McK1 wrote:Paladin55 wrote:kam77 wrote:Hill for Bayless.
If you are the Knicks, you would regret making this trade, if you did, at some point in the future, IMO.
why?
Better upside for Hill, IMO, and although Bayless may become a good guard at some point, he is nothing special, also IMO.
We also have Douglas, who is a better defensive player, and may be a better shooter. I looked at some Portland sites, and have watched a few games on League Pass to know that Bayless' jumper is very inconsistent, and he has not shown enough as a distributor to make you believe he can be a PG in the NBA.
I am not willing to trade a guy with Hill's potential for a 6'2"/6'3" combo guard with a questionable shot whose greatest strength is his ability to get to the basket.
No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee