh balked, figuring he might be able to bring up Jeffries value. Finally, he had to face facts this past deadline.

Just me thinking out loud.

i agee, & i also agree that Donnie may have soured on the deal when asked for more assets... still, i can't imagine any GM being crazy enough to ask for our #8 lottery pick, swap rights & another pick tho at the time... we weren't in panic mode then... everyone knew they had Donnie by the balls at the deadline this year cuz this was his last chance to dump salary before the summer rolled around.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Uptown
Posts: 31359
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

2/23/2010  10:51 PM
TMS wrote:
Uptown wrote:
TMS wrote:right, i don't doubt his integrity about the 2010 clearing cap plan... it's just some of his other inconsistencies that i doubt... we use a pick on a player who he seemingly is high on & a few months later we end up dumping him with other assets to clear cap... if we were trying to dump Fishlips contract last year don't u think a #8 lottery pick would have been more than enough to get it done w/o having to deal away future picks in the process? i do.

Walsh clearly missed the boat on the Sac-town deal last year. I think it was do or die at the deadline. The window was closing on his 2010 dreams and he was forced to give perhaps a little more than he wanted (2012 draft pick, and Hill) in order to keep the 2010 plan alive. I wasn't happy we included the pick, but Walsh felt compelled to do it.

i agree, he felt compelled to do it... i wish he had been more proactive last season to avoid some of the panic moves he made this year... maybe we could have ended up with some useful assets out of the Nate Robinson trade instead of rental players that are all likely to be renounced to save on the cap, or at the very least not have had to give up so much to dump Jeffries' contract.

i don't often kill trades before i know the outcome but this one i just can't push it under the rug & convince myself everything's going to work out just fine... hoping for the best tho.

I have to admitt, I am a bit intigued by Walker and Giddens. I watched both in college and think each them has good potential. Perhaps not both, but hopefully we can sign one of them next season and they can serve as our rookie, so-to-speak for next year. Hey, as Isiah said, when you dont have draft picks you have to "beat the bushes."

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/23/2010  10:57 PM
we barely have the cap space to sign 2 max guys as it is... to keep those guys they'd have to agree to minimum level deals... i think we can probably pick up talent on their level in the 2nd round personally... high flying dunk machines aren't that hard to find.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Walsh, Why Exactly Did You Trade Darko

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy