[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Walsh talks Lee (7M per over 6yr) and Nate (QO)
Author Thread
Cartman718
Posts: 29069
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/12/2007
Member: #1694

6/30/2009  3:12 PM
Posted by McK1:

if milsap gets 10 mil plus a yr, Lee is not settling for 7

millsap is said to be waiting for david lee
Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
AUTOADVERT
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
6/30/2009  3:14 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by McK1:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by McK1:

if milsap gets 10 mil plus a yr, Lee is not settling for 7

he will if no other team offers him more.

his agent has already stated NY has got a hometown discount for 4 years. time to pay Lee

dont matter what his agent says. And a rookie contract does not count as a hometown discount.

oh take out hometowm. doesn't hide the fact that the 30th pick in the 05 draft has outperformed his draft position and wage scale by 20 picks. Guess we'll start to find out in a few hours how much being a Knick vs getting paid like a double double monster means to Lee
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/30/2009  3:32 PM
bottomline D Lee & his agent can demand a max contract doesn't mean they're gonna get it from another team... he'll sign the best contract he can get... if that ends up being the Knicks' offer at $7 mil per or so like this article suggests, then he's got little other choice but to sign, or just stay on for the QO & hit free agency in 2010 when more teams will have money freed up to spend.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
6/30/2009  3:40 PM
Posted by TMS:

bottomline D Lee & his agent can demand a max contract doesn't mean they're gonna get it from another team... he'll sign the best contract he can get... if that ends up being the Knicks' offer at $7 mil per or so like this article suggests, then he's got little other choice but to sign, or just stay on for the QO & hit free agency in 2010 when more teams will have money freed up to spend.

if they think they'll lose Bosh would T-Dot pay Lee a starting number NY won't match?
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/30/2009  3:42 PM
if he does then Lee goes to TOR & we end up w/nothing, & Donnie has egg all over his face for letting his best trade asset walk for nothing in return.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/30/2009  3:55 PM
6 years, $7 mil per year? With a back-loaded contract, my guess is that his salary in the crucial 2010 season would be around $5 or $5.5 mil. That would be a great scenario.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/30/2009  3:58 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

6 years, $7 mil per year? With a back-loaded contract, my guess is that his salary in the crucial 2010 season would be around $5 or $5.5 mil. That would be a great scenario.
It's unfortunate he became an FA before our crucial 2010 FA season. Tell him that if he takes such a contract, we'll put a player option anywhere he wants in the contract and we'll be able to then give him a max contract extension. He should understand our situation and understand that in the long-run NY will pay him more than any other team. I think that would make the difference if a competing offer he got was close to ours (maybe 49 mil instead of 42 mil) but obviously he's not gonna take our offer if another team gives him something like 60 mil.
martin
Posts: 78579
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
6/30/2009  4:17 PM
Posted by TMS:

if he does then Lee goes to TOR & we end up w/nothing, & Donnie has egg all over his face for letting his best trade asset walk for nothing in return.

here's the thing though, as a GM you can't control what other teams will offer for your players and you always have to do what's right by your team. Should Walsh have signed Lee to a contract starting at $6.5M a year ago? Perhaps. Would David's agent let him sign that contract? Perhaps no. Would his agent let him sign starting at $7M? I think yes. Is it completely unreasonable for Walsh to not have signed Lee? No. He just didn't know the player or his work habits, etc.

So, if another team offers Lee starting at $8.5M, should the Knicks match (with the risk of losing him for nothing)? I say no. that's a lot of cap space for a dude who doesn't play both ends. And he didn't even show flashes or even a little grit for playing team D (as far as I could tell). He seems like the 4th or 5th best player on a really good playoff team, and the Knicks just don't have those other guys, and his salary would hurt us GETTING those players.

There is a caveat. The other teams that want to sign Lee also want to do so at the most reasonable price they can too, and that usually means in a sign-and-trade situation. Which I hope the Knicks can pull off.

Egg on the face? Perhaps to some but not to me.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/30/2009  4:25 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by TMS:

if he does then Lee goes to TOR & we end up w/nothing, & Donnie has egg all over his face for letting his best trade asset walk for nothing in return.

here's the thing though, as a GM you can't control what other teams will offer for your players and you always have to do what's right by your team. Should Walsh have signed Lee to a contract starting at $6.5M a year ago? Perhaps. Would David's agent let him sign that contract? Perhaps no. Would his agent let him sign starting at $7M? I think yes. Is it completely unreasonable for Walsh to not have signed Lee? No. He just didn't know the player or his work habits, etc.

So, if another team offers Lee starting at $8.5M, should the Knicks match (with the risk of losing him for nothing)? I say no. that's a lot of cap space for a dude who doesn't play both ends. And he didn't even show flashes or even a little grit for playing team D (as far as I could tell). He seems like the 4th or 5th best player on a really good playoff team, and the Knicks just don't have those other guys, and his salary would hurt us GETTING those players.

There is a caveat. The other teams that want to sign Lee also want to do so at the most reasonable price they can too, and that usually means in a sign-and-trade situation. Which I hope the Knicks can pull off.

Egg on the face? Perhaps to some but not to me.
Well put. I'd add that even the best run organizations in sports have lost good players for nothing. It happens. The worst run organizations make poor decisions out of fear of losing a player for nothing. Every decision in sports is a gamble. Sometimes you'll lose a good player for nothing even though objectively no decision along the way was a better gamble.
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
6/30/2009  4:33 PM
the best executives always get something for their assets.
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
Nalod
Posts: 71791
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/30/2009  4:35 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by martin:
Posted by TMS:

if he does then Lee goes to TOR & we end up w/nothing, & Donnie has egg all over his face for letting his best trade asset walk for nothing in return.

here's the thing though, as a GM you can't control what other teams will offer for your players and you always have to do what's right by your team. Should Walsh have signed Lee to a contract starting at $6.5M a year ago? Perhaps. Would David's agent let him sign that contract? Perhaps no. Would his agent let him sign starting at $7M? I think yes. Is it completely unreasonable for Walsh to not have signed Lee? No. He just didn't know the player or his work habits, etc.

So, if another team offers Lee starting at $8.5M, should the Knicks match (with the risk of losing him for nothing)? I say no. that's a lot of cap space for a dude who doesn't play both ends. And he didn't even show flashes or even a little grit for playing team D (as far as I could tell). He seems like the 4th or 5th best player on a really good playoff team, and the Knicks just don't have those other guys, and his salary would hurt us GETTING those players.

There is a caveat. The other teams that want to sign Lee also want to do so at the most reasonable price they can too, and that usually means in a sign-and-trade situation. Which I hope the Knicks can pull off.

Egg on the face? Perhaps to some but not to me.
Well put. I'd add that even the best run organizations in sports have lost good players for nothing. It happens. The worst run organizations make poor decisions out of fear of losing a player for nothing. Every decision in sports is a gamble. Sometimes you'll lose a good player for nothing even though objectively no decision along the way was a better gamble.

Phuching eh dude!

Your paraphrasing of others content is always suspect but this time you nailed it!!!!

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/30/2009  5:27 PM
Posted by McK1:

the best executives always get something for their assets.
Always? highly unlikely.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/30/2009  5:42 PM
Posted by McK1:

the best executives always get something for their assets.

thank you... letting Lee &/or Nate walk for nothing is blatantly irresponsible on Walsh's part if he allows it to happen... in basketball there is a salary cap to work around... if he had no intentions on resigning them to extensions then he should have absolutely traded them at the deadline last year, i'm sorry... he needs to make sure he gets back something of value for Lee & Nate this offseason or before the deadline this season... no excuses.

[Edited by - TMS on 06-30-2009 2:43 PM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27684
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
6/30/2009  5:50 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by McK1:

the best executives always get something for their assets.
Always? highly unlikely.

I am with Bonn on this one. I think this is more a case of know when to hold em', know when to fold em. I am certain if there is a good sign and trade to be had, we will make it, but at the end of the year, we need cap space more than we need 6th men-- of course it all depends on the cost.
You know I gonna spin wit it
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/30/2009  6:03 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by McK1:

the best executives always get something for their assets.
Always? highly unlikely.
Here are some examples of well-run teams losing good players for nothing. Keep in mind none of these team's GMs inherited as tough a situation as Walsh.


2008-Atlanta lost Josh Childress
2008-Boston-James Posey
2007-Orlando-Grant Hill
2006-Atlanta-Al Harrington
2005-Dallas-Michael Finley
2004-Dallas-Steve Nash
2004-Detroit-Mehmet Okur
2004-Spurs-Hedo Turkoglu
2003-Spurs-Stephen Jackson
2003-LA Lakers-Robert Horry
2003-Utah Jazz-Karl Malone
2002-Utah-Donyell Marshall
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

6/30/2009  6:30 PM
Posted by TMS:

if he does then Lee goes to TOR & we end up w/nothing, & Donnie has egg all over his face for letting his best trade asset walk for nothing in return.

Help me out here guys, as I am still not caught up on how this is supposed to work. If Donnie offered Lee a contract last year say 8-9 M a year for 5 years, and Toronto just said heck we'll pass and no one else thought he was worth that type of money wouldn't we be stuck with an overpaid player for another 5 years? If so I would think Donnie plyed it safe and I am glad he did.
TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
Ira
Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
6/30/2009  6:35 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Bonn1997:

6 years, $7 mil per year? With a back-loaded contract, my guess is that his salary in the crucial 2010 season would be around $5 or $5.5 mil. That would be a great scenario.
It's unfortunate he became an FA before our crucial 2010 FA season. Tell him that if he takes such a contract, we'll put a player option anywhere he wants in the contract and we'll be able to then give him a max contract extension. He should understand our situation and understand that in the long-run NY will pay him more than any other team. I think that would make the difference if a competing offer he got was close to ours (maybe 49 mil instead of 42 mil) but obviously he's not gonna take our offer if another team gives him something like 60 mil.

This is an interesting approach and it might just work. I think he wants to stay in New York and he wants to win.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/30/2009  6:36 PM
Posted by loweyecue:
Posted by TMS:

if he does then Lee goes to TOR & we end up w/nothing, & Donnie has egg all over his face for letting his best trade asset walk for nothing in return.

Help me out here guys, as I am still not caught up on how this is supposed to work. If Donnie offered Lee a contract last year say 8-9 M a year for 5 years, and Toronto just said heck we'll pass and no one else thought he was worth that type of money wouldn't we be stuck with an overpaid player for another 5 years? If so I would think Donnie plyed it safe and I am glad he did.

playing it safe is 1 thing, passing up an opportunity is something else... i didn't say he messed up just yet, but if he lets Lee & Nate walk w/o getting back value on those assets then it will be a royal fugg up of pretty large proportions in my eyes.

& btw, who said he had to sign Lee to an extension before signing him last year? they weren't RFA's last year... you could have gotten back picks for them at the very least or used them to unload bad contracts like Fishlips or Curry because both were highly productive players for the money they were signed to... now if they're signed to lucrative extensions the return on the investment for those 2 is not nearly as attractive, which reduces their trade value... like i said, Donnie's options are going to be limited now in dealing those 2... that wasn't a smart play on his part if things turn out the way i'm afraid they might.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/30/2009  6:46 PM
Would it be as big a "royal fug up" as Dallas losing Nash and Finley for nothing (and oh yeah, subsequently making it to the NBA finals)? Or the Spurs losing Stephen Jackson AND Hedo Torkoglu in consecutive years for nothing (and then making it to the finals)? To say yes, you'd need to make some absurd assumptions, like
a) David Lee is better than Steve Nash and Michael Finley combined; so losing him would be a bigger fug up than that example.
b) Donnie Walsh inherited a much simpler GM situation than Mark Cuban was in at the time.
c) Our GM should make fewer mistakes than those by the best GMs of this decade.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
6/30/2009  7:01 PM
knicks are tied up to about $27-30 mil for 2010.

that leaves them space for one max player. do you think they will add another $5-7 mil or $3-4 mil in contracts? no way.

lee and nate are gone and nothing more than a pick or trade exemptions will be coming back.
Walsh talks Lee (7M per over 6yr) and Nate (QO)

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy