Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
izybx
Posts: 22366 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 10/16/2006 Member: #1178 USA |
![]() Posted by bitty41:Posted by izybx: Ill take that you being unable to answer the question of who was the Democratic leader before Obama is an acknowledgement of how difficult it is to have a leader when your party doesnt have a sitting president. Ill tell you what though, the Republican needs to have a leader who will provide a voice to the Republican party. The Republican party is shameful. So is the Democratic. In the end of the day, there is noone who is standing up for the American people. I have very little confidence in our government right now. Beat the Evil Empire. BEAT MIAMI
|
sebstar
Posts: 25698 Alba Posts: 4 Joined: 6/2/2002 Member: #249 USA |
![]() Izybx...you're STILL not getting it.
Is Rush Limbaugh the leader of your party? No. But the growing perception is that he is. Key word is perception. When people see his mug on t.v all the time, and the actual leader of the RNC bowing to his bluster and the party as a whole failing to denounce him and actually celebrating him--- what conclusion are people going to draw? Thats why Obama did what he did. I knew where he was going with this from the jump. Obama is trying to expose the backwards, extremist wing of the party that has become the dominant voice in the Bush administration. He knew Limbaugh would take the bait, and now your party is going to go one of two ways. They are either going to break free of the Limbaugh infected nonsense that has turned the Republican waters toxic, or they are going to defend Limbaugh and embrace his views which will make Republicans look irrelevant and extreme in a changing centrist/now left-leaning America. Its really that simple. Ball is in your guys court. Your poll numbers are dropping to dangerously low levels. My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets.
--Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
|
izybx
Posts: 22366 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 10/16/2006 Member: #1178 USA |
![]() Posted by sebstar: I changed your post to what you really mean. You really think that in this day and age Obama is still worried about the Republican party? The economy is in shambles, theres a war on our southern border and our most important ally in the middle east is on the verge of civil war and you think hes concerned about Rush Limbough and making Republicans look bad? If I were him I would be worried about the stimulus bill actually doing something and the economy not falling flat on its face or he will go down as one of the biggest failures to ever sit in office. Beat the Evil Empire. BEAT MIAMI
|
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769 Alba Posts: 51 Joined: 6/23/2002 Member: #261 USA |
![]() Rush is the de facto leader of the republican party. I get that that makes you wince, and I understand how you'd not want to be associated with him, but the truth is the truth. He has sway with more voters than any other republican. I don't see how you or anyone can deny that.
|
izybx
Posts: 22366 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 10/16/2006 Member: #1178 USA |
![]() Posted by Killa4luv: You say so it must be the truth. Thanks for clearing that up Beat the Evil Empire. BEAT MIAMI
|
Nalod
Posts: 71363 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() Obama winning empowered Limpbaugh following that will point to any and all failures of this administration. The Limp ditto heads feel the media made Bush ineffective and feel they should have the same rights.
The Limp ditto heads did not win, are not in power and are not used to being in minority. Its more important that Obama establish his power and make progress. Restore confidence is paramount. In absence of a figurehead for the party Rush is now its mascot. That itself speaks volumne for the Rebuplican party at the moment. |