[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

As is right now rank these teams how they will finish--put them in what order you believe best to last
Author Thread
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
8/14/2009  6:11 PM
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by BRIGGS:

I think if we add Sessions and bring back Lee Nate and Skita we will be a playoff team. Obviously some wild cards are also if Curry really comes in the like 2 years ago--if we end up trading Mobley and Lee for Boozer etc...
someone had their happy meal today

Nooo... This is BRIDDS just dreaming.
"Dream on...Dream on... It's so easy for you"
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
AUTOADVERT
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/15/2009  12:15 PM
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by BRIGGS:

I think if we add Sessions and bring back Lee Nate and Skita we will be a playoff team. Obviously some wild cards are also if Curry really comes in the like 2 years ago--if we end up trading Mobley and Lee for Boozer etc...
someone had their happy meal today

I think we can be a playoff team--I really do. I havent felt that way in 9+ years. Of course this is dependent on getting an upgrade at PG.


If Curry can come back to 2007 or close to it---we will be a MUCH bigger deeper team--this about the size we add

7-1 250 Darko
6-11 200 Curry
6-10 235 Hill
Possibly Skita 7-0 250

Thats a big difference in the middle. It will open up three point shooting opportunities and increase easy % baskets as well. On the other end--just having another big in there will help clog the lane. Last year it was like a freeway to the basket. This year we should be able to play with two big guys for most of the game like the good teams do.
RIP Crushalot😞
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
8/15/2009  4:42 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by BRIGGS:

I think if we add Sessions and bring back Lee Nate and Skita we will be a playoff team. Obviously some wild cards are also if Curry really comes in the like 2 years ago--if we end up trading Mobley and Lee for Boozer etc...
someone had their happy meal today

I think we can be a playoff team--I really do. I havent felt that way in 9+ years. Of course this is dependent on getting an upgrade at PG.


If Curry can come back to 2007 or close to it---we will be a MUCH bigger deeper team--this about the size we add

7-1 250 Darko
6-11 200 Curry This will be hilarious... Curry – dystrophic
6-10 235 Hill
Possibly Skita 7-0 250

Thats a big difference in the middle. It will open up three point shooting opportunities and increase easy % baskets as well. On the other end--just having another big in there will help clog the lane. Last year it was like a freeway to the basket. This year we should be able to play with two big guys for most of the game like the good teams do.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27679
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
8/15/2009  5:41 PM
Cavs- I think they are the team to beat.
Celtics Another year older, but they have more names than any other team. Their biggest competition is the IR.
Magic- Lost Hedo, added Vinsanity. The top three teams are just going to roll through the division.
Hawks- For them, a year older is a year wiser. The young Hawks should hit their prime real soon. Look for Crawful to screw it up somehow.
Bobcats- this team looks like the toughest defense in the East.
Detroit- Not sure that Gordon can fill the gap in Detroit left after trading away Billups. On paper the UConn-infusion of Gordon and
Raptors- So they added Hedo and Jack. Calderon/Jack/Turk/Bosh/Bargnani. This team has some serious wildcard potential.
Villanueva keeps them at their blue collar roots, but this team might need a year or two to mesh. Still, I think they are playoff bound.
Sixers- No more Andre Miller. Brand doesn't seem to be playing the same way. Iggy is good, I ju
Bulls- I like Derrick Rose... i just don't like anything else about this team.
Heat- This team hasn't gotten better. I don't see it.
Knicks- Kool-aid drinking puts the Knicks here. That assumes that everything goes right. Duhon/Chandler/Harrington/Darko/Lee I don't think this gets it done in this league. All jokes aside, an in-shape Curry could carry this team on his back. I just don't want to get my hopes up. I'd like to see Darko turned loose a little bit. See if he can do his thing in this system, at the PF spot.
Bucks- Redd will be back, but Jefferson and Villanueva won't be back. Looks like no Sessions either. I don't see it.
Wizards
Pacers
Nets
You know I gonna spin wit it
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
8/16/2009  9:15 PM
Bobcats
Raptors
Knicks
Wizards
Nets
Pacers
Bucks

This is it, in that order, no other way about it.
WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
As is right now rank these teams how they will finish--put them in what order you believe best to last

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy