[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Kenny Thomas for Nate and Jeffries????
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 2 of 5 ‹ Previous 1  2  3  4 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/19/2009  2:46 PM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by NYKBocker:

Nate and Curry for Kenny Thomas and Hawes or 1st RD pick.

or

Nate and JJSkinny for KT, Hawes and 1st RD pick.

You want Nate, take on Curry. {Period.

i like the sound of that. no one is going to do that in this economy though. no one. Curry MUST prove he's healthy, but that's an option for next season as well - if Curry can at least prove to be healthy, you say, hey, you want Nate? take our Curry, please.
¿ △ ?
AUTOADVERT
martin
Posts: 79923
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/19/2009  2:47 PM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by NYKBocker:

Nate and Curry for Kenny Thomas and Hawes or 1st RD pick.

or

Nate and JJSkinny for KT, Hawes and 1st RD pick.

You want Nate, take on Curry. {Period.

talk about overvaluing your own players.

Nate is good but is he worth a first round pick straight up? And then you want the other team to add $10M to their salary cap with a player who is caca?

Come on guys.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
2/19/2009  2:48 PM
Yes, Nate is worth a 1st round pick. We need a pick back if we trade him and include Jefferies.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
2/19/2009  2:49 PM
Do it!! Jesus wooo.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
2/19/2009  2:50 PM
no way. not worth it.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
martin
Posts: 79923
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/19/2009  2:51 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:

Yes, Nate is worth a 1st round pick. We need a pick back if we trade him and include Jefferies.

Nate is on the cusp of demanding $6M+ on a team that has Kevin Martin and FGarcia and you think that SAC is gonna want Nate for 1 year AND take Jefferies AND give up a 1st round pick.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/19/2009  2:51 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by NYKBocker:

Nate and Curry for Kenny Thomas and Hawes or 1st RD pick.

or

Nate and JJSkinny for KT, Hawes and 1st RD pick.

You want Nate, take on Curry. {Period.

talk about overvaluing your own players.

Nate is good but is he worth a first round pick straight up? And then you want the other team to add $10M to their salary cap with a player who is caca?

Come on guys.

i mean, there's no way we get sacramento's pick - they're going to have a top 3 pick in the draft. but i think packaging nate just to dump jefferies is undervaluing. i am glad donnie is patient to let the thing play out.
¿ △ ?
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
2/19/2009  2:51 PM
i think they'll hold onto nate and jeffries. i guess donnie thinks they can deal jeffries later? i really liked the washington deal (malik and jeffries for mike james and etan thomas).
#Knickstaps
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
2/19/2009  2:52 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by NYKBocker:

Nate and Curry for Kenny Thomas and Hawes or 1st RD pick.

or

Nate and JJSkinny for KT, Hawes and 1st RD pick.

You want Nate, take on Curry. {Period.

talk about overvaluing your own players.

Nate is good but is he worth a first round pick straight up? And then you want the other team to add $10M to their salary cap with a player who is caca?

Come on guys.

Don't label everyone else

I like Joe, but time and time again he makes these crazy-azz trades lol.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
2/19/2009  2:52 PM
painful, but this is exactly the kind of trade we have to make in order for 2010-2Max to work
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
2/19/2009  2:54 PM
It sounds like their might be a minor market for Jeffries. We won't get anything too worthwile for him other than 1 yr of savings but that is all we need. We may be able to wait till the offseason. Curry is the one that's going to be a bear to move.
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/19/2009  2:54 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by martin:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by NYKBocker:

Nate and Curry for Kenny Thomas and Hawes or 1st RD pick.

or

Nate and JJSkinny for KT, Hawes and 1st RD pick.

You want Nate, take on Curry. {Period.

talk about overvaluing your own players.

Nate is good but is he worth a first round pick straight up? And then you want the other team to add $10M to their salary cap with a player who is caca?

Come on guys.

Don't label everyone else

I like Joe, but time and time again he makes these crazy-azz trades lol.

I didn't propose the origional trade. I am happy with just Nate and Curry for Thomas. The other guy proposed those trades.
~You can't run from who you are.~
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/19/2009  2:55 PM
Posted by JohnWallace44:

painful, but this is exactly the kind of trade we have to make in order for 2010-2Max to work

i think donnie is trying to determine nate's value at the moment. nate has been up and down all year, but if he can play the level he's been playing lately, why do you trade him in a salary dump that only creates $6M in space?
¿ △ ?
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
2/19/2009  2:57 PM
Posted by VDesai:

It sounds like their might be a minor market for Jeffries. We won't get anything too worthwile for him other than 1 yr of savings but that is all we need. We may be able to wait till the offseason. Curry is the one that's going to be a bear to move.

If we can move Jeffries it would give us enough salary cap room to sign two major free agents.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/19/2009  2:57 PM
Posted by Cosmic:

UPDATE (2:36 p.m. ET): Just got word that the Knicks turned down the Kings again. Sounds like they're not as motivated to move Jared Jeffries as so many of us thought.




.....
Nate is probably playing a little to well to do such a trade but Jeffries is crippling us as well and having to KEEP Jeffries AND PAY Nate? Double whammy. If Sac offered back a protected pick I think you consider it then.
Its Walsh. He's patient to a fault. He's not going to take a bad trade and thats a terrible trade, even with those prospects. Nate is close to becoming a bigtime player. Those guys arent.

I am very happy with everything that went down today. We got good players that fill vital rolls and we gave up nothing. We got a defensive athletic bigman that can guard centers and play uptempo. We got a versatile perimeter defender and scorer in Hughes and we got rid of Malik who was doing nothing here and fugazy who is... well, fugazy.

Knicks are a playoff team right now. We have a good starting lineup with Wilcox, Lee, Harrington, Hughes and Duhon and awesome firepower off the bench in Chandler, Nate, QBrick and Gallo.

Good 9 man rotation for MDA

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/19/2009  2:58 PM
Posted by sebstar:
Posted by VDesai:

It sounds like their might be a minor market for Jeffries. We won't get anything too worthwile for him other than 1 yr of savings but that is all we need. We may be able to wait till the offseason. Curry is the one that's going to be a bear to move.

If we can move Jeffries it would give us enough salary cap room to sign two major free agents.

this is not true if we sign Dlee and Nate and Duhon. it gives us the space to sign ONE. we NEED to move jefferies if we want to keep Duhon, Nate and Lee and get ONE Max guy.
¿ △ ?
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
2/19/2009  2:59 PM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by JohnWallace44:

painful, but this is exactly the kind of trade we have to make in order for 2010-2Max to work

i think donnie is trying to determine nate's value at the moment. nate has been up and down all year, but if he can play the level he's been playing lately, why do you trade him in a salary dump that only creates $6M in space?

Absolutely. No need to jump the gun here.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
KnickFanInPlano
Posts: 20007
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/5/2009
Member: #2482
USA
2/19/2009  3:00 PM
Douby is being released by the Kings, he can back up Duhon. I think he is good for 10-12 minutes a night and is from Rutgers.
mikesknicks
Posts: 20755
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/17/2004
Member: #684
USA
2/19/2009  3:01 PM
I love Nate but if you can get rid of Jeffries I say do it.
In the Knick of time. Knickal for Your thoughts.
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
2/19/2009  3:02 PM
Douby can't play point
Page 2 of 5 ‹ Previous 1  2  3  4 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
Kenny Thomas for Nate and Jeffries????
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy