Posted by Marv:
Posted by nysportsfan11:
If another team really wanted Steph that bad or wanted to dump contracts for him, he'd be gone by now.
why wouldn't a team re-evaluate as the season goes on and decide to re-tool after seeing that their roster wasn't working?
Because it's not that easy with a guy like Steph. If it were that easy, the Knicks wouldn't be in this position. If it was Stephon Marbury with the talent and expiring contract but without the quotes, Youtube outbursts, weird interviews, tattooed head, coach killing and locker room cancer reputation, he'd be in Oakland, Miami, Orlando, Houston, Boston, Dallas or Phoenix by now. Hell, he might even be playing for the Knicks. The guy has basketball talent and skill. He can play the game. It's everything else that's a problem.
It's a lot easier for a GM to take a risk with the vet minimum than it is with $20 mil or whatever the balance on his deal is. Not every owner is Jim Dolan. If/when Steph is released, he'll be sought after, but I doubt, just from speaking to people around the league, that he will be as sought after in a trade by the deadline.
[Edited by - nysportsfan11 on 01-06-2009 1:59 PM]