[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Message to Ny Knick management--we don't need MORE 3 point shooters
Author Thread
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/26/2008  9:18 AM
Posted by Bippity10:

One of the mistakes that Layden and Isiah made was continually building on top of current teams. Never taking a step back and building the team for 2,3 4 years down the road. I am praying that this front office does something completely different. So far so good. Those recent trades were not made to make this current team better. Those recent trades were made to clear cap space to give us flexibility for the future. If we do that again with Curry who cares if we bring in another 6-9 three point shooter. If you take his salary off the books and replace him with 2 6-9 shooters whos contracts expire in 2009 why is that a bad thing. Why are we worried about our current roster? If you trade Curry and get a potential lottery pick along with 2 6-10 3 pt shooters who cares? It isn't about maximizing wins today. Our coach is doing his best to win with what he has, but the GM needs to look to the future. So far so good.

At this point we can't worry about if this next trade will affect our chances for the 8th seed. That was Isiscott Laymos type thinking. We can't worry about what draft pick we missed out on, we have to worry about developing the one we have and hope the next one pans out as well. It's time to start thinking about the future instead of constantly whining and moaning and complaining about the past.

[Edited by - bippity10 on 26-12-2008 09:16 AM]

This is one of the best posts I've read in a while (other than when I re-read mine of course!)
AUTOADVERT
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
12/26/2008  9:52 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Bippity10:

One of the mistakes that Layden and Isiah made was continually building on top of current teams. Never taking a step back and building the team for 2,3 4 years down the road. I am praying that this front office does something completely different. So far so good. Those recent trades were not made to make this current team better. Those recent trades were made to clear cap space to give us flexibility for the future. If we do that again with Curry who cares if we bring in another 6-9 three point shooter. If you take his salary off the books and replace him with 2 6-9 shooters whos contracts expire in 2009 why is that a bad thing. Why are we worried about our current roster? If you trade Curry and get a potential lottery pick along with 2 6-10 3 pt shooters who cares? It isn't about maximizing wins today. Our coach is doing his best to win with what he has, but the GM needs to look to the future. So far so good.

At this point we can't worry about if this next trade will affect our chances for the 8th seed. That was Isiscott Laymos type thinking. We can't worry about what draft pick we missed out on, we have to worry about developing the one we have and hope the next one pans out as well. It's time to start thinking about the future instead of constantly whining and moaning and complaining about the past.

[Edited by - bippity10 on 26-12-2008 09:16 AM]

This is one of the best posts I've read in a while

I agree with you.
I just hope that people will like me
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34072
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

12/26/2008  10:22 AM
Considering just how far the Knicks need to go to be relevant, I'm in favor of any move that will improv the team. A SG would improve the team. Our bigs wouldn't need to spend so much time on the perimeter if there actually was a perimeter to take advantage of their low post play.
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/26/2008  10:24 AM
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Bippity10:

One of the mistakes that Layden and Isiah made was continually building on top of current teams. Never taking a step back and building the team for 2,3 4 years down the road. I am praying that this front office does something completely different. So far so good. Those recent trades were not made to make this current team better. Those recent trades were made to clear cap space to give us flexibility for the future. If we do that again with Curry who cares if we bring in another 6-9 three point shooter. If you take his salary off the books and replace him with 2 6-9 shooters whos contracts expire in 2009 why is that a bad thing. Why are we worried about our current roster? If you trade Curry and get a potential lottery pick along with 2 6-10 3 pt shooters who cares? It isn't about maximizing wins today. Our coach is doing his best to win with what he has, but the GM needs to look to the future. So far so good.

At this point we can't worry about if this next trade will affect our chances for the 8th seed. That was Isiscott Laymos type thinking. We can't worry about what draft pick we missed out on, we have to worry about developing the one we have and hope the next one pans out as well. It's time to start thinking about the future instead of constantly whining and moaning and complaining about the past.

[Edited by - bippity10 on 26-12-2008 09:16 AM]

This is one of the best posts I've read in a while

I agree with you.
You accidentally left off part of my message
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

12/26/2008  12:01 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

This is turning into a gimmick 3 point shooting team. Our 3 point differential is over ELEVEN and we are DEAD last in rebounding and blocked shots. If you take these three important aspects and put them together were not going to be a winning team. Do NOt spend or acquire more guys who need to shoot long distance as their major contribution. We need someone who can rebound/clog the lane and a back up PG. Al Harrington Tim Thomas Q Rich and Wilson Chandler have to play smarter basketball and move their games in from the perimeter. Were taking way to many 3 point shots. & seconds or less doesnt mean jack a 3 at any given point----look for better % shots and the coach has to preach this.

[Edited by - BRIGGS on 12-24-2008 3:10 PM]

I think this goes back to style/philosophy of play...I think PHX had better players to execute this style of play but this is the coach's philosophy...I'm not sure if this coach want players to "clog" the lane...I think he wants more agile players up front...



[Edited by - holfresh on 12-26-2008 12:02 PM]
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
12/26/2008  12:21 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Bippity10:

One of the mistakes that Layden and Isiah made was continually building on top of current teams. Never taking a step back and building the team for 2,3 4 years down the road. I am praying that this front office does something completely different. So far so good. Those recent trades were not made to make this current team better. Those recent trades were made to clear cap space to give us flexibility for the future. If we do that again with Curry who cares if we bring in another 6-9 three point shooter. If you take his salary off the books and replace him with 2 6-9 shooters whos contracts expire in 2009 why is that a bad thing. Why are we worried about our current roster? If you trade Curry and get a potential lottery pick along with 2 6-10 3 pt shooters who cares? It isn't about maximizing wins today. Our coach is doing his best to win with what he has, but the GM needs to look to the future. So far so good.

At this point we can't worry about if this next trade will affect our chances for the 8th seed. That was Isiscott Laymos type thinking. We can't worry about what draft pick we missed out on, we have to worry about developing the one we have and hope the next one pans out as well. It's time to start thinking about the future instead of constantly whining and moaning and complaining about the past.

[Edited by - bippity10 on 26-12-2008 09:16 AM]

This is one of the best posts I've read in a while

I agree with you.
You accidentally left off part of my message

In life there are no accidents
I just hope that people will like me
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/26/2008  12:26 PM
Do we have an Amare type player? I think if you look at what MDA is doing, I think we can see that he's trying to fashion a new version of his PHX teams. I think he'd love to do it better tho. They could've used a real center tho I think a guy who is more agile and a better shooter than Shaq. I believe this is where MDA and Walsh are headed.
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

12/26/2008  12:31 PM
Posted by nixluva:

Do we have an Amare type player? I think if you look at what MDA is doing, I think we can see that he's trying to fashion a new version of his PHX teams. I think he'd love to do it better tho. They could've used a real center tho I think a guy who is more agile and a better shooter than Shaq. I believe this is where MDA and Walsh are headed.

You might be looking for players who do not exist, after all, PHX had three players on the roster that were all stars in their hay day...I'm not sure how much better than that you can do...


Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
12/26/2008  12:34 PM
Posted by nixluva:

Do we have an Amare type player? I think if you look at what MDA is doing, I think we can see that he's trying to fashion a new version of his PHX teams. I think he'd love to do it better tho. They could've used a real center tho I think a guy who is more agile and a better shooter than Shaq. I believe this is where MDA and Walsh are headed.

The duo has made a move for Duhon a PG they felt could thrive in the system. They signed Roberson, a guy they felt could supply some outside shooting to the team. Other than that there moves were to create cap space. They didn't trade for Harrington and TT and Mobley because of the system, i believe they traded for them to create cap space and gain flexibility. If there contracts lasted until 2012 they would not be on the roster. I think a lot of us are seeing moves and trying to determine what type of team they are building. I think the reality is that they are still in the tearing down and player evaluation phase of the rebuilding and have not begun to build a team yet. We haven't rebuilt in NY in so long that many of us have no idea what rebuilding looks like. We are analyzing every move as if this is who Walsh and D'Antoni are going to go to war with. I personally feel they are trying to gain free-agent and trade flexibility so that they can attempt to get legitimate stars to build around.

For me the only thing I'm worried about is will this team take advantage of the draft. Will they obtain another first round pick moving forward. Every other move clearly seems geared for the future so I'm not sure why we are worrying about how many 3 point shooters we have and whether we need a shot blocker or not. If the youth develops and shows it can win games then you can start worrying about that stuff. Layden and Thomas trained us poorly for rebuilding.

[Edited by - bippity10 on 26-12-2008 12:36 PM]
I just hope that people will like me
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

12/26/2008  12:42 PM
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by nixluva:

Do we have an Amare type player? I think if you look at what MDA is doing, I think we can see that he's trying to fashion a new version of his PHX teams. I think he'd love to do it better tho. They could've used a real center tho I think a guy who is more agile and a better shooter than Shaq. I believe this is where MDA and Walsh are headed.

The duo has made a move for Duhon a PG they felt could thrive in the system. They signed Roberson, a guy they felt could supply some outside shooting to the team. Other than that there moves were to create cap space. They didn't trade for Harrington and TT and Mobley because of the system, i believe they traded for them to create cap space and gain flexibility. If there contracts lasted until 2012 they would not be on the roster. I think a lot of us are seeing moves and trying to determine what type of team they are building. I think the reality is that they are still in the tearing down and player evaluation phase of the rebuilding and have not begun to build a team yet. We haven't rebuilt in NY in so long that many of us have no idea what rebuilding looks like. We are analyzing every move as if this is who Walsh and D'Antoni are going to go to war with. I personally feel they are trying to gain free-agent and trade flexibility so that they can attempt to get legitimate stars to build around.

For me the only thing I'm worried about is will this team take advantage of the draft. Will they obtain another first round pick moving forward. Every other move clearly seems geared for the future so I'm not sure why we are worrying about how many 3 point shooters we have and whether we need a shot blocker or not. If the youth develops and shows it can win games then you can start worrying about that stuff. Layden and Thomas trained us poorly for rebuilding.

[Edited by - bippity10 on 26-12-2008 12:36 PM]

Come on Bip, you keep pounding Layden and Isiah who were bad in their right...I think it's Dolan who changed his philosophy to rebuild...Clearly it's going to take some time which I do agree with you..I just think we are putting too many eggs in the 2010 basket...I think as we clear cap space, we should try to pick up some draft picks as well...

franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
12/26/2008  1:08 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

One of the mistakes that Layden and Isiah made was continually building on top of current teams. Never taking a step back and building the team for 2,3 4 years down the road. I am praying that this front office does something completely different. So far so good. Those recent trades were not made to make this current team better. Those recent trades were made to clear cap space to give us flexibility for the future. If we do that again with Curry who cares if we bring in another 6-9 three point shooter. If you take his salary off the books and replace him with 2 6-9 shooters whos contracts expire in 2009 why is that a bad thing. Why are we worried about our current roster? If you trade Curry and get a potential lottery pick along with 2 6-10 3 pt shooters who cares? It isn't about maximizing wins today. Our coach is doing his best to win with what he has, but the GM needs to look to the future. So far so good.

At this point we can't worry about if this next trade will affect our chances for the 8th seed. That was Isiscott Laymos type thinking. We can't worry about what draft pick we missed out on, we have to worry about developing the one we have and hope the next one pans out as well. It's time to start thinking about the future instead of constantly whining and moaning and complaining about the past.

[Edited by - bippity10 on 26-12-2008 09:16 AM]

I'm not sure that the recent trades were exclusively made for long term rebuilding. Yes, we cleared cap room. But, did we get a first round pick? No. I made this point elsewhere- I suspect we could have gotten a first rounder in exchange for Crawford if we were willing to take back less talent than Harrington.

Walsh's stated goal is very little different from what Isiah's was- to clear cap room, but to stay as good as possible until 2010, i.e., changing the engine in mid flight.

Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
12/26/2008  1:08 PM
Posted by holfresh:
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by nixluva:

Do we have an Amare type player? I think if you look at what MDA is doing, I think we can see that he's trying to fashion a new version of his PHX teams. I think he'd love to do it better tho. They could've used a real center tho I think a guy who is more agile and a better shooter than Shaq. I believe this is where MDA and Walsh are headed.

The duo has made a move for Duhon a PG they felt could thrive in the system. They signed Roberson, a guy they felt could supply some outside shooting to the team. Other than that there moves were to create cap space. They didn't trade for Harrington and TT and Mobley because of the system, i believe they traded for them to create cap space and gain flexibility. If there contracts lasted until 2012 they would not be on the roster. I think a lot of us are seeing moves and trying to determine what type of team they are building. I think the reality is that they are still in the tearing down and player evaluation phase of the rebuilding and have not begun to build a team yet. We haven't rebuilt in NY in so long that many of us have no idea what rebuilding looks like. We are analyzing every move as if this is who Walsh and D'Antoni are going to go to war with. I personally feel they are trying to gain free-agent and trade flexibility so that they can attempt to get legitimate stars to build around.

For me the only thing I'm worried about is will this team take advantage of the draft. Will they obtain another first round pick moving forward. Every other move clearly seems geared for the future so I'm not sure why we are worrying about how many 3 point shooters we have and whether we need a shot blocker or not. If the youth develops and shows it can win games then you can start worrying about that stuff. Layden and Thomas trained us poorly for rebuilding.

[Edited by - bippity10 on 26-12-2008 12:36 PM]

Come on Bip, you keep pounding Layden and Isiah who were bad in their right...I think it's Dolan who changed his philosophy to rebuild...Clearly it's going to take some time which I do agree with you..I just think we are putting too many eggs in the 2010 basket...I think as we clear cap space, we should try to pick up some draft picks as well...


I keep pounding them? I'm not pounding them I just think it's a relevant comparison. Bottom line is they accepted the position and tried to build the team under the conditions they were given. They were unable to sell Dolan on a different way of looking at things. With the help of D. Stern, Walsh and D'Antoni have been able to change Dolan's mind. Regardless of the perfect storm that Walsh and D'Antoni have walked into it still doesn't excuse the poor moves that Layden/Thomas made and it's still relevant to our current situation.

I'm with you, I do think we should try to pick up draft picks as well. I will be upset if we do not. But step one had to be to clear cap space. That was done, now you can focus on step 2 or more of step 1. If the next trade clears more cap space or brings back a draft pick it's difficult to see the logic behind complaining about either move. Where I disagree is that we are putting two many eggs in the 2010 basket. The goal was too get under the cap. If we could do it by 2009 we would. Instead we shoot for 2010. In my view this is very quick, plus it gives us the opportunity to get one of the marquee free agents. If we don't get one of them have we really lost anything?(besides bloated contracts).

It's clear to me that Walsh and D'antoni have a plan. What isn't clear is if they have the will, smarts and freedom from Dolan to do keep up with the plan. I guess we won't be happy until they actually acquire a draft pick. I understand that. I completely understand where you are coming from and worry that maybe they won't target a pick. But my previous post was in response to the talk of adding more 3 point shooters. I just think at this stage of the game it's not worth worrying about. We are currently rebuilding and many more moves are to come.
I just hope that people will like me
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

12/26/2008  1:20 PM

I hear ya...
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
12/26/2008  1:22 PM
Posted by franco12:
Posted by Bippity10:

One of the mistakes that Layden and Isiah made was continually building on top of current teams. Never taking a step back and building the team for 2,3 4 years down the road. I am praying that this front office does something completely different. So far so good. Those recent trades were not made to make this current team better. Those recent trades were made to clear cap space to give us flexibility for the future. If we do that again with Curry who cares if we bring in another 6-9 three point shooter. If you take his salary off the books and replace him with 2 6-9 shooters whos contracts expire in 2009 why is that a bad thing. Why are we worried about our current roster? If you trade Curry and get a potential lottery pick along with 2 6-10 3 pt shooters who cares? It isn't about maximizing wins today. Our coach is doing his best to win with what he has, but the GM needs to look to the future. So far so good.

At this point we can't worry about if this next trade will affect our chances for the 8th seed. That was Isiscott Laymos type thinking. We can't worry about what draft pick we missed out on, we have to worry about developing the one we have and hope the next one pans out as well. It's time to start thinking about the future instead of constantly whining and moaning and complaining about the past.

[Edited by - bippity10 on 26-12-2008 09:16 AM]

I'm not sure that the recent trades were exclusively made for long term rebuilding. Yes, we cleared cap room. But, did we get a first round pick? No. I made this point elsewhere- I suspect we could have gotten a first rounder in exchange for Crawford if we were willing to take back less talent than Harrington.

Walsh's stated goal is very little different from what Isiah's was- to clear cap room, but to stay as good as possible until 2010, i.e., changing the engine in mid flight.

Let's say you wake up tomorrow and find out Walsh traded Curry for a draft pick. Or let's say on draft night there was another move that acquired a top pick. If that occurred would your opinion change? If so, then you are probably being impatient.

Give it time. It makes us antsy that a draft pick has not been obtained, but antsy does not mean that the front office isn't having the exact same thoughts that you and I have.
I just hope that people will like me
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/26/2008  4:40 PM
Message to Ny Knick management--we don't need MORE 3 point shooters...

unless his name is Morris Almond.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
12/26/2008  6:21 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

This is turning into a gimmick 3 point shooting team. Our 3 point differential is over ELEVEN and we are DEAD last in rebounding and blocked shots. If you take these three important aspects and put them together were not going to be a winning team. Do NOt spend or acquire more guys who need to shoot long distance as their major contribution. We need someone who can rebound/clog the lane and a back up PG. Al Harrington Tim Thomas Q Rich and Wilson Chandler have to play smarter basketball and move their games in from the perimeter. Were taking way to many 3 point shots. & seconds or less doesnt mean jack a 3 at any given point----look for better % shots and the coach has to preach this.

[Edited by - BRIGGS on 12-24-2008 3:10 PM]

Wilson's 0.9 bpg leading the team is a no brainer. Keep shooting 3's. The odds will catch up.
I'll never trust this' team again.
JesseDark
Posts: 22825
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/9/2003
Member: #467
12/26/2008  7:26 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

This is turning into a gimmick 3 point shooting team. Our 3 point differential is over ELEVEN and we are DEAD last in rebounding and blocked shots. If you take these three important aspects and put them together were not going to be a winning team. Do NOt spend or acquire more guys who need to shoot long distance as their major contribution. We need someone who can rebound/clog the lane and a back up PG. Al Harrington Tim Thomas Q Rich and Wilson Chandler have to play smarter basketball and move their games in from the perimeter. Were taking way to many 3 point shots. & seconds or less doesnt mean jack a 3 at any given point----look for better % shots and the coach has to preach this.

[Edited by - BRIGGS on 12-24-2008 3:10 PM]

Briggs, I agree with you on this point. Just because we are banking on '10 doesn't me we should be playing no dee street ball until then.

Bring back dee-fense
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/26/2008  10:51 PM
Posted by JesseDark:
Posted by BRIGGS:

This is turning into a gimmick 3 point shooting team. Our 3 point differential is over ELEVEN and we are DEAD last in rebounding and blocked shots. If you take these three important aspects and put them together were not going to be a winning team. Do NOt spend or acquire more guys who need to shoot long distance as their major contribution. We need someone who can rebound/clog the lane and a back up PG. Al Harrington Tim Thomas Q Rich and Wilson Chandler have to play smarter basketball and move their games in from the perimeter. Were taking way to many 3 point shots. & seconds or less doesnt mean jack a 3 at any given point----look for better % shots and the coach has to preach this.

[Edited by - BRIGGS on 12-24-2008 3:10 PM]

Briggs, I agree with you on this point. Just because we are banking on '10 doesn't me we should be playing no dee street ball until then.

It's a real finesse style of play with very little emphasis on the D. People keep saying it's all about 2010 and my question is what about it? We'll just draft another finesse player like Gallinari and we'll still take 35 3's playing out of control with no D. Dantoni is a good coach but lets admit he got lucky having Marion Stoudemire Nash Joe Johnson Barbosa in their pure prime. I think any coach can win 55++ with that. Everything were going to do is going to be geared towards what Mike wants and lets be real--unless we get Lebron James 2010 will only be about acquiring a fringe all star while we purge the rest of the roster to get there--again so what. There are a lot of problems here and unless we get lucky and Lebron James walks through those doors this could be really really bad for multiple years on top of the long term failure as is. We shouldve given the job to the Celtics assistant who was here for many years and brought in a GM who wasnt nearly 70 years old and had NO ONE from the old scouting services make any decision in terms of personnel. Whatever.
RIP Crushalot😞
Message to Ny Knick management--we don't need MORE 3 point shooters

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy