[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Should the Knicks Still Trade Jared Jeffries for an expiring contract?


Author Poll
toodarkmark
Posts: 1145
Joined: 1/2/2004
Member: #515
USA
Should the Knicks Still Trade Jared Jeffries for an expiring contract?

David Lee tonight mentioned how Jeffries is the defensive anchor on the team, and there have been numerous stories written about this, so it's good to see his trade stock is up. But if we trade him for an expiring, we open up another 6.9 million next year, and if the Salary Cap is 55 Million, then we have 34.6 million open. And that is enough for two 16.5 million max contracts, 30% for 7 year players at a salary cap of 55 Mil.

Everyone would love to move Eddy Curry, but Christmas has passed, no miracles, and it looks like he will end up a huge expiring next year. And to make this work, we would have to denounce David Lee, which I hate. But if Lebron would only sign if he could bring his friend Bosh with him, then it would be worth it?

So do we trade Jared for an expiring?

Yes
No
View Results


Author Thread
SteveSmith
Posts: 20203
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/16/2009
Member: #2812
Germany
1/8/2010  10:14 AM
orangeblobman wrote:He can knock down more and more jumpers.

He should not take them. He should actually make some layups.

AUTOADVERT
Panos
Posts: 30385
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
1/8/2010  10:18 AM
Hell yes.
No doubt in my mind. Guy is worth $2.5M maximum.
toodarkmark
Posts: 21145
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/2/2004
Member: #515
USA
1/8/2010  7:48 PM
Nate Robinson and Jared Jeffries to Portland for Steve Blake, Travis Outlaw, Juwan Howard and Patrick Mills. Jordan Hill would get Jeffries minutes. We do get hurt short term, but 6.9 mil off of next year. Brandon Roy and Nate are buddies from way back. Jeffries fills some minutes for Oden and Joel P. Works for everyone.
I don't care what people think. People are stupid. - Charles Barkley
Mondo
Posts: 20036
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/9/2005
Member: #867
1/8/2010  7:58 PM
I'd rather team chemistry was left along for a season
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
1/8/2010  9:27 PM
SteveSmith wrote:No, this year seems to direct to the playoffs. And for this, it would not without JJ.

And the Cap Space is sufficiant to sign Bron and Lee.

No it aint.

lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
1/8/2010  10:58 PM
I want to know who voted No.
NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
toodarkmark
Posts: 21145
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/2/2004
Member: #515
USA
1/9/2010  12:33 AM
kam77 wrote:
SteveSmith wrote:No, this year seems to direct to the playoffs. And for this, it would not without JJ.

And the Cap Space is sufficiant to sign Bron and Lee.

No it aint.

27.3 we have already on the books. Lee costs us 8 mil against the cap at first if we don't renounce him, that's 35.3. If per say the cap is 54, that gives us 18.7, and at 54 the max would 16.5, so we def could re-sign Lee and sign a max, if we sign the max first, then we could even pay Lee 12 mil a year if we wanted. Problem is, does Lebron come to Knicks without another Max player?

I don't care what people think. People are stupid. - Charles Barkley
Olbrannon
Posts: 21913
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/2/2009
Member: #2919
USA
1/9/2010  1:49 AM
fishmike wrote:crunch the #s. We dont need a 2nd max FA, thats Lee. If we have enough for Lee and Lebron then you can wait and see. You have to be sure of that. If NOT dumping Jared costs you resigning Lee and offering Lebron max than your an idiot.

Both Curry and Jeffries would be expiring next year and Knicks under the cap so easier to trade if that's the best option?

Bill Simmons on Tyreke Evans "The prototypical 0-guard: Someone who handles the ball all the time, looks for his own shot, gets to the rim at will and operates best if his teammates spread the floor to watch him."
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
1/9/2010  3:27 AM
toodarkmark wrote:
kam77 wrote:
SteveSmith wrote:No, this year seems to direct to the playoffs. And for this, it would not without JJ.

And the Cap Space is sufficiant to sign Bron and Lee.

No it aint.

27.3 we have already on the books. Lee costs us 8 mil against the cap at first if we don't renounce him, that's 35.3. If per say the cap is 54, that gives us 18.7, and at 54 the max would 16.5, so we def could re-sign Lee and sign a max, if we sign the max first, then we could even pay Lee 12 mil a year if we wanted. Problem is, does Lebron come to Knicks without another Max player?

Lee's caphold is 150 % his salary. If we make the playoffs, that's 12 mil caphold. That's probably what he will get as well...

Now you're assuming a cap of 54 which is optimistic.

lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
scoshin
Posts: 20584
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #568
1/9/2010  3:37 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/9/2010  3:44 AM
27.3 we have already on the books. Lee costs us 8 mil against the cap at first if we don't renounce him, that's 35.3. If per say the cap is 54, that gives us 18.7, and at 54 the max would 16.5, so we def could re-sign Lee and sign a max, if we sign the max first, then we could even pay Lee 12 mil a year if we wanted. Problem is, does Lebron come to Knicks without another Max player?

Bad info.

We have 27.3M on the books, but that's only with 6 players, so the league will credit an extra 6 phantom roster spots at the league minimum (or roughly $450k each). This will already bring our team salary to around $30M. Moreover, Lee's cap hold is 10.5M, not 8M. Dunno where you got the latter number from but it's wrong. Lee's cap hold puts us at $40.5M, and we'd need the cap to be around $56-57 to sign a max player (a max for LeBron will be at MINIMUM $16.5M no matter what the salary cap is). If the salary cap is lower than 57M, we can try and shave a few million by (a) negotiating a lower buyout with Curry or Jeffries; or (b) signing Lee for a starting salary around $8-9M so he no longer counts for $10.5 on the books (doubt he signs that low after his all-star play). Resigning Lee along with a max FA is no guarantee, and all depends on what the salary cap is set at in July. Getting rid of Jeffries though not only ensures we can resign Lee, but gives us the option to sign 2 max FA's, if LeBron demands as much.

Lee's caphold is 150 % his salary. If we make the playoffs, that's 12 mil caphold

Not sure if the bonus in his contract counts in regards to the cap hold, but it may. Reading into it further, it does seem any bonuses that are achieved gets added to the team's salary, so you're right, if we make the playoffs, David Lee's cap hold will increase even further from 10.5 to 12M.

Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

1/9/2010  4:24 AM
nyk4ever wrote:Listen, I want to make the playoffs as much as anybody and like it or not Jeffries is a huge part of the way we're playing right now, but the reality of the situation is that this team is going to look completely different next year. So while making the playoffs this year is something that we're all starving for, it really isn't the most important thing right now, so if we can deal Jeffries in the RIGHT trade, then we have to do it.

Better to trade him now than later, then, because if the team really is turning around and making a playoff run, it will be difficult to let him go at some point. You figure that Walsh wants to trade him BUT what if the Knicks have a winning record around the trade deadline? What if we are fighting for the 5th, and dare I say 4th, seed?

Hill, Bender, or someone else would have to step up to replace the D that Jeffries brings to the team. As frustrating as he is on offense, the guy does so much for us on D that you might not be able to replace him during the season if he is traded away.

It will be interesting to see if Bender can get his legs back. He has shown the ability to block shots, and although he has had trouble holding the ball at times, he can still finish better than Jeffries. I don't know if you want him matching up against PGs on D, though, and I don;t think Hill can do this, but Bender might eventually be a Jeffries' replacement.

You could conceivably use Gallo to replace him, and MDA has at times, but then you will take away a lot of the energy and legs that he needs for offense.

All of this is moot, though, if the team does not keep up the pace it is on and falls back into the lottery range.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
Erniecat
Posts: 20577
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2005
Member: #851
1/9/2010  8:24 AM
an absolute no-brainer to trade jeffries for an expiring. we have to have the cap room to re-sign lee, which we may not be able to do if we still have JJ around. saving that $6.9 million is huge.

thankfully JJ has legit value now, so hopefully walsh can get a deal done soon.

JCHAN
Posts: 20138
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 11/26/2009
Member: #2999

1/9/2010  10:02 AM
I'll bite. I don't think we should trade Jeffries. I hated him just as much as anyone up until the last 18 gamesish. But he's growing into something real nice for the knicks. I don't think we're going to get 2 max free agents anyway. I think that LBJ + Lee and the rest of our lineup is more valuable than LBJ + Bosh + scraps. I don't think we need the extra room, JJ has actual use, and this team has great chemistry right now. Throwing Jeffries away would kill that chemistry and put a hamper on our playoff push. We got rid of Randolph and Crawful last year and look what happened. Now, if we can get rid of Curry, fantastic. But coach is on a roll and has his lineup, I don't think you can just give away something we need for junk.
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/9/2010  10:31 AM
I would rather give up an asset and trade Curry then trade JJ and get nothing back. We trade JJ and I dont think we make the playoffs this year.

I would give up on someone like Hill or Douglas (both of whom I am high on) if I could move Curry. Maybe even a future first rounder

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/9/2010  9:59 PM
JCHAN wrote:I'll bite. I don't think we should trade Jeffries. I hated him just as much as anyone up until the last 18 gamesish. But he's growing into something real nice for the knicks. I don't think we're going to get 2 max free agents anyway. I think that LBJ + Lee and the rest of our lineup is more valuable than LBJ + Bosh + scraps. I don't think we need the extra room, JJ has actual use, and this team has great chemistry right now. Throwing Jeffries away would kill that chemistry and put a hamper on our playoff push. We got rid of Randolph and Crawful last year and look what happened. Now, if we can get rid of Curry, fantastic. But coach is on a roll and has his lineup, I don't think you can just give away something we need for junk.

so ur basically saying u'd rather have Lee & FL over Bosh (assuming Lebron will come here regardless, which is a big if)... am i reading u correctly here?

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
JCHAN
Posts: 20138
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 11/26/2009
Member: #2999

1/9/2010  10:05 PM
yeah, absolutely
TheGame
Posts: 26647
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
1/10/2010  3:04 PM
JCHAN wrote:I'll bite. I don't think we should trade Jeffries. I hated him just as much as anyone up until the last 18 gamesish. But he's growing into something real nice for the knicks. I don't think we're going to get 2 max free agents anyway. I think that LBJ + Lee and the rest of our lineup is more valuable than LBJ + Bosh + scraps. I don't think we need the extra room, JJ has actual use, and this team has great chemistry right now. Throwing Jeffries away would kill that chemistry and put a hamper on our playoff push. We got rid of Randolph and Crawful last year and look what happened. Now, if we can get rid of Curry, fantastic. But coach is on a roll and has his lineup, I don't think you can just give away something we need for junk.

I don't disagree. We may find out that James + Lee may be better for us than James + Bosh, assuming we can sign Lee for $5-$6 mill less per year than Bosh. If Lee continues to improve, he will be at a Bosh-like level in 2 years at a cheaper price. I also would not oppose the idea of keeping Jeffries until Hill develops into a starting caliber center. I think Hill needs about 2 more years to reach his potential, so keeping Jeffries helps solidify our defense for now until Hill is ready. Basically, if we replace Harrington with Lebron, we should have a 50 win team with the continued development of Chandler, Gallo, Douglas, and Hill. Next year, Curry and Jeffries drop off. Hopefully, Hill can take Jeffries place as the starting center, and we then sign one more max player.

Trust the Process
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/10/2010  3:16 PM
If Lee continues to improve, he will be at a Bosh-like level in 2 years at a cheaper price.

nothing against Lee, but why is it that people always assume he'll keep improving & yet Bosh has somehow already reached his ceiling when Lee is a year older than Bosh & much less highly touted talent & potential wise coming out of college?

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TheGame
Posts: 26647
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
1/10/2010  3:20 PM
TMS wrote:
If Lee continues to improve, he will be at a Bosh-like level in 2 years at a cheaper price.

nothing against Lee, but why is it that people always assume he'll keep improving & yet Bosh has somehow already reached his ceiling when Lee is a year older than Bosh & much less highly touted talent & potential wise coming out of college?

Not saying Bosh cannot improve, but Lee has made noticeable improvements each year in the league, which is something few players can do. If he takes his jumper up one more level and works on a few more post moves, the guy will be a 20-22 pt scorer. I don't see Bosh turning into a 28 pts per game type player.

Trust the Process
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/10/2010  3:29 PM
TheGame wrote:
TMS wrote:
If Lee continues to improve, he will be at a Bosh-like level in 2 years at a cheaper price.

nothing against Lee, but why is it that people always assume he'll keep improving & yet Bosh has somehow already reached his ceiling when Lee is a year older than Bosh & much less highly touted talent & potential wise coming out of college?

Not saying Bosh cannot improve, but Lee has made noticeable improvements each year in the league, which is something few players can do. If he takes his jumper up one more level and works on a few more post moves, the guy will be a 20-22 pt scorer. I don't see Bosh turning into a 28 pts per game type player.

Bosh's scoring has levelled out in recent years so i guess i can understand why you might think he's reached his peak, but i think his numbers would go up playing in MDA's system... i can easily see him getting to 26 & 11 if u replaced Lee w/Bosh on this team right now.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Should the Knicks Still Trade Jared Jeffries for an expiring contract?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy