Same way adding kg and two supporters to the celtics did.
The knicks are better than the celtics pre-KG in record alone.
We add a kg to the knicks we content. We add KG and Ray Allen. We win a title.
Just looking at recent history.
If lebron came to the knicks same current team we'd be the cavs.
No title but close.
Just don't feel the celtics were necessarily burning up the league with talent in last place.
You disagree. You feel last place means talent I suppose.
Posted by McK1:
Posted by babyKnicks:
What was the celtics record before Garnett and crew? What position did they draft?
If that doesn't make them scrubs what does?
You add a superstar and two supporters to a team. They can make a run.
He did it with spree and theat other guy in minny.
We add a star to this crew and we're in the mix. Any of the crew steps up then we are a contender.
The celts sucked and they were scrubs. They had the worst record in the league (worst than the 23 win knicks)
What was Minny's record before the trade? Seattle's? by your logic KG and Ray were scrubs at the time.
Furthermore the Knicks must all be scrubs too. How does adding a star to this group equal success?
Let's go Knicks. That's amare