[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

How about Malik rose to Utah for Matt Harpring Morris Almond
Author Thread
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
12/25/2008  9:50 AM
You might get Harpring straight up, but I feel like he's a signature player for the franchise.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
AUTOADVERT
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/26/2008  11:44 PM
People can think this trade is dumb as sht but anything close to it would be a coup for us. My bet is we don't think outside the box like this--that we would be more interested in *obtaining* a two year player like a Stackhouse rather than go after assets. I read all about Utah's money problems and next year--that owner would do this deal--9mm $ is a LOT of money when you are bleeding it.
RIP Crushalot😞
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
12/26/2008  11:59 PM
I think your expectations for the trade are a bit high. You are right when you say that teams make trades to save on the cap all the time and in the past the Knicks have not taken advantage of this but I don't think you are going to get close to what you are proposing. I think you have to question whether the Knicks should have a 2010 1st round pick anyway. The team drafts horribly and a first round pick is applied to their cap number automatically. Teams sell first their first round draft picks so they don't take the hit on the cap. I am sure 2010 will not have the talent that the 08 draft had. At least fans would have less to regret and the front office would have more to work with with the cap.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/27/2008  12:32 AM
Posted by CrushAlot:

I think your expectations for the trade are a bit high. You are right when you say that teams make trades to save on the cap all the time and in the past the Knicks have not taken advantage of this but I don't think you are going to get close to what you are proposing. I think you have to question whether the Knicks should have a 2010 1st round pick anyway. The team drafts horribly and a first round pick is applied to their cap number automatically. Teams sell first their first round draft picks so they don't take the hit on the cap. I am sure 2010 will not have the talent that the 08 draft had. At least fans would have less to regret and the front office would have more to work with with the cap.
What?

RIP Crushalot😞
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
12/27/2008  12:41 AM
Utah wouldn't give up that much for Malik. The Knicks draft horribly. First round picks automatically go against the cap. The Knicks want cap space in 2010. Hope that clarifies things.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/27/2008  1:40 AM
Posted by CrushAlot:

Utah wouldn't give up that much for Malik. The Knicks draft horribly. First round picks automatically go against the cap. The Knicks want cap space in 2010. Hope that clarifies things.

9mm dollars savings for a prospect they dont use our pick back they acquired for 3mm and a second rounder? I think that is within reason--that is the market. To buy a pick in the draft costs 3mm$ our pick might be higher so you are looking at 5-6mm. Then we add in the extra 3mm in savings worth a 2??? To say we shouldnt try to get our pick back because we sck at drafting and the sum might cost us in FA is absurd.
RIP Crushalot😞
LivingLegend
Posts: 26564
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 8/13/2007
Member: #1645

12/27/2008  2:24 AM
Posted by BRIGGS:

our 2010 number 1 pick back + a 2009 Utah second rounder


That alleviates 6.5mm off of the Utah books which the desperately need and gives us the assets to possibly get a high pick OR the right to use the picks to get rid of Curry in a combo deal.


You can't be serious you are asking for our 2010 pick back, an 09 #2 pick, Harpring and Almond for Malik?

You my friend are Coo-Coo for Coa-Coa Puffs.

We probably couldn't get that return for our whole roster let alone Malik.

How about Malik for a Salami sandwich --- nope Jazz say no.
LivingLegend
Posts: 26564
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 8/13/2007
Member: #1645

12/27/2008  2:26 AM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by TMS:

is this a joke?

Malik Rose for Harpring, Almond, our '10 1st round pick back & an '09 2nd rounder

yep, seems like a fair & equitable trade to me... i think u might have had a little too much egg nog.

Im sorry you dont follow basketball to hard but Utah is in a bind in terms of their salary cap next year. We would be taking 6.5MM +_an additional 2.6mm in luxury tax off of their hand[a total saving of 9.1mm$] for our essentially our pick back the Jazz second rounder and two guys who dont play. Utah received our pick for much LESS than 6.5mm. That is a deal that is more than fair


Dude - don't be throwing down on other posters b-ball knowledge when you put out one of the funniest trades ever proposed on the board.

OK - maybe Utah wants to move some $ -- so maybe they give us Harpring and Almond for Malik -- but why the hell are they throwing in a 1 and a 2?

Come on - don't be silly.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/27/2008  2:58 AM
Harpring & Almond alone for Malik would be a hard sell on the Jazz IMHO... throwing in a 1st & 2nd rounder in the deal won't even make it past the secretary's answer machine.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

12/27/2008  3:05 PM
You know how long they've been waiting to capitalize on that pick? We've been putting it off every year, using the pick while it still had protection. Well you know what - it's not protected next year. We stink this year and as of right now, there's a pretty good chance we'll stink again next year too. That first rounder is an enormous asset for Utah as it would be for any team. NO WAY they include that 1st rounder.. They're not getting a viable player back - Malik's retiring after this year - he can't play anymore. I could possibly see maybe Malik for Harpring and little-used Almond (whose contract they didn't pick up) for the cap flexibility you're talking about but forget the 1st rounder bro - that's too much. Nobody forgos POTENTIAL LOTTERY PICKS for cap flexibility. Teams sell picks for cash all the time but they're usually low 1st/2nd rounders - that 2010 pick we owe them could very well be a lottery selection. Utah couldn't use that? The Jazz aren't the Lakers or the Celtics. Their roster still needs some work like mostly every team out there...
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/27/2008  3:12 PM
Posted by Finestrg:

You know how long they've been waiting to capitalize on that pick? We've been putting it off every year, using the pick while it still had protection. Well you know what - it's not protected next year. We stink this year and as of right now, there's a pretty good chance we'll stink again next year too. That first rounder is an enormous asset for Utah as it would be for any team. NO WAY they include that 1st rounder.. They're not getting a viable player back - Malik's retiring after this year - he can't play anymore. I could possibly see maybe Malik for Harpring and little-used Almond (whose contract they didn't pick up) for the cap flexibility you're talking about but forget the 1st rounder bro - that's too much. Nobody forgos POTENTIAL LOTTERY PICKS for cap flexibility. Teams sell picks for cash all the time but they're usually low 1st/2nd rounders - that 2010 pick we owe them could very well be a lottery selection. Utah couldn't use that? The Jazz aren't the Lakers or the Celtics. Their roster still needs some work like mostly every team out there...

Nobody forgos POTENTIAL LOTTERY PICKS for cap flexibility===umm Boston Pheonix
RIP Crushalot😞
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

12/27/2008  4:04 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by Finestrg:

You know how long they've been waiting to capitalize on that pick? We've been putting it off every year, using the pick while it still had protection. Well you know what - it's not protected next year. We stink this year and as of right now, there's a pretty good chance we'll stink again next year too. That first rounder is an enormous asset for Utah as it would be for any team. NO WAY they include that 1st rounder.. They're not getting a viable player back - Malik's retiring after this year - he can't play anymore. I could possibly see maybe Malik for Harpring and little-used Almond (whose contract they didn't pick up) for the cap flexibility you're talking about but forget the 1st rounder bro - that's too much. Nobody forgos POTENTIAL LOTTERY PICKS for cap flexibility. Teams sell picks for cash all the time but they're usually low 1st/2nd rounders - that 2010 pick we owe them could very well be a lottery selection. Utah couldn't use that? The Jazz aren't the Lakers or the Celtics. Their roster still needs some work like mostly every team out there...

Nobody forgos POTENTIAL LOTTERY PICKS for cap flexibility===umm Boston Pheonix

Boston traded draft assets, yes, among other things but for an ALL-LEAGUE PLAYER in Garnett and an ALL-STAR player in Ray Allen. And it worked - Ainge gambled but wound up winning a title going all in the way he did.. Last year, they used their selection to take JR Giddens at #30, their 2009 first rounder goes to Minnesota in the Garnett deal and as far as I know, they still own their 2010 1st. What pick(s) have they surrendered recently in sheer 'dump expirings and/or draft assets SOLELY for cap flexibility' scenarios like the Malik Rose trade you're suggesting???? Same for Pheonix - I can't think of anything off the top of my head. They made the big move for Shaq but wasn't it for Marion & Marcus Banks? Regardless, they TRADED FOR SHAQ, a player they thought would really help get them over the hump against San Antonio even though he had passed his prime at that point. Since then, Pheonix used their 1st rounder last year and grabbed a center in Robin Lopez at #15 and as far as I know, they still own their 2009 & 2010 first round picks. If memory serves, they may have dealt their 2007 1st to Portland in a minor move, which turned out to be the #24 pick (Rudy Fernandez). But like I said earlier, low 1st rounders and 2nd rounders get dealt for cash all the time. A #24 is not a lottery pick. What you're talking about and what these two teams have done recently is not the same thing.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/27/2008  4:24 PM
Posted by Finestrg:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by Finestrg:

You know how long they've been waiting to capitalize on that pick? We've been putting it off every year, using the pick while it still had protection. Well you know what - it's not protected next year. We stink this year and as of right now, there's a pretty good chance we'll stink again next year too. That first rounder is an enormous asset for Utah as it would be for any team. NO WAY they include that 1st rounder.. They're not getting a viable player back - Malik's retiring after this year - he can't play anymore. I could possibly see maybe Malik for Harpring and little-used Almond (whose contract they didn't pick up) for the cap flexibility you're talking about but forget the 1st rounder bro - that's too much. Nobody forgos POTENTIAL LOTTERY PICKS for cap flexibility. Teams sell picks for cash all the time but they're usually low 1st/2nd rounders - that 2010 pick we owe them could very well be a lottery selection. Utah couldn't use that? The Jazz aren't the Lakers or the Celtics. Their roster still needs some work like mostly every team out there...

Nobody forgos POTENTIAL LOTTERY PICKS for cap flexibility===umm Boston Pheonix

Boston traded draft assets, yes, among other things but for an ALL-LEAGUE PLAYER in Garnett and an ALL-STAR player in Ray Allen. And it worked - Ainge gambled but wound up winning a title going all in the way he did.. Last year, they used their selection to take JR Giddens at #30, their 2009 first rounder goes to Minnesota in the Garnett deal and as far as I know, they still own their 2010 1st. What pick(s) have they surrendered recently in sheer 'dump expirings and/or draft assets SOLELY for cap flexibility' scenarios like the Malik Rose trade you're suggesting???? Same for Pheonix - I can't think of anything off the top of my head. They made the big move for Shaq but wasn't it for Marion & Marcus Banks? Regardless, they TRADED FOR SHAQ, a player they thought would really help get them over the hump against San Antonio even though he had passed his prime at that point. Since then, Pheonix used their 1st rounder last year and grabbed a center in Robin Lopez at #15 and as far as I know, they still own their 2009 & 2010 first round picks. If memory serves, they may have dealt their 2007 1st to Portland in a minor move, which turned out to be the #24 pick (Rudy Fernandez). But like I said earlier, low 1st rounders and 2nd rounders get dealt for cash all the time. A #24 is not a lottery pick. What you're talking about and what these two teams have done recently is not the same thing.

I'm buying my pick back from 2010. I dont see where it is written in stone where it will be a high lottery pick and 9mm is a lot to gamble on that--that is why we need a little more and why i think the cash bleeding Jazz would do it. If it ended up as a 17th pick--then they blew 9mm $
RIP Crushalot😞
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
12/27/2008  4:29 PM
If you are talking about purging the roster this year so that the Knicks are in contention for a top 3 pick in 09, what makes you think that in 09 the team will improve to the point where they are not in the lottery? Utah is not selling that pick or giving it up for Malik. They know what they have. Isiah Thomas is not running their team.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/27/2008  4:42 PM
Posted by CrushAlot:

If you are talking about purging the roster this year so that the Knicks are in contention for a top 3 pick in 09, what makes you think that in 09 the team will improve to the point where they are not in the lottery? Utah is not selling that pick or giving it up for Malik. They know what they have. Isiah Thomas is not running their team.

I think 9mm is a lot of money when you are losing money.
RIP Crushalot😞
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
12/27/2008  5:26 PM
I think you are underestimating Larry Miller, Kevin O'connor and Jerry Sloan.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
nysportsfan11
Posts: 20252
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/20/2007
Member: #1782

12/27/2008  5:30 PM
Larry Miller would not do anything to help the Knicks.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/27/2008  5:59 PM
BRIGGS is the only poster on this thread that follows the NBA apparently.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/27/2008  7:02 PM
Posted by nysportsfan11:

Larry Miller would not do anything to help the Knicks.

He's cheap he's sickly and they are bleeding money. I view it as the Knicks helping him.
RIP Crushalot😞
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
12/27/2008  7:41 PM
Good luck. There are teams that can sometimes be fleeced but Utah is not one. Golden State in their current state is one. The Knicks during Isiah's tenure was one.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
How about Malik rose to Utah for Matt Harpring Morris Almond

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy