[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Just as I thought - Knicks are mental case team, no matter who plays in NY
Author Thread
martin
Posts: 79931
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/12/2009  12:37 AM
Posted by BasketballJones:
Posted by 4949:

And I think it is the atmosphere (fans - media) that causes this to happen.

They get a great streak going and all kinds of potential. They prove they can win and when they get swept, and it was expected, they cannot recover. They lose to every stinking nook and cranny team in the league until they desperately climb right out of the hole again and get it going again. The way these Knicks are going, I'll be surprised at this point if they can even win 30 games. It's got to be the atmosphere in NY, because it couldn't be anything else.

My sig says it all.

Do you think it might have something to do with the atmosphere in NY?

it has to do with the atmosphere of playing BOS, CLE, LAL, POR consecutively.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
AUTOADVERT
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
2/12/2009  8:28 AM
Posted by 4949:
Posted by BlueSeats:
Posted by 4949:

[quote]Posted by BlueSeats:


I was the one who was preaching that when the season started.

Looks like Knicks can't even handle L.A. Clips so far. A 12 win team giving the Knicks problems also.

How does anyone here explain how the Knicks were 9-7 in January (including a six out of seven win streak at the end of Jan.), get swept by the big three and take a five (probably six) game nose dive, losing streak into February? If that isn't a mental lapse, then I don't know what is!

We all know that they are in the mode 'if only we can win one game, then we can get it going again'. It's a mental block and I still say it's generated by the media and the fan.

How many legitimate starters do you think we have on this team? Do you think if you take a team of bench guys and stick them in the midwest somewhere they'll be a winning team? It's not about the roster, it's about where they play?

Hey, you been pretty cool in trying to discuss it at least, so I will only say that what I am saying is, this team compared to the team three years ago, is basically doing the same thing. Win about six and go on a massive losing streak. That's what I'm saying. I don't care who's on the roster. It's the same thing happening is my only point.

This year is different from the prior losing seasons.

1. They actually are playing a system- and one on offense that I didn't think they could play

2. The team has been competitive. They are still outgunned most nights, but stick together and keep things close. Look at our point differential this year (-2.65) to last year when we were over -5/6 much of the season

3. Although I disagree with the notion that 2010 free agents are coming to save our franchise, management realizes that we are not one quick move away from a fix.

You can agree or disagree with MDA, his system, Walsh & some of his moves. But the fact is, there is a world of difference around this franchise compared to the Isiah years.
DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

2/12/2009  12:55 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:

You don't have to wait a day, we already know Reed and Clyde and Patrick and Oakley didn't require a pretty atmosphere before they'd play their guts out.

A good team will make a good atmosphere.

But this definitely ain't Utah. NY fans are rough. Paraphrasing Patrick when they retired his number, you know that Ewing and the fans had a rocky relationship, especially towards the end. NY fans are with you when you are up, but I don't know if we have patience when things are going rough. Passionate, yes. Loyal? To the team for generations, but not the players. Maybe we're more realistic.

But we can be nasty. I was at the Celtics game, and I swear that we lost the game in the 4th right after a "Boston sucks" chant started. It's a pretty lame chant. These are the defending champs, and the most storied franchise in the league. We'll probably never catch up in my lifetime. In their Garden there's nothing but Finals banners, no room or time for division or conference champs. Basically, they DON'T suck. Maybe the town isn't the best in the world, but "Boston sucks" IMHO is a lame schoolyard chant by a fanbase with an inferiority complex.

Trust me, I know what I speak of as a Mets fan. I HATE it when we're playing Florida or the Phillies or whoever, and a "Yankees suck" chant starts, it's like WTF? Is our little brother complex that prominent that the Yankees are in our minds when they aren't even in the stadium?

I love this town, but sometimes I think we are our worst enemy.
Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

2/12/2009  1:13 PM
Posted by DrAlphaeus:
Posted by BlueSeats:

You don't have to wait a day, we already know Reed and Clyde and Patrick and Oakley didn't require a pretty atmosphere before they'd play their guts out.

A good team will make a good atmosphere.

But this definitely ain't Utah. NY fans are rough. Paraphrasing Patrick when they retired his number, you know that Ewing and the fans had a rocky relationship, especially towards the end. NY fans are with you when you are up, but I don't know if we have patience when things are going rough. Passionate, yes. Loyal? To the team for generations, but not the players. Maybe we're more realistic.

But we can be nasty. I was at the Celtics game, and I swear that we lost the game in the 4th right after a "Boston sucks" chant started. It's a pretty lame chant. These are the defending champs, and the most storied franchise in the league. We'll probably never catch up in my lifetime. In their Garden there's nothing but Finals banners, no room or time for division or conference champs. Basically, they DON'T suck. Maybe the town isn't the best in the world, but "Boston sucks" IMHO is a lame schoolyard chant by a fanbase with an inferiority complex.

Trust me, I know what I speak of as a Mets fan. I HATE it when we're playing Florida or the Phillies or whoever, and a "Yankees suck" chant starts, it's like WTF? Is our little brother complex that prominent that the Yankees are in our minds when they aren't even in the stadium?

I love this town, but sometimes I think we are our worst enemy.

You're being weay too literal with that "Boston Sucks" stuff. It's just an expedient way if saying "I hate Boston" which includes all the pain of being inferior to them. When I was a season ticket holder I always used to shout out "Riley Sucks" whenever Miami played us, but the truth is I loved Riley (as a coach) and was expressing the pain of him ditching our team. Smart players love the boos. Reggie Miller loved being the villain because he knew it meant he struck fear in our hearts.

I agree NY is tough, especially when you're down - but that ain't changing. If you don't want it, don't sign the contract. I was also there when Patrick's teams would have a lackluster first half and get booed at halftime and then come out on fire. Some teams get motivated by the pressure.

And if this were Utah, would this team of bench dudes really have a better record?
DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

2/12/2009  1:36 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:

You're being weay too literal with that "Boston Sucks" stuff. It's just an expedient way if saying "I hate Boston" which includes all the pain of being inferior to them. When I was a season ticket holder I always used to shout out "Riley Sucks" whenever Miami played us, but the truth is I loved Riley (as a coach) and was expressing the pain of him ditching our team. Smart players love the boos. Reggie Miller loved being the villain because he knew it meant he struck fear in our hearts.

I agree NY is tough, especially when you're down - but that ain't changing. If you don't want it, don't sign the contract. I was also there when Patrick's teams would have a lackluster first half and get booed at halftime and then come out on fire. Some teams get motivated by the pressure.

And if this were Utah, would this team of bench dudes really have a better record?

I could be taking it too far with the "sucks" thing, I'll give you that, Blue. I just like to get a little more clever with my insults, but it's tough to get 10,000 folks to chant: "Your storied franchise doesn't make up for the fact that we are the premier United States city!"

But maybe when you have a team of young, bench-types, that is exactly the type of team that will drop a game or two in a season partially because the crowd starts turning on them. Losing the home court advantage at home, that sort of thing?
Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
2/12/2009  1:42 PM
I don't believe that New York is the problem. I think the problem is with the Knicks franchise and, particularly, Dolan's leadership of it. We are hopefully going to change that with Walsh and D'Antoni, but we won't know that for a while.

That's not to say that playing in New York doesn't present special challenges. It does, but that hasn't stopped the Yankees (for example) from being a successful franchise.

https:// It's not so hard.
DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781

2/12/2009  1:47 PM
Posted by BasketballJones:

I don't believe that New York is the problem. I think the problem is with the Knicks franchise and, particularly, Dolan's leadership of it. We are hopefully going to change that with Walsh and D'Antoni, but we won't know that for a while.

That's not to say that playing in New York doesn't present special challenges. It does, but that hasn't stopped the Yankees (for example) from being a successful franchise.

A good -- albeit painful -- point re: the Yankees. You guys are talking down from the ledge, or from my high horse more appropriately. I don't want to be just another "dump on the fans" guy. Let's dump on the media!


For real though, you can almost see the obsession with 2010, because it takes a special character to make it in this town. Or in case of the 1986 Mets, a lot of chicks and drugs.
Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
2/12/2009  1:49 PM
DrAlphaeus - You are THE MAN today.

Excellent posts all around.

I couldn't agree with you more.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
2/12/2009  2:25 PM
NY has always been a rough town when you lose and a great town when you win. eventually we will win again. The problem is 100% the roster. We have had a group of guys that have never won at the NBA level before. As a collection they do not know how to avoid distraction. They do not understand the intensity level needed consistently to win. They do not understand the mental focus it takes to win on a nightly basis. They don't understand what is a right or wrong decision down the stretch of games. They celebrate as if they won the title after a lay-up in the 3rd quarter that ties the game. They haven't had anyone on the floor who has won that they can emulate. Behaviors that they see that lead to winning. If you've never done it before it's almost impossible to suddenly know how. None of this is suprising. Our core group learned from Marbs and Eddie and Zach and Jamal. They are repeating the behaviors they learned 3 years ago(especially during the "it's okay to quit year" under LB) under their leadership. Things can change without bringing in real leaders, but it will take a long time for this to occur. We need winners!

Been saying this for years but we keep expecting different. Time to listen to Bip, he's seen this before. He is trying to warn you!!!!!!!!!!!

[Edited by - bippity10 on 12-02-2009 2:29 PM]
I just hope that people will like me
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
2/12/2009  9:46 PM
Read carefully and fully:

Well, in reading the rest of what you guys said, I guess it was a little far fetched to solely say it's the fans and media. But this massive winning streaks, followed by massive losing streaks is the same as a few years ago. That's what I was curious about.

I mean, I can see we lose two, win one, lose two more, win three, lose three, win one, lose one, win two, lose three is much more normal kind of streaks. Going 9-7 for January, with the last six games were we went 5-1 and then we play the top three in a row and just keep falling.

There just seemed to be some kind of connection with these streaks. Not to mention that we lost the last two to two of some of the lousiest teams in the league. That's obviously a mental laps.

But what's causing it is my whole question? I can understand when your losing, but why is it so specifically this kind of winning - losing? It's like being on drugs and then the drugs suddenly wear off. This happened three years ago. Why is it happening again with this team, with a different coach? This has been happening under three coaches now. Coincidence??

Is it possible to do the same thing over and over regarding these streaks, and doing it under different circumstances? We've had Curry, Marbury, Lee and Nate for about that long, but this time Marbury and Curry are basically gone. Lee has improved vastly on the offensive end and Nate is still just being Nate. It appears the Duhon has been some what a blessing in disguise.

Zach and Crawford are both gone, but I don't think it was them specifically either, because they just ended up on the winning end, both twice in a row. Not to mention, with the old teams, we had a full staff of players and for the most part this year, it has been greatly reduced, with the same kinds of results.

The other thing is also, the Knicks basically beat some qualities teams towards the end of the January, so we know they are capable of beating those kinds of teams. And I can understand losing to the top three, but losing to a quality team and two way under .500 teams now?

I'm trying to put my finger on it, but it's been very difficult, hence my sig and the fact that I suggested that maybe it's us and the media. So what is it that causes this team to have so maybe ups and downs, bundled up in hordes of streaks?? Was it fair to us to have to play the top three teams, three games in a row? Was it that demoralizing to these Knicks to have to lose three in a row, after trying so hard to win (and they did put everything they had into those games) that they have lost their touch again? All professional NBA teams are professional because they can regroup under difficult circumstances. Are these guys just not professional enough?

I have one other possibility, that I hate to bring up again and have been harping on it with the progress of Lopez, but our problems seem to go back as long as we haven't had a legit, proper center since Ewing was sent packing. Is that, could that be the sole problem with this teams big ups and downs?

I still think it's a very important question.
I'll never trust this' team again.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
2/12/2009  11:44 PM
Posted by 4949:

Read carefully and fully:

Well, in reading the rest of what you guys said, I guess it was a little far fetched to solely say it's the fans and media. But this massive winning streaks, followed by massive losing streaks is the same as a few years ago. That's what I was curious about.

I mean, I can see we lose two, win one, lose two more, win three, lose three, win one, lose one, win two, lose three is much more normal kind of streaks. Going 9-7 for January, with the last six games were we went 5-1 and then we play the top three in a row and just keep falling.

There just seemed to be some kind of connection with these streaks. Not to mention that we lost the last two to two of some of the lousiest teams in the league. That's obviously a mental laps.

But what's causing it is my whole question? I can understand when your losing, but why is it so specifically this kind of winning - losing? It's like being on drugs and then the drugs suddenly wear off. This happened three years ago. Why is it happening again with this team, with a different coach? This has been happening under three coaches now. Coincidence??

Is it possible to do the same thing over and over regarding these streaks, and doing it under different circumstances? We've had Curry, Marbury, Lee and Nate for about that long, but this time Marbury and Curry are basically gone. Lee has improved vastly on the offensive end and Nate is still just being Nate. It appears the Duhon has been some what a blessing in disguise.

Zach and Crawford are both gone, but I don't think it was them specifically either, because they just ended up on the winning end, both twice in a row. Not to mention, with the old teams, we had a full staff of players and for the most part this year, it has been greatly reduced, with the same kinds of results.

The other thing is also, the Knicks basically beat some qualities teams towards the end of the January, so we know they are capable of beating those kinds of teams. And I can understand losing to the top three, but losing to a quality team and two way under .500 teams now?

I'm trying to put my finger on it, but it's been very difficult, hence my sig and the fact that I suggested that maybe it's us and the media. So what is it that causes this team to have so maybe ups and downs, bundled up in hordes of streaks?? Was it fair to us to have to play the top three teams, three games in a row? Was it that demoralizing to these Knicks to have to lose three in a row, after trying so hard to win (and they did put everything they had into those games) that they have lost their touch again? All professional NBA teams are professional because they can regroup under difficult circumstances. Are these guys just not professional enough?

I have one other possibility, that I hate to bring up again and have been harping on it with the progress of Lopez, but our problems seem to go back as long as we haven't had a legit, proper center since Ewing was sent packing. Is that, could that be the sole problem with this teams big ups and downs?

I still think it's a very important question.

Why beat yourself over the head with this. I gave you the answer to your question. I'm not making this crap up. What I said is happening...IS HAPPENING
I just hope that people will like me
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
2/13/2009  12:14 AM
Posted by Bippity10:

Why beat yourself over the head with this. I gave you the answer to your question. I'm not making this crap up. What I said is happening...IS HAPPENING

I didn't read 4949's post because I didn't have time. How about a synopsis?
https:// It's not so hard.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
2/13/2009  6:02 PM
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by 4949:

Read carefully and fully:

Well, in reading the rest of what you guys said, I guess it was a little far fetched to solely say it's the fans and media. But this massive winning streaks, followed by massive losing streaks is the same as a few years ago. That's what I was curious about.

I mean, I can see we lose two, win one, lose two more, win three, lose three, win one, lose one, win two, lose three is much more normal kind of streaks. Going 9-7 for January, with the last six games were we went 5-1 and then we play the top three in a row and just keep falling.

There just seemed to be some kind of connection with these streaks. Not to mention that we lost the last two to two of some of the lousiest teams in the league. That's obviously a mental laps.

But what's causing it is my whole question? I can understand when your losing, but why is it so specifically this kind of winning - losing? It's like being on drugs and then the drugs suddenly wear off. This happened three years ago. Why is it happening again with this team, with a different coach? This has been happening under three coaches now. Coincidence??

Is it possible to do the same thing over and over regarding these streaks, and doing it under different circumstances? We've had Curry, Marbury, Lee and Nate for about that long, but this time Marbury and Curry are basically gone. Lee has improved vastly on the offensive end and Nate is still just being Nate. It appears the Duhon has been some what a blessing in disguise.

Zach and Crawford are both gone, but I don't think it was them specifically either, because they just ended up on the winning end, both twice in a row. Not to mention, with the old teams, we had a full staff of players and for the most part this year, it has been greatly reduced, with the same kinds of results.

The other thing is also, the Knicks basically beat some qualities teams towards the end of the January, so we know they are capable of beating those kinds of teams. And I can understand losing to the top three, but losing to a quality team and two way under .500 teams now?

I'm trying to put my finger on it, but it's been very difficult, hence my sig and the fact that I suggested that maybe it's us and the media. So what is it that causes this team to have so maybe ups and downs, bundled up in hordes of streaks?? Was it fair to us to have to play the top three teams, three games in a row? Was it that demoralizing to these Knicks to have to lose three in a row, after trying so hard to win (and they did put everything they had into those games) that they have lost their touch again? All professional NBA teams are professional because they can regroup under difficult circumstances. Are these guys just not professional enough?

I have one other possibility, that I hate to bring up again and have been harping on it with the progress of Lopez, but our problems seem to go back as long as we haven't had a legit, proper center since Ewing was sent packing. Is that, could that be the sole problem with this teams big ups and downs?

I still think it's a very important question.

Why beat yourself over the head with this. I gave you the answer to your question. I'm not making this crap up. What I said is happening...IS HAPPENING

Why talk about anything!
I'll never trust this' team again.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
2/17/2009  11:29 PM
And here we go again, the roller coaster ride begins. They finally beat a quality team again and we should see them playing tough once again for the next several games. That's until they run into a wall again and go into depression.

Gotta love these Knicks.
I'll never trust this' team again.
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
2/17/2009  11:40 PM
We have to be on all cylinders to make this thing run well, and each time we do something good you find out another part doesnt click right. But thats what a youth movement does your core players are less then 5 years in, and they have been coach by three different coaches.
ES
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
2/18/2009  12:01 AM
And this team is touchy about streaks either way.
I'll never trust this' team again.
Just as I thought - Knicks are mental case team, no matter who plays in NY

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy