[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Isola says Sessions or Tinsley in 1 or 2 days
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum


Author Poll
EnySpree
Posts: 24919
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
Who do you want to run the point for the Knicks in 2009/10 season???
Sessions at half or all of the mid-level for multi years/sign and trade
Tinsley for what would probably be a 1 year rental at the vet min
Re-sign Nate
Give it to Toney
Duhon cuz he sucks so good
View Results


Page 2 of 3 ‹ Previous 1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
7/30/2009  5:49 PM
Posted by Cookdcokehop:
Posted by Markji:
Posted by Cookdcokehop:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Dude, getting Jared is WORSE than losing Sessions for nothing!

Reasons why Bucks would do a deal for Jeffries

1. Jared Jeffries is a Scott Skiles type player.

2. They traded Richard Jefferson and are in need of a small forward. Bruce Bowen won't get it done.

3. Jeffries has 2 years left on his contract and the deal we offer Ramon will be 3-5 years.
Trading Jeffries for Sessions would just be too good to be true. I think if we threw in a 2nd round pick they might do it?? One can hope!

Jared Jeffries and future second round pick for Ramon Sessions

Shit throw in Saer Sene as well.

Damn, that's a big sacrifice. I don't know if we want to give away talent like that. The Bucks would be set at C and SF with this trade. It's a gamble.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
AUTOADVERT
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
7/30/2009  6:01 PM
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by Cookdcokehop:
Posted by Markji:
Posted by Cookdcokehop:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Dude, getting Jared is WORSE than losing Sessions for nothing!

Reasons why Bucks would do a deal for Jeffries

1. Jared Jeffries is a Scott Skiles type player.

2. They traded Richard Jefferson and are in need of a small forward. Bruce Bowen won't get it done.

3. Jeffries has 2 years left on his contract and the deal we offer Ramon will be 3-5 years.
Trading Jeffries for Sessions would just be too good to be true. I think if we threw in a 2nd round pick they might do it?? One can hope!

Jared Jeffries and future second round pick for Ramon Sessions

Shit throw in Saer Sene as well.

Damn, that's a big sacrifice. I don't know if we want to give away talent like that. The Bucks would be set at C and SF with this trade. It's a gamble.

Lol smart ass
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
7/30/2009  6:35 PM
i dont want sessions for 5 years MLE. He is gonna be a earl watson type player in my opinion, and in a year or two from now, all of us are going to be saying - why did donnie do this?! I think any longer than 3 years for any player is too long, too much can go wrong in 5 years - injury, jerome james'ed, just whatever. sucks, and is a bad move.
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
7/30/2009  7:39 PM
The same frank isola
That said nate would be sign by weeks end

But I would find a way to package duhon for sessions, then sign tinsley for the vet min.
ES
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
7/30/2009  7:46 PM
Posted by Caseloads:

I dont want sessions for 5 years MLE. He is gonna be a earl watson type player in my opinion, and in a year or two from now, all of us are going to be saying - why did donnie do this?! I think any longer than 3 years for any player is too long, too much can go wrong in 5 years - injury, jerome james'ed, just whatever. sucks, and is a bad move.

I agree with the 3 years though.

ES
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
7/30/2009  8:00 PM
Posted by Caseloads:

I dont want sessions for 5 years MLE. He is gonna be a earl watson type player in my opinion, and in a year or two from now, all of us are going to be saying - why did donnie do this?! I think any longer than 3 years for any player is too long, too much can go wrong in 5 years - injury, jerome james'ed, just whatever. sucks, and is a bad move.

I agree with the 3 years though.

ES
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
7/30/2009  8:01 PM
The same frank isola
That said nate would be sign by weeks end

But I would find a way to package duhon for sessions, then sign tinsley for the vet min.
ES
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
7/30/2009  8:04 PM


So nice you say it twice.

[Edited by - GKFv2 on 07-30-2009 8:04 PM]
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34071
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127
7/30/2009  8:06 PM
Why don't we just forfeit every game instead of pretending basketball operations matter at all
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
7/30/2009  8:50 PM
I'm not sure how that happen..but it is happy hour over here
ES
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
7/30/2009  9:27 PM
Posted by DrAlphaeus:

Ain't Tinsley hella out of basketball shape at this point?

you from the bay?
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
7/30/2009  10:08 PM
Posted by Bippity10:


I promise all of you here that if we sign Tinsley I will spend an entire week in Apalonia!




I wouldn't mind spending a week in Apollonia myself....giggity goo!

[Edited by - enyspree on 30-07-2009 10:08 PM]
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
7/30/2009  10:31 PM
signing sessions would be dumb. wait till 2010 to get a better idea of what the roster is going to look like. why sign a guy that's shown something for 40 games instead of re-signing a guy like nate who's shown something the past few years? adding $6 mil to next year's cap is just stupid if walsh is all in for next july.
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
7/30/2009  11:04 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

signing sessions would be dumb. wait till 2010 to get a better idea of what the roster is going to look like. why sign a guy that's shown something for 40 games instead of re-signing a guy like nate who's shown something the past few years? adding $6 mil to next year's cap is just stupid if walsh is all in for next july.

so I can put you down for Tinsley for one year?
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
7/30/2009  11:21 PM
I think the Jason Williams rumor is interesting. It seems that Walsh maybe looking to gamble on a vet with something to prove for one year if he can get Tinsley or Williams and not effect the 2010 plan.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
7/31/2009  12:54 AM
Posted by djsunyc:

signing sessions would be dumb. wait till 2010 to get a better idea of what the roster is going to look like. why sign a guy that's shown something for 40 games instead of re-signing a guy like nate who's shown something the past few years? adding $6 mil to next year's cap is just stupid if walsh is all in for next july.

i couldnt agree more
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
7/31/2009  1:29 AM
Yeah, to me, Nate is numbero uno on the list.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Panos
Posts: 30387
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
7/31/2009  1:42 AM
LOL @ "Duhon cuz he sucks so good"
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
7/31/2009  1:44 AM
Zack berg of nba.com says on twitter:
Rumor has it Knicks are close to signing Ramon Sessions to offer sheet. Would be a an excellent move for NYK. Gotta hope MIL doesn't match
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/31/2009  1:49 AM
Posted by djsunyc:

why sign a guy that's shown something for 40 games instead of re-signing a guy like nate who's shown something the past few years?

because Sessions has shown he can be a distributor of the ball, which is what we're looking for... we don't need to sign up an undersized SG to a longterm deal.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Page 2 of 3 ‹ Previous 1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Isola says Sessions or Tinsley in 1 or 2 days
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy