[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The Knicks Never Develop Young Talent, Except 6'11 Jordan Hill Is Looking Better and Better Every Day
Author Thread
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/24/2010  7:14 PM
martin wrote:
TMS wrote:
martin wrote:
TMS wrote:please, Jordan Hill should have been playing all year just like several other rookies this year... our team was not good enough that we could afford to have our #8 lottery pick wasting away on the bench & playing scrubs like Jonathan Bender... MDA doesn't deserve credit for his handling of Jordan Hill by not playing the kid until now.

except for the fact that the record after Nov kinda proved MDA made some right choices after SSOL and giving everyone on the roster a chance at minutes.

Maybe you could argue that MDA should have gone with a short rotation and slow-down all year, and on top of the given a minute or 2 to rookies (who perhaps were still not ready anyway).

u believe Bender deserved playing time over Jordan Hill?

for me it's not about deserved playing time of one player over the other. Both of their situations are apples and oranges.

Hill is on a 5 year contract and has a long way to go to learning how to play in the NBA. It was clear to me in the beginning of the year that he didn't know where to be on the floor, where to be on the offense, when to pop, when to roll, when to shift on defense, how much intensity he needed to play with. Nothing extraordinarily wrong, just rookie mistakes. You add to the fact that the Knicks were still trying to figure out rotations, bench players vs starters, roles, etc., it's no wonder that Hill, Darko, Landry, Douglas were dropped in favor of experienced vets. Let's face it, after 1-9 start, the Knicks needed wins to build confidence.

Did Lee really lose a lot because he did not play in the first year? Chandler? It's a long process, and as long as those guys practice hard and get better, good things will come around.

Bender is on a 1-year deal and hasn't played in 4 years. Coach can't just play the guy 2 minutes every third game and expect him to do anything. He would need time over a long stretch at 10-12 minutes a game just to get rust off and then start to produce just to see if he is worth playing this year and next. 8-10 games and if he is not consistent or contributing like the coach wants, then either sit him or play him at your discretion.

Bender is not a scrub. Roberson is a scrub. Bender helps stretch the defense with his outside shot. He can cause trouble at his length. he can rebound. block shots. Can he put it together? That's the question. His dribble drive sucks, cause it's like an automatic turnover. And he seems to be able to pick up the MDA offense and defense pretty quickly. Not 100%, but not too bad either.

If I recall, bender got minutes when Harrington was hurt. Hill and Harrington have 2 different rolls on the team, so it's OK IMHO to give Bender those minutes.

Seems like Bender got his stretch and is now on the bench getting DNP's and Hill is not. C'est la vie.

Jordan Hill's playing the same way now as he was when he was getting sporadic action... he's just seeing more minutes now... he always showed tons of energy & was active on both ends of the floor... he was always stroking that midrange J... he still looks a bit unsure of where he needs to be on the floor... sorry, but i don't see eye to eye on this with you at all... yes, these are all rookie mistakes he's making, but the only way he'll stop making those rookie mistakes is by giving him the regular run to learn... watching veterans like Jonathan Bender playing is not helping Jordan Hill's development at all.

btw, David Lee played 67 games his rookie season, started 14 of them & averaged 17 minutes per... to me that's called giving your young player regular run, & he wasn't even a lottery pick... give Jordan Hill that same run & i guarantee you he'd be putting up much better numbers than David Lee did his rookie season... why is expecting Jordan Hill to get a similar run wrong in your eyes?

also you're wrong about Bender getting minutes when Harrington was hurt... he got into the game 3 days after we signed him & Harrington was getting big minutes at the time... MDA wanted to get Walsh's signing in so he could see what he had... i got no problem with that, but when it comes at the expense of playing your #8 lottery pick, then i start to have a big problem with it... matter of fact Harrington played big minutes in the first 8 games Bender saw action & he only missed 2 games that Bender played in all year.

Bender does nothing that Harrington & Gallo don't already do much better, so what's the point in giving him minutes over a kid like Jordan Hill, who like u just admitted brings different things to the table & could have helped to solve the HUGE deficiency in low post defense we've seen all year from this team? the problem this team had was not in 3 point shooting, it was on team defense... IMO if we had this kid in the regular rotation all year, not only would Jordan Hill be at a more advanced stage in his development, but also our record would be better right now... i see absolutely no downsides to have been giving him regular burn this season, & i saw very little upside in having Bender playing instead.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/24/2010  7:18 PM
martin wrote:here is another good example: what good did playing Curry and or Tyson Chandler do for Chicago? Those guys never earned their minutes and are still making rookie mistakes (Curry more so).

Curry still needs to be told to box out, go after rebounds, don't foul on post ups, hustle back on D, etc. Rookie stuff.

Curry & Chandler came in straight from HS, talk about apples & oranges.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/24/2010  7:25 PM
How can u just dismiss Tommy Dee's viewpoint when he's watching Hill practice?

"Now Hill is still developing, but over the past few weeks of practices I’ve been to, Hill has stood out virtually every time. His talent has really shined through, and clearly the coaching staff has taken notice."

Since Hill didn't play all year what R U basing your opinion on?

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/24/2010  7:32 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/24/2010  7:41 PM
nixluva wrote:How can u just dismiss Tommy Dee's viewpoint when he's watching Hill practice?

"Now Hill is still developing, but over the past few weeks of practices I’ve been to, Hill has stood out virtually every time. His talent has really shined through, and clearly the coaching staff has taken notice."

Since Hill didn't play all year what R U basing your opinion on?

watching him play games in college, Summer League & in spot action in the pros... what are you basing your opinion on? just trusting blindly to what MDA does & trusting his judgement?

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/24/2010  8:01 PM
TMS wrote:
nixluva wrote:How can u just dismiss Tommy Dee's viewpoint when he's watching Hill practice?

"Now Hill is still developing, but over the past few weeks of practices I’ve been to, Hill has stood out virtually every time. His talent has really shined through, and clearly the coaching staff has taken notice."

Since Hill didn't play all year what R U basing your opinion on?

watching him play games in college, Summer League & in spot action in the pros... what are you basing your opinion on? just trusting blindly to what MDA does & trusting his judgement?

No, part of my opinion is based on his few spot performances early on. I'm not counting college! His SL and Preseason and reports that suggested he needed more work. Now the biggest thing that you seem to be dismissing is that MDA and the whole staff felt he needed work, needed to push harder in practice and to get more comfortable with playing on this level. MDA said many times that he was getting better and wasn't far off, but early in the year he wasn't close to ready. You're damned right I trust MDA's opinion on this more than you!

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/24/2010  8:31 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/24/2010  8:39 PM
nixluva wrote:
TMS wrote:
nixluva wrote:How can u just dismiss Tommy Dee's viewpoint when he's watching Hill practice?

"Now Hill is still developing, but over the past few weeks of practices I’ve been to, Hill has stood out virtually every time. His talent has really shined through, and clearly the coaching staff has taken notice."

Since Hill didn't play all year what R U basing your opinion on?

watching him play games in college, Summer League & in spot action in the pros... what are you basing your opinion on? just trusting blindly to what MDA does & trusting his judgement?

No, part of my opinion is based on his few spot performances early on. I'm not counting college! His SL and Preseason and reports that suggested he needed more work. Now the biggest thing that you seem to be dismissing is that MDA and the whole staff felt he needed work, needed to push harder in practice and to get more comfortable with playing on this level. MDA said many times that he was getting better and wasn't far off, but early in the year he wasn't close to ready. You're damned right I trust MDA's opinion on this more than you!

i don't give a crap if u trust me or not, i'm giving u my opinion on it... i have an opinion & not afraid to speak on it... don't ever remember u having an opinion on much of anything over the past few years other than saying everything is roses in Knicksville... u can sing the Sun'll come out tomorrow, bet your bottom dollar that tomorrow, there'll be sun til the cows come home, but there are some serious things still wrong w/this team even to this day & you'd be a fool to turn a blind eye to it.

& ur telling me i'm ignoring the fact that Hill needed to push harder in practice, but Bender comes in & gets regular burn 3 days after we sign him? please... stop being naive... this isn't about working hard in practice... MDA just likes to play his vets... there's nothing u can tell me that would convince me that playing Bender ahead of Hill for 13 games was for the good of our franchise.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/24/2010  8:57 PM
I've expressed plenty of opinion and none of that has anything to do with this discussion. You have your opinion and that's fine but those aren't based on anything substantial. Spot minutes, college play and blind belief he could've handled playing sooner isn't a strong argument. Many of us loved his talent, skills and energy, but there's more to this than that.

You're right MDA prefers the vets. It seems all he was looking for was a more consistent effort in practice. To show he understands what it takes to succeed on this level. Why should MDA have just gave him minutes if he wasn't pleased with his efforts in practice? I'm sure MDA knew Hill's talent and what he brought to the table after seeing him day after day. MDA's is the one who said he reminded him of Amare. Why do you assume MDA needlessly held the kid out when every report suggests he needed work early and has clearly gotten better?

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/24/2010  9:19 PM
exactly how has he gotten clearly better in your eyes? cuz i see the same Jordan Hill now that i saw all year... he's just getting more minutes.

you need to realize he hasn't even begun to show u what he can do... bring in a PG who can really push the tempo & run the fastbreak & u will see another dimension of Jordan Hill's game... what he's shown u so far in 15 games is not improvement we're seeing out of Jordan Hill, it's stuff he already knows how to do & has shown he can do in college ball & summer leagues.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
1/24/2010  9:30 PM
improvement is gradual and not always obvious to a fan, but to the coaches and the reporters that are more intimately familiar with mr. hill, they see improvement. i think just the fact that he is getting these minutes is because of his improvement, so that's improvement. mda is never shy to put a player on the bench and if hill couldn't give adequate business then he would still be on the bench.
WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/24/2010  9:45 PM
orangeblobman wrote:improvement is gradual and not always obvious to a fan

apparently it's obvious to nixluva

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/24/2010  10:52 PM
TMS wrote:exactly how has he gotten clearly better in your eyes? cuz i see the same Jordan Hill now that i saw all year... he's just getting more minutes.

you need to realize he hasn't even begun to show u what he can do... bring in a PG who can really push the tempo & run the fastbreak & u will see another dimension of Jordan Hill's game... what he's shown u so far in 15 games is not improvement we're seeing out of Jordan Hill, it's stuff he already knows how to do & has shown he can do in college ball & summer leagues.


You seem to be assuming that we don't already believe in Hill and what he can do. Of course he's doing what he's always been good at doing what's your real point here? There's more to the game than showing energy and hitting shots which we've seen he could do before he got here. How do you know if he's been making mistakes in practice or not? I haven't been there and far as I know neither have you. All you keep bringing up is that he's talented in the areas we all knew already but what about the intangibles, missing defensive assignments, rotations, maintainig focus or just plain learning how to respond to certain situations? To my eyes he looks sharper and more engaged in the action. Only once in a while does a teammate have to nudge him into the spot on D. He's more ascertive in his actions which comes with being more confident.

In the end this was a coaching decision and I wouldn't have had a problem with him playing more sooner. I don't agree that he was a lock to have looked good earlier based on what I saw. Could MDA have gotten him in the mix sooner? I'm sure he could but it's not serious.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/25/2010  12:38 AM
actually there were a lot of Jordan Hill doubters around here until MDA finally woke up & got him into the rotation, & there still are some non believers... u haven't been reading the forums much if u don't see it... weren't u of the notion that he wasn't ready yet to contribute so MDA wasn't playing him?... please don't make me backtrack & bring up old posts to embarass anyone... i'm not posting this to put people on blast, but i believe i'm right that Hill could have been at a more advanced stage in his development if he'd gotten into the mix sooner & we could possibly have won more ballgames because of it... to me, that is a big deal.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
WindsorPl
Posts: 20413
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/12/2009
Member: #2799
USA
1/25/2010  1:02 AM
Some good reading, if you missed it.
http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=15076
While at Arizona, Hill says point guard Nic Wise frequently lofted the ball over the defense because "he (knew) I could jump up there and get it."

But the pick and roll doesn't work like that in the NBA. Post defenders are taller, more athletic, and have enough experience to anticipate a lazy lob pass seconds before the ball is even released. Running this style of offense in the pro game requires footwork, timing, and the ability to score on a jumper or a lay-up.

"We try to teach him how to pick and how to roll the way we do it as opposed to the way they try and do it in college," said Knicks assistant and 18-year NBA veteran Herb Williams. "What we're trying to do is to actually get the guy to chase the guard. Once we can get the defensive guard to chase the guard, then the big has to engage and then the big that's rolling, most of the time, is open."

Once open, a new obstacle emerges: making the open shot. That's why Hill has gone the extra mile to wok on his mid-range jump shot.

"He's definitely shown the ability to hit that jump shot," D'Antoni said before the Knicks loss to the Lakers last Friday.

That game was the third of four straight games in which Hill made three shots and played more than 10 minutes.

Hill was an instant offensive spark for New York against the Lakers. He entered the game in the second quarter with the Knicks trailing by six. Within the next minute Hill hit a lay-up, a jump shot, and grabbed two offensive and two defensive rebounds. With just over eight minutes left in the frame, Hill hit another shot that gave New York a one-point lead.

"He played really well," D'Antoni said afterwards. "He's done that the last couple of games, so he's coming on a little bit."

"I feel like every time he takes the mid-range, it's been going in because he's been real consistent," said fellow Knicks rookie and former AAU opponent Toney Douglas. "For a big guy, 6-10, he has the inside, outside presence and he's only going to get better and better."

Hill is far from a finished product. He readily admits that his defense needs work, which could be a major reason for his sloppy fouls. (He had three in 15 minutes against the Pistons.)

Still, he's made the most of his minutes. His Player Efficiency Rating (20.04) would he good enough for 30th in the NBA if he had enough minutes to qualify. That would put him after Marc Gasol but ahead of Al Horford and Rajon Rondo.

Hill has also been a model student. Williams credits him for his ability to listen and work while opponents are even starting to take notice as well.

"He's active," said the Lakers' Pau Gasol. "He's a guy with more size. He's active on the boards. I haven't seen much of an offensive game yet, but other than that I see a lot of offensive potential. He's a guy that they're expecting some good things out of."

Above all, Hill is in the right situation to succeed in New York – even if that means watching Lee and Chris Duhon run the pick and roll while he sits.

Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/25/2010  8:48 AM
I still doubt Jordan Hill. He looked much better in those two short stints in those two recent games.

Yet I don't see why some are gushing over the kid. Is it because he's new?

He is very raw and doesn't do any one thing very well at all.

I still think it's more than time that he gets 20 minutes per game no matter how poorly he plays.

Yet I'm not going to base two ten minute stints where he looked decent and turn that into "future super star starting center for the world champion new york knicks" as some seem to want to do or wish he would be.

I mean, some fans just don't want to live in reality at all. If he was as good as a few really prop him up to be the kid would have been playing 30mph regularly.

Truth is he doesn't really get the NBA game, his hands and footwork are very raw and downright clumsy at times, his decision making is raw as most rookies are.

So after all of this I can see why he hasn't played much. Mike is probably right in making him work in practice more before he really gets him out on the court regularly.

The FINAL little bit is the trade deadline coming up. We can't sit Jeffries and play Hill because then there is ZERO chance to trade Jeffries. We can't sit Al Harrington and play Hill because what if Al Harrington is the key to dumping Jeffries in trade?

So there are a lot of factors at work here:

*Downright over rating of the kid.
*Not really NBA ready.
*Trade ability diminished if he takes minutes from other players.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
MS
Posts: 27060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
1/25/2010  9:42 AM
I think Hill has zero basketball IQ right now which is somewhat encouraging because he can get points and rebounds just on activity. I don't know who our big man coach is but we really need someone working with him on footwork. He already has a good midrange game so that's a huge positive.

His ability to rotate is a work in progress. Something that is troubling are his hands. They appear to be very weak and lack cordination. He loses the ball on rebounds and can't seem to bring it in.

At this point I like what I see. I think he will get much better long term and will develop into a nice double double bench player.

iSergio
Posts: 21499
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2010
Member: #3043
USA
1/25/2010  9:56 AM
If Jordan Hill becomes Udonis Haslem, I'll be very happy.
TheGame
Posts: 26647
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
1/25/2010  1:09 PM
TMS wrote:exactly how has he gotten clearly better in your eyes? cuz i see the same Jordan Hill now that i saw all year... he's just getting more minutes.

you need to realize he hasn't even begun to show u what he can do... bring in a PG who can really push the tempo & run the fastbreak & u will see another dimension of Jordan Hill's game... what he's shown u so far in 15 games is not improvement we're seeing out of Jordan Hill, it's stuff he already knows how to do & has shown he can do in college ball & summer leagues.

TMS, to chime in, I think Hill has gotten better in his understanding of where to be on the court. He clearly needed to improve in that area and I think he has since the beginning of the year. I, however, agree with you that he showed from the beginning that he had a high skill set and could hit the mid-range jumper. To be honest, I don't think there is a move a PF can make that this kid cannot do. He has the J, he has the post-moves, including a nice drop step, and he can shoot the fade-away. Clearly Hill should have been playing at the start, but the main thing is MDA needs to give him a consistent 15 minutes from here on out, and if we fall out of contention, Hill's minutes should jump to 20-25 minutes a game. I think Hill has a shot to be our starting center next year if we don't get Bosh or Amare. I think he can be the perfect center for MDA's offense.

Trust the Process
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/25/2010  1:34 PM
I love Hill's physical talent and skills and always did, but I felt he wasn't close to ready mentally. Just cuz he can run, jump and hit a shot doesn't mean he really understands the nuances of the NBA game and can take full advantage of his talent. I have no problem with a rookie being brought along slower.

He's got his shot now and hopefully he'll stay in the rotation permanently! I think the game has slowed down for him a bit now. Early on he looked like the game was way too fast for him, as you might expect for a rookie who only had 5 yrs of organized ball.

sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
1/25/2010  2:03 PM
He can go either way, but since he's settled down some you can see why he was selected at number 8...hes got a feathery touch and hes fairly athletic and long with a good motor.

Hes gotta work and he needs every available minute.

My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/25/2010  5:49 PM
Cosmic wrote:I mean, some fans just don't want to live in reality at all. If he was as good as a few really prop him up to be the kid would have been playing 30mph regularly.

first of all, that's not necessarily true cuz plenty of NBA rooks start out with limited minutes & turn out to be great... second, i don't think anyone here has ever said this kid should have been seeing 30 minutes per every night... just wanted to have this kid in the rotation at least seeing maybe 10-15 minutes a night.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
The Knicks Never Develop Young Talent, Except 6'11 Jordan Hill Is Looking Better and Better Every Day

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy