[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

the most underachieving team you had ever seen
Author Thread
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
2/14/2010  5:52 PM
Cosmic wrote:The Portland Trailblazers when they loaded up on all that talent. I don't even recall the exact year when they were at their peak.

Was it 0203?

That team's BENCH was better than half the league's starting five!

Of course, the NBA was all in the Lakers butt so I still say Portland got screwed that year (and so did the Kings) in the interest of the league wanting to make Kobe/Shaq the new face of the league.

Which well, makes me wonder why I watch these games beyond the same way I watched the WWF in the 80s....knowing it was rigged.

I guess it's just entertainment in the end.

I think the best trailblazer team from that era was the 99-00 one. The year they choked against the lakers. That team was straight up better than the Lakers and ridiculously deep.



Jermaine O'Neal
Scottie Pippen
Arvydas Sabonis
Detlef Schrempf
Steve Smith
Damon Stoudamire
Rasheed Wallace
Bonzi Wells

My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
AUTOADVERT
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/14/2010  6:03 PM
Okay maybe that was the year.

I'm thinking of the year where Sabonis would hold his ground, Shaq would smash into him, and they'd keep calling Sabonis for fouls.

I thought it was the same year the refs got together halfway through the 4th quarter of a Kings-about-to-eliminate-the-Lakers game and decided to whistle all fouls possible on the Kings and ignore any Laker fouls so the Lakers could win the game and advance.

Maybe it wasn't the same year.

But I think you know what I'm saying when I think of the LOADED Blazers team!

Lakers three-peat should have been a Lakers one-peat with the Blazers and Kings also winning titles.

Not so sure why Stern wanted a Laker three-peat. I just don't get it. Fans were on board with the Blazers and Kings getting rings.

But, well, whatever......that's one big whole different argument.

So back to the topic? PORTLAND TRAILBLAZERS ... failblazers.

That was one loaded roster.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
2/14/2010  6:17 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/14/2010  6:18 PM
I think all this illustrates one big thing - collection of stars and talents is not good enough to win it all.
The thing that wins champinsheep is the TEAM. And the thing which can repeate is a DYNASTY.
Players, coaches, and executives who can step over their ego for the ultumate goal. This is what makes a winner.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/14/2010  6:18 PM
VDesai wrote:The Suns team that Barkley was on with KJ, Majerle, Chambers, etc. that we brawled with had an insane amount of talent.

so did the Utah Jazz, but the Michael Jordan era created a sad fate for several other hugely talented NBA teams

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
2/14/2010  6:53 PM
Cosmic wrote:Okay maybe that was the year.

I'm thinking of the year where Sabonis would hold his ground, Shaq would smash into him, and they'd keep calling Sabonis for fouls.

I thought it was the same year the refs got together halfway through the 4th quarter of a Kings-about-to-eliminate-the-Lakers game and decided to whistle all fouls possible on the Kings and ignore any Laker fouls so the Lakers could win the game and advance.

Maybe it wasn't the same year.

But I think you know what I'm saying when I think of the LOADED Blazers team!

Lakers three-peat should have been a Lakers one-peat with the Blazers and Kings also winning titles.

Not so sure why Stern wanted a Laker three-peat. I just don't get it. Fans were on board with the Blazers and Kings getting rings.

But, well, whatever......that's one big whole different argument.

So back to the topic? PORTLAND TRAILBLAZERS ... failblazers.

That was one loaded roster.

I think Stern wanted to re-create another superpower squad from a big market city (ala Boston/L.A from the '80s and Chicago from the '90s)

Only problem is that the Lakers of the 2000s were very unlikeable. Shaq was bully on the court, Kobe was petulant, Phil was arrogant, and the squad as a whole was seen as being favored by the league and Stern.

Yeah, when analyzing rosters from top to bottom I dont think there were ever any rosters compiled that were superior to those Blazer squads.

My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
the most underachieving team you had ever seen

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy