[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

How about Larry Hughes
Author Thread
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/6/2010  4:15 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/6/2010  4:15 PM
i don't trade a future pick for a half year rental unless he's going to make the difference for us in a title run... there's no way we're going to extend Boozer AND keep Lee, so what's the point?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AUTOADVERT
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
1/6/2010  4:37 PM
I just don't like the guy, this Carlos Boozer. Don't want him on my team.
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
1/6/2010  5:28 PM
TMS wrote:i don't trade a future pick for a half year rental unless he's going to make the difference for us in a title run... there's no way we're going to extend Boozer AND keep Lee, so what's the point?

This is true, not to mention that D will sets this guy up with tons of easy shots, just imagine D lee playing along side D will. Duhon does an adequate job and has some good chemistry with d lee, but he's not even cloes to deron with the passing game.

ES
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

1/6/2010  6:52 PM
I would LOVE to get Koufos base don what little I have seen of him, but I agree with TMS about Boozer being a half year rental. If we are NOT going to keep Lee, then may be. But then we would count his salary to cap space in 2010 at whatever his contract ends up being instead of Lee's
TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/6/2010  7:27 PM
loweyecue wrote:I would LOVE to get Koufos base don what little I have seen of him, but I agree with TMS about Boozer being a half year rental. If we are NOT going to keep Lee, then may be. But then we would count his salary to cap space in 2010 at whatever his contract ends up being instead of Lee's

The old Knicks had 4 enormous guys in the starting 9 Ewing--245 Mason -260 Oakley 250 Smith 250

when it comes to competing with teams like Boston--we dont haev that quality size--adding Boozer for essentially nothing--imho gives us a chance to compete with any team in the east---diesnt matter if we have D Lee--O mean remove Jefferies from starting line up and insert Boozer
It's like saying Zach Randolph scks but it's not true. I would be more than willing to give up a stupid lottery protected 1 and 3mm $ to try and win now--what exactly am I losing?

I want to compete now--I dont give a flying frackle about a draft pick--we have 2 2's and three draft picks who dont get off the bench now. I want high powered vets. If he's available--why not try to get him? I don't believe that anyone thinks that the team with the ADDITION of Boozer without a subtraction isnt miles better? Id bet my sugar on it that we would be--we could compete with Orlando and Boston to win. Thats worth a pick and 3mm

RIP Crushalot😞
Ira
Posts: 24691
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
1/6/2010  7:50 PM
Boozer's next contract will be his last. Starting next season, he won't get another penny for playing hard. I think whoever signs him will be disappointed.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
1/6/2010  10:55 PM
Ira wrote:Boozer's next contract will be his last. Starting next season, he won't get another penny for playing hard. I think whoever signs him will be disappointed.

Maybe he should lay off the booze. Just a thought.

https:// It's not so hard.
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

1/7/2010  9:49 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/7/2010  9:51 AM
I don't think Utah would do this -- getting Boozer would strengthen us for the rest of the year (I think it's safe to say that Boozer, rental or not, would definitely help us win some more games this season), thus greatly lowering the value of the draft pick we owe them (which according to draft.net is currently slated to go 8th -- before our recent surge, that was looking more like a top 4 pick - thank Christ we started playing better). I don't think they'd view that as a positive. It'd be like shooting themselves in the foot. Plus, I think they just got CJ Miles back not too long ago and the last I saw, that kid Matthews was playing pretty well and contributing. I'm not sure they'd have too much interest in Larry Hughes now. Hughes may have made some sense to them way back when a lot of their perimeter players all went down around the same time and there was some uncertainty surrounding others (Harpring got hurt, Miles got hurt, then there was the semi-ugly contract dispute with Ronnie Brewer that made the papers, nobody really knew how good Matthews Jr. could be, etc..). That was the time for the Jazz to go fishin' for a wing. Now their perimeter situation has stabilized somewhat...

Don't get me wrong, I love Kosta's game and would love to see this kid rockin' a Knick uniform but the only way I could see us getting Koufos right now is if we go lateral/young potential for young potential as in Hill for Koufos or if we decided to give up on a young piece that's really starting to take off for us right now like a Wilson Chandler. For Koufos, maybe you do those moves. I'm not sure...But I don't see them doing us any favors by taking our garbage (Hughes isn't even part of our rotation right now) and giving us back a 20/10 player pretty much in his prime AND a future skilled 7 footer, no matter how much money they may save in the short-term. Not when they have a personal interest in the Knicks losing as many games as possible. No way they can sell that trade to their fans. Just my humble opinion...

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/7/2010  1:24 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/7/2010  1:27 PM
Finestrg wrote:I don't think Utah would do this -- getting Boozer would strengthen us for the rest of the year (I think it's safe to say that Boozer, rental or not, would definitely help us win some more games this season), thus greatly lowering the value of the draft pick we owe them (which according to draft.net is currently slated to go 8th -- before our recent surge, that was looking more like a top 4 pick - thank Christ we started playing better). I don't think they'd view that as a positive. It'd be like shooting themselves in the foot. Plus, I think they just got CJ Miles back not too long ago and the last I saw, that kid Matthews was playing pretty well and contributing. I'm not sure they'd have too much interest in Larry Hughes now. Hughes may have made some sense to them way back when a lot of their perimeter players all went down around the same time and there was some uncertainty surrounding others (Harpring got hurt, Miles got hurt, then there was the semi-ugly contract dispute with Ronnie Brewer that made the papers, nobody really knew how good Matthews Jr. could be, etc..). That was the time for the Jazz to go fishin' for a wing. Now their perimeter situation has stabilized somewhat...

Don't get me wrong, I love Kosta's game and would love to see this kid rockin' a Knick uniform but the only way I could see us getting Koufos right now is if we go lateral/young potential for young potential as in Hill for Koufos or if we decided to give up on a young piece that's really starting to take off for us right now like a Wilson Chandler. For Koufos, maybe you do those moves. I'm not sure...But I don't see them doing us any favors by taking our garbage (Hughes isn't even part of our rotation right now) and giving us back a 20/10 player pretty much in his prime AND a future skilled 7 footer, no matter how much money they may save in the short-term. Not when they have a personal interest in the Knicks losing as many games as possible. No way they can sell that trade to their fans. Just my humble opinion...

You know what fin--I have thought about this--I would be willing to give up a lottery protected 1 with Hughes--cash even the deal out for Boozer. They wont throw in Koufus for 3mm$ --or maybe they would???

I'm a believer in sporst when you think you can win now--you go for it. If this was Checkettes and Grunfeld and they could get a chance at bring in Boozer to go with Lee upfront for one lousy protected pick--they would do it and so would I. I want to win now--if you a have chance to bring in a superior caliber player--you do it. Perhaps after the season we see what happens with lee etc.. and we can always S+T him[boozer] for the 6th year and bring something back. At the bottom line--I think getting Boozer honestly gives us a chance to win the east.

RIP Crushalot😞
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/7/2010  1:33 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
Finestrg wrote:I don't think Utah would do this -- getting Boozer would strengthen us for the rest of the year (I think it's safe to say that Boozer, rental or not, would definitely help us win some more games this season), thus greatly lowering the value of the draft pick we owe them (which according to draft.net is currently slated to go 8th -- before our recent surge, that was looking more like a top 4 pick - thank Christ we started playing better). I don't think they'd view that as a positive. It'd be like shooting themselves in the foot. Plus, I think they just got CJ Miles back not too long ago and the last I saw, that kid Matthews was playing pretty well and contributing. I'm not sure they'd have too much interest in Larry Hughes now. Hughes may have made some sense to them way back when a lot of their perimeter players all went down around the same time and there was some uncertainty surrounding others (Harpring got hurt, Miles got hurt, then there was the semi-ugly contract dispute with Ronnie Brewer that made the papers, nobody really knew how good Matthews Jr. could be, etc..). That was the time for the Jazz to go fishin' for a wing. Now their perimeter situation has stabilized somewhat...

Don't get me wrong, I love Kosta's game and would love to see this kid rockin' a Knick uniform but the only way I could see us getting Koufos right now is if we go lateral/young potential for young potential as in Hill for Koufos or if we decided to give up on a young piece that's really starting to take off for us right now like a Wilson Chandler. For Koufos, maybe you do those moves. I'm not sure...But I don't see them doing us any favors by taking our garbage (Hughes isn't even part of our rotation right now) and giving us back a 20/10 player pretty much in his prime AND a future skilled 7 footer, no matter how much money they may save in the short-term. Not when they have a personal interest in the Knicks losing as many games as possible. No way they can sell that trade to their fans. Just my humble opinion...

You know what fin--I have thought about this--I would be willing to give up a lottery protected 1 with Hughes--cash even the deal out for Boozer. They wont throw in Koufus for 3mm$ --or maybe they would???

I'm a believer in sporst when you think you can win now--you go for it. If this was Checkettes and Grunfeld and they could get a chance at bring in Boozer to go with Lee upfront for one lousy protected pick--they would do it and so would I. I want to win now--if you a have chance to bring in a superior caliber player--you do it. Perhaps after the season we see what happens with lee etc.. and we can always S+T him[boozer] for the 6th year and bring something back. At the bottom line--I think getting Boozer honestly gives us a chance to win the east.

Briggs- that is what has been wrong with the Knick's thinking the last 10 years- they thought they were a mere 1 piece, 1 move away from being able to win it all.

How'd that work out for us?

Dolan has finally, I think, bitten the bullet and realized that despite what he thought, you can and do have to rebuild in NY.

No more future picks should be traded away by the Knicks. Maybe if we got Lebron and winning 50 games and we're 1 piece away.

But if we whiff this off season, we might still be sucking when 2012 comes around.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/7/2010  1:56 PM
BRIGGS, what possible use would UTA have for Larry Hughes & a protected #1 for Boozer & Koufos? that doesn't make sense for UTA, Boozer & Hughes are both expirings & Boozer is the better player by far... if Koufos is as good a prospect as u seem to think he is why would they give him up for a protected pick? they already own our pick this year as it is, they're not going to do us any favors & make us better & screw themselves in the process.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/7/2010  2:15 PM
franco12 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
Finestrg wrote:I don't think Utah would do this -- getting Boozer would strengthen us for the rest of the year (I think it's safe to say that Boozer, rental or not, would definitely help us win some more games this season), thus greatly lowering the value of the draft pick we owe them (which according to draft.net is currently slated to go 8th -- before our recent surge, that was looking more like a top 4 pick - thank Christ we started playing better). I don't think they'd view that as a positive. It'd be like shooting themselves in the foot. Plus, I think they just got CJ Miles back not too long ago and the last I saw, that kid Matthews was playing pretty well and contributing. I'm not sure they'd have too much interest in Larry Hughes now. Hughes may have made some sense to them way back when a lot of their perimeter players all went down around the same time and there was some uncertainty surrounding others (Harpring got hurt, Miles got hurt, then there was the semi-ugly contract dispute with Ronnie Brewer that made the papers, nobody really knew how good Matthews Jr. could be, etc..). That was the time for the Jazz to go fishin' for a wing. Now their perimeter situation has stabilized somewhat...

Don't get me wrong, I love Kosta's game and would love to see this kid rockin' a Knick uniform but the only way I could see us getting Koufos right now is if we go lateral/young potential for young potential as in Hill for Koufos or if we decided to give up on a young piece that's really starting to take off for us right now like a Wilson Chandler. For Koufos, maybe you do those moves. I'm not sure...But I don't see them doing us any favors by taking our garbage (Hughes isn't even part of our rotation right now) and giving us back a 20/10 player pretty much in his prime AND a future skilled 7 footer, no matter how much money they may save in the short-term. Not when they have a personal interest in the Knicks losing as many games as possible. No way they can sell that trade to their fans. Just my humble opinion...

You know what fin--I have thought about this--I would be willing to give up a lottery protected 1 with Hughes--cash even the deal out for Boozer. They wont throw in Koufus for 3mm$ --or maybe they would???

I'm a believer in sporst when you think you can win now--you go for it. If this was Checkettes and Grunfeld and they could get a chance at bring in Boozer to go with Lee upfront for one lousy protected pick--they would do it and so would I. I want to win now--if you a have chance to bring in a superior caliber player--you do it. Perhaps after the season we see what happens with lee etc.. and we can always S+T him[boozer] for the 6th year and bring something back. At the bottom line--I think getting Boozer honestly gives us a chance to win the east.

Briggs- that is what has been wrong with the Knick's thinking the last 10 years- they thought they were a mere 1 piece, 1 move away from being able to win it all.

How'd that work out for us?

Dolan has finally, I think, bitten the bullet and realized that despite what he thought, you can and do have to rebuild in NY.

No more future picks should be traded away by the Knicks. Maybe if we got Lebron and winning 50 games and we're 1 piece away.

But if we whiff this off season, we might still be sucking when 2012 comes around.


It's not Isiah Thomas --it's a #1 pick with lottery protection until cashed in. Ill trade a 20+ pick in 2012 for the chance to win now. I don't know if Utah wants us to win now:) but I would pursue him.

RIP Crushalot😞
WindsorPl
Posts: 20413
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/12/2009
Member: #2799
USA
1/7/2010  3:04 PM
It's not Isiah Thomas --it's a #1 pick with lottery protection until cashed in. Ill trade a 20+ pick in 2012 for the chance to win now. I don't know if Utah wants us to win now:) but I would pursue him.

I am sure Zeke used that exact quote to sell Dolan on the Marbury trade.
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

1/26/2010  12:30 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/26/2010  12:56 PM
Koufos was just sent down to the D-League once again. Even though he's saying the right things, I don't think he's too happy about it at all. Something's wrong out there with this guy - he just isn't getting any time and doesn't seem to be fitting in. What makes the demotion even more strange is that Utah's playing without backup center Kyrylo Fesenko who's been out with a sprained ankle. And yet KK still gets sent down... Sounds like Utah fans are even getting a little impatient & a little upset with his play recently, saying he looks lost and confused out on the floor (supposedly he looked terrible in garbage time against the Nets recently, committing 4 turnovers in under 10 mins.). Sounds like this guy might need a change of scenery..

I think now might be the time to strike. Maybe we come in with an offer of Nate and both our 2s for Koufos and Wesley Matthews. Or if Nate rejects it, I might consider dangling Wilson Chandler, believe it or not. I don't care how lost Koufos has looked - he's a talented big man and I'm still interested. It'll be tough to get both Koufos & Matthews though. Wes Matthews isn't a no name anymore -- he's played great for them all season, including last night where he had another standout game against Phoenix. He had a double-digit 4th quarter and was as instrumental as any Utah player in helping his team climb back from a 17 pt. deficit last night against a very good Suns team...I just saw the replay -- Matthews was all over the joint - driving the ball, running the court, hitting 3s, playing defense, moving the ball to the open man -- this guy's a good player. And he does it all within the team concept, never really forcing anything...You wanna laugh, I bet Utah may be more willing to deal Koufos than Matthews right now. Sounds like Sloan loves him...I'd love to get both players but I think we may at least have a shot at Koufos right now..

Tell you what, if we could get Kosta Koufos for Nate and a 2 or Nate, a 2 and some cash, etc., that would be a steal. Even if we didn't get LeBron this summer how good a frontcourt on paper would Koufos, Lee and Chandler (with Hill as the first big off the bench) look? Answer: not too bad. That would be a nice young frontcourt core..

How about Larry Hughes

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy