Posted by martin:
I'll just add this in general to anyone who does NOT think JJ/Curry/Lee for Miller/Salmons is a good deal for the future.
With JJ/Curry gone, you GUARANTEE that the Knicks can sign 2 max free agents during the 2010 offseason; it's a lot of eggs in one basket, but why not shoot for the moon. You also get back a super solid 2-way shooting guard at low cost.
Your projected 2010 roster would be:
Gallo 3.3M
2009 pick 3.0M
Wilson 2.1M
Nate 6.0M
Salmons 5.8M
Duhon 7.0M
FA#1 17M
FA#2 15M
-------------------------
59.4M
Nice visual there. If the trade did happen then management needs it at the press conference at all the pissed off Lee fans.

Really, that puts into perspective how little money we have for a supporting cast.
If Salmons is a good defender and can score then maybe it's not terrible, cause I just don't see how we are going to afford Lee and get two max free agents. Perhaps a 1st round pick to us would be the deciding factor.
It might be a lot easier and we could get better value for Lee to work on separate deals. Someone will bite on Curry. Jeffries I'm not so sure about. Management has there work cut out for them but they already did the impossible. Remember, it is waaaay easier to trade an athletic (albeit fat) center in a center deprived league than a max me first SF.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein