[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

How to tear down a disaster capped out roster with no hope in 2 Years.
Author Thread
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/19/2010  9:15 PM
TMS wrote:

how about u answer my question & not act like a douche? Dionte Christmas was a talented scorer in college & could have helped our need for size at the SG position all year... why didn't we take a look at him? what the hell is Donnie Walsh's fascination for undersized SG's who can't shoot? why is Jonathan Bender a Knick when he can barely run up & down the court? someone like Josh Heytvelt wouldn't have been a better option if you wanted a bigman who can shoot the rock? u telling me there aren't better players out there to be signed on veteran's minimum deals than the scrubs Donnie's pulled in since he's been our GM? please.

Jonathan Bender sucks. But he's a friend of Walsh's so he was given a shot. Big deal.

Dionte Christmas? Josh Heyvelt? Come'on. You're just naming more scrubs that if we had signed them - then - you'd be upset with the fact they suck.

You're bashing Donnie Walsh for signing one scrub but passing on another in a season when the BIG plan was to just dump salary.

Really?

There's got to be a better fight than this to take on.

Come'on. You think any of those guys would have changed the course of our season? I don't think so.

It is what it is. Forget the last two years. They were spent tearing down Isiah's mistakes. Nothing more.

It's all about building a new team starting July 2010 and nothing else.

Time to stop discussing the past. Besides, I'm sure there will be mistakes made in the future worth harping on.

lol.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/19/2010  9:40 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/19/2010  9:42 PM
Cosmic wrote:
TMS wrote:

how about u answer my question & not act like a douche? Dionte Christmas was a talented scorer in college & could have helped our need for size at the SG position all year... why didn't we take a look at him? what the hell is Donnie Walsh's fascination for undersized SG's who can't shoot? why is Jonathan Bender a Knick when he can barely run up & down the court? someone like Josh Heytvelt wouldn't have been a better option if you wanted a bigman who can shoot the rock? u telling me there aren't better players out there to be signed on veteran's minimum deals than the scrubs Donnie's pulled in since he's been our GM? please.

Jonathan Bender sucks. But he's a friend of Walsh's so he was given a shot. Big deal.

Dionte Christmas? Josh Heyvelt? Come'on. You're just naming more scrubs that if we had signed them - then - you'd be upset with the fact they suck.

You're bashing Donnie Walsh for signing one scrub but passing on another in a season when the BIG plan was to just dump salary.

Really?

There's got to be a better fight than this to take on.

Come'on. You think any of those guys would have changed the course of our season? I don't think so.

It is what it is. Forget the last two years. They were spent tearing down Isiah's mistakes. Nothing more.

It's all about building a new team starting July 2010 and nothing else.

Time to stop discussing the past. Besides, I'm sure there will be mistakes made in the future worth harping on.

lol.

dude, u posted a list of his moves & i'm commenting on it.... if u don't wanna discuss the past then why did u post this thread to begin with?

what does Donnie's FA signings have to do with tearing down Isiah's mess? absolutely nothing... he missed on every FA signing he's made since he's been here & that's not something to instill confidence for this summer, that's my point.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/19/2010  9:51 PM
TMS wrote:what does Donnie's FA signings have to do with tearing down Isiah's mess? absolutely nothing... he missed on every FA signing he's made since he's been here & that's not something to instill confidence for this summer, that's my point.

From the look of the guys he was signing, there seems like there was no effort made to go hard for a FA that was sure to stick. It was mostly guys that you take a chance on to see how they do. Guys who might catch on and give us some decent service for the last 2 year, but I don't believe he was really ever looking for someone who would stick beyond this season.

No one had a major impact which is a bit disappointing, but it really doesn't seem like an issue worth quibbling over.

Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/19/2010  9:55 PM
TMS wrote:

dude, u posted a list of his moves & i'm commenting on it.... if u don't wanna discuss the past then why did u post this thread to begin with?

what does Donnie's FA signings have to do with tearing down Isiah's mess? absolutely nothing... he missed on every FA signing he's made since he's been here & that's not something to instill confidence for this summer, that's my point.

I created the thread to show the entire list of transactions Donnie Walsh made in an effort to tear down Isiah's mistakes. Nothing more.

I think it illustrates beautifully what it takes for any GM to come in and tear down someone elses' mess. And believe me, Isiah's mess was record breaking salary mistakes.

The points you are harping on are low level meaningless points in my opinion. Situations where Donnie knew he was only signing stop gaps that wouldn't exceed his 2010 plan. You're upset over one scrub being signed over another scrub. You're upset over a scrub being signed over a mysterious well skilled player you (or Briggs, or anyone who opposes this plan) can't seem to name.

So I don't know what the intent is.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/19/2010  9:57 PM
nixluva wrote:
TMS wrote:what does Donnie's FA signings have to do with tearing down Isiah's mess? absolutely nothing... he missed on every FA signing he's made since he's been here & that's not something to instill confidence for this summer, that's my point.

From the look of the guys he was signing, there seems like there was no effort made to go hard for a FA that was sure to stick. It was mostly guys that you take a chance on to see how they do. Guys who might catch on and give us some decent service for the last 2 year, but I don't believe he was really ever looking for someone who would stick beyond this season.

No one had a major impact which is a bit disappointing, but it really doesn't seem like an issue worth quibbling over.

Donnie's signings have everything to do with tearing down Isiah's mess. They were not to interfere with the 2010 plan no matter what. Also, there weren't very many players available during these past two season. So I don't get the frustration over not signing some marquee player the past two years. There were none given our assets. There were none given our plan of action.

As NIX said it had to do with finding guys who we could give a trial - without messing with the 2010 salary dump plan.

But, well, this is played out. I've said what I have to say. If you disagree that's cool.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/19/2010  10:05 PM
Cosmic wrote:Donnie's signings have everything to do with tearing down Isiah's mess. They were not to interfere with the 2010 plan no matter what.

doing nothing accomplishes the same thing... Donnie spent millions of dollars signing FA's he thought could help this franchise... they didn't... minor signings most, but Chris Duhon has not been a minor signing, we spent over $11 million ($22 million if u count the luxury expenditures) on him & he clearly has not been the answer... go ahead & gloss over all these "minor mistakes" if u wish, just because the plan has been for 2010 doesn't mean you're allowed to make stupid signings in the meantime & be absolved completely of any fault.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/19/2010  10:07 PM
I think the point was that - even though we were tearing down the team - he didn't want to have a team of completely useless players - or - a team that was completely say lacking a single guard.

So while tearing down the team he made lateral moves and low risk signings of players that fit the position that was lacking.

Duhon - we had no PG.
Trading for Hughes - we had no legit SG.

Things of that nature.

I doubt he made the moves and sat back and said 'Yeah, perfect. Playoffs here we come."

I think he just tried to keep a balanced roster while behind the scenes he continued the "master plan" out of sight of those that believed his NECESSARY corporate style press conferences.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/19/2010  10:09 PM
just to clarify, i'm not completely hating on Donnie Walsh... i thought his trades to dump Zach & Jamal were absolutely necessary & completely justified... but his FA signings have all been flops IMO... not major flops but flops nonetheless... he also failed to get back any usable assets for Nate in a trade, which really should have been done last year when Nate had no veto rights... same goes for D Lee.

there isn't anything major to quibble over other than this T-Mac trade he just made because he hasn't made any other moves except for these scrub signings for us to discuss... at this point i don't think i'll be happy w/the job he's done as our GM until we land Lebron James this summer... if we land him that is... a few days ago it wasn't Lebron or bust for me, but after this trade it most certainly is.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/19/2010  10:13 PM
nixluva wrote:
TMS wrote:what does Donnie's FA signings have to do with tearing down Isiah's mess? absolutely nothing... he missed on every FA signing he's made since he's been here & that's not something to instill confidence for this summer, that's my point.

From the look of the guys he was signing, there seems like there was no effort made to go hard for a FA that was sure to stick. It was mostly guys that you take a chance on to see how they do. Guys who might catch on and give us some decent service for the last 2 year, but I don't believe he was really ever looking for someone who would stick beyond this season.

No one had a major impact which is a bit disappointing, but it really doesn't seem like an issue worth quibbling over.

we signed Chris Duhon as the behest of Mike D'Antoni... we didn't need to spend the money on him, there were other options available to us... DW has tried to accomodate MDA far too often instead of focusing on building a team with players that address the issues of balance on this team... we passed on Allen Iverson because MDA didn't wanna coach him IMHO... we bring in scrubs like Bender out of nepotism instead of from sound basketball judgement... again, i'm just curious who's in charge of scouting the talent Donnie Walsh brings in cuz so far he hasn't brought in anyone other than Gallo who's been able to stick w/this team longterm & that's very disappointing to me.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/19/2010  10:15 PM
Cosmic wrote:
TheGame wrote:THis thread should be "How to tear down a disaster capped out roster with no hope in 2 years by trading away all your draft picks"

The plan was to build through free agency.

The PICK is inconsequential. Again, THE PICK. Not "pickS"

2011 SWAP.
2012 PICK.
JORDAN HILL.

Not 3 picks. Not 3 lotto picks.
Not 2 picks. Not 2 lotto picks.
A 2011 SWAP - contingent on the records of the Rockets and Knicks.
A 2012 PICK that goes to Houston (ONE PICK). One. 1. Whose place is dependent on the Knicks record.


We don't make the deal we are a perrenial 35 win team. What do 35 win teams win in the draft year after year? Yeah, Sweetney, Hill, Frye.

We're seeking FRANCHISE BUILDING BLOCKS. And we're doing it through FREE AGENCY.

Not banking on some future 2012 pick.

If you're banking on building an elite team off of a mid lotto 2011 and 2012 pick, well, to be kind I have no idea what to tell you except that you're wrong to think that's possible.


Boy cos, you are on a got damn roll in this thread.. (running to get my popcorn and soft drink).. OK continue bro... hahahahahaha

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/19/2010  10:17 PM
TMS wrote:
Cosmic wrote:Donnie's signings have everything to do with tearing down Isiah's mess. They were not to interfere with the 2010 plan no matter what.

doing nothing accomplishes the same thing... Donnie spent millions of dollars signing FA's he thought could help this franchise... they didn't... minor signings most, but Chris Duhon has not been a minor signing, we spent over $11 million ($22 million if u count the luxury expenditures) on him & he clearly has not been the answer... go ahead & gloss over all these "minor mistakes" if u wish, just because the plan has been for 2010 doesn't mean you're allowed to make stupid signings in the meantime & be absolved completely of any fault.

good point TMS.. both you and cos are making some solid points here...

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/20/2010  3:14 AM
What was the option to Duhon? At the time very few players would accept only a 2 yr deal. DW's signings didn't help but they also didn't hurt the overall plan. More important than any in season success was to keep on course for Max cap space and DW did that. Could we have also won more at the same time with better moves? Maybe but in the end the caliber of players we can now go after us unparalleled. We'll never have another chance to get such great talent all at once.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/20/2010  6:40 AM
DW's signings didn't help but they also didn't hurt the overall plan.

steer your mind away from the damn 2010 plan for once & ask yourself if any of Donnie's signings have helped this team improve over the past 2 years or not... what kind of idiot GM makes FA signings with the idea that they won't help you get better? particularly on a team that's over the luxury tax threshold? if that's the case they'd just not spend the money... no one throws millions of dollars out the window with the knowledge that these guys won't help you win games.

as to who else was available instead of Duhon, i have no idea... give me a list of FA's that were available that year since you're obviously positive that no one else would have accepted a 2 year $11 million dollar deal to come play here... i'm not even trying to say I told you so either on this one, at the time i had no issues with Duhon's signing, but looking back u have to say it was not a good signing at all... guys like EnySpree were dead right on this one cuz they hated the signing from the start... i have to think there were other options out there that would have been better than Chris Duhon for the money we spent on bringing him here just like i think there were better options we could have brought in on those minimum salary contracts too... the fact that Donnie's signings have all turned out to be horrible NBA players is not a good reflection on his eye for talent.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/20/2010  7:43 AM
tkf wrote:
TMS wrote:
Cosmic wrote:Donnie's signings have everything to do with tearing down Isiah's mess. They were not to interfere with the 2010 plan no matter what.

doing nothing accomplishes the same thing... Donnie spent millions of dollars signing FA's he thought could help this franchise... they didn't... minor signings most, but Chris Duhon has not been a minor signing, we spent over $11 million ($22 million if u count the luxury expenditures) on him & he clearly has not been the answer... go ahead & gloss over all these "minor mistakes" if u wish, just because the plan has been for 2010 doesn't mean you're allowed to make stupid signings in the meantime & be absolved completely of any fault.

good point TMS.. both you and cos are making some solid points here...

I think not doing anything was part of the 2010 plan though TMS. Why fill up the roster with mediocre talent?

Again I keep wondering about the players you feel we missed out on. There really wasn't much out there. If there was something better than Duhon we would have signed him.

As I have said in the past, the roster that Walsh walked into when he took the job, was not a roster that made you go "Wow, this is pretty good, let me ADD TO IT, and that will put it over the top."

For, that was never going to happen. Isiah tried and tried with MLEs and trades and the same result was we were a 23-33 win team. That there is proof that the foundation/core of the team was one you couldn't add to with success.

So what you do is tear it down. In the meantime you don't leave yourself entirely gutted you try to add a few players who can at least play the game and not interfere with your bigger plan of 2010 cap space.

And that's what he did.

Was watching the losing fun? No.

But if Walsh didn't do the sidestep moves along the way we'd look like the 5-50 Nets right now. Now, that would have been something worth being really upset over.

This...this team...last year and this year...frustrating but it didn't upset me because I see what Walsh wants to do and I believe in it.

I don't know the final outcome of what begins in 2010 but I do know regardless of that outcome this is the path we had to take as a franchise.

Had to tear that roster down to the bottom. Had to. There was nothing there to add to. Nothing. Outside of Lee, Gallo, Chandler, Douglas there is nothing of value now, nor the day Walsh arrived, that any GM would keep and try to build around.

We're on the right path. Where it winds up nobody knows but WE ARE ON THE RIGHT PATH.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
2/20/2010  8:19 AM
Cosmic wrote:
tkf wrote:
TMS wrote:
Cosmic wrote:Donnie's signings have everything to do with tearing down Isiah's mess. They were not to interfere with the 2010 plan no matter what.

doing nothing accomplishes the same thing... Donnie spent millions of dollars signing FA's he thought could help this franchise... they didn't... minor signings most, but Chris Duhon has not been a minor signing, we spent over $11 million ($22 million if u count the luxury expenditures) on him & he clearly has not been the answer... go ahead & gloss over all these "minor mistakes" if u wish, just because the plan has been for 2010 doesn't mean you're allowed to make stupid signings in the meantime & be absolved completely of any fault.

good point TMS.. both you and cos are making some solid points here...

I think not doing anything was part of the 2010 plan though TMS. Why fill up the roster with mediocre talent?

Again I keep wondering about the players you feel we missed out on. There really wasn't much out there. If there was something better than Duhon we would have signed him.

As I have said in the past, the roster that Walsh walked into when he took the job, was not a roster that made you go "Wow, this is pretty good, let me ADD TO IT, and that will put it over the top."

For, that was never going to happen. Isiah tried and tried with MLEs and trades and the same result was we were a 23-33 win team. That there is proof that the foundation/core of the team was one you couldn't add to with success.

So what you do is tear it down. In the meantime you don't leave yourself entirely gutted you try to add a few players who can at least play the game and not interfere with your bigger plan of 2010 cap space.

And that's what he did.

Was watching the losing fun? No.

But if Walsh didn't do the sidestep moves along the way we'd look like the 5-50 Nets right now. Now, that would have been something worth being really upset over.

This...this team...last year and this year...frustrating but it didn't upset me because I see what Walsh wants to do and I believe in it.

I don't know the final outcome of what begins in 2010 but I do know regardless of that outcome this is the path we had to take as a franchise.

Had to tear that roster down to the bottom. Had to. There was nothing there to add to. Nothing. Outside of Lee, Gallo, Chandler, Douglas there is nothing of value now, nor the day Walsh arrived, that any GM would keep and try to build around.

We're on the right path. Where it winds up nobody knows but WE ARE ON THE RIGHT PATH.


The signings/no signings were inconsequential with respect to where we are now, IMO. Duhon's signing was good. Donnie only gave him 2 years so he would expire for 2010. Duhon was OK first year. Not this year.

Drafting Hill was not a good choice.

Donnie's main mistake was with Jeffries. When he traded Jamal and Zach in Nov 2008, we were "ALL IN" at that time. That was the time to have traded Jeffries also. or keep trying to trade Jeffries until we had some deal. Jeffries had to be gone by the 2009 trade deadline (last year - not wait til this year). That mistake was so huge as it cost us our #1 picked player from last year (Hill), #1 pick 2012 and a 2011 potential swap. We didn't need to be put in the situation we are now in.

The plan was great. Donnie stopped short of executing it well. I still can't understand how/why he screwed up so much with Jeffries. We were all in 1 1/2 years ago. Jeffries should have been all out then!

The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/20/2010  8:24 AM
ok, going through the list of free agents that were available in 2008 just to entertain this discussion...

http://www.sportscity.com/NBA/NBA-Free-Agents-2008/

Anthony Johnson signed a 2 year contract for $3.8 million with Orlando that summer... Donnie signed Chris Duhon to 2 years $11 million... who do you think was the better value?

Carlos Arroyo signed a contract to play in Israel with opt outs after each season in case an NBA team wanted to sign him... coulda easily signed him on a 1 year deal at minimum dollars if we wanted a stop gap PG, no?

or here's a novel idea, how about drafting a PG & actually letting him play? if we were going to suck anyways, mine as well develop a young guy, no? i know MDA is allergic to such endeavors but this would seem to make sense on a rebuilding team... seeing as though you like to stress the point that this has been a rebuilding situation for the past 2 years, wouldn't that have been the logical direction to go in rather than spending $22 million including luxury tax expenditures on a PG who was only going to be a stopgap solution anyways?

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/20/2010  8:25 AM    LAST EDITED: 2/20/2010  8:28 AM
Edit: This was to respond to Markji

--

Well, without being there, you'd have to think he tried. The Nate/Jeffries to SAC for Kenny Thomas had legs - but I think the question is what were the other pieces to that trade? Did SAC demand a pick? Is that why the trade fell through? (And, yes, it was a real rumor, the NBA granted SAC/NYK a 15 minute trade deadline extension to try to work out a deal).

And with Curry - Walsh told any team who wanted Lee last year they had to take Curry. That was the right thing to do but that was the end of that.

In the end maybe we would have been better off giving up a pick last year to dump Jeffries. Maybe do it draft day instead of drafting Hill.

I don't know...that's a lost cause to figure that out. I'm sure there was opportunity but at the time the asking price may have seemed to high. This time we got backed into a corner and we had to do - what we had to do - to get it done - or end up screwed.

Jeffries + ? + 09 pick on draft night for Kenny Thomas. I'm guess that could have been done. We don't draft Hill. We keep our 2011 swap and 2012 pick.

Yes, I suppose that's entirely probable. But, again at the time, Walsh wasn't giving up a pick to dump Zach or Craw or Jeff or Curry. In hindsight it backfired on Jeffries and it cost us the unnecessary 2011 swap and 2012 outright pick.

However, remember, we did get Rodriguez who could prove worth that 2012 pick sent out. We could be better in 2011 than the Rockets meaning no swap. We know hill isn't good.

So it MAY just work out in the end if you think of it on those terms.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
TheGame
Posts: 26647
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
2/20/2010  8:27 AM
Cosmic wrote:
TheGame wrote:THis thread should be "How to tear down a disaster capped out roster with no hope in 2 years by trading away all your draft picks"

The plan was to build through free agency.

The PICK is inconsequential. Again, THE PICK. Not "pickS"

2011 SWAP.
2012 PICK.
JORDAN HILL.

Not 3 picks. Not 3 lotto picks.
Not 2 picks. Not 2 lotto picks.
A 2011 SWAP - contingent on the records of the Rockets and Knicks.
A 2012 PICK that goes to Houston (ONE PICK). One. 1. Whose place is dependent on the Knicks record.


We don't make the deal we are a perrenial 35 win team. What do 35 win teams win in the draft year after year? Yeah, Sweetney, Hill, Frye.

We're seeking FRANCHISE BUILDING BLOCKS. And we're doing it through FREE AGENCY.

Not banking on some future 2012 pick.

If you're banking on building an elite team off of a mid lotto 2011 and 2012 pick, well, to be kind I have no idea what to tell you except that you're wrong to think that's possible.

Walsh has just essentially made the exact same trade IT made 4 years ago. In fact, in throwing in Hill, Walshes trade is even worse. Except whereas IT traded for an actual player who he thought would become a cornerstone of our franchise, Walsh has traded for cap space and the 50% chance (at best) that Lebron wants to leave Cleveland and play in NY. If this was his plan all along, then why not trade Nate and Jeffries last year when it would not have cost us nearly as much. It was poor planning and the only thing that can save this disaster in the making is if McGrady returns to near-all star form and he can entice Lebron and Bosh to come here.

Trust the Process
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/20/2010  8:27 AM
TMS wrote:ok, going through the list of free agents that were available in 2008 just to entertain this discussion...

http://www.sportscity.com/NBA/NBA-Free-Agents-2008/

Anthony Johnson signed a 2 year contract for $3.8 million with Orlando that summer... Donnie signed Chris Duhon to 2 years $11 million... who do you think was the better value?

Carlos Arroyo signed a contract to play in Israel with opt outs after each season in case an NBA team wanted to sign him... coulda easily signed him on a 1 year deal at minimum dollars if we wanted a stop gap PG, no?

or here's a novel idea, how about drafting a PG & actually letting him play? if we were going to suck anyways, mine as well develop a young guy, no? i know MDA is allergic to such endeavors but this would seem to make sense on a rebuilding team... seeing as though you like to stress the point that this has been a rebuilding situation for the past 2 years, wouldn't that have been the logical direction to go in rather than spending $22 million including luxury tax expenditures on a PG who was only going to be a stopgap solution anyways?

Donnie signed Duhon to 2-years 11M because he didn't want to sign him to 3-years 11M which is what Duhon wanted. He wanted to sign him for 2-years 7.5M. Duhon said no he wanted 3 years 11M. So we compromised, gave him his 11M, and preserved our space.

Anthony Johnson? Proved solid in the end but he wasn't as good as Duhon. So I don't think that's a big deal.

Arroyo wanted to go overseas.

See, you're still bringing up marginal talent that you wanted to sign in lieu of... marginal talent. So I just don't see what you're getting at. We'd been no better with Johnson or Arroyo over Duhon.

And I'm going to stop talking about it because it's turned into a debate over scraps. Inconsequential scraps.

On to the future, TMS, on to 2010.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/20/2010  8:30 AM    LAST EDITED: 2/20/2010  8:31 AM
TheGame wrote:

Walsh has just essentially made the exact same trade IT made 4 years ago. In fact, in throwing in Hill, Walshes trade is even worse. Except whereas IT traded for an actual player who he thought would become a cornerstone of our franchise, Walsh has traded for cap space and the 50% chance (at best) that Lebron wants to leave Cleveland and play in NY. If this was his plan all along, then why not trade Nate and Jeffries last year when it would not have cost us nearly as much. It was poor planning and the only thing that can save this disaster in the making is if McGrady returns to near-all star form and he can entice Lebron and Bosh to come here.

Why do I have to keep explaining that Isiah threw in picks to acquire long term contracts that turned out to be terrible players who destroyed our flexibility ---- WHERE Walsh made the pick trades to CREATE infinite flexibility --- AND that flexibility will turn out to be players who make us a good team --- who could entirely invalidate the 2011 swap --- and make the 2012 pick at the best a late teens pick --- and that Jordan Hill is a scrub?

TMac is now the key to LeBron? No. No he isn't.

I expect the guy to go down in a heap once again and get waived at the end of the year. He was here to dump Jeffries and be given a look-see the same way Donnie gave Wilcox, Hughes, Darko look-sees, and the same way hes going to give House a look-see.

Nothing more.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
How to tear down a disaster capped out roster with no hope in 2 Years.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy