| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
tkf
Posts: 36487 Alba Posts: 6 Joined: 8/13/2001 Member: #87 |
Posted by BRIGGS:Posted by Pharzeone: you see the guys he is playing against? my teenage son would drop 30 on those guys!!! LOL Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser...............
TKF
|
|
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183 Alba Posts: 14 Joined: 2/11/2005 Member: #871 |
Posted by tkf:Posted by BRIGGS:Posted by Pharzeone: I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
|
|
Finestrg
Posts: 27296 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/1/2006 Member: #1069 |
Posted by TMS:Posted by martin:Posted by TMS:what you don't see in this clip is what you see in the clip above--the guy looks like he can absolutely shoot the ball in a big time way in the mid range post and pop. Just started reading through the thread and was thinking the exact same thing. You can't possibly decifer ANYTHING from that first clip. It's completely worthless. A fluff piece. I remember seeing a practice clip of Chris Wilcox knocking down jumper after jumper (with a nice looking form btw) in the gym last year at some point after the Knicks got him -- that's all good, practice makes perfect, but come on, we all know damn well Wilcox isn't doing that in real games. And for a guy who hasn't accomplished anything yet, Mullens sure sounded a little ****y here no? Comparing himself to Garnett was funny enough but Garnett, Dirk AND A'mare? Wow! LMAO! First of all, they're all completely different players and he doesn't resemble any of them. His response there was way over the top, let's be honest. Oh, and he EXPECTS to go top 15... Hey, what's he supposed to say there though I guess, right? I would've preferred some more humble responses based on his unimpressive, minuscule body of work thus far, but whatever. I'll give the young fella a little slack I guess... If anyone wants to read an excellent player interview, read this DeJuan Blair piece with Jonathan Givony over at Draftexpress.com. Tremendous interview of not just anyone here - Blair was a DOMINANT college basketball player last year. However, throughout their conversation together, not once do you hear Blair say something like, "yeah, Charles Barkley, that's who I resemble most.." or anything absurd like that. Blair sounds confident, he openly discusses his weaknesses and what he plans to do to correct them and he gives high praise and credit to guys like Millsap, Udonis Haslem and Carl Landry, comparisons Givony came up that Blair calls "great players" who he admires because they "worked to get to where they want to be." Obviously, Blair has potential to be MUCH BETTER than these guys but you won't here that from him. Confident yet humbled & classy at the same time, he gave honest, mature responses throughout the one-on-one with Givony. Man, call me nuts but what I think we'll eventually wind up seeing with Blair is a Larry Johnson-type inside player minus the 3 ball... GREAT read, check it out: http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/DeJuan-Blair-5049/ Anyway, back to Mullens. I guess we've got a few postives here: he does seem confident which is good, appears to be working hard if you take him at his word which I do (although I don't see this new phantom physique Briggs mentioned - physically he looks the same to me), he's a big boy and very athletic. Only thing is, that's about all we're looking at right now. The rest is pure speculation and that's it. I hope this kid succeeds, I really do. I never wanna see any young player fail and fall short of his dreams, but I just can't get too pumped up about this kid based on what I've seen so far. And again, like I said on another thread, say we drafted him (and again there's no way you take this kid 8, that's completely crazy), how do we develop him here exactly? D'Antoni's good at what he does but I think there's some truth to the speculation that this is not his type of player at all, the rest of the coaching staff, though capable, is devoid of true "big-men coaches" (Phil Weber, Mike's brother Dan, etc.. all seem like good coaches (esp. Weber) but what we would need for Mullens is a Pat Ewing or even a Mark Aguirre here ready to get busy with this kid in the gym right from day one - sadly we don't have guys like that to work with him), the NBDL is a mess of a league and anything but a true "developmental league" (odds are he wouldn't develop a lick if we grabbed him then banished him to Reno for the time being) and lastly, while I respect everyone's opinions here - Martin, please explain to us exactly what David Lee teaches Mullens except a few tips on how to pursue a rebound? David Lee's gonna help turn Mullens into a complete player? How? He's far from a complete player himself... There it is in a nutshell - unpolished/raw prospect at the moment with limited opportunities to get better in the event he ever did come here. That's my whole thing... Hey, everyone has their favorites in the draft every year - I have mine, you fellas have yours. This kid is obviously a Briggs guy. I respect that. Briggs, you got yourself set up for the big "I told you so" in the event he ever amounted to something... we'll just have to see. Hopefully he does become a decent NBA player. But based on all the available information and what I saw with my own eyes last year, I just don't see it at the moment... [Edited by - finestrg on 05-23-2009 11:32 PM] |
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
Posted by Finestrg:Posted by TMS:Posted by martin:Posted by TMS:what you don't see in this clip is what you see in the clip above--the guy looks like he can absolutely shoot the ball in a big time way in the mid range post and pop. Kind of like last year when everyone said Anthony Randolph was too skinny or Brook Lopez was slow and uncoordinated. Anthony Randolph Forum Index NY Knicks Forum Go to first unread post Go to first unread post « Reply To Topic Author Thread BRIGGS Posts: 12182 Alba Posts: 6 Joined: 07-29-2002 Member: #297 05-23-2008 9:39 PM Show Profile Reply with Quote From reading people's comments I think there is a misconception on this player. I watched 7 full games of his--anyone can--they are still archived on Yahoo. While he does have some SF skills--there is no doubt about he is a 4 man--perhaps a bit of a hybrid power forward but still a 4 in my book. He is younger than almost anyone in the draft coming into school barely 18 years old yet played at a very high level in a very tough conference. Right now he would get puched around some--Chris Bosh did--but lets say were looking at the difference between Gallinari and Randolph--Randolph is much more athletic--he's better in the post--he can handle the ball as well as any big man coming out in years--his wingspan makes him play longer than his 6-11 frame---he's much faster baseline to baselione he's going to be a much better rebounder--he's got a nice left hand stroke. When looking at Randolph--we must ask--where would this kid be drafted IF he stayed and played two more years at LSU? I think he would easily go up to 20-10-3 next year --where would that leave him on a draft board at 6-11--lets say he gets hinself up to 225 by 19. On top of it while he is skinny and gets pushed around he's disruptive defensively because of his length he can block shots--simply he can do more than Gallinari he has more natural gifts and when its said and done he will be a true 4 with the potential ability to be an athletic 20-10 PF in the NBA. Brook Lopez - bust? Forum Index NY Knicks Forum Page 2 of 2 < 1 2 Go to first unread post Go to first unread post View entire thread View entire thread « Reply To Topic Author Thread BRIGGS Posts: 12182 Alba Posts: 6 Joined: 07-29-2002 Member: #297 05-29-2008 08:03 AM Show Profile Reply with Quote quote:Originally posted by purple012870: Brook Lopez is good at being 7'2". I bet that if Brook Lopez falls to 6 there is a very high possibility the Knicks take him. I don't think he will get there but it is possible--someone is coming down. Just my guess work but I would have to think the Knicks view Lopez as a top 5 pick and if they go by their board they will take him. When you start talking about pick 6--they want as close to a sure thing as possible---Not saying he is a franchise player[but he could be] but at 6 they dont want extra guess work and if I look at Walsh history of drafting he will take the big man. He's not my choice but people are being a little crazy saying he is good at being 7-2. He's a guy who dominated big time games in a big time league and came in late into the season as a sophomore. You don't put up multiple 30 point games as a 7 footer if you sck. Ive seen PLENTY of big men in college 6-10--7-3 who stink. Brook Lopez is a good player--he is definitely not on my list of guys who I would consider a disappointment if we picked him. Everyone who is 6-10 is viewed as Channing Frye --this is not Channing Frye--this guy has a very solid frame with good skills. The honesty is most of the people who are calling Mullens something else are the same people who rocked Randolph Mcgee and Lopez. Lets face it here dude--I like Blair but I wouldnt touch him with a pole--we danced that tune 6 years ago. He still weighs 273? Go back to the drawing board my man--I think my credibility for the lat 7 years is pretty dam straight. RIP Crushalot😞
|