[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Is it morally wrong to pose nude for a magazine?
Author Thread
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
10/26/2009  3:53 PM
orangeblobman wrote:it's not about a pair of floppy boobs but a greater loosening of discipline that will spell the end of life as you know it today. what will follow is a hedonistic backwater society where anything goes and no one gets anything done.

Dog, stop being so damn dumb. We're talking about looking at somebody naked. Whatchu talking 'bout? Who you lying to, b?

My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
AUTOADVERT
coolbeans
Posts: 20520
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/29/2009
Member: #2875
Niue
10/26/2009  3:54 PM
@blob nah mang it wont be nudity it'll be SURROGATES (movie reference) if society every gets THAT plugged into living through the internet-- then nothing will ever get done.
coolbeans@in.com
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
10/26/2009  3:55 PM
@beans. surrogates? i've heard of that. is it worth a look?
WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
coolbeans
Posts: 20520
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/29/2009
Member: #2875
Niue
10/26/2009  3:58 PM
orangeblobman wrote:@beans. surrogates? i've heard of that. is it worth a look?

torrent it man. dont rent it. it was a boring execution of an interesting plot.

coolbeans@in.com
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
10/26/2009  3:59 PM
coolbeans wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:@beans. surrogates? i've heard of that. is it worth a look?

torrent it man. dont rent it. it was a boring execution of an interesting plot.

i'll do you one better and save myself the download time, watch-movies-links.net should have it. management was a good movie that i saw recently

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
coolbeans
Posts: 20520
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/29/2009
Member: #2875
Niue
10/26/2009  4:04 PM
@blog cool thanks for the link! managment will be a fun movie to see especially after the movie paranormal activity made me fear bumps in the night.
coolbeans@in.com
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
10/26/2009  4:14 PM
For men its wrong. For women its ok.
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
10/26/2009  4:54 PM
orangeblobman wrote:it's not about a pair of floppy boobs

i prefer a set of nice, plump & jiggly boobs myself, but to each his own.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
10/26/2009  5:09 PM
orangeblobman wrote:
coolbeans wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:@beans. surrogates? i've heard of that. is it worth a look?

torrent it man. dont rent it. it was a boring execution of an interesting plot.

i'll do you one better and save myself the download time, watch-movies-links.net should have it. management was a good movie that i saw recently

posing nude = wrong, stealing intellectual property = right?? haha!

check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
10/26/2009  5:49 PM
eViL wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:
coolbeans wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:@beans. surrogates? i've heard of that. is it worth a look?

torrent it man. dont rent it. it was a boring execution of an interesting plot.

i'll do you one better and save myself the download time, watch-movies-links.net should have it. management was a good movie that i saw recently

posing nude = wrong, stealing intellectual property = right?? haha!

lol. u caught that.

My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
10/26/2009  5:53 PM
sebstar wrote:
eViL wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:
coolbeans wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:@beans. surrogates? i've heard of that. is it worth a look?

torrent it man. dont rent it. it was a boring execution of an interesting plot.

i'll do you one better and save myself the download time, watch-movies-links.net should have it. management was a good movie that i saw recently

posing nude = wrong, stealing intellectual property = right?? haha!

lol. u caught that.

it is not morally wrong to view bootleg movies online IF you have NO intention of spending money on a movie, ever. and this is the case for me. if the bootlegs didn't exist, i simply wouldn't watch any movies. i don't know about the rest of the pirates...

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
coolbeans
Posts: 20520
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/29/2009
Member: #2875
Niue
10/26/2009  7:24 PM
@evil i dont see the equivalency of posing nude for a magazine and youtubing. seriously what would hurt you more wife youtubing a movie or wife ***** popping on a magazine.
coolbeans@in.com
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
10/26/2009  9:59 PM
coolbeans wrote:@evil i dont see the equivalency of posing nude for a magazine and youtubing. seriously what would hurt you more wife youtubing a movie or wife ***** popping on a magazine.

it's not about what would hurt me more. because if it was my movie that was being pirated and someone else's wife, then what? still neither of those premises really have any relevance to the comparison. rather, all they do is personalize the situation as if "what would hurt me more?" became some sort of standard for what is more "wrong."

in one case, my "wife" would have the freedom to choose what she wants to do and hopefully she's making some good money doing it. in the other case, you are stealing someone's intellectual property which whether you agree with it or not is against the law. i'm not going any further because i'm aware enough to know when there's no point elaborating.

just poking fun at the moral righteousness over certain things but not over others. definitely hope that catching some flack over here opens some dudes eyes to the fact that they comin with some clownish stuff. i ain't gonna come on here and tell people how to be, but if cats wanna portray themselves as some sort of upstanding american heros, then they best take it to the maximum. so even though orangeblob is a virgin, he better not curse, he better not watch R-rated movies, no sweets before dinner, no posing in enyspree's favorite mags, and no illegally dl'ing valuable copyrighted intellectual property (FEDERAL OFFENSE FOR GODSAKES!!!) none of that selective ish. strict purity for this young pillar of holiness.

check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/26/2009  10:25 PM
eViL wrote:
coolbeans wrote:@evil i dont see the equivalency of posing nude for a magazine and youtubing. seriously what would hurt you more wife youtubing a movie or wife ***** popping on a magazine.

it's not about what would hurt me more. because if it was my movie that was being pirated and someone else's wife, then what? still neither of those premises really have any relevance to the comparison. rather, all they do is personalize the situation as if "what would hurt me more?" became some sort of standard for what is more "wrong."

in one case, my "wife" would have the freedom to choose what she wants to do and hopefully she's making some good money doing it. in the other case, you are stealing someone's intellectual property which whether you agree with it or not is against the law. i'm not going any further because i'm aware enough to know when there's no point elaborating.

just poking fun at the moral righteousness over certain things but not over others. definitely hope that catching some flack over here opens some dudes eyes to the fact that they comin with some clownish stuff. i ain't gonna come on here and tell people how to be, but if cats wanna portray themselves as some sort of upstanding american heros, then they best take it to the maximum. so even though orangeblob is a virgin, he better not curse, he better not watch R-rated movies, no sweets before dinner, no posing in enyspree's favorite mags, and no illegally dl'ing valuable copyrighted intellectual property (FEDERAL OFFENSE FOR GODSAKES!!!) none of that selective ish. strict purity for this young pillar of holiness.


+1; even here I'll give my own views and I definitely word them bluntly but I'm not going to tell other people what to think or tell them the world will come to an end if they don't start agreeing with me.
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
10/26/2009  11:46 PM    LAST EDITED: 10/26/2009  11:53 PM
i don't download any copyrighted intellectual property. there are just sites that happen to stream certain sections of movies, they are hosted on legitimate video hosting sites. no downloading or distributing or recording ever takes place. does this change it at all?

and let's say i never planned to see movie A, that means my money was never going to go into supporting movie A. but a site comes to my attention where, sometimes, low quality videos of movie A are streamed, but never downloaded (or distributed by me). did i really hurt the studio by misdirecting money that never existed, or i was never going to spend, in the first place?

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
10/27/2009  1:24 AM
im not going to say its wrong because why is it wrong? if you are comfortable enough to pose nude and dont care about peoples reactions then cool.

Keep in mind though thats its all about portrayal and opinion and theres no evidence that shows that either opinion is wrong. So if you pose nude, dont be dissapointed if people aren`t praising you bc those peole aren`t wrong either.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
10/27/2009  1:24 AM
im not going to say its wrong because why is it wrong? if you are comfortable enough to pose nude and dont care about peoples reactions then cool.

Keep in mind though thats its all about portrayal and opinion and theres no evidence that shows that either opinion is wrong. So if you pose nude, dont be dissapointed if people aren`t praising you bc those peole aren`t wrong either.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
10/27/2009  1:26 AM
im not going to say its wrong because why is it wrong? if you are comfortable enough to pose nude and dont care about peoples reactions then cool. Keep in mind though thats its all about portrayal and opinion and theres no evidence that shows that either opinion is wrong. So if you pose nude, dont be dissapointed if people aren`t praising you bc those peole aren`t wrong either.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/27/2009  5:42 AM
orangeblobman wrote:i don't download any copyrighted intellectual property. there are just sites that happen to stream certain sections of movies, they are hosted on legitimate video hosting sites. no downloading or distributing or recording ever takes place. does this change it at all?

and let's say i never planned to see movie A, that means my money was never going to go into supporting movie A. but a site comes to my attention where, sometimes, low quality videos of movie A are streamed, but never downloaded (or distributed by me). did i really hurt the studio by misdirecting money that never existed, or i was never going to spend, in the first place?


That's basically the utilitarian argument on ethical behavior--"I got enjoyment out of it and it harmed no one--so it's a net gain for humanity." The argument can be used to justify violating all sorts of moral principles (e.g., setting up a spy cam in a locker room and getting enjoyment out of it while the other persons never found out. You get your enjoyment and they never know.)
coolbeans
Posts: 20520
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/29/2009
Member: #2875
Niue
10/27/2009  6:05 AM
@evil i wouldnt value a movie over my wife and daughter (whether its my intellectual property or not.) in today's world to appear nude on a magazine leads to women being (unfairly) labeled and treated negatively. plus severely limiting their career options of just doing porn. there's zero scorn or ill treatment by society youtubing.
coolbeans@in.com
Is it morally wrong to pose nude for a magazine?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy