[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The Bulls?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 4 ‹ Previous 1  2  3  4 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
kingofelpaso
Posts: 20270
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/3/2009
Member: #2542
7/23/2009  4:02 PM
Why Brad Miller?

Where does he fit in next to Darko, Curry, and Hill?

We already have enough of a log jam at center now, we need guards.....point guards
AUTOADVERT
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
7/23/2009  4:04 PM
Posted by kingofelpaso:

Why Brad Miller?

Where does he fit in next to Darko, Curry, and Hill?

We already have enough of a log jam at center now, we need guards.....point guards

Expiring contract.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/23/2009  4:08 PM
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by kingofelpaso:

Why Brad Miller?

Where does he fit in next to Darko, Curry, and Hill?

We already have enough of a log jam at center now, we need guards.....point guards

Expiring contract.

he also fits this supposed system far better than any center on that list.
¿ △ ?
joec32033
Posts: 30612
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
7/23/2009  4:14 PM
What about a 3 way with Portland. Lee and Outlaw to Chicago, Hinrich and Duhon to Portland, Bayless and Ty Thomas and an expiring corpse to NY?
~You can't run from who you are.~
fishmike
Posts: 53851
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/23/2009  4:22 PM
I like Hinrich a lot. Hinrich and Tyrus Thomas for Lee and JJSkinny. They can send us back Jerome James if they need to match $$$
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
7/23/2009  4:23 PM
I'm only going to say this because I never say this. I have a source who usually gets everything right but doesn't say too much anymore. Today, he was commenting on the rumors about the Bulls with Lee and says it has some legs. Said it was just talks and he'll find out more and say whatever news he has tonight. No trade imminent but something like this has been discussed:
D Lee to Chicago
Hinrich to Portland
Bayless/pick to NY

Thoughts?
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
7/23/2009  4:30 PM
Posted by GKFv2:

I'm only going to say this because I never say this. I have a source who usually gets everything right but doesn't say too much anymore. Today, he was commenting on the rumors about the Bulls with Lee and says it has some legs. Said it was just talks and he'll find out more and say whatever news he has tonight. No trade imminent but something like this has been discussed:
D Lee to Chicago
Hinrich to Portland
Bayless/pick to NY

Thoughts?

Well, we must REALLY like Bayless to give up Lee. I mean at the same time I don't think we value Lee too highly. As I stated in another thread, when Zach wasn't here Lee's rebounding was around 7 a game. (maybe he was hurt?) I trust management here, if a pick and Bayless is enough in their mind then it's a go, but I don't understand then having Nate, Bayless and Douglas. Perhaps more is in the works... Finally some excitement though around here
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
martin
Posts: 76317
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/23/2009  4:30 PM
Posted by GKFv2:

I'm only going to say this because I never say this. I have a source who usually gets everything right but doesn't say too much anymore. Today, he was commenting on the rumors about the Bulls with Lee and says it has some legs. Said it was just talks and he'll find out more and say whatever news he has tonight. No trade imminent but something like this has been discussed:
D Lee to Chicago
Hinrich to Portland
Bayless/pick to NY

Thoughts?

interesting. Bayless is a 2, right? Not at all a 1, so essentially you are filling out your bench.

But it does mean the backcourt is crowded: Duhon, Hughes, Nate, Douglas are already there. But I do suspect that Nate will be gone with Jefferies.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
7/23/2009  4:30 PM
Posted by GKFv2:

I'm only going to say this because I never say this. I have a source who usually gets everything right but doesn't say too much anymore. Today, he was commenting on the rumors about the Bulls with Lee and says it has some legs. Said it was just talks and he'll find out more and say whatever news he has tonight. No trade imminent but something like this has been discussed:
D Lee to Chicago
Hinrich to Portland
Bayless/pick to NY

Thoughts?

That would be outstanding
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
purple012870
Posts: 21778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2003
Member: #432
7/23/2009  4:33 PM
D Lee to Chicago
Hinrich to Portland
Bayless/pick to NY

Then you sign Warrick to a MLE.
joec32033
Posts: 30612
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
7/23/2009  4:36 PM
Posted by McK1:
Posted by GKFv2:

I'm only going to say this because I never say this. I have a source who usually gets everything right but doesn't say too much anymore. Today, he was commenting on the rumors about the Bulls with Lee and says it has some legs. Said it was just talks and he'll find out more and say whatever news he has tonight. No trade imminent but something like this has been discussed:
D Lee to Chicago
Hinrich to Portland
Bayless/pick to NY

Thoughts?

That would be outstanding

I just posted an idea with a trade just like that with Ty Thomas and Bayless coming here.....I'm like Mr. Cleo.
~You can't run from who you are.~
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
7/23/2009  4:37 PM
Posted by McK1:
Posted by GKFv2:

I'm only going to say this because I never say this. I have a source who usually gets everything right but doesn't say too much anymore. Today, he was commenting on the rumors about the Bulls with Lee and says it has some legs. Said it was just talks and he'll find out more and say whatever news he has tonight. No trade imminent but something like this has been discussed:
D Lee to Chicago
Hinrich to Portland
Bayless/pick to NY

Thoughts?

That would be outstanding
Bayless is an unproven combo guard who cant shoot from beyond the 3 pt arc. Nate is similar but better than Bayless and we have Nate already. I'm not hot on Bayless. He was going to be a top pick in last year's draft and fell to #11 with 5 guards taken before him. We don't need Bayless. We need a point guard ....and we need a SG who can hit the 3pt with 40% consistency.

The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/23/2009  4:39 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by GKFv2:

I'm only going to say this because I never say this. I have a source who usually gets everything right but doesn't say too much anymore. Today, he was commenting on the rumors about the Bulls with Lee and says it has some legs. Said it was just talks and he'll find out more and say whatever news he has tonight. No trade imminent but something like this has been discussed:
D Lee to Chicago
Hinrich to Portland
Bayless/pick to NY

Thoughts?

interesting. Bayless is a 2, right? Not at all a 1, so essentially you are filling out your bench.

But it does mean the backcourt is crowded: Duhon, Hughes, Nate, Douglas are already there. But I do suspect that Nate will be gone with Jefferies.

I wouldn't say that Bayless isn't a 1. He's more SG than he is PG definitely - but he can pass the ball and I think in this offense, which is predicated on spacing and scoring, he'd really be able to move the ball around, speed and use his own scoring ability to his advantage.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
martin
Posts: 76317
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/23/2009  4:42 PM
Posted by purple012870:

D Lee to Chicago
Hinrich to Portland
Bayless/pick to NY

Then you sign Warrick to a MLE.

Yuck. Gallo, Chandler, LBJ already at the 3
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
purple012870
Posts: 21778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2003
Member: #432
7/23/2009  4:45 PM
I see Warrick as more of an athletic 4 (not unlike Ty Thomas).
martin
Posts: 76317
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/23/2009  4:49 PM
Posted by purple012870:

I see Warrick as more of an athletic 4 (not unlike Ty Thomas).

Athletic 4: JHill, Gallo, Chandler, LBJ.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/23/2009  4:50 PM
What about Warrick as a big PG?
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
fishmike
Posts: 53851
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/23/2009  4:51 PM
not a Bayless fan... at all. Hated his FG% in college. All I see is Jamal Crawford part II. A volume shooting off guard in a point guard's body.

Hinrich is a real PG, and he is one of the better defenders at the position. We need guys like that on the floor late in games. A guy that can drill a three, set up a teammate for an easy score and get then get a stop. He's a real two way guy.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
purple012870
Posts: 21778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2003
Member: #432
7/23/2009  4:54 PM
Martin:

SF: LBJ, Gallo
PF: Warrick, Hill

all can play either posish except Hill who may be able to play C in time (and Gallo will need to fill out b4 playing any 4).
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/23/2009  4:55 PM
Posted by fishmike:

not a Bayless fan... at all. Hated his FG% in college. All I see is Jamal Crawford part II. A volume shooting off guard in a point guard's body.

Hinrich is a real PG, and he is one of the better defenders at the position. We need guys like that on the floor late in games. A guy that can drill a three, set up a teammate for an easy score and get then get a stop. He's a real two way guy.

Fish, I'm curious what you didn't like about Bayless's FG% in college? He shot 45% overall from the field, 40% from 3 and 84%ft.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Page 2 of 4 ‹ Previous 1  2  3  4 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
The Bulls?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy