Posted by sebstar:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by sebstar:
So we just give up a first rounder and Lee for a player who we, more than likely, have the best shot at signing?
based on what?
There's no way you'll ever get more for David Lee and the pick than Bosh. And we'd still have room for one more max player in 2010 anyway. Having Bosh already on the team would make the team a lot more appealing. What kind of team is Lebron or Wade or Joe Johnson more likely to want to join: One with David Lee and a rookie or one with Chris Bosh? I'd say Bosh by a wide margin.
He's going to be a unrestricted free agent, and he's definitely not re-upping with Toronto...so who is he going to sign with? If we're aggressive enough, I dont see why we wouldnt be the front runners. Especially under the pretense that if we traded for him, he would re-sign. Why wouldnt we just sign him outright and save our resources for another trade?
[Edited by - sebstar on 04-14-2009 4:28 PM]
What else do you have in mind regarding Lee? Is it something that allows us to sign Bosh and Lebron and keep whatever we get in return (which will add to our payroll) for Lee? If not, then there's no point in signing Bosh in 2010 unless we're certain Lebron won't come. I'd be more concerned about how much whatever other trade involving Lee you have in mind will add to our payroll.
Also, see bold font above for an additional reason why I'd jump on the opportunity to get Bosh right away.
One more reason:
Anything can change in a year. What if Calderon is healthy and Toronto next year is the roughly 50 win team they were recently? Will Bosh want to be a part of rebuilding in Toronto then?
I think historically, those who immediately jump on opportunities to get star players do better in the long-run than those who say "we can get him in the future and under better circumstances."