[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Celtics, Knicks enter trade discussions for Nate?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 15 ‹ Previous 1  2  3  4 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
joec32033
Posts: 30621
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/16/2010  10:10 PM
Cosmic wrote:How does it fail?

It meets that criteria dead on.

I'm gunna have to say the trade checker is wrong on this one.


Nate is worth 2M in trade scenarios. You don't see players on the Celtics that meet that burden? I do.

I wouldn't rely on the trade checker on this one.

BYC restrictions. They are complicated. When I mess around with BYC players it is hit or miss. You got to remember unless it is a dead on salary, the smaller you get-salary wise-the less margin of error in the 125% leeway.

I have even seen ESPN trade Machine approve stuff Tradechecker correctly wouldn't allow.

~You can't run from who you are.~
AUTOADVERT
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
2/16/2010  10:17 PM
TMS wrote:
Uptown wrote:
TMS wrote:LOL... Nate for House, Allen & Scalabrine is just to give MDA some peace of mind... talentwise Boston makes out like bandits... what a joke... unless we were getting back a pick this is a pointless trade & doesn't help us get any better IMO

If we cant get a pick, we at least need to get back a prospect like Giddens or Bill Walker. If not, whats the point?

exactly... Nate's so much better than any of those guys it's not even funny... w/o at least a young asset we can use or a future pick, or even some cap relief, this trade does absolutely nothing to help our franchise... it's just to get rid of a thorn in MDA's side... if this trade is made then we really know who's in charge of this team's roster moves.


Nate for House, Allen & Scalabrine doesn't work on the trade checker. Nothing works except......a deal which is too good to be true.

Nate + Jeffries for House, Allen & Scalabrine. This works on trade checker. It also works if we added Marcus Landry. Also, we can throw in some money for Jeffries.
Boston gets 2 players who can help them this year and they get rid of lesser quality players. And we won't ask them for a draft pick for Nate.

The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/16/2010  10:18 PM
Markji wrote:
TMS wrote:
Uptown wrote:
TMS wrote:LOL... Nate for House, Allen & Scalabrine is just to give MDA some peace of mind... talentwise Boston makes out like bandits... what a joke... unless we were getting back a pick this is a pointless trade & doesn't help us get any better IMO

If we cant get a pick, we at least need to get back a prospect like Giddens or Bill Walker. If not, whats the point?

exactly... Nate's so much better than any of those guys it's not even funny... w/o at least a young asset we can use or a future pick, or even some cap relief, this trade does absolutely nothing to help our franchise... it's just to get rid of a thorn in MDA's side... if this trade is made then we really know who's in charge of this team's roster moves.


Nate for House, Allen & Scalabrine doesn't work on the trade checker. Nothing works except......a deal which is too good to be true.

Nate + Jeffries for House, Allen & Scalabrine. This works on trade checker. It also works if we added Marcus Landry. Also, we can throw in some money for Jeffries.
Boston gets 2 players who can help them this year and they get rid of lesser quality players. And we won't ask them for a draft pick for Nate.

u forgot to throw in Jordan Hill & 2 1st round picks bro

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
2/16/2010  10:20 PM
If the Knicks get nothing but expiring for Nate this is ridiculous. Walsh needs to stop protecting D'Antoni. Nate is too talented and too much of a fan favorite to throw away because the coach can't communicate with him. I hope Harrington at least brings something back when Walsh moves him out for big D.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
joec32033
Posts: 30621
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/16/2010  10:21 PM
Markji wrote:
TMS wrote:
Uptown wrote:
TMS wrote:LOL... Nate for House, Allen & Scalabrine is just to give MDA some peace of mind... talentwise Boston makes out like bandits... what a joke... unless we were getting back a pick this is a pointless trade & doesn't help us get any better IMO

If we cant get a pick, we at least need to get back a prospect like Giddens or Bill Walker. If not, whats the point?

exactly... Nate's so much better than any of those guys it's not even funny... w/o at least a young asset we can use or a future pick, or even some cap relief, this trade does absolutely nothing to help our franchise... it's just to get rid of a thorn in MDA's side... if this trade is made then we really know who's in charge of this team's roster moves.


Nate for House, Allen & Scalabrine doesn't work on the trade checker. Nothing works except......a deal which is too good to be true.

Nate + Jeffries for House, Allen & Scalabrine. This works on trade checker. It also works if we added Marcus Landry. Also, we can throw in some money for Jeffries.
Boston gets 2 players who can help them this year and they get rid of lesser quality players. And we won't ask them for a draft pick for Nate.

Great trade, Markji.....

~You can't run from who you are.~
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/16/2010  10:21 PM
maybe walsh can use some of his savvy and squeeze a 2nd rounder in the 50 range from boston...
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
2/16/2010  10:24 PM
djsunyc wrote:maybe walsh can use some of his savvy and squeeze a 2nd rounder in the 50 range from boston...

do you think the celts would be so daft?!
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/16/2010  10:24 PM
Cosmic wrote:CHICAGO - The Knicks have been looking to relocate Nate Robinson since December and they may have found a taker in the Boston Celtics.

According to a league source, the Knicks and their Atlantic Division rival are working on a deal that would send Robinson, the back-up guard and three-time Slam Dunk champion, to Boston. Since Robinson is entering the last year of his contract the Knicks will only take back expiring contracts.

Eddie House, who played for Mike D'Antoni in Phoenix, has an expiring contract as does Tony Allen and Brian Scalabrine.

The Knicks have been trying to trade Robinson since December when D'Antoni benched the energetic yet erratic guard for 14 games. The Knicks were in talks with the Memphis Grizzlies but the deal never progressed once Robinson informed the club that he wouldn't approve a trade to Memphis.

Robinson has veto power but according to a source close to the situation Robinson would gladly accept a trade to Boston.

Robinson did not accompany the Knicks to Chicago. According to the club, he is home with the flu.

I will take tony allen and a pick from the celtics...

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Nalod
Posts: 71761
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
2/16/2010  10:31 PM
Nates walking in 30 games. Whats the big deal?

Larry, isiah and MDA can't get in this kids head.

We talking nate here. His celeberty and talent is obvious, but playing him is pointless. We don't win with him either, so if it opens it up for TD to finally get some run. In a way the knicks help him rather than just bury him on the bench.

He walks we get nothing. Maybe Boston is the third team to get us another deal.

Nates had three coaches. He drives them all nuts. He will be in good company with KG.
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
2/17/2010  1:21 AM    LAST EDITED: 2/17/2010  1:22 AM
Don't know how reliable this guy is but here you go:

Last Intel I Had On Details of Possible Celts/Knicks Deal - Eddie House, Shelden Williams & Future Draft Pick for Marcus Landry & N Robinson

http://twitter.com/MattyDHume

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
2/17/2010  2:06 AM
Childs2Dudley wrote:Don't know how reliable this guy is but here you go:

Last Intel I Had On Details of Possible Celts/Knicks Deal - Eddie House, Shelden Williams & Future Draft Pick for Marcus Landry & N Robinson

http://twitter.com/MattyDHume

trade actuallly works...dunno if it makes any freakin sense but it does work....a future 1st round pick could pay off since that team is old as **** now

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/17/2010  3:35 AM
if we get a late round pick for Nate i'm fine w/it
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
BigC
Posts: 22672
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/14/2004
Member: #829
2/17/2010  5:54 AM
That trade is trash even with a late pick from the Celtics. Eddie House is a bum. The Celtics have one of the best records in the league. I don't think the Knicks will be able to draft anything special with a late first round pick. Let alone any rookie that will get playing time. This trade is a waste of time.
BigC's Knick blogs and Knicks highlights after every Knicks game http://fromthebaseline.com/
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/17/2010  8:14 AM
BigC wrote:That trade is trash even with a late pick from the Celtics. Eddie House is a bum. The Celtics have one of the best records in the league. I don't think the Knicks will be able to draft anything special with a late first round pick. Let alone any rookie that will get playing time. This trade is a waste of time.

Nate Robinson is a waste of time. The idea is to ship him out of town because he and the coach have had it. And quite frankly I'm tired of his game which disrupts any real offensive flow.

Donnie, rather than cut players or wait for them to expire, like to swap them for equal contracts or shorter contracts. No problem with that.

If we score this offseason who would you rather re-sign? Eddie House cheaply to be a great spot up shooter? Or Nate Robinson to go 1-1 and jack shots up and disrupt the team?

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
iSergio
Posts: 21499
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2010
Member: #3043
USA
2/17/2010  8:16 AM
We're not resigning either Nate Robinson or Eddie House so it doesn't really matter.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
2/17/2010  8:16 AM    LAST EDITED: 2/17/2010  8:17 AM
no problem with this deal if we pick up a 1st rounder as well and if that's a 2012 1st rounder it could be a good selection with the age the celtics have in the big3.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
iSergio
Posts: 21499
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2010
Member: #3043
USA
2/17/2010  8:23 AM
Question - if we acquire a future 1st, does that immediately count against the cap for 2010-2011?
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/17/2010  8:24 AM
iSergio wrote:Question - if we acquire a future 1st, does that immediately count against the cap for 2010-2011?

Depends on the year of the pick it doesn't have to be next year.

Yes it would have a cap hold equal to the pick's position which because of the C's record would be in the 20s and therefore comparative to say Toney Douglas.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
chislic
Posts: 20100
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/23/2006
Member: #1209
2/17/2010  8:26 AM
Did anyone catch this? LA might still be in the mix.

Source: Nate Robinson Has Been Told 2 Not Join His Team & Wait for Word On Finalization of Pending Trade, Nate's Waiting 2 Approve LA or Bos

http://twitter.com/MattyDHume
iSergio
Posts: 21499
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2010
Member: #3043
USA
2/17/2010  8:31 AM
I'd love Jordan Farmer. Very underrated.
Page 2 of 15 ‹ Previous 1  2  3  4 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
Celtics, Knicks enter trade discussions for Nate?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy