[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Fun game. Is our best player better than ANY other teams best player?
Author Thread
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
9/24/2009  11:05 AM
i think this is a very tough question, since we can't even decide who our best player is.

we're kind of a team right now that any guy could be the "best" on a given night.

i think training camp and after a little bit into the season we might get a clearer picture of who qualifies.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
AUTOADVERT
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
9/24/2009  1:57 PM
Posted by PresIke:

i think this is a very tough question, since we can't even decide who our best player is.

we're kind of a team right now that any guy could be the "best" on a given night.

i think training camp and after a little bit into the season we might get a clearer picture of who qualifies.

-I think because we can't agree on who our best player is, it means we clearly don't have one- we have a roster with a bunch of really ok guys, but none really stand out better than the others.

And this is why we lose games. Basketball is I think the one team game where an individual player can have the greatest impact on the outcome of the game. And we seldom have THE BEST player on the court, and that is why we lose.
Moonangie
Posts: 24767
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 7/9/2009
Member: #2788

9/24/2009  2:08 PM
1. Gallo (just wait and see, he's a rock star)
2. Chandler (more balanced game than Al)
3. Al
4. Lee
5. Not sure, but only Hill, Douglas and Darko matter past those top 4.

Honorable mentions: JJ, Eddie, Duhon, Larry, and N8 (who is certainly the best of this bunch)

Of course, slim-Eddie (if he can maintain proper habits) could be a stud, we'll just have to see.
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
9/24/2009  3:02 PM
Sadly enough, I may have to go with Al Harrington.

Brain-farty rim hanging tactics aside..dude can score outside/inside and he can guard a wide variety of players.

After that I'd say it's a tie between Gallo and Chandler.

Hopefully after this season Gallo will clearly rule the coop after a MONSTER breakout season.

Larry Johnson with a bad back > anyone on this Knicks squad, true?

MSG played a little piece on him last weekend. He was pretty nasty player and above all competitor.

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

9/24/2009  5:26 PM
Damn, this *is* a depressing game. I got nothin'.
Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
9/24/2009  5:54 PM
It may cheer you guys up to know that at least our worst player isn't the worst player in the league! This guy plays for Chicago now:
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/jerome_james/index.html
TheGame
Posts: 26647
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
9/24/2009  6:04 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

It may cheer you guys up to know that at least our worst player isn't the worst player in the league! This guy plays for Chicago now:
http://www.nba.com/playerfile/jerome_james/index.html

Lol and last year the worst player in the league was our best defensive center.
Trust the Process
coolbeans
Posts: 20520
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/29/2009
Member: #2875
Niue
9/24/2009  7:10 PM
Posted by DrAlphaeus:

Damn, this *is* a depressing game. I got nothin'.

lol
coolbeans@in.com
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
9/24/2009  8:16 PM
Posted by franco12:
Posted by PresIke:

i think this is a very tough question, since we can't even decide who our best player is.

we're kind of a team right now that any guy could be the "best" on a given night.

i think training camp and after a little bit into the season we might get a clearer picture of who qualifies.

-I think because we can't agree on who our best player is, it means we clearly don't have one- we have a roster with a bunch of really ok guys, but none really stand out better than the others.

And this is why we lose games. Basketball is I think the one team game where an individual player can have the greatest impact on the outcome of the game. And we seldom have THE BEST player on the court, and that is why we lose.

i'm not really sure how that makes sense.

if you look at an all-star team, who can you say is the best player there?

or even easier...

the u.s. olympic team.

kobe, lebron, wade, paul, etc.

this doesn't mean we don't have good players, we just don't have a great player on our team, and we have more than a few who are just not that good at enough things to help us be a consistent winner.

that's beginning to change, and we'll see how we do with mostly the same roster who have already played here and with d'antoni last year, and a full training camp. duhon said that keeping the roster consistent might be helpful, and actually he's right in that most good teams don't constantly make a lot of big roster changes.

last year we started off well before we traded our most talented guys who were here during camp (jamal and z-bo).

no matter what you think of those guys, they at least were trained in d'antoni's system.

as the season went on last year, after all the deals, d'antoni pretty much abandoned his system and went with a go with whoever's hot approach, which was most often harrington. walsh has said that what may have hurt us most last year was the latter deals where we already went through a big change with the crawford and randolph deals early in the season, and then two more deals at the trade deadline.

with a healthy gallo and mostly the same guys here again, maybe that will help us. however, we do know that we are going to look to deal this year, especially guys like curry and jeffries, or if a big star we want is available...with all of our ending deals + the more valuable mobley deal, we could be players in that market, but at least it would be for more than someone like a marginal overpaid decent malcontent talent in hughes.


[Edited by - PresIke on 09-24-2009 8:18 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
9/24/2009  10:20 PM
Posted by PresIke:

as the season went on last year, after all the deals, d'antoni pretty much abandoned his system and went with a go with whoever's hot approach, which was most often harrington. walsh has said that what may have hurt us most last year was the latter deals where we already went through a big change with the crawford and randolph deals early in the season, and then two more deals at the trade deadline.

with a healthy gallo and mostly the same guys here again, maybe that will help us. however, we do know that we are going to look to deal this year, especially guys like curry and jeffries, or if a big star we want is available...with all of our ending deals + the more valuable mobley deal, we could be players in that market, but at least it would be for more than someone like a marginal overpaid decent malcontent talent in hughes.

THANK YOU PRESIKE!!! You get 3 for that post. I really think it's amazing how a little thing like the facts get in the way of so many who just won't accept that sometimes there are legitimate excuses for bad seasons. Do we just ignore how detrimental all that change can be to an already shaky team? When evaluating the talent is it too much to ask to see how good the talent really is when it has a fair chance to play without all those disruptive things?

I think we've seen this team underachieve under Isiah and also be subject to some of the worst luck of any Knick team over a period of time. Almost nothing has gone right. That said, we all have acknowledged that the talent hasn't been that bad, but the result has. Under MDA we saw at the start of the year what a difference a good coach can make. The team was playing well and if not for the trades it's likely that they would've won a lot more games. is it a stretch to think they could've gone .500 if left untouched? We don't have superstars, but we may have emerging young stars. I'm looking forward to this season, cuz I think it's gonna be the 1st fair shot we'll have to see what we have and then go into 2010 with a better idea of what to do to make the team better.
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
9/24/2009  11:02 PM
In short: No.

In long: No.

Celtics - Pierce, Allen, KG
Nets - Harris
Raptors - Bosh
Sixers - Igoudala, Brand
Bulls - Rose
Cavaliers - 'Nough said
Pistons - Gordon, Prince
Pacers - Granger
Bucks - Redd, Bogut
Hawks - Smith, Johnson, Horford
Bobcats - Wallace, Augustin
Heat - Wade
Magic - Dwight
Wizards - Butler, Arenas, Jamison
Mavericks - Dirk
Rockets - Yao
Grizzlies - Gay, Mayo
Hornets - Paul, Okafor
Spurs - Duncan
Nuggets - Carmelo
Timberwolves - Jefferson
Thunder - Durant, Green
Blazers - Aldridge, Roy
Jazz - Boozer, D Williams
Warriors - debatable
Clippers - Griffin, Gordon?
Lakers - Kobe, Gasol
Suns - Amare, Nash
Kings - Martin

So one team is debatable - the Warriors. That's it.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
9/25/2009  12:07 AM
GKF:

Nate Robinson is better than Devin Harris. That's right, I said it.

He's also better than Ben Gordan. Prince is a nice role player who can hit a 3 and block a shot, but Al Harrington and Lee are both better.

Augustine hasn't done sheeeot yet and I would take Nate over him.

Boozer is real nice but is he THAT much better than David Lee, when Boozer himself doesn't play any defense? I would say he's not that much better.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
9/25/2009  12:13 AM
Posted by Allanfan20:

GKF:

Nate Robinson is better than Devin Harris. That's right, I said it.

He's also better than Ben Gordan. Prince is a nice role player who can hit a 3 and block a shot, but Al Harrington and Lee are both better.

Augustine hasn't done sheeeot yet and I would take Nate over him.

Boozer is real nice but is he THAT much better than David Lee, when Boozer himself doesn't play any defense? I would say he's not that much better.

He's a better scorer (Boozer) so yes.

And Nate better than Harris? Nah, I don't think so.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
9/25/2009  12:20 AM
Lee is a better rebounder and Boozer maybe a better scorer but not by a ton.

Harris is not better than Nate. He may be a better passer but Nate is the better overall player. Book it.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
9/25/2009  12:22 AM
Posted by Allanfan20:

Lee is a better rebounder and Boozer maybe a better scorer but not by a ton.

Harris is not better than Nate. He may be a better passer but Nate is the better overall player. Book it.

Who plays more within an offense? Who keeps their emotions in check? Who doesn't commit dumb turnovers? I don't think this can be used to describe Nate. I don't think there's many GM's in the league who take Nate over Harris and I don't either.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
9/25/2009  6:29 AM
Posted by Allanfan20:

GKF:

Nate Robinson is better than Devin Harris. That's right, I said it.

He's also better than Ben Gordan. Prince is a nice role player who can hit a 3 and block a shot, but Al Harrington and Lee are both better.

I don't think any GM would take our players over the ones you just mentioned.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
9/25/2009  7:37 AM
Bonn, do you REALLY think Ben Gordan is a better player than Nate Robinson? Lets be honest and take a look at their games here and when you do come back with an answer.

Nate does a lot more than Ben and may very well be just as good a shooter.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
9/25/2009  8:26 AM
Just to throw it out there..

We might have one of the best collections of young players in the league with Chandler, Gallo, Hill, Lee and Nate. I can't imagine finding a team with 5 better young players than that.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
9/25/2009  8:42 AM
Posted by nyk4ever:

Just to throw it out there..

We might have one of the best collections of young players in the league with Chandler, Gallo, Hill, Lee and Nate. I can't imagine finding a team with 5 better young players than that.

Yeah, we don't have a star so people aren't excited about our long-term prospects. To me that makes sense because you clearly cannot win unless you have a star, but.............I think in all our pessimism many of us have missed the fact that we have put together a very solid young core. Add a star to this, and this team is pretty good.
I just hope that people will like me
Sangfroid
Posts: 24681
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/7/2009
Member: #2784

9/25/2009  11:38 AM
Posted by GKFv2:

In short: No.

In long: No.

Celtics - Pierce, Allen, KG
Nets - Harris
Raptors - Bosh
Sixers - Igoudala, Brand
Bulls - Rose
Cavaliers - 'Nough said
Pistons - Gordon, Prince
Pacers - Granger
Bucks - Redd, Bogut
Hawks - Smith, Johnson, Horford
Bobcats - Wallace, Augustin
Heat - Wade
Magic - Dwight
Wizards - Butler, Arenas, Jamison
Mavericks - Dirk
Rockets - Yao
Grizzlies - Gay, Mayo
Hornets - Paul, Okafor
Spurs - Duncan
Nuggets - Carmelo
Timberwolves - Jefferson
Thunder - Durant, Green
Blazers - Aldridge, Roy
Jazz - Boozer, D Williams
Warriors - debatable
Clippers - Griffin, Gordon?
Lakers - Kobe, Gasol
Suns - Amare, Nash
Kings - Martin

So one team is debatable - the Warriors. That's it.

OUCH!
"We are playing a game. We are playing at not playing a game..."
Fun game. Is our best player better than ANY other teams best player?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy