Posted by islesfan:
Posted by martin:
Posted by islesfan:
Teams are desperate for financial relief and the Knicks eat a $20 million expiring contract out of spite.
Where's the logic in that?
which team made a trade for financial relief at this deadline?
Sac and NO for 2. And plenty of others are looking for relief. How many teams are taking out loans? The Knicks have 1 blatant advantage over most teams and they chose spite.
New Orleans? What else did they do other than have to take back Chandler?
Sacramento? For the 15 trade they made they saved about 47 dollars lol.
Where did we choose spite? During the trade deadline? How? Doing what? You want us to take on 2010 and 2011 gigantic contracts just to recycle Marbury's 09 expiring? The best thing this franchise did in a LONG time was finally let a MASSIVE expiring deal.......expire...so WE for a change are the ones saving cash!
I don't see the spite in that.
The only spite we'd be engaging in is if we waive Marbury on March 2nd. THAT would be out of spite and would be very unprofessional.
If Steph gives back? Let him go free. If not? Send him home until the summer.
Just please, under no circumstances, waive him on March 2nd. Then all we will hear and read is how pathetic the Knicks are for screwing with a player's playoff eligibility, how things never changed, we'll have players and media crucifying us for it, we'll have other GMs saying how dare we shape the course of a player's future, league officials, etc, all up our asses.
For what....to giggle at Marbury like a 12 year old girl who got back at some other 12 year old girl for looking at her boyfriend?
Gimme a break...do the right thing here.