fishmike wrote:McK1 wrote:a) charlotte is losing.b) i disagree with the assessment of the talent level on the roster. the roster isn't as bad as some make it out to be. what is bad game to game:
duhon still starting and getting so much court timelee being miscast as a 5
treating al harrington like he is al ducati
galinari having little to no plays ran for him most nights
jeffries is getting more than specialist minutes
douglas being used sparingly
hill getting no minutes
and all these things fall back on 
c) dunleavy won a bunch of games with the lakers and blazers. would you hire him to cach new york?
how do you know? How do you know Walsh hasnt told MDA to win as many games as he can with the vets so they can explore deadline deals?Who is best suited to play center over Lee? Curry? (injured) Darko? (terrible)
Deadline deals for the vets? I don't see how playing Jefferies makes it easier to trade him. If we play Hill over Jefferies, other GMs can assume that we are looking to develop youth, and that it doesn't mean Hill is better than Jefferies. Same for TD & Duhon.
Also, playing the vets has only exposed them. If they were on the bench, they might not be so ugly and some GM might be fooled into taking them.
And I'll take Darko (terrible) over Lee (overmatched, pushed around, jumped over, jazz hands defense).
Darko has played 70 mins. Is that enough for MDA to know he can't play for us? This is the same braintrust (MDA & Walsh) who passed on Jennings, Jason Williams, Tinsley, but had the biggest hard on for Anthony Robersuck.
So I should trust their judgement on Darko? Based on practice and 70 minutes of game time?
We're lucky the Nets suck, or we would be the second worse team in the league. Right now, we're the third worse.
Yes, give me Darko, and lets see what he can do over 20 games getting some reasonable playing time.
I'm all for giving Walsh & MDA time to make things right. I'm patient. But I don't like what I'm starting to see, or not see.