[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Would you trade Lee's RFA rights & the # 1 (after the pick is made, so as to comply with rules) for
Author Thread
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/14/2009  4:17 PM
Posted by sebstar:

So we just give up a first rounder and Lee for a player who we, more than likely, have the best shot at signing?

based on what?


There's no way you'll ever get more for David Lee and the pick than Bosh. And we'd still have room for one more max player in 2010 anyway. Having Bosh already on the team would make the team a lot more appealing. What kind of team is Lebron or Wade or Joe Johnson more likely to want to join: One with David Lee and a rookie or one with Chris Bosh? I'd say Bosh by a wide margin.
AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/14/2009  4:21 PM
Posted by Marv:
Posted by VDesai:

Absolutely

wow. i wish i had that strong a feeling for bosh's health and D. you're giving up the #8 or 9 pick, a 16/12/2 guy and now being held hostage to bosh's rfa offer, which could be huge. love to hear exactly what you see us getting for that in bosh with the whole contract thing ahead of of us.

Defense: I think Bosh is about average and a lot better than David Lee.
Health: I think you're off base here. He's averaged 73 games/season in his career, and in his career low season still played 67 games. Neither of those numbers indicates reason for concern about injury IMO.
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
4/14/2009  4:27 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by sebstar:

So we just give up a first rounder and Lee for a player who we, more than likely, have the best shot at signing?

based on what?


There's no way you'll ever get more for David Lee and the pick than Bosh. And we'd still have room for one more max player in 2010 anyway. Having Bosh already on the team would make the team a lot more appealing. What kind of team is Lebron or Wade or Joe Johnson more likely to want to join: One with David Lee and a rookie or one with Chris Bosh? I'd say Bosh by a wide margin.

He's going to be a unrestricted free agent, and he's definitely not re-upping with Toronto...so who is he going to sign with? If we're aggressive enough, I dont see why we wouldnt be the front runners. Especially under the pretense that if we traded for him, he would re-sign. Why wouldnt we just sign him outright and save our resources for another trade?

[Edited by - sebstar on 04-14-2009 4:28 PM]
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
4/14/2009  4:36 PM
I don't give Wilson up for Bosh. The guy has too much potential. Lee is expendable in such a deal and our pick is as well. That would give us a very solid nucleus. I don't know how much money you tie up there but you have to figure lee gets 8 million our draft selection another three so that's 11 added to the cap.

You could also buy another pick or maybe move Nate in a sign and trade for one
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/14/2009  5:07 PM
Posted by sebstar:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by sebstar:

So we just give up a first rounder and Lee for a player who we, more than likely, have the best shot at signing?

based on what?


There's no way you'll ever get more for David Lee and the pick than Bosh. And we'd still have room for one more max player in 2010 anyway. Having Bosh already on the team would make the team a lot more appealing. What kind of team is Lebron or Wade or Joe Johnson more likely to want to join: One with David Lee and a rookie or one with Chris Bosh? I'd say Bosh by a wide margin.

He's going to be a unrestricted free agent, and he's definitely not re-upping with Toronto...so who is he going to sign with? If we're aggressive enough, I dont see why we wouldnt be the front runners. Especially under the pretense that if we traded for him, he would re-sign. Why wouldnt we just sign him outright and save our resources for another trade?

[Edited by - sebstar on 04-14-2009 4:28 PM]

What else do you have in mind regarding Lee? Is it something that allows us to sign Bosh and Lebron and keep whatever we get in return (which will add to our payroll) for Lee? If not, then there's no point in signing Bosh in 2010 unless we're certain Lebron won't come. I'd be more concerned about how much whatever other trade involving Lee you have in mind will add to our payroll.
Also, see bold font above for an additional reason why I'd jump on the opportunity to get Bosh right away.
One more reason:
Anything can change in a year. What if Calderon is healthy and Toronto next year is the roughly 50 win team they were recently? Will Bosh want to be a part of rebuilding in Toronto then?
I think historically, those who immediately jump on opportunities to get star players do better in the long-run than those who say "we can get him in the future and under better circumstances."
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
4/14/2009  5:18 PM
lee and the knicks #1 for chris bosh and some of y'all say no? lol...

but regardless, these quotes aren't very good for the bosh to stay in toronto camp:
"My employer right now is who it is right now,' Bosh said cutting off further questioning along this line. "If rumours get started, I can't control that. Right now who I work for is who I play for," Bosh said.

Bosh will sit down with GM Bryan Colangelo at the end of the season as will all the Raptors. He said last night he's not prepared to indicate what his intentions are after the 2009-10 season.

"I'm not indicating anything,' Bosh said. "It will be routine stuff. We will go over the season, assess the season. See how we can get better, see how I can get better."

sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
4/14/2009  6:30 PM
Its a risk I'm willing to take...if he re-signs, he re-signs but I doubt it. I dont think Bosh is all that great. Now if this were Melo or Wade, then yeah I'm jumping on that. But I just dont see what sense it makes to give away two of our more valuable resources for a player who has given every indication that he will test the market in one year.

Just a difference of opinion. I can see wanting to secure him now, but I just dont think he's that kind of player worth all that.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

4/14/2009  8:21 PM
Posted by sebstar:

Its a risk I'm willing to take...if he re-signs, he re-signs but I doubt it. I dont think Bosh is all that great. Now if this were Melo or Wade, then yeah I'm jumping on that. But I just dont see what sense it makes to give away two of our more valuable resources for a player who has given every indication that he will test the market in one year.

Just a difference of opinion. I can see wanting to secure him now, but I just dont think he's that kind of player worth all that.


I disagree, like someone else already posted, when you have an opoortunity to land a start player you take it. A lot can change in a year, besides we can let Bosh, Chandler and Gallo play together for a year and see how it works out. A few more W's in 2009 season wouldn'texactly hurt us would it?
TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
4/14/2009  8:31 PM
Amare and his health issues yes. Bosh no. Bosh is as much a numbers guy as Lee is right now, just a better numbers guy.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
King1
Posts: 22993
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2005
Member: #998
USA
4/14/2009  10:00 PM
Sign and trade are usually done with players close to max contracts like Joe Johnson and Rashad Lewis. Why would a team not just offer lee a little more money knowing the Knicks may not match instead of giving up draft picks and players. The Knicks have no leverage on this one and every team knows that. How many sign and trade are done with 8-10 million dollar players?
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

4/14/2009  10:40 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by sebstar:

So we just give up a first rounder and Lee for a player who we, more than likely, have the best shot at signing?

based on what?


There's no way you'll ever get more for David Lee and the pick than Bosh. And we'd still have room for one more max player in 2010 anyway. Having Bosh already on the team would make the team a lot more appealing. What kind of team is Lebron or Wade or Joe Johnson more likely to want to join: One with David Lee and a rookie or one with Chris Bosh? I'd say Bosh by a wide margin.
I think that any move we make should be made with the understanding that we will probably not get any major free agent star in 2010. You simply cannot make deals or signings if the only reason you do it is to make your team more attractive for James, Wade, etc.. Sure, we may pick up one of the prize free agents, but you cannot assume that we will.


No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
30andOverClub
Posts: 20108
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2005
Member: #876
4/15/2009  12:22 AM
Posted by King1:

Sign and trade are usually done with players close to max contracts like Joe Johnson and Rashad Lewis. Why would a team not just offer lee a little more money knowing the Knicks may not match instead of giving up draft picks and players. The Knicks have no leverage on this one and every team knows that. How many sign and trade are done with 8-10 million dollar players?

In the last 5 or 6 years: Eddy Curry, Jamal Crawford, Sharif Abdur Rahim (though it was rescinded since he failed the physical), Keyon Dooling (a lot less, but he wasn't a max salary player obviously), Peja wasn't far off (5 years, $64MM), Al Harrington, Brad Miller. And I'm sure there are more.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
4/15/2009  1:53 AM
Bosh is an upgrade over Lee. He's longer has much more offensive versatility and firepower and can block a few shots and play better man to man D. I would suspect he could be a 25-12 player here.

I don't know what Toronto would want but they arent exactly in the drivers seat. David Lee resigned tp a 6 year 48mm $ contract pick 8 and a few of the scrubs we just signed for bosh and pick 39.

Then I would go after Pheonix's pick because I don't think they want to take on that salary if they resign Nash. We could offer tham 3mm in cash and a future lottery restricted 1 and see if we can pick up Mullens for the long term. That would be adding 6-11 240 and 7-1 270 to our perpetually small roster.

One of the PGs will fall and it's possible we could find a solid back up at 39 and use the MLE to grab a guard in the NBA.
RIP Crushalot😞
Would you trade Lee's RFA rights & the # 1 (after the pick is made, so as to comply with rules) for

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy