Posted by MS:
Ok so Randolph is the better ball handler, finisher, defender and athlete than Gallo not to mention he isn't a bad shooter. He is the better player and will be the better player.
Gordon shot 45.6% as a rookie and is 6-4. He is a scorer and if you want to say he doesn't have the upside overal that's fine, but Gallo hasn't show anything to lead you to believe he is going to be a big time scorer. He will be a winning player, but he is very limited right now and part of that has to do with his legs, injury, and cultural adjustment period. Just for the record Ray Allen doesn't do anything except score and shoots at at 45% for his career. If you can score at will you have value especially with another big time player on the team.
what games are you watching? Gordon doesnt defend anything or anyone. He doesnt facilitate any offense either. He never passes. He comes off screens and shoots. He dribbles and shoots. He penetrates for layups. If he can get into the paint he shoots. I cant fault those parts of his game cause he's good at it, but thats all he does. He has zero impact on the offense when he's not trying to score and he has zero impact on defense.
Now to be fair thats more than Gallo has because he's unproven. Gordon can score in the NBA. Gallo has yet to show us what kind of player he is or isnt.
For now I'm sticking with the 6'10 forward over the 6'2 shooting guard. Time will tell
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs