| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
GKFv2
Posts: 26752 Alba Posts: 114 Joined: 1/16/2007 Member: #1259 USA |
I really don't see how he can run an offense from that video. 95% of that video is him shooting jump shots. We already know he's a good shooter. We just don't know if there is much else he can do that well.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
|
|
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 12/9/2001 Member: #178 USA |
Posted by GKFv2: how about this video #Knickstaps
|
|
BigC
Posts: 22672 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 12/14/2004 Member: #829 |
Posted by VDesai:If the Knicks draft Curry he is not going to be guarding 2 guards. He will be guarding point guards. Look at the players we have now. The season could start and it could be Curry and Larry Hughes in the backcourt. Hughes would guard shooting guards while Curry focuses on guarding point guards. Curry is also good at playing passing lanes. If you get Curry and Larry in the backcourt watch out because the Knicks will be racking up steals left and right. Or better yet imagine Chandler and Curry in the backcourt. Chandler can hold his own on the defensive end at the 2 guard spot. At the point gaurd spot really how many point guards really guard their man in the NBA? Most of the times players are label as good defenders by the amount of steals they get. Duhon got killed trying guard smaller and quicker point guards. The Knicks opponents will not have it that easy with Curry because they will also have to use energy trying to guard Curry on the offensive end. Compare this to Duhon who must point guard do not really have to use energy to guard Duhon because he is not a scorer. BigC's Knick blogs and Knicks
highlights after every Knicks game http://fromthebaseline.com/
|
|
Ira
Posts: 24692 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 8/14/2001 Member: #91 |
I think Curry can play the point. His ball handling and passing may not be great, but they're decent - and they will improve. I love his quick release. He is smart enough and quick enough to get his shot off against more athletic defenders. And D'Antoni's system gives players open looks behind the arc.
|
|
VDesai
Posts: 43301 Alba Posts: 44 Joined: 10/28/2003 Member: #477 USA |
Posted by BigC:Posted by VDesai:If the Knicks draft Curry he is not going to be guarding 2 guards. He will be guarding point guards. Look at the players we have now. The season could start and it could be Curry and Larry Hughes in the backcourt. Hughes would guard shooting guards while Curry focuses on guarding point guards. Curry is also good at playing passing lanes. If you get Curry and Larry in the backcourt watch out because the Knicks will be racking up steals left and right. |
|
VDesai
Posts: 43301 Alba Posts: 44 Joined: 10/28/2003 Member: #477 USA |
Posted by TMS: DeRozan was pretty bad during the early part of the season and later in the middle of year, and while he had a really good run late, I don't see the long term consistency yet from him. You mention his size, but I don't know that he's ready to take advantage that on the NBA level, and honestly if he's playing NBA SF (which is the position he seems best suited for), he'll be a little smaller for that role. He has good potential, but here's a guy I'd definitely like to see a sophomore year from. If he was in last year's draft I doubt he would've sniffed the top 10. Evans is a player with poor shot selection and is in between two positions. Another guy who I'd like to see take a significant step forward. He could be a truly great player, but has a lot of the red flags that players with bust potential generally have. At this point in his development he's also a very risky pick. I view him as a very similar prospect to Larry Hughes when he came out...Hughes kind of ended up somewhere in the middle- somewhat dissapointing, it took teams several years to keep him strictly at SG, but once he found his niche he became a good NBA player. If Evans can't establish himself as a PG right away he may follow the same career path. Curry has a fully developed, top notch NBA skill and enough ability to fill an NBA role from the jump and do that at a very high level. In addition his work ethic and IQ to me will allow him to adapt to the pro level quickly and not suffer from the growing pains that may affect the other 2 guys. I can't say I'm fully decided about which of the 3 I'd be most interested in taking at this point, but I woudn't necessarily be angry with any of them at 8. I'd lean towards Curry now, but I'd like to see the workouts/combines etc. before I can ultimately say "we have to get this guy..." Griffin, Rubio, Thabeet, Harden and Hill are the only 5 guys that I'd be happy to take at 8 without hesitation, but clearly they will be top 5. I'd probably throw Jonny Flynn in there as a borderline guy as well. I think he's gonna be a terrific NBA PG- he has the heart, leadership, toughness and skillset to be a true PG- his only limiting factor is height. |
|
VDesai
Posts: 43301 Alba Posts: 44 Joined: 10/28/2003 Member: #477 USA |
|
|
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 3/25/2005 Member: #880 USA |
How tall is this dude anyway? Some sites have him listed at 6ft and others have him at 6'3....wtf???
|
|
PresIke
Posts: 27671 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/26/2001 Member: #33 USA |
one can find the video here where bobby knight says, and diagrams specific instances that support his belief that curry was the best passer in college basketball.
how can he not be able to play pg if someone like him is willing to say this? he was among the top assist getters in college too. and of course... he actually played PG most of last year. and folks are very doubtful he can play the position... because he can shoot? guess steve nash should be considered an undersized sg. too good of a shooter to be pg. curry HAD to shoot on his team...because they stunk outside of him, for the most part. in the nba, that is just not going to be the case. Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
|