Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
djsunyc
Posts: 44929 Alba Posts: 42 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #536 |
![]() the sugarhill gang caused the war on terror...
|
sebstar
Posts: 25698 Alba Posts: 4 Joined: 6/2/2002 Member: #249 USA |
![]() Yes. Second paragraph in the 'Crime Over Time' section.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets.
--Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
|
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/1/2009 Member: #2539 Nauru |
![]() Posted by sebstar: sebstar, i read the paragraph. and it is perfectly IN-LINE with what I have been presenting all along. 2005 - 30 = 1975. even according to my original graph, one can see that crime HAS indeed been the lowest in 30 years. since 1975. but what even the 1975 level is MORE THAN DOUBLE that of the beginning of the graph (1960). also, in the same paragraph, i would like to point out that: Over the past thirty years, the crime rate rose throughout the 1980s, reached its peak in 1991 and then began to decrease throughout the 1990s and 2000s. Recent statistics indicate that crime could again be increasing. so really, thanks for backing up exactly what i have been saying since the first post with that graph. here is the graph again: ![]() we might not agree on a lot, but i don't understand what it is about this that we can't agree on? crime-ridden society, indeed. it also seems that you've conveniently left out the sentence that i've bolded in this post. why did you do that? [Edited by - orangeblobman on 05-04-2009 12:49 PM] WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
|
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/1/2009 Member: #2539 Nauru |
![]() Posted by sebstar: LMAO. my fact-deprived, conservative...statistics?? so when you can't respond to numbers, you resort to personal insults? very interesting (not really) how your mind works, sebstar. i urge you to go over my posts, the graphs, and the information that has been presented and then re-evaluate your conclusion; though, since you've got such an aversion to facts and numbers, i doubt you will be able to draw a different conclusion. so yea, lets move on, because there's no moving going on in presenting numbers and factual arguments to you. here's a cheers to the decadence: [Edited by - orangeblobman on 05-04-2009 1:08 PM] WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
|