Bippity10 wrote:Keep in mind that players always look better then they really are when they are next to superstars not playing for the knicks

lemme edit that for you bip -

tkf wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:and he is a 5-6 option in Orlando--that tells you where we are as a team/franchise

ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

where was this post just the day before when he had 7 points and 6 boards on 2-14 shooting.

briggs, you are so predictable..

Ryan Andersen is the real deal--what is the big difference in the players? Gallo can handle and pass better and Andersen is a better rebounder and more athletic and active? Same size--Im sorry but there is little difference from what I have seen.

martin wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:I'm throwing in the towel--we sck and there is no reason to sugar coat it. We''ll sck after 10 games after 20 games--we just sck. We need to start revamping for the future now.

Walsh beat you to it by a year. He started with Marbury, Crawford, and Zbo and targeted 2010 when the greatest free agent class becomes available and when Lebron may have a handshake deal with Stern to go to NY.

I think we can do much more--we have some good individual players on ending contracts and I am willing to trade anyone except Gallo for the right price today.[I should caveat that I would personally be willing to trade anyone including Gallo for the right price but the Knicks think he is Larry Bird]

martin wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

martin wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:I'm throwing in the towel--we sck and there is no reason to sugar coat it. We''ll sck after 10 games after 20 games--we just sck. We need to start revamping for the future now.

Walsh beat you to it by a year. He started with Marbury, Crawford, and Zbo and targeted 2010 when the greatest free agent class becomes available and when Lebron may have a handshake deal with Stern to go to NY.

I think we can do much more--we have some good individual players on ending contracts and I am willing to trade anyone except Gallo for the right price today.[I should caveat that I would personally be willing to trade anyone including Gallo for the right price but the Knicks think he is Larry Bird]

I don't think Walsh would disagree with you, except on the Gallo part.

What if Toronto was willing to part with Bosh for Harrington and Gallo?

BRIGGS wrote:What if Toronto was willing to part with Bosh for Harrington and Gallo?

i would personally shoot colangelo in the face...

martin wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

martin wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

martin wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:I'm throwing in the towel--we sck and there is no reason to sugar coat it. We''ll sck after 10 games after 20 games--we just sck. We need to start revamping for the future now.

Walsh beat you to it by a year. He started with Marbury, Crawford, and Zbo and targeted 2010 when the greatest free agent class becomes available and when Lebron may have a handshake deal with Stern to go to NY.

I think we can do much more--we have some good individual players on ending contracts and I am willing to trade anyone except Gallo for the right price today.[I should caveat that I would personally be willing to trade anyone including Gallo for the right price but the Knicks think he is Larry Bird]

I don't think Walsh would disagree with you, except on the Gallo part.

What if Toronto was willing to part with Bosh for Harrington and Gallo?

well, this is the real world, so Walsh probably would say yes to that deal but Toronto would never offer it.

Right--so we acknowledge that we have no one player that is not available. Toronto may lose Bosh for nothing--maybe an attractive package that had a Gallo Chandler Hill with a Harrington--that is how Minnesota traded for Garnett

BRIGGS wrote:

sebstar wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:and he is a 5-6 option in Orlando--that tells you where we are as a team/franchise

why is your boo, Randolph, only averaging 8 pts this year and is now currently locked on the bench? Lets start with that.

knee and back injuries +nellie and new guards= small ball deluxe

I havent heard anything about him being hurt. Those sound like excuses, fam. Nellie's crazy as shyt, no doubt, but he's not playing Randolph because of his perceived talent level and how he fits in to the club. Not because he's injured.

Randolph is already barking at the media about his playing time.

fishmike wrote:Randolph is hurt? Its hard to play in the NBA when Kate Moss has a better bench press. He's a bust... lets move one.

Does anyone doubt Walsh is going to make deals to get young players and more flexibility in here? 6 weeks into the season last year he dumped Zach and Crawford and the Knicks were playing well. Walsh doesnt need to admit this is an expansion team for it to be an expansion team. Let see what happens.

walsh is not getting anymore young players. he didn't get young players for zach and crawford and he won't for hughes + harrington. 2010 baby!!!

thedpj wrote:I hate to say it, but he's right. I like Danillo, but he will never be the #1 or #2 guy on a championship level team. His back is going to put a serious limit on the amount of good years he will have, and even then, his ceiling at this point is Peja.