[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

I know he is young
Author Thread
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30258
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
5/22/2009  4:54 PM
Posted by Nalod:

who has more upside, Bynum or Oden?

Oden easily.

Even if Bynum stayed healthy he won't be on the level of a Shaq or Dwight Howard. Bynum at best would be a 7'ft Al Jefferson. A guy that would put up nice stats but would need a star PG or SG in order to even make the playoffs. Luckly he has Kobe who will hide that fact.

You aren't going to run the offense though Bynum, he isn't going to make everyone around him better.

Oden on the other hand has the upside to challenge Howard as the best defensive center in the NBA and making a whole team around him better defensively. He is the type of guy who would bring teams to defensive heights and be the leader of some of the best defensive teams. That's his potential though doesn't mean that he will achieve it.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
AUTOADVERT
Ira
Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
5/22/2009  6:18 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Ira:
Posted by TMS:

Bynum looks just like Isay-ugh.

Not to say Isaiah was a good coach or gm, but the guy was a hall of fame player - and he didn't just barely make it in.

i was talking literally... he looks just like him.

Sorry. Actually, there is a resemblence.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/22/2009  8:24 PM
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by Nalod:

who has more upside, Bynum or Oden?

Oden easily.

Even if Bynum stayed healthy he won't be on the level of a Shaq or Dwight Howard. Bynum at best would be a 7'ft Al Jefferson. A guy that would put up nice stats but would need a star PG or SG in order to even make the playoffs. Luckly he has Kobe who will hide that fact.

You aren't going to run the offense though Bynum, he isn't going to make everyone around him better.

Oden on the other hand has the upside to challenge Howard as the best defensive center in the NBA and making a whole team around him better defensively. He is the type of guy who would bring teams to defensive heights and be the leader of some of the best defensive teams. That's his potential though doesn't mean that he will achieve it.

Here are his last 5 games before he was hurt this year

Jan 30 @ MIN W 132-119 1 30:28 10 15 66.7 0 0 0.0 7 8 87.5 7 8 15 1 2 0 2 4 27
Jan 27 CHA L 110-117 1 41:08 10 14 71.4 0 0 0.0 4 5 80.0 2 12 14 1 4 0 6 2 24
Jan 25 SAS W 99-85 1 24:13 4 10 40.0 0 0 0.0 7 8 87.5 4 7 11 1 2 1 4 2 15
Jan 22 WAS W 117-97 1 27:32 8 12 66.7 0 0 0.0 7 8 87.5 4 10 14 2 2 0 1 1 23
Jan 21 @ LAC W 108-97 1 36:23 17 24 70.8 0 0 0.0 8 11 72.7 8 7 15 0 2 0 3 2 42

AVG 26.1 points 13.9 rebounds 3.1 blocks shooting 67%--thats better than Dwight Howard because hes much more skilled than Dwight Howard. The guy has had bad luck that has held him back from becoming a 1st team type all NBA player.
RIP Crushalot😞
Ira
Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
5/22/2009  8:56 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by Nalod:

who has more upside, Bynum or Oden?

Oden easily.

Even if Bynum stayed healthy he won't be on the level of a Shaq or Dwight Howard. Bynum at best would be a 7'ft Al Jefferson. A guy that would put up nice stats but would need a star PG or SG in order to even make the playoffs. Luckly he has Kobe who will hide that fact.

You aren't going to run the offense though Bynum, he isn't going to make everyone around him better.

Oden on the other hand has the upside to challenge Howard as the best defensive center in the NBA and making a whole team around him better defensively. He is the type of guy who would bring teams to defensive heights and be the leader of some of the best defensive teams. That's his potential though doesn't mean that he will achieve it.

Here are his last 5 games before he was hurt this year

Jan 30 @ MIN W 132-119 1 30:28 10 15 66.7 0 0 0.0 7 8 87.5 7 8 15 1 2 0 2 4 27
Jan 27 CHA L 110-117 1 41:08 10 14 71.4 0 0 0.0 4 5 80.0 2 12 14 1 4 0 6 2 24
Jan 25 SAS W 99-85 1 24:13 4 10 40.0 0 0 0.0 7 8 87.5 4 7 11 1 2 1 4 2 15
Jan 22 WAS W 117-97 1 27:32 8 12 66.7 0 0 0.0 7 8 87.5 4 10 14 2 2 0 1 1 23
Jan 21 @ LAC W 108-97 1 36:23 17 24 70.8 0 0 0.0 8 11 72.7 8 7 15 0 2 0 3 2 42

AVG 26.1 points 13.9 rebounds 3.1 blocks shooting 67%--thats better than Dwight Howard because hes much more skilled than Dwight Howard. The guy has had bad luck that has held him back from becoming a 1st team type all NBA player.

His numbers look better than Howards because you picked what is probably the best five game sequence of his career. He's a good player, but he isn't as good as Howard. He and Oden have the same problem - injuries. But staying healthy is part of the game.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/22/2009  10:23 PM
Posted by Ira:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by Nalod:

who has more upside, Bynum or Oden?

Oden easily.

Even if Bynum stayed healthy he won't be on the level of a Shaq or Dwight Howard. Bynum at best would be a 7'ft Al Jefferson. A guy that would put up nice stats but would need a star PG or SG in order to even make the playoffs. Luckly he has Kobe who will hide that fact.

You aren't going to run the offense though Bynum, he isn't going to make everyone around him better.

Oden on the other hand has the upside to challenge Howard as the best defensive center in the NBA and making a whole team around him better defensively. He is the type of guy who would bring teams to defensive heights and be the leader of some of the best defensive teams. That's his potential though doesn't mean that he will achieve it.

Here are his last 5 games before he was hurt this year

Jan 30 @ MIN W 132-119 1 30:28 10 15 66.7 0 0 0.0 7 8 87.5 7 8 15 1 2 0 2 4 27
Jan 27 CHA L 110-117 1 41:08 10 14 71.4 0 0 0.0 4 5 80.0 2 12 14 1 4 0 6 2 24
Jan 25 SAS W 99-85 1 24:13 4 10 40.0 0 0 0.0 7 8 87.5 4 7 11 1 2 1 4 2 15
Jan 22 WAS W 117-97 1 27:32 8 12 66.7 0 0 0.0 7 8 87.5 4 10 14 2 2 0 1 1 23
Jan 21 @ LAC W 108-97 1 36:23 17 24 70.8 0 0 0.0 8 11 72.7 8 7 15 0 2 0 3 2 42

AVG 26.1 points 13.9 rebounds 3.1 blocks shooting 67%--thats better than Dwight Howard because hes much more skilled than Dwight Howard. The guy has had bad luck that has held him back from becoming a 1st team type all NBA player.

His numbers look better than Howards because you picked what is probably the best five game sequence of his career. He's a good player, but he isn't as good as Howard. He and Oden have the same problem - injuries. But staying healthy is part of the game.

I didnt pick any 5 of his best games--I picked his last 5 games before the injury--that wasnt a lucky streak that was going to end. But you are right at the bottom line--injuries count.
RIP Crushalot😞
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30258
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
5/22/2009  11:15 PM
When he puts up those #s without Kobe on the perimeter for a full season carrying his team to a 50 win season as the go to guy making everyone else on the team better then I will change my stance.

Those big time games were vs LAC, WAS, CHA, MIN btw,

Posting up stats only proves my point anyway though. How many open shots did he open up for the rest of the team because of his offensive presence. How good was LA's defense in these games with him being on the floor. Those are the things that make a player a franchise player or just a guy that puts up stats.

Al Jefferson 6 games before he got injured

25pts 14rebs 0blks
36pts 22rebs 2blks
18pts 11rebs 1blk
12pts 15rebs 2blks
34pts 11rebs 4blks
34pts 13rebs 4blks
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
5/23/2009  1:23 AM
Posted by King1:

but did the Lakers screw up giving Bynum 64 million. He is obsolete in the playoffs, and he has got hurt both years in the league. I have a feeling they will regret giving him 64 as much as the Bucks regret giving Bogut 60+ million

You're right. Bynum is basically a dunker and sometimes a shotblocker. I see other guys have compared him to AL Jefferson...way off! jefferson is one of the best offensive big men in the game and demands double and triple teams. bynum can't put the ball in the hole unless he is wide open because every defensive man is on Kobe and Gasol.

Bynum is good at being big, but really not special for his size. He's had almost 1 good season adding up all his games out of 4 years, he is injury prone, and that 5 game stretch BRIGGS descirbed were dunk-fests vs. the worst front lines in the league whose front lines were injured for the most part so he was playing their second and third strings!

Still, I'd take him on the Knicks...for Duhon!


oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
5/23/2009  9:17 AM
Bynum. Oden's already 50 so has has probably reached his ceiling.
~You can't run from who you are.~
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30258
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
5/23/2009  11:57 AM
Posted by oohah:
Posted by King1:

but did the Lakers screw up giving Bynum 64 million. He is obsolete in the playoffs, and he has got hurt both years in the league. I have a feeling they will regret giving him 64 as much as the Bucks regret giving Bogut 60+ million

You're right. Bynum is basically a dunker and sometimes a shotblocker. I see other guys have compared him to AL Jefferson...way off! jefferson is one of the best offensive big men in the game and demands double and triple teams. bynum can't put the ball in the hole unless he is wide open because every defensive man is on Kobe and Gasol.

Bynum is good at being big, but really not special for his size. He's had almost 1 good season adding up all his games out of 4 years, he is injury prone, and that 5 game stretch BRIGGS descirbed were dunk-fests vs. the worst front lines in the league whose front lines were injured for the most part so he was playing their second and third strings!

Still, I'd take him on the Knicks...for Duhon!


oohah

Jefferson is a more productive player. But the comparison of Bynum & Jefferson was strictly on the fact that Jefferson could score and rebound and get blocks and draw double and triple teams. But he doesn't create offense for others out of the post the way a Shaq or Tim Duncan could. Shaq would get the ball back his man down 2 times knowing the double was coming then kick it out for the open 3. He understood and looked to find the open man out of the post. Same thing with Duncan.

The comparison is that if Bynum was the best player on his team his team wouldn't make the playoffs just like Jefferson. That Bynum would never even sniff the playoffs unless he had a star guard to play with just like Jefferson. Neither of them have dominant personalities or leadership characteristics either.

Shaq & Duncan average 3-5 assist per game each.
Jefferson & Bynum average 1.6 & 1.4 assist per game.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/23/2009  12:25 PM
Posted by Ira:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by Nalod:

who has more upside, Bynum or Oden?

Oden easily.

Even if Bynum stayed healthy he won't be on the level of a Shaq or Dwight Howard. Bynum at best would be a 7'ft Al Jefferson. A guy that would put up nice stats but would need a star PG or SG in order to even make the playoffs. Luckly he has Kobe who will hide that fact.

You aren't going to run the offense though Bynum, he isn't going to make everyone around him better.

Oden on the other hand has the upside to challenge Howard as the best defensive center in the NBA and making a whole team around him better defensively. He is the type of guy who would bring teams to defensive heights and be the leader of some of the best defensive teams. That's his potential though doesn't mean that he will achieve it.

Here are his last 5 games before he was hurt this year

Jan 30 @ MIN W 132-119 1 30:28 10 15 66.7 0 0 0.0 7 8 87.5 7 8 15 1 2 0 2 4 27
Jan 27 CHA L 110-117 1 41:08 10 14 71.4 0 0 0.0 4 5 80.0 2 12 14 1 4 0 6 2 24
Jan 25 SAS W 99-85 1 24:13 4 10 40.0 0 0 0.0 7 8 87.5 4 7 11 1 2 1 4 2 15
Jan 22 WAS W 117-97 1 27:32 8 12 66.7 0 0 0.0 7 8 87.5 4 10 14 2 2 0 1 1 23
Jan 21 @ LAC W 108-97 1 36:23 17 24 70.8 0 0 0.0 8 11 72.7 8 7 15 0 2 0 3 2 42

AVG 26.1 points 13.9 rebounds 3.1 blocks shooting 67%--thats better than Dwight Howard because hes much more skilled than Dwight Howard. The guy has had bad luck that has held him back from becoming a 1st team type all NBA player.

His numbers look better than Howards because you picked what is probably the best five game sequence of his career. He's a good player, but he isn't as good as Howard. He and Oden have the same problem - injuries. But staying healthy is part of the game.
Regardless of the timing of the 5 games, relying on a 5 game stretch in a 213 game NBA career defies just about every law of statistics.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/23/2009  12:45 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Ira:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by Nalod:

who has more upside, Bynum or Oden?

Oden easily.

Even if Bynum stayed healthy he won't be on the level of a Shaq or Dwight Howard. Bynum at best would be a 7'ft Al Jefferson. A guy that would put up nice stats but would need a star PG or SG in order to even make the playoffs. Luckly he has Kobe who will hide that fact.

You aren't going to run the offense though Bynum, he isn't going to make everyone around him better.

Oden on the other hand has the upside to challenge Howard as the best defensive center in the NBA and making a whole team around him better defensively. He is the type of guy who would bring teams to defensive heights and be the leader of some of the best defensive teams. That's his potential though doesn't mean that he will achieve it.

Here are his last 5 games before he was hurt this year

Jan 30 @ MIN W 132-119 1 30:28 10 15 66.7 0 0 0.0 7 8 87.5 7 8 15 1 2 0 2 4 27
Jan 27 CHA L 110-117 1 41:08 10 14 71.4 0 0 0.0 4 5 80.0 2 12 14 1 4 0 6 2 24
Jan 25 SAS W 99-85 1 24:13 4 10 40.0 0 0 0.0 7 8 87.5 4 7 11 1 2 1 4 2 15
Jan 22 WAS W 117-97 1 27:32 8 12 66.7 0 0 0.0 7 8 87.5 4 10 14 2 2 0 1 1 23
Jan 21 @ LAC W 108-97 1 36:23 17 24 70.8 0 0 0.0 8 11 72.7 8 7 15 0 2 0 3 2 42

AVG 26.1 points 13.9 rebounds 3.1 blocks shooting 67%--thats better than Dwight Howard because hes much more skilled than Dwight Howard. The guy has had bad luck that has held him back from becoming a 1st team type all NBA player.

His numbers look better than Howards because you picked what is probably the best five game sequence of his career. He's a good player, but he isn't as good as Howard. He and Oden have the same problem - injuries. But staying healthy is part of the game.
Regardless of the timing of the 5 games, relying on a 5 game stretch in a 213 game NBA career defies just about every law of statistics.

You're right--it has zero to do with statistics--that's the level he was playing at when he was hurt--he[statistically] slowly ramped up from the start of the season and if you are a stat guy and actually watched him play you would understand what I am talking about. Before Bynum was hurt again--like the previous year and maybe even better--he was becoming a 20+10+-2.5+ 57%++ player. Thats what he is when he is not hurt--right now he is allowed to play 20 minutes or less and is on his third brace--thats not a guy who is close to 100%. This guy is an incredible player when he is not hurt considering how young he is. Thats why people smarter than you or I gave him 13mm a year.

Let me tell you this--take Bynum OFF the Lakers--get him back to 100% health and I would love to see what he could do playing 40 minutes and getting 15-17 FGA--put him on the Hawks for Josh Smith and that team would be difficult to play against with Horford and Bynum upfront.

Heck I would give them DAvid Lee and Wilson Chandler for Bynum

[Edited by - BRIGGS on 05-23-2009 12:47 PM]
RIP Crushalot😞
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/23/2009  1:06 PM
I'm too lazy to go to previous season game logs but what happened in games 6-10 before the injury? Why are you focusing on the *five* pre-injury games? What's so special about them that justifies this exclusive focus? Why not the 6 or 10 or 15 most recent pre-injury games?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/23/2009  1:11 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

I'm too lazy to go to previous season game logs but what happened in games 6-10 before the injury? Why are you focusing on the *five* pre-injury games? What's so special about them that justifies this exclusive focus? Why not the 6 or 10 or 15 most recent pre-injury games?

Because he injured his knee the previous year and they said it would take him around 9 months post op to get back to where he was--obviously at the beginning of the season--he was not there physically yet.
RIP Crushalot😞
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30258
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
5/23/2009  1:23 PM
Nobody questions Bynum's ability to put up stats.

The question is if Bynum is the best player on your team how many games do you win? Does Bynum make everyone around him better offensively and defensively?

Kobe is able to hide Bynum from being exposed from all of that. Putting him on the Hawks with Hortford, Johnson, Bibby wouldn't tell me anything either. What would tell me something is if you were able to put him on the Kings and they turn into a 45-50win team from a 17win team.

You put Howard on the Kings and they are instantly a 50win team. Bynum to me is a guy that wouldn't make the playoffs without a stud guard. And with a guy like Deron Williams or Chris Paul would make the playoffs every yr but lose in the first rd. He doesn't come off as a guy that will be the leader or co leader for a championship calibre squad.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/23/2009  1:34 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by Bonn1997:

I'm too lazy to go to previous season game logs but what happened in games 6-10 before the injury? Why are you focusing on the *five* pre-injury games? What's so special about them that justifies this exclusive focus? Why not the 6 or 10 or 15 most recent pre-injury games?

Because he injured his knee the previous year and they said it would take him around 9 months post op to get back to where he was--obviously at the beginning of the season--he was not there physically yet.
OK and the 5 games before the injury marked precisely the 9 month point? I'm still trying to figure out why (other than it best helped your argument) you decided on precisely 5 pre-injury games.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/23/2009  2:00 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by Bonn1997:

I'm too lazy to go to previous season game logs but what happened in games 6-10 before the injury? Why are you focusing on the *five* pre-injury games? What's so special about them that justifies this exclusive focus? Why not the 6 or 10 or 15 most recent pre-injury games?

Because he injured his knee the previous year and they said it would take him around 9 months post op to get back to where he was--obviously at the beginning of the season--he was not there physically yet.
OK and the 5 games before the injury marked precisely the 9 month point? I'm still trying to figure out why (other than it best helped your argument) you decided on precisely 5 pre-injury games.

It's pretty simple--he started to get healthy and get his rhythm down.
RIP Crushalot😞
Ira
Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
5/23/2009  3:34 PM
Briggs, I take your word that you chose this five game stretch without regard to the numbers, but without taking the time to calculate - just by looking at the numbers in that period and through the game logs in his last two seasons, it appears that this was the best five game stretch of Bynum's career. If, for example, you took a 10 game stretch before the injury, the numbers would be different. If you took a 20 game period before the injury, the numbers would be very different.

Bynum is a good player and he is the guy Isaiah should have drafted, but he has a lot to prove before we compare him to Howard.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/23/2009  4:28 PM
Posted by Ira:

Briggs, I take your word that you chose this five game stretch without regard to the numbers, but without taking the time to calculate - just by looking at the numbers in that period and through the game logs in his last two seasons, it appears that this was the best five game stretch of Bynum's career. If, for example, you took a 10 game stretch before the injury, the numbers would be different. If you took a 20 game period before the injury, the numbers would be very different.
But Briggs is Bynum's doctor. He knows that 6 games before the injury, Bynum had not yet gotten healthy. The 5 game mark was a perfectly rational, by no means post-hoc, demarcation.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/23/2009  4:34 PM
Quick question:
If we assume that any ordinary player should, by chance, have a few very impressive random 5 game stretches in his career AND
IF this same ordinary player seems to suffer a new injury every month,
THEN what are the odds that at least one of these impressive 5 game stretches in his 213 game career will precede an injury just by chance? Probably pretty high. There's no way to know that he was on to something truly special rather than just having another expectable, random good stretch that would soon end.
I'm more playing devil's advocate here, though, than arguing against Bynum. He's not a Knick and his play doesn't really mean that much to me.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/23/2009  4:39 PM
Posted by Ira:

Briggs, I take your word that you chose this five game stretch without regard to the numbers, but without taking the time to calculate - just by looking at the numbers in that period and through the game logs in his last two seasons, it appears that this was the best five game stretch of Bynum's career. If, for example, you took a 10 game stretch before the injury, the numbers would be different. If you took a 20 game period before the injury, the numbers would be very different.

Bynum is a good player and he is the guy Isaiah should have drafted, but he has a lot to prove before we compare him to Howard.

I believe in a 35 game stretch in 2007-2008 and his numbers were moving up quite dramatically at time of injury the 20 year old Bynum lead the NBA in FG% avg 13 points over 10 rebounds and 2 blcoks in only 28 minutes a game. His last 14 games before injury the numbers went up to 18 points 10 rebounds 3 blocks and an incredible 77FG%

There is no doubt about it health + minutes and this guy is a monster--and I think it's been proven over enough games. The only thing I can complain about this guy is health and lets not underscore that--thats a big complaint--otherwise we would be talking about Bynum as a top 10 player in this league already--injuries are the only thing that has held him back.
RIP Crushalot😞
I know he is young

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy